goodbye world!

After some massive malware attack on the site fractalparadigm.com is gone… The attack took also place in economicstruth.com and cerntruth.com  so all my sites are gone.

In any case if any reader of all those webs gets interested in my work by some miracle… a couple of months ago i put most of the stuff of those blogs in kindle e-books, therefore for those who still believe in humanism, organicism, complexity and the existence of human minds able to go where no machine will ever go, here they are. Prices are dirty cheap since i believe new knowledge of logical or ethical nature must be available to all mankind…

im too old for this bull$hit, and i didnt save the content, nor i built the webs (im a thinker not a nerd – two things often confused). So that will probably be ‘it’ about the webs.

The best books on my view:  for cerntruth ‘the black hole factory’ (abridged), for fractalparadigm (the equation of god, now giving it for free on kindle share) and for those with huge iqs and bigger curiosity to understand it all ’4th paradigm of science’.

For those who liked economicstruth.com

‘the future of the economic crisis’ (mind the reader in my columbia U. master years in the 90s the first version of that book predicted the 2008 crisis in all its detail – ‘magic’, not of course, a ‘real’ science of economics, since all sciences are epistemologically defined as such only wne they can predict the future cycles of the species they study, so astrology became astronomy when those cycles were tabulated and today ‘classic economics’, just a series of dogmas, ‘damned lies and statitics’ is at worse in the age of myths at best in the age of ‘collection of data’, so is history. But that is not because we humans are ‘that stupid’, it is called censorship.

Also the film i started with william morris endeavor on the cern issue, till it was also censored and finished with a loan www.lhcdefence.org

the longer version was put at cerntruth.com so that is gone… i dont have resources or interest either to start all this sheer amount of work again.

To remember all that today is tuesday 13, in the latin tradition a terrible day to get married or start a journey; Lol and i never believed in superstitions

i do not understand though why they had to destroy also the painfully crafted structure of multiple layers on a general systems theory of multiple spaces and times that unifies all the sciences with the Generator Equation of all systems of the universe… that was a bit up the mental frame of cernies not to speak of possible GOPs and fundamentalist banksters…

i guess there is some ‘hate’ going on… or just routine… who cares, frankly i dont… These releases me further from engagement with a species i increasingly find well below the threshold of beauty that deserves survival in the fractal universe… exceptions made, most humans are good but stupid, managed as sheeple by the 1% of evil but intelligent ‘cretinos’ that are subconsciously destroying the world.

And so what an steppenwolf can do? Observe with amazement how the leaders of the pack and the herd go to the cliff? Suffer from an incurable angst. perhaps if i were german but im not

Better to enjoy life in barcelona while it lasts, observe the Universe in silence following the advice of another Luis

‘when all has been said better to remain silent’.

Adeu.

1.3: the properties of energy and form

A Mind/POV mirrors Spacetime fractals with 2 Languages: Geometry&Causal Time

Human Minds mirror those fractals of space & time with 2 Languages – Geometry & Causal Logic – and 2 senses: scientific mechanisms, cameras & clocks or life senses: Is=Eyes & Wor(l)ds

The Universe is constructed with 2 simple elements, the energy of the vacuum and the fractal forms that evolve from it.

The inverse, formal properties of energy and information.

After Einstein’s death, the geometrical analysis of curved space times evolved further, both in mathematics and natural sciences, thanks to a new mathematical branch called fractal mathematics, and the explanation in depth of the Non-Euclidean, Riemannian geometry of time/spaces that Einstein barely introduced in General Relativity. Those 2 advanced branches of mathematics are the best geometrical models to describe the invariance of energy and information morphologies across multiple scales. Hence they are the conceptual frame used to study cyclical/fractal, time/spaces. Indeed, the discovery in the 80s that Nature’s information is geometric, multidimensional and fractal, extended in different microscopic and macroscopic Planes and dimensions, reopened the understanding of cyclical time, the 2nd arrow of Nature. Mehaute, pioneer of Fractal Theory, proved that when Nature doesn’t release energy, for time to continue, it has to create fractal dimensions of in/form/ation. Thus, there are 2 arrows of relative future creation, energy/entropy and information/ cyclical time that substitute each other in the events of creation and extinction of each quantic reality.

Temporal in/form/ation, like its name says, is a measure of inner form, which we perceive when there are discontinuities in a certain bidimensional surface – a clock, a page, a computer screen – either because the static form is broken into informative patterns (–) or its movement makes a sudden peak (>), bouncing in an action-reaction cycle. Yet those 2 trans-form-ations of space into form, of lineal, energetic movement, into a cyclical one, are mathematically equivalent to the creation of a fractal geometry of space-time. Thus we define information as a ‘fractal dimension with form’, generated by the repetition or quantization of a given ‘generator equation’ or ‘mother-cell’. The Universe and its fractal species are constantly generating informative dimensions or erasing them into extended space, with lesser form. Imagine a hand, in mythic terms the hand of God, wrinkling and ironing a paper, the ultimate energy of vacuum space. It is a good image of what happens to the Universe that departed from a sheet of pure energy and will be crunched to explode again into a big bang. Each of us goes through the same process in the life-death cycle as we wrinkle our young energy into form to explode back at death. Such is the geometric nature of existence in time-space that Einstein rediscovered. The interaction of the arrow of expansive, lineal energy, described by Thermodynamics and the arrow of cyclical information, described by fractal Geometry defines the Generator cycle of the Universe. And the sum of multiple ΣS/TI cycles creates its fundamental Particles: an Organic system of space-time, an entity of Nature, which is guided by 2 arrows of existence, constantly absorbing energy from its environment; and then imprinting, bending that vital, Energetic Space to reproduce its form – until death erases its Mandala, its existential cycle, back into energy again. It is then evident that the 2 essential forms of space and time, lines and cycles, are self-similar to the 2 opposite, complementary arrows of the Universe, at its simplest level, which are:

- The arrow of energy and entropy, of lineal movement, disordered freedom and expansion in space, which exists also in non-Physical systems. Since freedom, movement, disorder and expansion of an entity’s vital space are concepts applied to all sciences.

- And the arrow of geometrical information, of implosive, cyclical movements, which we perceive as stable in/form/ation through the repetition of self-similar formal cycles, as in the case of a spinning wheel or a spinning mass-particle. That arrow of information is opposed geometrically to the arrow of expansive disorder, lineal energy and space; since it occupies little space and has a lot of form, while energy occupies a lot of space and erases form. Thus the main logic characteristic of energy and information are their inverted properties, which defines them in algebraic terms as 2 opposed flows of movement:

3. ΣSxTI0:Arrow of entropic energy, lineal space, radiation, width, freedom, death vs. TIx ΣS0: Cycle of fractal information, implosive evolution, hierarchic order, height, life

The arrow of information, TIx ΣS0, is a transformation of energy into inner form, a change from lineal, chaotic movement into cyclical, repetitive one; from expansive waves into imploding particles; from disordered, equalized masses of indistinguishable forms extending in space, into an ordered, hierarchical system. Its inverse function is ΣSx TI0: the explosion of energy, the dissolution of form. Though science recognizes the inverse arrow of entropy as negantropy; that is, the negation of entropy, it is long overdue to name it properly as form that crystallizes and organizes chaotic, lineal energy into cyclical, repetitive patterns of in/form/ation. Then we can understand the functions and properties of energetic space and informative time, as 2 opposite, complementary, logic arrows or flows:

4. Informative time, TI Vs Energetic Space, ΣS

Form: Time, Function:Information Vs Form: Space, Function: energy

Small, still Vs Large, moving fast

Tall, Perpendicular, Hierarchical Vs Long, Parallel, Democratic

Height, Repetition, Bidimensional Vs Bidimensional, Length, Width-Growth

Cyclical, Rotational, imploding Vs Lineal, uncoiling, exploding

Informative Frequency Vs Lineal Speed

Singular, Broken form Vs Continuous, amorphous, differentiable

Intelligent, perceptive, feminine Vs Strong, fast, masculine.

Social, organic, creative behaviour Vs Darwinian, destructive behaviour.

Future, evolved predator Vs Past, energetic victim

Life arrow Vs Death arrow.

Waves of space Vs Particles of Time

Female, yin principle Vs. Male, yang principle

Masses, charges Vs. Forces, fields

Heads Vs. Bodies.

Energetic Space and Informative time are opposite in form and function but they easily transform into each other, in balanced, iterative=reproductive yin-yang processes that give origin to the 3 forms in space and 3 ages in time of any species of energy and information. The Universe is made of spatial movement and temporal form whose dynamic transformations through intermediate, balanced forms are the essence of all realities. Lineal Movement and cyclical frequency or in/form/ation, are its 2 inverse properties, studied in Natural Philosophy since Aristotle. Its inversion is evident: the smallest the spatial size of the temporal cycle, the higher it will be its frequency and information. It is the black hole/chip paradox, a fundamental inversion of space-time, which once more has a geometrical how and a biological why. In fact, all those inverse properties that will appear once and again in all relative invariant scales of existence, have a biological why, despite its geometrical how. For example, information has the dimension of height, because to perceive an extension of space the best position is on top, with a high perspective. So from biological heads, to audiovisual antenna, from black holes on top of galaxies they might perceive with gravitation to speakers in Hyde Park, all those systems that provide information are in the dimension of height.

Physics’ reductionism of the 2 arrows of the Universe to a single arrow of Energetic Space have spatialized time and information as fixed forms without biological functions. This is false. Information is in/form/action, form in action as its etymological meaning shows: information was born as an expression of the action of giving form to the brain of a student. Indeed, information requires a mind that absorbs, perceives and interprets forms as informations. On the other hand, energy is in itself amorphous, a movement, waiting for a potential form to ‘contain’ it. Accordingly, Hylomorphism, the classic Greek philosophy that divides the nature of things in 2 elements, form and matter (equivalent to space or extension) is the western homologous to the yin/yang theory and the proper philosophy of science than monist materialism, departing from its definition of lineal time, has wrongly substituted.

Creation of information occurs with very limited energy, in stillness, with a high degree of order, in smaller spaces, as it happens in chips, life systems and sexual reproduction, which creates microscopic, fractal seeds that multiply life in/form/ation. The opposite happens in energy processes, which imply lineal, wave-like movements and a higher degree of freedom and expansion in space that dissipates or erases information.

The inverse complementarity of past energies and future informations explains both the immortality of the Universe and the meaning of death, which balances the informative warping of life. Since when we ad all those life/death, information/energy inversions for the overall Universe neither of both arrows dominates, but merely transform into each other in eternal cycles of future life and past death. Information is a synonymous of life and future time; since it lasts longer in time, as it shortens and wrinkles space (Max.TI=Min. ΣS). While death is associated to energetic space; since it lasts shorter in time but expands fast in space, as it explodes back the information of the being (Max. ΣS x Min TI). So spatial death seems secondary to us, humans, dominated by an overdeveloped, informative brain, focused in the arrow of life and information that considers death-related processes, errors of the Universal Program, claiming a God that will save us from extinction. Yet it is precisely death what allows ‘God’, the Cycle of Existence, the Mind of the Universe to be immortal.

Bidimensional time and space in geometry.

Forms in the Universe imitate the most efficient shapes of energy and information. Thus, informative systems resemble a spiral or sphere that stores max. information in min. space, accumulating its cycles/cells in the informative dimension of height, from black holes to heads and nervous systems. While bites and bodies of energy resemble the line or plane, its opposite, geometrical form that covers, as the shortest distance between 2 points, the maximum extension with min. volume, accumulated in the width dimension as ‘space’.

Let us consider the modes in which different sciences and scales of realty perceive those inversions of space-time and its relative dimensions:

- Geometry perceives then as static dimensions of height, length, width & rhythm.

-Physics perceives them as static dimensions of space or dynamic dimensions of time, where in/form/ation (curvature), speed and acceleration are the 3 modes of time-change.

- Biology perceives them as morphological evolving and devolving changes through eh cycles of life and death and evolution and extinction.

In the graph, we draw the ideal cycle of time traced by a rotating particle, which leaves behind a fixed, ideal form of information: a disk that establishes a discontinuity between its inner ‘vital space’ and the external Universe. And we draw the ideal movement of energy, which traces a line that might reproduce laterally or gather with other lines of energy into the ideal plane or wave of space. Since the most natural form of moving energy is a triangular plane. Thus most organic spaces and energy bodies are triangular, planar, bidimensional forms that fluctuate in their width and length. For that reason, energy is expelled in triangular flows through a rocket; while energetic systems move, forming triangles called steps, as human legs do.

Time is a duration composed of many time frequencies or bits of information that happen when multiple cycles of time accumulate in a knot-particle, created by several causal frequencies, or in a length or duration of time, Σi =T; while a vital space is a sum of a series of pieces of quantum energies with movement, Σe=S. The bits of information and bites of energy are observables, as they are shorter events that happen in smaller scales/planes. The time durations that accumulate formal trajectories or frequencies of informations, and the physical spaces that group waves of quantic energies, do exist and often can be observed, but they cannot be defined, as Newton did, in absolute terms. They are, at best, organisms and entities that last a time and occupy a finite space; whose informative organs host a relational image of other limited space-time fields, and often form part with self-similar entities of ‘whole’ networks, made of such informative bits and energetic bites, created by the social evolution of self-similar quanta. Since a time duration is the slow dimension that accumulates bits of information, evolving them. Yet for that reason the mind sees ‘time spaces’ as fixed, slow forms. Mental spacetime does not move, because it is an informative fractal image of a long spacetime movement taken in a single moment of present: it is not real; it is a simplification of vital space/times. Thus the main difference between the real states of energy and cyclical time, and the mental states of lineal time and space, is the moving nature of energy and cyclical time Vs the stillness of the mental images of those 2 formal movements. So we establish a series of dualities between real and mental forms:

5. Real, fractal, moving temporal energy vs. Mental, continuous, absolute, static, space/time

In the graph, the main parameters of a bit of temporal information are frequency and cyclical form, which combine in ‘knots of cyclical frequencies’, that give origin to an immense number of different multidimensional, temporal species: Σ i = Time.

On the other hand lineal bites of amorphous, moving energy aggregate into planes of bidimensional space, adding its dimension of width: Σe=S.

The 2 states of reality, Energetic Space and Informative Time, are in fact lineal planes and cyclical forms in movement that combine together, creating 4-D space-time fields of temporal energy, like the light wave that illustrates the graph, made of a bidimensional, lineal field of magnetic energy, over which a perpendicular, ‘high’ electric field of information moves rhythmically in cyclical waves. Indeed, the effect of a duration in the structure of a group of ‘parts’, the bites and bits of energy and information formed by closed space-time cycles, is to create a social whole, as a light wave is. As informative bits accumulate in time-depth, one after another, they wrinkle and create the height of the space-time field as a whole entity: cells accumulate as bits of information and a child grows; cycles accumulate in a hurricane that grows in height. Einstein’s curved space-time cycles bend the energy of vacuum into vortices of masses that accumulate in height, creating a black hole; and so on. Thus, height is the dimension that accumulates information in evolving process, erased in the inverse events of biological death or transformation of mass into energy (E=Mc2).

So the essence of dynamic, physical space-time field is the combination and transformation of bidimensional, ‘high’ in/form/ation into bidimensional, flat scales of energy. When both fields merge, they create a real 3-dimensional form, which ads a 4th dimension of frequency or rhythm, as in a ray of light, the simplest space-time field, made of 2 perpendicular planes: one of electric information with the dimension of height and frequency, and one of magnetic energy, with the dimension of width and speed. Yet since light is the space we use to construct our space-time mind-vision of the Universe, for that reason, Euclidean/Cartesian coordinates show the same 3 perpendicular dimensions of light.

To notice that, while the mathematical dimensions of time are height and cyclical form, inverse to the mathematical dimensions of space, length and width, since physics studies translational, spatial time=change, we ad 2 new dimensions of movement by deriving space in time, v=ds/dt or speed and acceleration, a=dv/dt. Since space and time are complementary yet inverse, we obtain the dimensions of space, in the same manner, when we integrate a one-dimensional line of space that moves in time generating a plane and we get the 3rd dimension of space or volume, moving in time the plane, creating a cube. The result is an eternal accelerating/decelerating Universe somewhat more complex than the geometrical, static world of space-times defined previously, with 2 pure dimensions of space, length and reproductive width and 2 pure dimensions of time change, speed and evolving acceleration. And a 5th shared dimension of height/in/form/ation.

13. Real Space is made of moving light with 3 perpendicular dimensions.

‘Functon is form’ means that the arrows/functions of time and its lineal and cyclical movements of energy and information become the organic forms of mental space in the human mind. While a fractal space, means that each region of the Universe creates a discontinuous relative space-time world, independent of the rest of the Fractal Universe, but related by those common arrows/forms of lineal energies and cyclical informations.

In other words, the Universe is made of actions of time and energy, which are ‘functional motions’ caused by the 3 arrows/dimensions of time, past-energies (being the pureset one vacuum space), future-informations and presents-reproductions (that mix both arrows), which we see as forms; that is, as the 3 relative dimensions of space, length, height and width. Yet again, neither Planck or Einstein took those obvious conclusions of their work to its ultimate conseuqneces defining the dimensions of our light-space in terms of light actions, made of the energy and information of light.

Light’s energy and information create our space-time with its temporal arrows illustrated in the graph; since our eye sees light not space. So it is a tautology that light is space and the arrows of light as a time fractal, become the arrows of light as a space fractal – function becomes form, time arrows becomes spatial dimensions. Those 3 arrows are the dimensions of our space-time, since we perceive light as the temporal energy of our world:

- Max. E-Width: The energy of light is its magnetic, flat field, becomes also the human dimension of width. Thus we interpret width in real beings as synonymous of energy. For example, a fat man is wide because he has a lot of energy stored as fat.

- Max. i-Height: The informative dimension of light is the electric field, defined by its height and perpendicularity with the magnetic field. The same functional morphology exists in the human mind, which considers height the informative dimension of time, locating priests, speakers and TV antennas in the highest points.

- c-Length:The reproductive dimension of light is its longitudinal field that reproduces its waveform with a C-speed of reproduction. And we also associate speed with light in fast missiles, weapons and cars. Accordingly, as per Maxwell equations the reproductive speed of light is a constant derived from the product of the electric and magnetic field: ExTi= C. And that is the present to us, the direction of our sight, straight.

- Social dimension. Finally colors summarize the more complex dimension of light: its social dimension, since the amount of photons that exist in a light ray determines its “frequency”, that we perceive as colors. And when light has maximum efrequency, it means it ads up the maximum number of photons, becoming in fact an electron, the next i-scale of informative complexity. So our light space is in fact the way our mind perceives the 3+i functional arrows of light: energy: ‘past-energy, present-reproduction’, ‘future-information’ and i-scalar evolution from the simplest fractal scale of light into the next scale of electrons.

This finding can be generalized to other relative i-spaces, such as the space occupied by electrons, defined by quantum numbers which explain electronic rotational, translational and cyclical movements that alccomplish the functional arrows of electrons; that is, its content of energy and information and the ways in which it shares that energy and information with other atomic particles.

In that regard, there are 2 fundamental kind of spaces you see:

- Light-space; which are the light rays that fill up the entire vacuum of the galaxy or air of the planet and are exactly the space you see, as impressionist painters thought (you see light-space, you don’t see abstract space, but a substance called light).

- Atomic space: The forms made of atomic masses, which float in that light-space.

So our problem of relating the functions of time and the forms of space becomes dual:

- Do the 3 space dimensions of light and its 3 temporal arrows, as a substance made of energy and information that reproduces its wave-like form coincide with our 3 classic dimension of length, width and height? We have found they do.

- Do the 3 spatial dimensions and the 3 relative arrows of energy, information and reproduction coincide in all other atomic objects? If we do a complex analysis of quantum physics, beyond the scope of this book, we would found also a relationship between the 3+i arrows of time (where I is the Ti sum of its fractal scales that earlier Taoist and Buddhist philosophers could not know; or ‘4th dimension of Time’)

Thus it is left only to study more complex fractal space, as those created by complex life organisms, made of atoms, to see if, as in any fractal form, the 3+i arrows of time of those organisms, their relative arrows of energy, information and reproduction, correspond to the relative length, width, height and fractal, social dimension of those atomic organisms.

Such spaces are beyond the theoretical world of quantum physics, since they have a bigger scale, but fortunately enough we have an alternative theory called Relativity, which was concerned with large space-times. So if we adapt Relativity to the fractal nature of space and time, we will find a guidance to study those relative bigger space-times and find out an answer to our inquire. In that regard the key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? In fractal terms the correct answer is: both. It depends on the detail of our observations. For that reason, Einstein, who analyzed the grand scale of the Cosmos without detail, came to the conclusion that the Universe was a space-time continuum. Yet when we observe it in its fractal details, Time and Space are not a continuum. As Einstein himself realized, there are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles with different speeds. But there are also, as quantum physicists noticed, infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities. The word fractal means exactly that: ‘fragmented’, something which is still a whole, but in detail is broken, crackled by those borders. Those wholes that are parts include a human being, made with an energetic body, fragmented into cells and an informative brain, considered for long a continuous mass of neuronal tissue, which turned out to be also fragmented into cells. The brain is the best example that explains the duality between discontinuous information and continuous space: neurons are discontinuous ‘in their form, in their information’, bu joined from the perspective of ‘energy and movement’ through dynamic flows of nervous messages. Thus the continuous /discontinuous structure of space-time is the first of many dualities in a Universe ruled by the paradoxical logic of beings which are made of 2 complementary, ei, opposite forms.

It is also the way in which form is transmited from lower to upper scales, maintaining the lineal and cyclical structures that allow to recognize energy and information shapes in any of those scales.

ח. Galileo’s paradox: epur si muove.

The fractal nature of all Universal entities, which occupy a piece of space and last a quantity of time, is the key to unify the laws of science. Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical, continuous plane, despite their appearance. In detail, they become quantic points, planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet, in a fractal repetition of the path the planet makes around the sun. Each planetoid becomes again a fractal sum of atoms, turning in cyclical paths. Those rings illustrate 2 fundamental dualities of the Space-Time Universe, contradicted by the ‘naïve realism’ of our simplest perception: Any region of the Universe seems at first glance still and continuous. So Galileo called Saturn’s planetoids, a ring, thinking they were made of continuous, still matter. Yet Saturn’s rings have in fact the form of the commonest informative fractal: a Cantor dust, which thins once and again into infinitesimal particles. Since when we see any continuous point of time/space in detail, it grows, becoming both, dynamic and discontinuous, made of quanta, moving in self-similar paths that are separated as independent beings, but pegged to each other by flows and networks of energy and information. The Universe is constructed through those logic dualities that make it grow in bigger scales of growing complexity, departing from its 2 essential motions, the line of energy and the cycle of information.

If Time is not a spatial, fixed dimension, what are the dimensions of Time? We have to cast aside the perceptive paradoxes that fix, as in the case of Galileo’s rings, movement into fixed space. Then, the dimensions of time become dimensions of movement and acceleration that ‘change’ and move a spatial surface along a speed, creating in the process space-time, as the movement reproduces the form of space along its trajectory. If the process again repeats itself, creating acceleration, again a second dimension of time is recreated. So the dimensions of time ad up to a 3 dimensional, fixed surface of energy that moves (adding a dimension of speed) and accelerates or decelerates, creating 2 time dimensions. This was foreseen by Einstein, when we affirmed that the fundamental Principle of the Universe is the Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and force, which defines a Universe in perpetual temporal movement, always creating and destroying ‘dimensional space-time’ as it moves and ‘prints’ form over surfaces of relative present space. In this manner, ‘cyclical, temporal movements’ and lineal trajectories, reproduce new space-time forms, creating what mathematicians call a fractal dimensions of space-time. To introduce them, we will start with a simple example: the rings of Saturn.

The most puzzling of the inverse dualities of energy and information is the duality between continuous, fixed space vs. quantic, moving time, illustrated in the graph by Saturn’s rings. Since it is both, a physical duality and a mental duality, caused by the limits of perception of our mind, which converts into still space what is a moving, temporal reality. That subjectivity of perception explains many of the paradoxes and errors of our understanding of the Universe. The example of the graph shows clearly this: In perceptive terms, Galileo discovered Saturn’s moving planetoids and called them rings, thinking they were a continuous, fixed form; when they are discontinuous satellites. The limited perception of his instruments erroneously transformed the moving cycles of those planetoids into a fixed ring-form; putting the multiple, fractal microcosmic and macrocosmic scales of matter that made up those rings together into a single space-time. So not only human senses, but also mechanist senses are inaccurate, as the recent discovery of a 96% of dark energy and matter have proved. Thus, the continuity and immobility of space and information is an ‘error of mental perception’, since the mind pegs the discontinuities between objects that we ‘don’t need to see’ and fusions instead all fractal space-times into a single surface of reality. The discontinuities are there, as they are in a movie, which is a quantic series of pictures we put together into a continuous image. In both cases, we do not see their discontinuities, because in order to survive we do not need to see the voids of formless space that lack any relevant information or any usable energy. It would only cramp our senses. So we don’t see for biological reasons the energetic movement of microscopic vacuum space; and we see a continuous Saturn’s ring, instead of a moving foam of quantized planetoids. A fact that leads to a biological understanding of perception and information as useful tools of survival:

The mind creates stillness in a moving Universe. We call that error of perception, the ‘Galilean Paradox’. Since Galileo discovered that we perceive mentally a fixed Earth; while in fact the Earth is moving (e pur si muove). Yet what abstract Physicists forgot to ask in the next 400 years is: why we perceive the Earth quiet when it is moving; why our senses cheat us? The answer is biological: People perceive moving time cycles and moving energy only in their relative plane of space-time existence, where such knowledge is relevant for their survival. The human mind transforms the remaining time cycles into fixed information and fixed space, which seems a still, continuous void. In this manner, quantum, moving, temporal energy becomes virtual, fixed forms, set up against a mental background of continuous, static space. So we see a quiet Earth instead of a moving planet. Stillness is a perceptive paradox caused by the fact that we see the Universe as static information to distinguish it better.

The Universe is dual, paradoxical, relativistic, dynamic, ever changing its in/form/ative and energetic nature. It is not composed of substances, material particles and static fields. It is made of dimensional arrows that move and reproduce, tracing the 2 essential forms of space-time: the line energy and the informative cycle. Each of those movements becomes still when a mind perceives it, and measures it, as Einstein put it, in simultaneity, but it is a movement, a dimensional arrow. A proton is not made of 3 fixed particles, called quarks, but of flows of lineal gluons and cyclical vortices of mass (the quarks) in perpetual transformation. A body is not a fixed substance, but a series of physiological cycles performed by its cells. A cell is not a fixed sphere, but a series of cycles traced by carbohydrates that seem, put together, a fixed substance. Those carbohydrates that seem fixed are in fact atoms tracing energetic, lineal and temporal cycles; yet atoms are particles doing cycles and particles are gravitational and electromagnetic, cyclical vortices that absorb lineal forces and can be modelled with the mechanics of superfluids. So all is in eternal movement, even the physical space/time that seems fixed to us, due to the tendency of the mind to see stillness. The Universe is made of movements and events, of actions in time, not of fixed substances, of forms in space. That is why the cycle of space/time existence is its fundamental particle. The perception of the Universe as a fixed series of continuous forms is an error of the mind, which tends to see form instead of movement, because movement distracts and occupies mental space, but formal stillness focuses what we see and can be stored in a smallish brain. In fact, we can see either movement or form, but not both together. We do not see the Earth moving and quiet at the same time. We do not see a wave and a particle at the same time (Complementarity Principle). The mind has less dimensions and volume than the Universe and for that reason it eliminates movement that occupies mental space from most of the entities it observes. Thus, the Galilean Paradox explains also the Uncertainty principle, one of the fundamental dualities of the Universe: the fact that we see things either as still, discontinuous particles; or as moving, continuous waves. Since the physical entity is both things together: the relative ‘head’/informative organ of the physical system is the particle, while the field of forces is the energetic body which carries the particle around space. And both co-exist together. But we can only perceive one, in the same way we do not perceive a human being as a whole and as a series of cells together, since the mind is limited to observe only one plane of space-time existence. Thus, we don’t see the scalar, fractal nature of the Universe, but a single space-time continuum. A human being is also a whole made of fragmented cells. While our brain is another example of the duality between discontinuous information and continuous space. Since it was considered for long a continuous mass of neuronal tissue, yet it turned out to be also broken into discontinuous of in/form/ation, joined from the perspective of ‘energy and movement’ through continuous, dynamic flows of nervous messages.

Fractal=fragmented space-time networks are also continuous (if we look at the flows of energy that communicate the cells of the network) and discontinuous (if we look at the holes, or dark space of the networks and its quantic particles). Duality implies that any continuous whole is also a fractal, organic system, sum of microcosmic actions and cells. It all depends on the detail of our observation. The limits of human perception imply that all what is not clearly perceived by the mind becomes still and continuous: if we observe very slow or very fast cycles, as those of a mass-vortex or a wheel spinning, or we observe forms from far away distances, as the rings of Saturn; or they are very small, as the cell cycles of your skin, they appear as a single undifferentiated still, mental form, fixed in space and integrated into a whole organism, despite being made of fractal, moving cycles. Thus the continuous/discontinuous structure of space-time is one of the many dualities of the 2 opposite, ΣSTI, forms of the Universe:

9.Fractal, discontinuous Informative Time CyclesAmorphous,continuous, Energetic Space

This explains the apparent paradoxes of Quantum Theory and Relativity: on one hand, time is indissolubly merged with space, bending it into future form, in/form/ation. On the other, Einstein proved that there are many rhythms of time, which means each space-time in the Universe has a different way of changing and processing its energy and information that combine to create a present space-time. So what is space-time, a discontinuous sum of fragmented quanta, as Quantum theory said, or a continuum? It is both. It depends on the detail and perspective of our observation: Informative Time breaks space-time into new, discontinuous forms. Yet from the perspective of pure energy, the Universe is a continuum, amorphous surface. For that reason, Einstein, who analyzed the grand scale of the Cosmos without detail, came to the conclusion that the Universe was a space-time continuum. Yet when we observe it in its fractal details, Time and Space are not a continuum. As Einstein himself realized, there are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles with different speeds. But there are also, as quantum physicists noticed, ∞ quantic spaces divided by membranes and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities. Thus, the duality between quantic and continuous space-time is an irreducible duality between a whole, which is broken into parts; and it happens everywhere: Your mind is a whole made of electromagnetic impulses that cross through broken neurons; an organism is a whole broken into billions of cells. The word fractal means exactly that: ‘fragmented’; something that is still a whole, but in detail is broken, crackled by cycles of time that create borders in space. So fractal means both: a continuous whole and a quantic group. Ultimately, all informations are quantic (as form needs discontinuities to be perceived), born out of temporal, cyclical rhythms that return periodically, in a discontinuous manner to a certain point, tracing again the same form; while energy is amorphous and hence it has the appearance of continuity.

We already mentioned that time is formal change. So if we were to do exactly the opposite of what Physicists do and temporalize space, we could say that:

- The 3 dimensions of space create a morphology of information, the form of space-time that Einstein defined as G-curvature (where height gives that curvature). Thus, we can further reduce those 3 dimensions to a G-factor that defines the total curvature of space, as Riemannian geometries do.

- Then, from a perspective of time, when that morphology with curvature moves, it create the 4th dimension of time or movement. In the graph it is given by the temporal reproduction of that height cycle.

- Finally, a 5th dimension of acceleration happens which further multiplies the total space of the being. Yet at this stage morphological biology cuts off the dimensionality of the Universe because it can be roved mathematically that the number of dimensions that create the maximal volume are 5 dimensions. Then the volume of space-time enclosed in a world of more than 5 dimensions sharply falls. We can see that 5th dimension in movement as acceleration or we can extend it into space reducing it to constant speed. This is secondary to the fundamental truth of a biological Universe that as all cosmologists know have a 5th dimensional shape, whose meaning now we fully grasp, thanks to the Galilean paradox. To see those dimensions as fixed extensions of space or accelerating and moving fields is equivalent. For example, in Relativity a vortex of space-time with a lot of curvature/ acceleration has a π value equal to 3. In terms of an accelerating mass vortex what curvature does is to create a spiral instead of a cycle that moves inwards. So 3=π means a spiral vortex with a reduced π-diameter, since the inner branch of the spiral vortex is shorter inside the accelerating vortex. Relativists use a hyper spatial 5D to explain it. Yet it is easier and closer to what we observe to define that 5th bending dimension as an accelerating time-change.

Thus, we conclude that the paradox of Galileo is the key not only to unify quantum physics and relativity but also to reconcile or rather explain in terms of dynamic, moving time, the theories of modern Physics with multiple dimensions of space, as it turns out that any dimension of space can be considered a dimension of time and vice versa.

ט. The modes of translational time=change in the Universe.

We can see a dimension of time movement as a spatial, fixed form, when we see it in simultaneity. So the 3 dimensions of space can be derived in time, by moving a point into a line, a line into a pane and a plane into a volume, and what we have termed as the 3 dimensions of physical time-change, in/form/ation, movement and acceleration, can also be derived from space by observing the curvature of space, and deriving that spatial form in time, v=ds/dt, and a=dv/dt.

So, time and space are not only inverse but complementary as we derive the 3 real dimensions of time from space and the 3 dimensions of space from time.

Physicists are specialists on the science of ‘space’, which they study in depth with mathematics, a language derived of geometry and hence, also specialized in the study of space. But the language of time is not mathematics but logic, and its realm far wider than the realm of space, which might be considered ‘a slice of reality’ or ‘dharma of present’ that times constantly move from past to future. For that reason, Frege and Hilbert wee able to derive the laws of mathematics from the laws of logic time, the ‘true language of God. Albeit a dualist logic more complex than the simple, lineal logic of Aristotle that physicists use in its spatial study of time. So time is a deeper phenomenon that encompasses all the spaces that there were and will be; and what truly matters is to learn the logic rules that transform in each of us, our quantic, vital space, from past to future, between birth and extinction. When physicists confront the phenomenon of time, they do so only from the perspective of spatial change, a very limited part of the entire realm of time=changes.

Today, when Physicists talk about time they really don’t know ‘what they are talking about’, as they are not talking about the logic/verbal meaning of the word time that means ‘change’ and hence studies all the types of change of the Universe. What they talk about is a parameter, t, which appeared first in an equation of speed, V=s/t, that Galileo found when studying translational change in space or ‘spatial movement’. Further more, because that rate of change in space is considered infinitesimal, V=ds/dt, they talk about ‘present change in space’, which Einstein latter adapted to his new concepts of ‘present simultaneity’, and relativity of movement. This was fully understood by painters, who started to paint simultaneous, present time, in a single bidimensional space, as the sum of quantic movements (Duchamp’s staircase models and Picasso’s cubist perspective),but surprisingly enough the people who grasped with more difficulty the concept of spatial, present simultaneous analysis of time, were the same physicists that had invented this model of time analysis. Moreover, every since physicists have denied there are many other ways in which time=change happens in the Universe, beyond the limited study of ‘changes in speed’ that Physics analyzes. This has been explained many, many times to Physicists, since Bergson and Poncaire explained to Einstein and Minkowski that they were ‘spatializing time’, or rather analyzing how vacuum space changes in time, (so Poncaire could establish with Topological analysis self-similar equations to those of relativity). Yet there are many other things besides vacuum space that change in time. We humans change in time our morphology (not our speed). Evolution changes in time the form of many species. Time is thus a synonymous in most sciences of a change in form, in the in/form/ation of species. And this type of informative change is basically ignored by Physics. This shows a general misconception of the meaning of Time in Physics, which has been termed as ‘simplistic and reductionist’ by philosophers of science. Because indeed, it is.

Time is philosophically defined as ‘change’ and divided in the study of ‘translational change’, which is carried out by Physics, and the study of ‘morphological change’ which is carried out by Biology. In that regard, Galileo defined only a limited type of time-change, translational change, with his equation, V=s/t. He ‘spatialized Time’ (Bergson), reducing the study of Time to a single process of change, movement. Einstein latter adapted Galileo’s formula to a fluctuating space-time background adding the implosive, -ct, arrow of gravitation to all translational movements. Thus he realized that Time in Physics also has a component of morphological change, as time warps energy into in/form/ation, not only in evolutionary processes, but also warps the energy of vacuum into in/form/ative masses.

Yet, when in Physics time appears with a negative term, it doesn’t mean, as people like Minkowski or recently Hawking think, that time is traveling to the past. Such patent non-sense comes out of the generalization of the parameter t=s/v, the equation which defines time in physics (or –ct in Einstein’s improvement of that formula), to the entire philosophical concept of time=change. Latter we will study what truly means traveling in time towards the past, when we consider in depth the absolute meaning of time=change and its main modes. Enough to say that in the restricted, spatial, geometrical definition of time in physics, it is just an inverse, cyclical movement as that created when moving backwards the needle of a clock. Since physicists ‘extract’ their concept of meaning from a spatial definition of movement: v=s/t. Thus physical time is only the analysis of change in the geometry of space; and traveling backwards in time in that equation is merely a geometrical change of direction.

The best known case are the virtual particle/antiparticle systems that constantly pop out in the Universe. Antiparticles seem to travel to the past while particles travel to the future and both annihilate themselves. What we observe here is 2 particles with different geometrical directions that together complete a ‘cycle of physical existence’. We cold say that the particle is the 1st age of the entity, from past to future and the antiparticle its devolving age from future to past or 3rd age of the entity and together form a closed loop of space-time, an existence. So we have to see them consequentially, one after another in time, even if when we measure them in present-simultaneity, as they are so fast we see the entire life of the particle in an instant of space, they seem to us mere geometrical shapes.

Spatial change however is limited, when studying flows from past to future to observe only those fast, simultaneous phenomena that can be perceived together as a fixed part of space. Which are obviously a minimal quantity of the time-events of change of reality. In any case no spatial change goes beyond the limits of the entity that experiences them. They do not influence the entire, absolute time of the Universe, as Hawking naively thinks, when he talks about black holes as time machines because their ‘t’ parameters are inverse. Or when he thinks that black holes evaporate because antiparticles make them ‘travel to the past’. Antiparticles are only the second life part of the particle, which quantizes its existence in 2 broken phases that we can separate, as a black hole does when attracting one of them, but do not affect at all the absolute time of the entire Universe.

9. The simplest constants: a pi fractal, its self-reproductive properties.

The simplest of all fractals is the pi-fractal that transforms a line of energy back and forth into a pi circle made up with 3 curved iterations of the initial energy lines that put together create a ‘time cycle’. A cyclical pi-form, the simplest space-time organism, composed of 3xd ínformative perimeters, with 3 sensorial apertures (0.14 d) to the external Universe, through which the fractal emits and absorbs energy and information and reproduces itself. That ideal organic form is ever pervading in the ∞ shapes of the Universe, from spiral galaxies to cells, but it has already, despite its simplicity, all the organic properties of space-time beings that we will find in more complex shapes and super-organisms.

Einstein, who is within the limits of Monist Physics, a colossus of thought, already said that the ultimate Natural Constants could not be ‘physical values’ (the relationships between energy and information studied in previous pages) but special numbers that constantly appear in Physical equations, ‘like pi and e’. And indeed, irrational, ‘fractal’ numbers are the absolute constants of the 3 main functions of existence:

– Pi is the formal constant of creation of in/form/ation. Since pi transforms a line of energy into a ternary cycle.

– Phi, the Golden Ratio, is the constant of reproduction, that multiplies an organic system into self-similar forms.

– e, is the decadent constant of destruction of form back into a lower scale of energy that devolves a formal being into its cellular subspecies. Again its most common ternary form is et=3=20.

And we do find them, indistinctly in physical and biological processes related to those 3 arrows – showing the fundamental equality of all Universal Systems.

For example, e appears in the decadence of radioactive atoms that release of energy, phi appears in the organization of a sunflower spiral, pi appears in the h-constant of transformation of light flows into electronic actions… and so on. The theme in itself would require an encyclopedia. Yet we don’t have space and time for it, so we shall consider only the most important of those 3 constants, pi, which certainly if we have to choose a mystique number would be the number of God, as it transforms the energy of the Universe into ‘in/form/ation’, the ‘intelligent’ substance we perceive.

It is said that Pythagoras committed suicide when he found that the Universe was not made of perfect cycles and spheres but of such rotating discontinuous pi-fractals, which ultimately are spirals that either uncoil or coil, according to the dual arrows of space/time. Indeed, one of his students found that the cycle was not perfect but fluctuated, since pi was not a perfect number but an irrational numbers whose length, depending on our approximation from above of bellow its absolute value, would create a shorter open cycle or a closed, longer one. Indeed, lets imagine that the perfect cycle is 3.145 diameters. But pi is never a fixed number so if we take 3.14 as the pi value the cycle wont have length enough to close and will be an open spiral. But if we take 3.15 as the value of pi, it will over close its ‘mouth’, as a closed spiral. And since the value of pi regardless of our detail of calculation will always fluctuate between an upper and lower bound, all cycles are in fact ±pi spirals fluctuating between the 2 vital arrows of space/time, the imploding and explosive arrows (which in Physical space corresponds to the arrow of imploding gravity or ‘Arrow of Einstein’ and the arrow of expanding electromagnetism or ‘Entropy arrow’ and in Biology to the arrows of life and death.

Fractal, cyclical Times break the continuum space into organic fields of energy and information that iterate constantly reproducing its form by fractalizing energy into living information. We can mathematize those processes of creation of complex super-organisms with the laws of fractal geometry, which is a Non-Euclidean Geometry of space, extended across multiple planes of reality. Yet if we want to mathematize the other limit of reality – the most simple form of space and time, the cycle of existence, we don’t need the complexity of fractal geometry, as the simplest cycles of existence take place in a single plane of space-time. Thus we can formalize those simpler cycles with the tools of classic Non-Euclidean Geometries which Einstein already used to describe the Gravitational plane.

Yet Einstein didn’t close the curvature of space-time as we do in this book. So he failed to find the minimal unit of space-time, the pi-cycle, which already displays all the features of a complex organism.

The most common act repeated ad eternal in the Universe is the creation of a cycle of existence – the transformation of a lineal flow into a cyclical pattern with 3 elements/ages that give birth to a pi fractal, where a continuous element of energy, 1, breaks in 3 curved times, creating a cyclical discontinuous sphere with 3 apertures between them. If we were to express the previous event using the formalism of the Unification equation we would write:

52. S -> 1 Line of Energy -> 3 curved paths/ages -> 1 pi cycle = Ti

A pi cycle is created by curving a line of simpler, faster energy, S>T. And it is destroyed when the information of the cycle is uncoiled back into a line of energy, T<S. In this manner a pi cycle already deploys the 2 arrows of energetic, expansive space and imploding, curved time.

Π is a simple transformation of 3 energy bites into a bidimensional cycle of time, 3E-> πT. Yet the beauty of an irrational, infinite fluctuating number like pi is that the cycle will never close into itself, but it will be just a little bit longer or a little bit shorter, without locking into a perfect, static form, but iterating, reproducing the cycle, moving, displacing bite by bit, in each turn of its existential wheel – it might be a vortex of mass, a hurricane, a galaxy, an engine wheel but the aperture provides an opening for its feeding, an escape for its movement. That is why so many real transformations of energy into information are spirals with a ±pi mouth that closes and opens, as we approach to pi, from above or below. Pi-thagoras had found the simplest natural fractal of self-reproductive information, a spiral made with 3 lines of energy, bent into a cycle of time, with ±0’1416 apertures between those 3 units, to feed or perceive energy and information through those apertures. Some examples of those apertures are senses, sunspots, mouths and magnetic poles. There are obviously all kind of formal variations as points evolve into more complex structures, but the functions and cyclical forms of all those apertures are maintained – since the Universe is a bio-logical game of existence where the absorption/emission of energy and information is needed in all organisms that need to refill their energy and information to survive.

Such process also creates a new dimension of in/form/ation by diminishing the lineal extension of energy space. The most well known case is the creation of masses through the Principle of cyclical equivalence, when a lineal, accelerated force, curves into an accelerating vortex of imploding, attractive space called a mass. And vice versa, when a mass explodes away uncoiling information into energy it becomes radiation in the inverse process (E=Mc2).

The geometry of those processes can be observed in Bubble chambers, where different particles with different mass coil and uncoil reversing constantly their arrows of time. Yet in all those dual events the same process occurs: a ± pi particle/antiparticle, vortex/radiation system curves or uncoils in opposite directions a physical space-time field. And the infinite, sum of temporal reversals and geometric action-reaction processes define the nature of physical interactions. Where a wave is an uncoiled pi vortex that changes its arrow of time from coiling into uncoiling when it has reached half of its cyclical extension.

It is then obvious that information and energy are constantly destroyed, but because they become transformed into each other, the total amount of energy and information of the Universe remains the same. When the arrow of time dominates, S>T, information is multiplied by 3 in each iteration as the line of force becomes a spinning particle. When we generalize to several dimensions and combine several processes, some of them opposite in form and tie arrows, the creation and destruction of pi-fractals explain the creative and destructive events that transform back and forth waves of energy into particles all over the Universe. Since mass and charge are geometrical vortices and forces lineal fields, and one can transform into each other, physical creation becomes just a geometrical game born out of the invariant forms of energy and space that ad up or cancel each other under the standard laws of classic geometry. So 2 waves with different geometrical orientation cancel their relative forms into a line of energy, while 2 waves moving in the same direction ad up their forms. 2 particles spinning in opposite directions simplify their form in particle-antiparticle collisions that emit lineal energy/radiation. 2 identical vortices/particles that implode or explode their spins in the same time direction cannot occupy the same place of space (Pauli’s exclusion principle). But if they spin in opposite directions, one expanding and other imploding, they can balance each other’s arrow to create a stable s/t dual particle. Such is the case of 2 electrons which can occupy the same quantum state if they have different spins.

When we move to higher scales of size the same game happens once and again: mechanic clocks balance the coiling clock-wise movement of the needles, we observe, with the constant uncoiling of the hidden sphere, which provides the energy for the formal cycles traced by the needle.

Paul Dirac’s explanation of an underlying sea of antiparticles, whose reversed time arrow feeds the movements of the particles of this Universe, follows the same principle.

The symmetries and antisymmetries of the physical Universe find in this way, for the fist time a logic explanation as variations of the same logic game, the game of pi fractals.

In this manner the physical Universe creates its informative waves and particles. In the simplest of those processes a line of moving energy, a ‘magnetic’ c-speed, acquires a new dimension of height, an electric field of information and so we can reinterpret the Equation of lineal speed of Galileo, V=S/T, in terms of cyclical speed, which constantly creates formal frequencies: W=Sxλ Frequency.

It is then obvious that the pi fractal also follows the ternary law of creation, as any pi fractal can either implode, explode or create a hypothetic perfect form in curved spaces in which the value of pi becomes a fixed, rational number (due to a potential underlying curvature of the initial energy, as it happens in some Riemannian curved space-times).

The result is the 3 fundamental types of charges of our electromagnetic world: exploding cyclical pis, or ‘negative charges’, neutral pis and imploding, positive charges.

For example, there are positive, negative and neutral ‘pions’ and they show inverse geometries turning left or right in a magnetic field. There are coiling and uncoiling particles and antiparticles; the atom has expansive spatial electrons and implosive, temporal protons… The equations of the total continuous spacetime Universe have also 3 solutions that correspond to those 3 geometrical forms: one with negative curvature, another with positive curvature and a 3rd with flat curvature.

Because spatial forms relate to temporal functions and dimensions, we can express those decouplings as the creation of ‘negative past, expansive arrows’, balanced, present lines and future curved information. And indeed, the plane of vacuum energy of the Universe constantly decouples into left and right particles and antiparticles in a Universe that constantly recreates itself in all its fractal scales, through the symmetric creation of curves and lines that become particles and waves of space/time.

The simplest pi fractals is a bidimensional cycle; but we live in a 3D Universe, so we should now generalize the concept of a moving, rotating, dual pi fractal to a point ‘with parts’ or rotating sphere often created by the accumulation of cyclical paths. It is the pi-point, the πoint with parts, the fundamental unit of the geometrical Universe…

When we study such a point in a single plane of space-time, we find out that it can be perfectly described by the most advanced mathematics of space-time planes, the Non-Euclidean mathematics that Einstein used to describe the space-time plane of the gravitational Universe and we will take further to its ultimate consequences, adapting it to the more complex logic of cyclical, discontinuous time/spaces.

4. Minds and languages as informative fractals.

A mathematical fractal like the Koch curve is an energy line that triples its in/form/ative bits every iterative cycle. But since it doesn’t grow in length, it exhausts its energy. An organic fractal also starts as a single cell that clones its in/form/ation. But since it can absorb energy, it can iterate billions of times. In both cases what defines a fractal is its reproduction of in/form/ation that bends energy into form, creating the arrow of futures. Ultimately we are all fractals, ‘Cantor dust of energy and information’: we fractalize so much that finally we loose energy, volume and return to the dust from where we departed in the process of death. For that reason, the solution to death by excess of information is fractal reproduction of a younger micro-form, when the being has enough energy to replicate in a discontinuous zone of space-time, ensuring in this way the immortality of its logic in/form/ation.

In the graph, the Ternary Principle also creates fractals like the Koch curve, which creates in each iteration 3 formal elements, or a pi fractal that curves a line in the 3’ pi sections of a cycle. Yet since languages are neuronal forms of the mind, we might wonder if minds can be considered also fractal systems. And indeed, they are: Minds replicate the forms and movements of the Universe in a smaller scale through the syntax and semantics of their languages, creating in this manner linguistic fractals, whose syntax is a reflection of the ternary structure of the Universe. Modern science concentrates in the study of the parallelisms between the hardware of the mind, the neuronal brain, and its software, the depiction of the Universe made with visual and verbal languages. But what truly matters to most people, which are biological beings trying to survive in the Darwinian Universe, is the parallelism between those mental structures, made of syntactic and semantic, fractal units (numbers, geometrical forms, phonemes and sentences), and the external Universe our minds try to map out accurately. So human minds are fractal mirrors who reflect the space-time Universe with:

- Verbal logic, the language that mimics the 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future with its verbal modes and the 3 elements, information <action>energy of the Universe in its ternary syntax.

- And geometry, a language that imitates the fractal lines & cycles of real space.

Both languages and minds are informative beings that show clearly the properties of information, which is small, broken and still. So a mind, as a fractal of pure information, occupies small spaces and works better under conditions of minimal energy: chips calculate faster in smaller, cold spaces and black holes of maximum gravitational mass-information have minimal size. Since we have defined the dimension of information as height we can now locate the dimensions of the mind as an informative organ. Minds will be in the upper region of any organism in order to perceive better from the ‘relative point of infinity’ of the projective geometry of its space-time field, which is always located on top of the system. Languages and minds are a fundamental tool of evolution: organisms survive thanks to their precise, mental perception of the feeding cycles of its preys and predators that orientate them in their movements. The mind acts as a virtual, fractal mirror, allowing the being to interact efficiently with the Universe, avoiding predators, absorbing energy from victims and finding self-similar sexual partners to reproduce its information. For that reason, minds and senses are located mainly in the upper, external region of the organism in order to absorb information from the external Universe. Thus languages and minds are entities whose informative boundaries tend to ∞ while the energy/space of those boundaries tends to zero:

53. ΣS0 x TI: Mental, informative, linguistic Fractal

The creation of information in minimal ‘mental space’ is possible because most information multiplies in the bidimensional boundary of the fractal, as in the case of the Mandelbrot set or a book page or a computer, which reduces 3-D energy into smaller 2-D broken, still forms. In Nature also the external, bidimensional membrane of most species grows fractal structures that absorb or emit information (senses, roots, hair, black holes, screens, mankind on Earth’s surface): In black holes information is attached to the boundary in a bidimensional space (Holographic principle) at temperature close to 0K. The human mind is also at the boundary: an eye-Wor(l)d created by the electromagnetic waves of the brain’s external cortex, the retina and other informative senses. Those senses are external systems that Nature creates pegged to the skin of organisms, in order to perceive fractal information and mimic with it in the still, reduced space-time of the brain the vital cycles of beings. Minds and senses are similar to mathematical fractals, since after all mathematics is a mind’s language that fixes the physical movements of Nature into geometrical, simplified, still images that lack the vital energy of the Universe. Their fundamental property is to increase constantly the in/form/ation of its perimeter or skin in an ever-diminishing volume of energy. Further on those mental, logic and geometric fractals guide accurately the actions of mankind in the external World, thanks to its self-similarity with the Real Universe, from which they eliminate most of its movement and energy, leaving only pure information to fit an image within the limited space-time of the brain. Those one-dimensional limits of the mind make its space-time logic simpler than the dual structure of the fractal Universe. For example, human minds perceive Euclidean space while the Universe ads to each point of that Euclidean space an inner volume, as Einstein proved, that enlarges reality. Thus, all minds are informative fractals, perceptive monads, (Max.TI =Min. ΣS); whose equations reflect how they gauge the information of the Universe, from its subjective, point perspectives:

54. ‌S (Universe) x 0 TI (Point-Mind) = K (linguistic World of spatial information)

Thus the mind confuses the total reality with its world map, the ∞ Universe with a relative World drawn with the minimal flows of temporal energy that come together into our mental fractal. We call that paradox of perception, the Galilean Paradox, since the most clear example is the fact that we see the Earth as the quiet the center of the Universe when it is not, as Galileo discovered. So we can write the paradox of the mind in verbal, logic terms:

55. ‘Every species is a relative center of the Universe that confuses its virtual world, the limited reality its languages scan, from its single perspective with the whole Universe’

The philosophical implications of that equation are many. The Galilean Paradox becomes the basis of human selfish, self-centered behaviour: a mind, despite being infinitesimal compared to the Universe, believes to be also infinite, in as much as all what it perceives comes towards its ‘self’, its ‘knot of quantic information’ that seems the center of that Universe. But the mind is only the center of an infinitesimal volume of quantic information that the eye scans out of the zillions of bits that exist in the Universe. Hence, humans think they are the center of the Universe. Therefore, we think we make ‘Universal Pictures’ and our intellectual leaders are ‘Universal minds’. Yet all truths are linguistic truths that other point of view might find false. Human eyes see the Earth still; yet Galileo proved that the Earth moves from the point of view of the Sun. What is then truth, the Human-Earth’s still point of view, or the Sun’s point of view? Both things. That is the paradox: reality is always translated by a mind, which deforms it through the syntax of the languages/forces it uses to perceive it. The Earth’s species see themselves as still point of views, center of their World, the Earth. Yet the Sun places the Earth as a satellite, used to stabilize its gravitational space-time field. So both truths are possible because the Earth and the Sun are self-centered beings that construct 2 different worlds based on 2 different informative languages. Since each language and being of the Universe creates different virtual maps of reality and acts-reacts, transforming that reality according to its selfish survival needs. Thus, there are infinite, relativistic, parallel Worlds, one for each language and species that measures informations and energies, trying to create with them cyclical actions that position their diffeomorphic point of view in the center of the Universe. Yet the mind does not perceive them. It only perceives the external, still image of those mental points, similar to the intelligent monads of Leibniz or the Atmans of Buddha and converts their life and intelligence in a quiet, dead image. Since a mind has minimal size, it reduces the Universe into a microform, as a mathematical fractal – a creation of the mind – does…

But, in as much as the mind is also connected to an energetic body, unlike a mathematical fractal, it can in a second stage use the body to add energy to those ‘ideas’ and recreate them into macroscopic forms. Thus, human minds create technological machines that resemble our organs of energy and information at a bigger Plane (mobile-ears, arms-cranes, etc.). Those minds also join into ‘social families’ of growing size, fractal civilizations that constantly produce bigger self-similar ‘forms’ of those ideas, (technology and art). Since only when information iterates over a surface of simpler energy it creates real multi-dimensional forms. For example, the mind creates a blueprint of information (a scheme for a machine, an idea); but only when human beings put together raw materials and physical energy, a real being becomes. What pure fractal information lacks is the growth provided by energy that allows a natural microform to grow into a macroform, self-similar to the ‘Mother. ’Space-time fractals, including the human mind that guides his spatial body, can combine and seek energy and information in feeding, perceptive and reproductive cycles that ‘vitalize’ its nature. So informative organisms, either seeds or mental fractals, once they are born, absorb energy and grow, creating replicas of themselves in all kind of ‘different energetic materials’. They live; they are real, they create reality. In that sense, the brain is a biological organ that uses information and languages to survive better in the Universe. Languages of temporal energy are the key factor in the survival of any species that somehow ‘understand’ them to be able to act-react to the cycles of other species in the Universe. What those languages do through their syntax is to resume reality, extracting the most relevant information about the world needed by each species. The mind extracts with those forces it absorbs, a min. volume of information, which creates a linguistic map, virtual mirror of the Universe.

1. The fractal, invariant, reproductive geometry of space bites and information bits

Space-time cycles perpetuate themselves through reproduction; since time is fractal, quantic, discontinuous, hence mortal. So space-time forms only survive through its iteration in parallel forms. For that reason reproduction is the main cycle of the Universe and its species, which combine energy and information to iterate themselves. The reproducer entity might be a ‘Mother’ or an external ‘enzyme’ – as it happens with carbohydrates or machines iterated by enzymes and ‘enzy-men’. Once we fully grasp the Galilean Px. and Quantum Relativity, Reproduction is possible because all things are made of movements whose reproduction is as simple as the repetition of a given trajectory. Further on, the organization of all those iterated, self-similar space-time cells/cycles creates complex organisms, where those recurrent cycles, which are functions of the type, ΣSTI, gather together in chained networks of self-similar in/form/ations, called cellular sets or families, creating bigger macro-organisms in a new st-plane. Nature’s fractals are made of such temporal, iterative cycles. In the graph: geometric, cosmic, chemical, biological and mechanical space-time fields during their cycles of reproduction

In the previous iterations we corrected some errors of Physics, regarding the meaning of time and space, translating to cyclical time-space the findings of Einstein, the Diffeomorphic, Relativity and Equivalence principles, the constant speed of light and the geometrical, curved nature of time. We also considered the meaning of the bidimensional, inverse, reproductive dimensions of those time/spaces; the sequential order of the arrows of time between birth and extinction in 3 ages; the spatial structure of organisms in 3±st dimensional, physiological networks of energy/information and reproduction homologous to those 3 ages; the self-similarity at scale of those dimensions of time and space, in cells, individuals and species, made of multiple individuals; the duality of space-time states, which alternate in all beings, who fluctuate between their quantic ‘jumps in space’ and their quantic jumps in time; and finally, the process of palingenetic reproduction and its dual rhythms of punctuated, social evolution and reproduction that moves space and changes time. So we gained a general view of the nature of fractal space and cyclical time. We have not used mathematics in the model, since our interest in a book directed to scientists of all disciplines is to describe the logic ‘Whys’ of the Universe, better explained with conceptual words. Nevertheless, cyclical, fractal space-time is a logico-mathematical mode, where the existence of 3 dimensions of time instead of 1 and ‘st’ Planes of fractal space, instead of a single space-time continuum, introduces a degree of logic and mathematic complexity that dwarfs all previous models of space-time. So we have to introduce the concepts of fractal geometry, with its finite, reproductive dimensions, scales and invariant laws of self-similarity, which define how the Universe, the whole, and its ∞, self-similar fractal species, its parts, self-reproduce. We will do so, adapting the terminology of fractal mathematics to the jargon of dual space/time.Why the Universe deploys a fractal geometry? The answer is that among all the branches of mathematics only fractal geometry is able to explain together the geometrical and biological properties of the Universe, since fractal geometry is a self-generating, iterative, self-reproductive geometry. And so it is ideal to explain the geometric/biological duality of the Universe. In that sense, one of the shortcomings of classic science, obsessed with abstract mathematics, as the single language of God, is to consider relevant only geometric principles, as if they were the only causes of reality, disregarding the laws of time, explained by the science of logic, and its ‘whys’; when in fact in the dual Universe bio-logic reasons are equally important to explain the creation and destruction of its species. In that sense the arrows of energy and information have a self-evident reading in biological terms: since all species are made of energy and information they need those substances to exist, and so energy and informative feeding through specialized organs (relative ‘bodies and heads’) are the why of almost every event in the Universe – regardless of the multiple forms those energies and informations acquire. We ad to those 2 arrows or wills of space-time fields the arrow of reproduction. Since fractal iteration is the only way to overcome the limited, discontinuous content of energy and information of any being, which sooner than latter becomes exhausted in the process of death. So only those species that reproduce mechanically (physical species) or vitally (biological ones) their logical form survive. Thus, energy, information and fractal iteration (reproduction) are not only the geometric dimensions of any space-time field, but also their biological functions. This means that even when we cannot recognize certain morphologies as energy or information, there will be a causal function associated to the organs of any ΣS/TI system that feeds on energy and are processes information. In fact only in homogeneous space-times, energy and information acquire its perfect, lineal and cyclical geometrical forms. Yet all Space-time systems are ruled by its arrows of energy and information feeding. So their organic forms adapt to the irregular topology of their ecosystems and the type of energy and form they encounter, even if it implies to develop ΣS/TI morphologies that become virtually unrecognizable as ‘cycles of information and lines of energy’. Thus, the vital energy/ information functions are the true invariants of the Universe. Though science stresses mainly its geometry the bio-logic functions of energy, information and fractal reproduction are the essence of the game of existence – the will of the Universe.

The relative ‘dimensions of space-time’ of any being are recreated through the 3rd arrow of the Universe, the arrow of fractal reproduction that combines constantly energies and informations, giving birth to new self-similar micro-forms, present replicas of their mother-beings: Pure informative-content only exists when a form is born ‘still’, as a fractal seed of information, without energy-space. Those micro-cellular forms then self-reproduce over a surface of energy, by transforming dimensions of energy into dimensions of information – normally a length dimension into a height dimension, as in the previous graphs. Such is the key transformation that defines the arrow of futures in the Universe: energy (dimensions) become information (dimensions), building ‘castles of life’ that death will tumble back into oblivion. We can see that process in space as the creation of a reproductive, fractal organism, which is the fundamental entity of the Universe, when observed in space; or in time, as the process of creation of form in 3 ages, which represents the fundamental time event of the Universe that warps energy into information. Let us then define generically all fractal systems, whose simplest form are mathematical, fractal equations that iterate an ideal fractal geometry, as the Koch curve of the illustration does.

Fractals are mathematical equations that iterate their information in self-similar shapes that extend through several Planes of informative size or ‘st’-Planes, also called co-dimensions. They are the most accurate models to depict natural phenomena related to informative growth and reproduction, the essence of life organisms, which can be considered ‘Natural fractals’. In both cases the boundary of the fractal being constantly increases its in/form/ation as it looses its energy volume. This paradox happens because the fractal creates microforms, smaller replicas of itself that need less and less energy to be generated. So a human organism creates a micro-cellular, seminal form that stores all the information of the original organism in minimal space, while a Mandelbrot fractal creates smaller replicas in its border. Thus in both cases we can define mathematically an arrow of fractal reproduction that transforms energy into form, self-similar to the 3 ages of the arrow of information, but now circumscribed to a ‘spatial boundary’, the external, bidimensional surface of the fractal:

47. Arrow of Fractal Information: ->ΔTI x ΣSs-1: TI->∞ x ΣS->0 = F©

In Mathematics, fractals are originated by a Generator Equation; in Biology by a ‘Mother’ with Genetic Information; in Physics by a particle defined by its Universal Constants, which produces a minimal ‘action’ of energy and time; in Sociology by a mind, which creates ideas and tools. In all cases the generator-mother iterates= reproduces into self-similar forms, reduced in spatial size, called sets in mathematics or families in Biology.

What is then the generator fractal equation of the Universe? Obviously the cycle of existence, ΣS<=>TI, which transforms, back and forth, energy and information, generating the same forms once and again, as forces and particles trace lineal and cyclical motions and space-time fields explode and implode. Those processes of physical creation are the simplest geometrical events of the Universe. For example, the differentiation of an energy and information particle in physics can be achieved merely with the decoupling of a lineal wave of light (photon) in 2 thinner cycles that bend the photon’s energy in 2 opposite paths, an antiparticle and a particle, a system dominant in energy that uncoils and returns to the vacuum (the antiparticle) and one dominant in information that becomes an electromagnetic vortex (the particle). Yet in biology the same differentiation creates a female, the cyclical form or informative sex; and a male, the lineal form or energetic species. Thus, as the system becomes more complex the differentiation creates also more complex forms, departing from the initial forms of energy and information, the line and the cycle. Yet the forms and ternary principles of creation do not vary: a relative present form differentiates in 3 balanced/present, past/energetic and future,/informative forms; which in turn can generate again 3 new forms.

In a mathematical fractal, formal reproduction ends with the creation of an ever-growing quantity of microscopic information that exhausts the Energetic Space of the fractal. Since mathematical fractals lack the energetic dimension of movement and growth. This means that their fractal sets are attached to the Mother’s boundary, where the self-similar forms nest, ever diminishing in size, as in the case of the well-known Mandelbrot set. Finally, the mathematical fractal becomes an indistinguishable series of microscopic forms, called a ‘Cantor dust’ and disappears. Organisms also enter a 3rd age of wrinkles and form without energy that brings their final death – since we are also ‘Dust of space-time and dust we will become’. Yet, unlike an idealized, mathematical micro-fractal, generated by a single arrow or informative equation, in the real Universe an organic fractal, once it is born, it will absorb also energy, the vital substance that allows organisms to move, grow and reproduce. It is the combination of both geometrical forms/functions, energy and information, what makes those fractal organisms, reproductive, living systems. So in the study of natural fractals, we have to ad to the informative arrow – whose laws can be deduced from the study of mathematical fractals and informative seeds – the energy arrow of entropy that thermodynamics analyzes in detail. Both together create a 3rd, reproductive arrow that combines energy and information, maintaining eternally the forms of the Universe. It is the arrow of relative presents that fusions past-energy and future-information into constant forms that are self-similar to the original mother. If we were to use an algebraic, adimensional equation to describe those organisms (instead of explaining them in geometrical terms, as made of lineal energy bodies and cyclical informative heads), we should consider the opposite properties of those 2 arrows and its constant combinations in balanced actions, Min. ΣS x TI= 0x∞ =K, as the defining elements of any organic system, which for an Σ number of cycles gives us a constant macroform, made of infinite cycles/cells in dynamic balance:

48. Energy, young arrow: ΔΣSx TI0  ΣS0 x ΔTI: Information, old arrow:

ΣS0x∞=c X TI0x∞=c : Present Constant Organism of energy and information

Thus informative ‘ideal beings’ described with a single arrow of existence – either mathematical fractals which iterate information but lack energy; or scientific models that describe reality with a single energy arrow (for example, the big-bang Universe) – are simpler than the real entities of Nature that combine both arrows in their existential cycles (from living organisms to the big-bang/crunch Universe). Since Organic fractals not only iterate their information as mathematical fractals do, but they also make it grow, absorbing the 2nd arrow of the Universe, energy. So Organic fractals leave a self-similar family of micro-forms, ‘Mother-cells’ that replicate their own structure of energy and information in an st-1 Plane of space-time as mathematical fractals do, but then it grows in size by absorbing energy arrows, becoming an exact replica of the Mother, which in this manner achieves its formal immortality through the reproduction of a fractal family. Those 2 arrows put together create in Nature palingenetic events of reproduction through at least 2 different st±1 and t Planes, which give birth to self-similar entities that we call Fractal organisms, the fundamental particle of the Universe. Thus palingenetic events combine the arrow of energy and the arrow of information, creating forms repeated in different physical Planes, a fact which explains the 4 dimension of existence – the t-scalar, finite dimension of fractal theory that measures the number of self-replicated cells of a fractal organism that occupy and create a finite volume of space-time. Thus a reproductive, palingenetic process is a dual cycle/rhythm of the 2 arrows of existence, between 2 ±st Planes of space-time, ordered with an st parameter of size and quantity of form. The palingenetic rhythm first reproduces identical information in a microscopic form or ‘Mother-cell’ that absorbs energy, growing in size, in a series of ΔΣS->ΔTI->ΔΣS, phases that create an exact replica of the macro-Mother:

49. Palingenesis: Mst: Mother -> ΔTI -> fractal family: Σ st-1 ->ΔΣS-> Mi

The pervading existence of fractal systems in a Universe that constantly reproduces itself is self-evident: not only mathematical, but also biological and physical forms are fractal, iterative species. Thus, according to the Ternary Principle, if we have distinguished 3 types of movements, depending on its quantity of energy and information (Max. ΣS, Max. TI, ΣS=TI), we also distinguish 3 main types of fractal systems: physical fractals with max. spatial extension; informative, linguistic fractals with max. information and organic fractals that constantly balance its energy and information, switching between both arrows, Max. ΣS->Max. TI->Max. ΣS, in palingenetic processes of growth.

The self-similarities of Physical and Biological reproduction.

Every species of the Universe reproduces. Physical waves self-reproduce explosively along a path of space. Biologists explain the reproduction of species in similar terms. They talk of radiations of species, caused by the speed of reproduction of a top predator form with better in/form/ation: biological species that endure a long evolution in time have a higher content of information than simpler, energetic, physical particles. Thus, according to the quantic definition of biological futures, those top predators with more information dominate the future, absorb energy from its victims and reproduce an offspring of quantic, self-similar forms. Biological radiations create a lot of information in time, but cause a minimal displacement in space. Radiations of species are ‘dense, informative’ dimensions, which do not vanish as waves of physical particles do. On the contrary, those radiations often come closer together and transcend into macro-organisms in which all the inner space is densely populated and converted into cellular, biological in/form/ation. Biological radiations transform dimensions of energy into dimensions of information, which we observe for all species as a transformation of the dimension of length into the dimension of height and as a growth of social, cellular complexity from a microcosms into a macrocosms of finite dimensions. The difference between a particle moving along a reproductive dimension of speed and a biological being is thus obvious: the wave or particle imprints a previous field of energy so lightly that its ghostly form doesn’t stay longer in time. The biological being however imprints so slowly and deeply the energy of space into information than its offspring of cells maintain their form in space. In terms of the fundamental space-time inversion, a physical wave is a spatial radiation that moves very fast in space, with minimal information (Max. ΣS = Min. TI) and a biological radiation is an informative wave with minimal energy that hardy moves in space (Min. ΣS = Max. TI). In geometric terms, evolution transforms the dimensions of space of all beings into time dimensions, increasing their height as information multiplies, as it does in matter and life, creating tall humans and tall black holes. Thus, there are 2 types of palingenetic reproductions, dominant either in energy or form:

- Physical, lineal reproduction that we just have analyzed for a wave of light and cyclical reproduction, which is the origin of masses.

- And biological, informative processes of social evolution that takes place in life and human beings, which themselves can be divided in processes of reproduction of cellular organisms (bodies of species) and linguistic processes of reproduction of mental organisms (the heads and languages of the species). Let us consider those informative fractals in detail.

3. Linguistic fractals.

Let us consider now informative, linguistic, mental fractals with min. energy and Max. TI. A mathematical fractal is not a real being because it doesn’t have the 2 ‘arrows of existence’, yin and yang, energy and information. It is only a geometrical species of pure information, without the energy arrow/dimension that vitalizes and puts in motion the organisms of the Universe. A geometrical fractal iterates its form, creating self-similar microforms, replicas of the mother-cell, but those cells don’t grow, don’t move. They lack the dynamism and functionality of space-time fractals. So they are dead, pegged to the so-called Generator cell, as it happens in the famous Mandelbrot Fractal.

Thus the difference between an abstract, fractal dimension and the fractal dimensions of Natural systems is clear: In mathematics a fractal dimension measures the ‘speed of warping’, of creation of formal bits attached to the generator cell, what Mandelbrot calls the roughness of the fractal curve, as in the curve Koch drawn in the previous figure. Without energetic movement, that arrow of increasing fractal information is similar to the wrinkling of the 3rd age in which also the lack of energy accelerates the fractal dimensional warping of the skin constantly. In Nature, this excess of information is found only in systems, which cease to interact with their environment as vital organisms, precisely when they loose its energy. So a form of pure information (a seed, a set of equations and graphs and old man) needs energy to become real (and grow into a human being or a machine) or else will die away. In that sense, we could consider the arrow of information, of futures, a fractal arrow that increases as time passes by for any Universal system. For example, a wave of light coming towards an electron increases its time frequency until it collapses and dies formally absorbed by the informative electron (Quantum Paradox). So happens in life, which constantly increases the rate of ‘roughness’, of warping, of creation of information until death. Inversely, the Koch curve could be defined as a form that gets old as it warps and shrinks until death. In that sense, each species shows a different fractal dimension of aging.

The fractal generator of languages is their syntax, which an iterative template with 3 elements that mimic the Universal equation. For example, mathematics are equations of the type A operandi B, where A and be can be considered space-time functions and the operandi establishes an energy/information relationship of aggregation or disaggregating between them. While verbal sentences have a Universal Grammar of the type A (informative subject) <Verb (ΣS/TI action) >Object (subject’s energy).

Thus, languages are self-replicating, syntactic fractals in which each specific semantic information creates a self-similar sentence that reflects the ternary structure of the Universe.

5. Biological, temporal Fractals: Super-organisms.

While a mental fractal is only an informative, still image of reality, Nature’s Space-time Fractals are alive since its dual arrows give them capacity to transform energy, reproducing their information over it, through ΣSTI, iterative cycles. Thus, Nature’s fractals differ from geometric fractals in their dynamism and capacity to absorb energy from their environment. They not only iterate their form in microcosmic Planes, but also feed their offspring of information until they grow into full replicas of themselves. In Nature either a Mother or an external enzyme – as it happens with carbohydrates or machines reproduced by human beings – iterates a micro-fractal family by absorbing energy, transformed into fractal information. Soon the fractal family becomes detached from the Mother, starting its life cycle, growing in size, and reorganizing until it emerges into the bigger world of the Mother.

Nature’s fractals are not only fixed, spatial, geometrical in/form/ation as the Mandelbrot set, void of life and temporal change, is. They exist, both in space and time. They have cyclical movement, since they repeat not only their forms in space but also their temporal bio-logic cycles and functions at different time intervals. Since not only space but also time is fractal, made of ∞ cyclical, repetitive trajectories or ‘clocks’, traced by those fractal forms. Since according to the Ternary Principle there is a symmetry between dimensions of space and ages/cycles of time. What this means is that we can describe:

- Biological fractals in space, as iterative processes of formal growth that give birth to complex botanic shapes: branches, leaves and roots are all easily created by the iteration of an initial Mother-form; a tree repeatedly fractalizes its form in 3 branches, ever slimmer, with less energy but ever increasing the information of the tree; a DNA molecule iterates its form both in micro-fragments (amino acids) and at macro-Plane, (recreating a cell), etc.

– And define them in time, as 3±st iterative, dimensional cycles that create networks made of chained cycles:

- Informative Cycles in which an entity processes mechanically or perceives vitally information become ‘neural networks.

- Feeding Cycles in which an entity controls a vital space in which it feeds on energy create ‘bodies’.

- Reproductive Cycles in which an entity combines and reproduces its energy & information create sexual networks.

- Social Cycles in which multiple clonic forms self-organize into a higher st+1 Plane create super-organisms.

A simple, vital idea emerges when observing the Universe with 3±st arrows/ dimensional networks: Reality becomes a fractal super-organism, made of infinite, smaller super-organisms. Super-organisms are ‘whole’ biological systems made of cellular networks of energy and information, in which each cell is itself a new super-organism, made of microscopic, smaller st-1 cells. We contend that all Nature’s fractals are super-organisms that extend from the microcosmic world of molecules, made of atoms, to the world of social ecosystem. Each of those Planes is made of smaller st-1 cells that process in self-similar, but never equal ways energy and information, creating together the whole:

50. ‘Universal species are fractal super-organisms made of smaller super-organisms that transform back and forth Energy into Information, shaping space-time cycles: STI’.

6. Social Palingenesis.

The 3±st ages of any existential space-time cycle or knot of frequencies define the existence of any cycle, cell or organism between 3 different planes of existence, ±st, the seminal, individual and social plane. Thus, the 4th dimension of the Universe is the ±st, scalar, fractal structure of any organism that evolves in time through the process of palingenesis, from a microscopic, cellular being (st-1) into an individual super-organism (st) that finally will exist in a social plane of ecosystem (st+1) during its 3 ages. Thus the origin of the ternary, scalar structure of all super-organisms which extend through those 3 Planes is the reproductive arrow of palingenesis:

A Mother, Mst reproduces a Mother-Cell, M©st-1, self-similar to herself in the microscopic scale, which acts as a seed of fractal information, starting a series of cycles of reproduction and self-organization (Max.ΣS->Max.TI), absorbing energy and recreating form till emerging again as an Mst, clonic mother form. The result is the creation of self-similar mathematical, biological, physical and mental fractals in the different Planes of reality.

The Universe fluctuates and recreates its forms in smaller and bigger st-planes through palingenetic processes of iteration and social evolution of micro-fractals into macro-organisms. In this manner, fractal palingenesis defines the 4th dimensional arrow of space-time, the most essential and yet less understood of all dimensions of reality…

The existential cycle starts at the end of those palingenetic, reproductive cycles, when the seminal being emerges into the higher st-plane of existence of the mother: any organism, born as an st-1 microcosmic, cellular, seminal seed, reproduces into multiple clonic forms that evolve socially till they emerge as a macrocosms with the form of the mother fractal and then participate in the existential life of a group of individuals or st+1 ‘species’. A fact that can be generalized to all organisms that co-exist in 3 st±1 relative scales, as information is reproduced in microscopic scales that grow into societies.

Those fractal super-organisms come in all kind of sizes and forms. What they all have in common? All fractal super-organisms are ‘cellular societies’ organized through 2 or 3 physiological networks, one of energy, one of information and in the most complex organisms, one that reproduces the system, and all of them live through 3 ages, defined by the repetitive, sequential dominance of those 3 networks. We can perceive the cells of those networks as fixed spatial forms or, according to the Galilean paradox, as cyclical movements whose time arrows/functions process energy, information or reproduce themselves. That vital, more accurate vision of a super-organism defines it as the sum of all those temporal, functional cycles that pegged together seem no longer a series of ΣS/TI exchange flows but a static network of cells, each one a knot of those frequential cycles. A super-organism is both, a spatial and a temporal system in which the elements that iterate across its 3±st scales are biological functions/cycles that ad up, creating the existential ±st life/death cycle. Thus, the repetition of cycles of energy feeding, reproduction and informative perception is the essence of Nature and life. And when we order those cycles together along the entire existence of any fractal, they explain the life-death cycle and its ages between birth and extinction, which all species follow. So the next question in our inquire is concerned with the creation of those complex organisms: how the different smaller cycles and cells that make up energy bodies and information brains, have evolved till creating those macroforms, made of an enormous number of individual cells and cycles? The answer is: through the creation of social networks, the 4th arrow of time: the arrow of social evolution.

7. The creation and destruction of dimensions of space and time in Biology.

According to the Ternary Principle, there are 3 only possible forms of creation, ΣSTI, TI<ΣS, ΣSTI, which transform energy and information dimensions into each other. In that regard, 2 main creative/destructive processes reduce or increase the dimensions of any fractal space-time field:

- ΣSTI: Genetic creation of ‘seeds’ by destruction of energetic movement: All beings are made of temporal energy, performing cyclical actions that leave a track of ‘in/form/ation’ when the dimension of the ‘action’ is lost. So when a space-time field looses movement and reduces its energy dimension, it transforms itself into a genetic memory that condenses the temporal cycles of the being into bits of information. The degree of sophistication of that process varies, but its dimensional nature remains. In this manner, a cycle of temporal energy becomes a ‘circle or bit’ of information, a living body becomes a frozen fossil, a man becomes ‘a photograph’; and in the most complex processes of genetic creation, an organism reduces its information into a ‘genetic seed’. Because information is mental and quiet, without the energy of the complete space-time cycle, a bit of information reduces a 4-dimensional space-time, by extracting at least one of its dimensions of energy, packing its in/form/ation into a fixed, fractal microform.

- Ti>ΣS. Explosive growth of a seed by reproduction of form over energy. In the inverse process those informative memories can create again organic systems of temporal energy, when we ad a dimension of energy to its “genetic, memorial” form. So a bidimensional graph of information, called an ‘industrial design’, creates a car when we add the proper energy: raw materials and workers. While a bidimensional “seed” or genetic code creates a plant when we add the proper energy and movement: water, earth and light. Since the genes of a living being are also a type of Informative Time.

Thus we distinguish ‘temporal seeds’, which have 2 time dimensions and 1 or 0 energy dimensions; ‘energy sources’, which have 2 energy dimensions and 1 or 0 informative dimensions; and space-time fields that have equal number of space and time dimensions and are the only 4-dimensional, ‘full-living beings’. Then, once the seed has become a living being, it starts the reproductive and social cycles/dimensions that will convert that micro-seed into a macro-form of its upper Plane of existence.

- ΣSTI: If we ad those 2 processes for an species extended in a longer period of time and a wider surface of space, we observe a dual rhythm of dimensional generation, in which a species switches between its slow dimensions of energy and information; suffering first a ‘punctuated evolution’ in time, mutating and increasing its information and then a ‘reproductive radiation’ in space, expanding its numbers in the ecosystem.

Time and space have 4 dimensions. Energy is a long movement, that we see as a wide space when the mind accumulates self-similar forms in a mental image of space; ΣS=T. So we prefer to write ΣS, as the symbol of any of the dynamic real, discontinuous spaces we see around us, made of a sum of energy quanta or cells. On the other hand time is a cyclical movement, a rhythm, a clock defined by its frequency, st-1, which define a bit of information processed by the entity that performs the cycle. Information is form-in-action, a form that traces and closes, completes a cycle of absorption of energy or information. But the deeper concept of time is evolution, which accumulates informative cells and cycles, often in the dimension of height, and beyond, as once a cyclical process of accumulation of height is completed, time can create a new, ‘5th dimension’ of scalar depth, evolving individuals into macrocosms, seminal seeds into entire organisms, big-bang seeds into Universes. The process of self-creation of dimensions doesn’t stop ever as time can create new toroids from a smaller ring, new macro-organisms from smaller cells, made of smaller molecules made of smaller atoms, made of smaller particles. A given space-time plane will have 4 standard dimensions 2 of space-energy and 2 of cyclical events and time cycles, but on the long run, the Universe becomes more complex as time ads depth and multiplies the fractal space-times in which its cyclical information is imprinted This fundamental new future of fractal, cyclical space/time is the key to fully grasp the structure of the Universe.

8. The stop and go process of fractal reproduction.

Space-time fields constantly switch, according to the Unification Equation, which defines the events of the Universe as ΣSTI transformations of time-space between energy and information states. Such is the essence of all movement in space-time: When the being is in its spatial, energetic state it moves in space; when it is in its temporal state it reproduces its information. So any movement is a stop and go process similar to that of a movie frame, that first is displaced and then it is ‘reproduced’ by light, which increases its size projecting the image in the screen. The moving, energetic step and the informative, enlightened step are quantic jumps that we see as a continuity when watching the movie. Yet all movements in space/time are quantic jumps, despite the continuous perception of them, according to the Galilean paradox – a fact which resolves many paradoxes of science, from Zenon’s to Special Relativity. Since the perception of a fixed light speed is cause by the fact that even a moving electron, stops, when it emits light. And so it is independent of the speed of the instrument.

- Our physical world made of electrons imprints itself constantly over a nebula of dense photonic particles that reproduce their specific electronic information, over light-space, the lower scale of information. A fact, which solves the paradox of Quantum Physics, regarding the nature of those electronic nebulae, described as mathematical probabilities. Yet in statistics, a probability can also be used to describe a ‘population’. So the probabilities of quantum physics are in fact populations of dense, photonic, fractal space, over which the electronic form imprints itself, they are not mathematical illusions.

And so we can form a ternary pyramid of gravitational space that feeds the forms of light that feed the forms of electrons. Where, in both cases, the initial forms of those light and electronic waves slowly fade their memorial traces, as new patterns emerge.

- Finally in the biological world, in a process called palingenetic reproduction, the genetic code of a certain species imprints its information on a lower surface of microscopic cells that will shape a bigger living organism.

So in all those cases, reproduction, the complex process by which information imprints in simpler energy – what we have termed as the 3rd dimension/will of the Universe requires the existence of lower planes of existence, microscopic scales of quantum energies in which the higher form imprints itself. Thus, again the biological need of any species to reproduce in order to survive and conserve the logic form, is the cause of the existence of a geometrical structure, in this case fractal spaces organized across several planes – what we call the 4th dimension/arrow of space-time, the arrow of social evolution that creates microscopic particles, one after another, reorganized in social fields of space-time:

51. 3rd Dimension: Reproduction: ext=k; ‘Space’.

4th ±t Dimension: t-scalar, palingenetic social evolution: ‘Time’.

We can find many other examples of palingenetic reproduction. Since the constant combination of the arrows of fractal information and Energetic Space, ΣS and TI, define the 2 more complex dimensions of existence: the palingenetic reproduction across multiple planes of space-time of any cycle of existence or species of the Universe.

We can now relate the 2 simple dimensions of energy and information and the complex dimensions of space and time, in an organic way: a bite of energy is imprinted every time-cycle in which a wave advances across its lower space. Thus ‘space’, which we define as the sum of energy quanta, ΣS, is the reproductive width that ads all those energetic quanta. While Time-duration accumulates information with the purpose of causing a palingenetic reproduction across several scales of space-time. Thus the fractal, hierarchical structure of space-time into multiple planes, born out of the social evolution of its cellular elements, is the slow, accumulative, long-term dimension of Time, sum of multiple informations: Σi=T.

And the interaction of both arrows/dimensions creates st±1 waves of microforms that become macroforms, by the reorganization and growth of self-similar reproduced cells. Those complex dimensions show the dual, geometric and organic nature of the Universe. Since even its simplest species, light photons at c-speed are reproductive waves that combine energy and information, whose equations, as Maxwell proved, are accordingly the product of the magnetic/energetic and electric/informative constants of vacuum space: 1/moxeo=c.

In that regard, fractal reproduction not only is an essential feature of quantum physics, able to explain in rational terms the meaning of the probabilities that appear in its equations, but it also solves the mysteries of Relativity, regarding the constancy of light space.

In Relativity, the fact that light is constant in speed regardless of the speed of the observer has not classic explanation. In Fractal Relativity it does. The speed of the observer is in fact relevant, because the emission of a bit of electromagnetic information takes place only in the moment in which the particle is in a stop, informative position. So it happens with its absorption by the observer’s instrument, which will measure the speed as an electronic machines that feeds on light photons. Thus, following Zenon’s paradox, neither the observer or the light source is truly moving when it emits and absorbs the light ray that we observe, whose speed is therefore constant.

Does this mean that the entire building of Relativity is based in a false postulate? Not, really, since the languages of God are indeed infinite and so are the perspectives and models we build to explain what we perceive. Relativity in its present formalism is a tool of calculus and measure, not a philosophical theory of the whys of the Universe. In that sense, it uses lineal time, and adopts the perspective of human beings who perceive constant movement around them in our scale of existence. So it allows to introduce within the mental way of perception that humans display, the paradoxes of the fractal Universe, whose logic reasons we explain in this book.

. Fractal dimensions. Reproductive waves of space-time.

19. V(s): Particle in space with movement V=s/t: —————————–

V(t): Informative Wave with momentum: e x ν: ——O O O O O OOOOO

In the graph, movement can be seen as the displacement of a form over a fixed frame of space/time (Galilean perspective) or as a process of reproduction of fractal information, which curves a simpler surface of energy. This 2nd model of movement is logically more consistent, as it solves the oldest paradoxes of Science put up by Zenon in Greece, (the existence of movement in a discontinuous Universe); and the most recent – the description of quantum particles as probabilities imprinted in the electronic nebulae of the atom.

Many Physicists consider that the Unification Equation is a particle, called the god’s particle. This is part of their spatial obsession. Reality, however is not made of particles of space but movements in time. Nor the discovery of the Unification equation of forces defines God, but merely one of the many self-similar cases of a system of space and time.

God is the creator, not a particle but a process – the process of reproduction. The Jewish, whose numbers, used in this iteration to honor Einstein and Gödel, are letters, so as not to take the name of the Lord in vain, won’t write the letters of 15, which mean yud-he (10+5), the name of God. Instead, by convention, tet-vav (9+6, טו) is always used. Following such ancient wisdom, we have numbered this paragraph and the next, which resolves the process of creation – which is a reproductive process, with the 2 names of God. It is not a vain name, since he already gave us that mandate, which all space-time fields follow when he uttered in the Bible these words: ‘grow=evolve and multiply=reproduce’. So does anything in the Universe. Because God is not a particle of space, but the will of logic, temporal information than in a quantic Univese of finite Time, can only survive through reproduction.

Cosmologists say that the Absolute Universe has 3 ‘fractal dimensions’ of value 1; which means our Universe ideally extends its spatial 3 Dimensions till infinity. However those infinite, ideal dimensions are the sum of multiple individual, quantic space-time fields, whose dimensions reach till the limits of those space-time fields. We could, thus, consider according to the Relativity principle that makes all space-time locals that dimensions are only local, and a Cartesian Plane, a local system of energy and information, whose X, Y and Z coordinates extend to the limits of the ‘energy and information’ fields of a given entity.

Thus, from the mathematical perspective, a space-time field can be represented as a fractal 3D Cartesian Plane, whose coordinates are the energy and information coordinates of the system. Thus, in Fractal space-time, unlike in Newtonian Physics, the Cartesian plane is not an abstract background but a field of space-time in action, a quantic space-time discontinuum with a given informative height-dimension and an energetic length-dimension. If we generalize that concept to the entire space-time of the Universe as a whole, then every point of that Cartesian plane is a relative space-time field/wave, with 2 dimensions:

The amplitude of the field/wave represents its energy; while the intervals of its time cycles create in the Time coordinates a wave frequency, which represent the speed of time cycles or informative speed of the being. And both together create a system of real, fractal space-time coordinates that measure the content of energy and information of the being, no longer existing in a background space-time but made of a space and time content. This simple upgrading of the Cartesian plane makes the space-time coordinates ‘real’ moving entities. For example, light becomes now a space-time, fractal field made of spatial wave amplitudes that carry energy and temporal frequencies that carry information: V (ext)=TI (frequency) x ΣS (Amplitude). Where the reproductive speed of the light wave becomes the ‘Constant of balance’ of its energy bites (magnetic constants of vacuum) and informative bits (electronic constants of vacuum) ΣS xTI =Constant, Reproductive Speed. Which explains why Maxwell found a self-similar equation, c=e 0 x  0 -1/2 and defined light-speed as the product of its magnetic and electric vacuum constants. Thus, in fractal space-times, a wave is a formal reproduction over an energy volume. And we generalize the concept of a reproductive speed for all classic waves of physics:

20. V = vλ = Time frequency x Spatial amplitude = c= Quantic Time-space field.

Thus, when we combine the findings of Relativity with the Galilean paradox that fixes the moving Universe of time into space, the definition of ‘fractal dimensions’ as moving, reproductive fields of space-time, which reach only till the limit of the organism, becomes crystal clear. For example, a human being has a height dimension of information, a width dimension of cellular energy and a length dimension through which it enacts its energetic/moving cycles. And the result is that he ‘creates’ and occupies a certain volume of space during a certain time in which he achieves that reproduction. That is the meaning of a physiological dimension, the fundamental concept of this book that unifies the jargons of geometry and biology. Let us consider that concept in more detail.

The never solved 3rd paradox of Zenon deals with the fact that in each instant of time an arrow seems frozen in space. How then it moves to the next region? No explanation is found ‘Therefore, movement cannot exist.’

The only solution to the paradox has been traditionally to consider space-time discontinuous. Yet then the paradox rephrases itself: how does the arrow jump from a space to the next one? The only answer is to consider movement a formal reproduction of information in the lower st-planes of energy of any space-time field. A fact that can be generalized to any –st > st planes, in which the –st particles of the microscopic, lower scale of existence are formed by the upper information of the more complex species:

- A wave of light imprints one after another its field over the smaller scale of vacuum space-time. The 2nd graph shows how such waves reproduce their in/form/ation, slowly vanishing their forms. In such a model speed is measured with the parameters of fractal space (energy) and discontinuous time or frequency. The simplest space-distance or amplitude of a wave and the simplest information or frequency of a wave, combine into the simplest reproductive constant, the speed of light, which reproduces the form of an electromagnetic wave across a surface of vacuum space. So the abstract spatial term, ‘speed’ is in fact, the reproductive speed of an in/form/ative wave over a simpler energy, in the case of light, the simplest gravitational space-time. Light speed becomes then the constant of reproduction of the dimension of length, the 3rd arrow of an electromagnetic organism that combines its magnetic energy and electronic information, recreating its form.

In that sense, the difference between a fractal and a continuous, Cartesian dimension is clear: Cartesian dimensions are idealized, ∞, abstract extensions of a vacuum energy, which do not seem to go for ever, as even the Universe has a limit. While discontinuous, finite, fractal dimensions are real, multiple, self-reproductive dimensions of information and energy proper of all ΣS/TI systems, which added up for the entire Universe gives us the Non-Euclidean dimensions of the continuous whole. Such fractal dimensions are created by a wave/cell of information, and consist in a series of self-similar, discontinuous forms put one after another. Hence they are finite in size, as the number of self-reproductions of a given cell/wave is finite, often based in a decametric Plane. Finite dimensions solve the problems of infinities that appear in physical theories: infinity is relative to the discontinuous limits of a fractal dimension, which constrains any space-time.

In fact most fractal dimensions have a decametric, finite number of spatial cells, being the most perfect space-time fractal made of Σst=1010-11, the number of neurons in a brain, stars in a galaxy and galaxies in the Universe…

The reproduction of waves and forms that create new dimensions is the biological why of the geometrical hows we observe around us. The real 4th, temporal dimension of the Universe is the scalar dimension of social growth from microcosms into microcosms, caused by those reproductive waves, which grow or diminish in frequency/form, as they transcend or descend between different planes of space-time existence. Such 4th t-dimension is potentially infinite in its informative complexity as the palingenetic cycle of reproduction, social evolution and emergence of microforms into macroforms can be repeated ad infinitum.

Yet, as the system becomes more complex in its informative planes of time-duration, the speed of reproduction slows down, since the entity has to reproduce more information; and so the spatial speed we perceive in the act of palingenesis diminishes: Max. TI=Min. ΣS. And vice versa. The simplest informative waves of light are the fastest reproductive waves of space, as its form is minimal and takes minimal time to reproduce: Max. ΣS=Min.TI. We might say that a biological palingenesis is a temporal reproduction in as much as it moves little in space but evolves a lot of Informative Time. While speed or translational movement is the spatial reproduction of a simple physical form across space. Yet in both cases the reproduction of dimensional forms creates reality.

Self-reproductive waves create what mathematicians call fractal, finite, self-similar dimensions, caused by a wave that repeats its patterns of information in diminishing or growing scales. Which is the key process to understand why energy and information are invariant shapes at scale, repeated ad infinitum from atomic to galactic cosmos: fractal waves translate those morphologies, as they change, grow or diminish in spatial size/speed and TI-frequency, connecting different space-time fields. Those waves of energy and information also cross the discontinuities between different space-time fields. So when we look at smaller Universes from our perspective we use an electronic or light flow, whose frequency increases as we enter those smaller, more informative Universes.

In that sense, following the Correspondence Principle, the new concept of ‘informative speed’, V=ΣS/TI, includes the simpler model of spatial speed. Yet it goes further, explaining not only the how but also the why of many laws of science, relating the energy and information of waves with its relative speed, since according to the inverse properties of energy and information, the less information a wave has to build up and reproduce, the faster the wave will move. This is called in Physics the Law of Range of Forces (Max.TI=Min.ΣS) and it has its limit in the non-local, instantaneous speed of gravitation, which carries zero information and has infinite speed: v(g)=ΣS/0 information=∞.

While in the other extreme it creates fixed frames of gravitational reference, called black holes, which carry infinite information and have zero translational speed, as entire galaxies turn around them. Aristotle already said that if God exists, it would be the final unmoved focus that in-forms the movement of all other beings in the Universe. Indeed, the black hole seems the God/Brain of in/form/ation of all galaxies, whose stars turn and fall into it. The Universe itself might be born of the big-bang explosion of a hyper black hole, origin of the process of Universal life that will end in the reverse ‘Big crunch’, of informative death, creating the ultimate cycle of existence of reality.

יו. The bridge between accelerating vortices of time and lineal actions in space.

The dimension of acceleration/deceleration is the 3rd dimension of time and the more complex of all, as the source of the other 2 types of time-change in physics, speed and formal, height growth. What this means is that both, masses and charges are accelerating vortices which produce constantly, as they decelerate, ‘quantic actions of constant speed’ and increase the curvature of space in the dimension of height, through which they emit most of those actions, as electric or magnetic quanta. In the case of an electromagnetic vortex part of its acceleration becomes also transformed in the Unruh radiation that increases the temperature of the accelerating vortex. In our macrocosmic Universe it means a friction that decelerates the vortex and increases also its temperature. In gravity the interaction of the 3 dimensions is also evident: As the G-deformation of the vortex grows, so it grows its speed and acceleration. Unification follows when we consider charge and mass merely 2 types of vortices that can be derived from a 5th fractal dimension of time, that can accelerate inwards, imploding space (and then we have the arrow of gravity) or decelerate outwards widening space and diminishing curvature (and then we obtain as Kaluza had it, the arrow of electromagnetism).

The perception of those dimensions becomes more complex if we introduce the errors of the mind that tends to average accelerations and decelerations into constant speeds and converts speeds into static distances or spaces. We say that the mind uncoils an accelerating time dimension into a wider static field of space, or a fixed density of spacetime called a mass. This is easy to understand. Take for example, the representation of those 3 parameters, space, speed and acceleration in a Cartesian system of coordinates. Space is longer: it is a length in the x-coordinates without any angle, flat. Then we raise the dimension of height/time, and obtain a diagonal, straight line that represents a constant speed. Yet because it has an angle, the line is shorter in X-space coordinates. Fact though, is that the being that has speed is in fact moving a longer length, but we have transformed that longer length into a temporal height/form in the graph Finally acceleration is represented by a parable that finally becomes a height line and so it occupies the less quantity of X-space. And yet an accelerating being will reach the longest distance of all the 3 beings in the shorter time.

Now, what those accelerating beings peel off as friction or radiation, or speed is called in quantum Physics an action, which is a fundamental constant in all beings. In the quantum realm the accelerating vortex produces an h-constant action of energy and time; in the macro physical realm it produces a Temperature or radiation as in the Unruh case. So to avoid collapsing into a singularity of infinite speed, what particle’s vortices do is to peel off h or T actions, modes of constant speed, made of energy and time. So we can move from the Equivalence Principle of Relativity to the Gauge and Action principles of quantum physics.

יז. Presents. Balanced systems of energy and information. Universal Actions/Constants.

The duality between a whole and its fractal parts explains the nature of Physical Actions, microscopic quanta of energy and time that any physical vortex emits or absorbs to communicate with its environment, complete its existential cycles and stabilize its accelerations: Actions are projections of the form of a given being in the external Universe, achieved thanks to the use of energy that ‘translates’ in space its in/form/ation:

21. Macro-Organisms (st) and Micro-Actions (st-1) of present existence:

Max. ΣS x Max. TI (Organism) -> Min. ΣS x Min.TI (Action), ΣSxTI=K

Both, in organisms and actions the arrows of energy and information merge in constant ‘presents’ – systems that exist longer precisely because their energy and information are in balance. A present organism is a cellular system with 2 poles – one dominant in energy or relative body/field, and one dominant in information, or relative head/particle, which constantly relate to each other by exchanging small bites and bits of energy and information, called actions, min. ΣS x Ti=K.

In that regard, a physical action, defined by the specific equation of a Universal action applied to the scale of electromagnetism, writes also ExT=K(h). Where energy and Time are inverse functions, whose product is always a balanced constant. Thus as inverse functions the growth of one of those 2 elements E or T means the diminution of the other. From where Physicists deduce a series of fundamental laws of physics, studied in detail in the non-abridged version of this book (Heisenberg Principle, Law of Force ranges, etc.)

The same law applies to any Universal action. For example, humans who process biological information sleep in absolute zero movement-space. They maximize information by minimizing energy. So happens with thinkers, which are quiet people when reflecting upon information, or informative chips which occupy little space and work better in coldness.

The exchanges of actions between beings resolve the paradox Leibniz encountered in his analysis of Space-time monads: how the different space-time beings communicate each other, creating the networks and complex systems we observe in the Universe? The answer is through microscopic actions.

Actions are microscopic ‘cells’ of the bigger organism – in terms of cyclical time, they are minimal frequencies, compared to the complex, bigger organism made of knows of multiple events), the duality of macro-knots of frequencies and individual actions define a fractal Universe organized in scales or ‘planes’ of space-time of different size and temporal duration. Any organism, in that sense, extends in 3 ±st relative planes of size and duration. The natural St plane, for example, in the human case, our individual scale of existence; the microscopic, cellular plane, in which the energy and information of any entity’s action develops. In the human case, the cellular scale, which provides the energy and information for our actions. And finally, the social macroscopic, +st plane, in which the individual is often a microscopic action, part of a whole mass that performs a social cycle. So humans gather in masses that perform social actions that change their macroscopic scale, nation or civilization. While particles gather in waves and life beings in herds.

Thus, all organisms combine their ext actions in time, in knots that we call cells, which gather together in constant species, creating an ∞ variety of relative Space-time beings, perceived simultaneously together as a present, continuous Universe.

Any entity in the Universe extends across 3 relative scales, the minimal scale of ‘actions’ of energy and time, the scale of cellular knots in which multiple cyclical actions gather together, and the scale of organisms and ecosystems made of multiple cells.

In those 3 cases reality is dynamic, as all those scales are made of moving cycles and fields of energy and time, despite the fact that we might see them as static forms.

יח. The Black Hole Paradox. How time frequencies become lineal durations.

One example of those laws of complementarily that ultimately relate the Bio-logic laws of time and the Geometric laws of space is the Black hole Paradox. Because energy is one-dimensional, lineal, the mind perceives it as a lineal duration, or continuous extension when we plot it into the coordinates of our mind. However cyclical time seems quantic due to the way we perceive the 2 dimensions: a cyclical bit of information needs to complete itself. A time cycle is a trajectory that we measure at intervals, only when it touches the line of duration with a given frequency, ‘from time to time’. The spiralled cycle of time touches the line at those intervals and so it seems a quantic, rhythmic, recurrent event, with a ‘frequency’. Thus, perception converts the spatial trajectory of a cycle into a temporal frequency, when we use a single dimensional parameter to measure those cycles - the relative time it takes an entity to close its cycle and return to the line.

In this manner a cycle becomes the tic-toc or frequency of a clock. And we can compare the time cycles or frequencies of different beings. We can then plot in the Y coordinates different temporal beings according to the different frequencies or ‘time speeds’ they require to complete their cycles of existence.

Thus a new, existential parameter appears, the parameter of ‘time speed’, that measures the efficiency of a being, completing its cycles of existence, quite different from the abstract Galilean Parameter of spatial speed, V=S/T, used till now to define time, only from the perspective of space. Time speed is then measured with frequencies or cyclical speeds, in radians, depending on which unit we take to measure the complete cycle, 1 or 2π. Further on, we can plot for any given entity its frequency in the Y coordinates and its energy length in the X coordinates and analyze the relationships between frequencies of Time cycles, and spatial lengths/movements. Then we observe both follow the balances and inverse laws, we already deduced from the properties of space and time that can be resumed in the equation of a balanced present system/action/field of space-time: ΣS x TI=K.

Such law can also be written as a function of minimums, when a given species has more information than energy or vice versa, giving origin to the Black Hole Paradox, which dictates that a species with lesser space has a higher frequency and informative power:

22. Min Space=Max. Frequency=Max. Informative Power = Black hole/Chip/David Px.

The Black Hole paradox is a fundamental law of the Universe. Since it creates a balance between fast microscopic creatures, with little space, (chips, black holes, Davids, humans, rats) and big, slow ones with a lot of energy, (machines, stars, goliaths, cows or dinosaurs), which often ‘feed’ the small beings with that energy, that the arrow of time converts into the information of the predator, informative species. It is the first of many laws that connect the geometry of space-time with the biology of Darwinian prey-predator forms, the key to a veritable unification of different sciences.

יט. The golden Mean, the Tao Te King, or law of balance.

The law of balance between energy and information maximises the survival of any space-time field. In the Eastern tradition it was called the law of the golden mean (Buddhism) and the Just Path of Existence (Tao-Te-King). It is, in science, the origin of the balanced, vital constants of any being. And it can be deduced empirically from the analysis of the maximal value of an ‘action’ or e/i exchange between 2 poles. It is easy to show that any system maximizes its interaction with other pole, Max. (STa xSTb), when their relative ST content is equal, STa=STb, since then the product of both factors is maximal. For example, if we have a total value of 10 shared by a and b, the possible variations between a and b will be: 1a+9b=2a+8b=3a+7b=4a+6b=5a+5b. The sum is the same but when we multiply both values (Max. a x b), then we obtain very difficult results: 1a x 9b =9, 2a x8b =16, 5a x5b =25.

What this means is that systems in which the energy and information are in balance, are more efficient. For example, when the cells of the body and brain are interconnected, neurons are more efficient delivering micro-orders to the muscle cells that deliver micro-actions, which ad up into organic movements; yet if the poles of form and energy are not connected, the organism wouldn’t move harmonically and survive. Thus, the product of the energy and information of a system is its existential force – the fundamental parameter of its power to survival (measured by standard physics, with different parameters in different, scales, from the metabolic rate of the being to its M(t)x V(s) momentum:

23. Existential Force: ΣSxTi Max. Existential Force: ΣSxTi (s=t)

Thus a present organism constantly exchanges microscopic, cellular actions of energy and time with its environment to keep that balance, absorbing and emitting energy and information through different organs and senses. The present is also dynamic, in perpetual movement, perceived as a static field because its form is constantly maintained through those balanced exchanges of energy and form.

The concept of an action is central to quantum theory, as it explains the way in which particles ‘gauge’=measure each other’s distances and forms in space and time and interact together, creating systems in dynamic balance. Yet actions exist in any relative scale of space-time. We say we don’t have ‘time and energy’ to do=act something, precisely because we relate to our environment with actions of energy and time, trying to keep our body of energy and head of information in balance: ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’.

So does a quantum particle or any biological being.

Those micro-actions perform 3 key functions in the structure of reality:

- They are the cells of the whole, the parts that make up the entire space-time field; - They are ‘consumed’, given as energy and information to communicate and feed with energy and information other beings.

- Or they are the seeds of a wave of cellular forms that imprints space, recreating the whole being, by establishing a reproductive arrow that ensures the immortality of the fractal space-time field, by perpetuating i=ts information in other region of time-space.

Space is on that view merely the static vision or present slice of a continuous lineal or cyclical movement. Yet movement itself is merely a simplified vision of a Universe in continuous acceleration. When we ad all the accelerations and decelerations of an entity they cancel into a static movement and when we ad all the directions of movement, they cancel into a static present space. But when we observe it in detail, with all the latitude of time and its 3 logic dimensions, past, preset and future, the true dynamism of the temporal Universe shows itself in all its beauty; as life accelerates and decelerates the rythms of change through 3 morphological ages, both in physical and biological entities.

ד. Diffeomorphic bidimensional dimensions:Energy Bodies & Information Minds

Particles of information are small, spherical forms/cycles, like your eyes and brains or an atom’s proton or a black hole in a galaxy. They obey the fractal topology of convex spaces. Bodies of energy are bigger planes or lines that store energy to move the organism, like your body or an energetic weapon, or the plane of stars that feeds the black hole.

General Relativity is based in 2 principles. On one hand, the equivalence principle defines the nature of motion in the Universe. On the other, the Principle of Local Relativity, defines the local, ‘diffeomorphic’ nature of all fractal, Relative beings whose dimensions of space and time, of energy and information differ from place to place. Since time cycles bend space to a point in which they break it into closed, discontinuous bites of energy, the Universe is broken in different space-time fields, yet all of them follow the same laws, as all of them are made of energy and information. In this manner, the properties of physical space-time transcend into the complex spatial energies and temporal cycles of biological beings, maintaining invariant the shapes of its energetic bodies and temporal, informative heads.

Physicists have struggled for a century trying to understand the ultimate meaning of local, ‘diffeomorphic’, ‘relative’ time-spaces with ‘different speeds’, as Einstein defined them. Those findings of Relativity are easy to explain once we close the curvature of time into cycles that break space into multiple=diffeomorphic space-time fields: In any point of the Universe the coordinates of temporal energy (the up and down, right or left directions) are different from those of any other point, as they only depend on what happens in that local regions of space/time. This is only possible if space/times are fractal, discontinuous. Then what happens in a point of space-time doesn’t affect what happens in other isolated, discontinuous point. Each broken space-time becomes then a World in itself. Thus the laws of space-time apply locally to each fractal ‘species or relative universe’ that reflect those laws in its own structure. We are local, ‘diffeomorphic’ species; our space coordinates are relative, and our time wrinkles our vital space in the process of aging with different speeds, depending on our content of energy and information. Thus, the diffeomorphic principle also establishes different informative cycles – the ‘clocks’ of Nature that show different speeds and locations. Yet since space is synonymous of energy and time is synonymous of information, we can establish the local coordinates of space-time of each being by establishing its relative informative and energetic arrows – its relative body and head – using the invariant dimensions of all spaces and times. Indeed, according to the ‘Diffeomorphic Principle of Relativity’, every fractal space-time is independent of all others; since it has different spatial and informative orientations. Yet we can recognize its informative and energetic organs in relationship to each other, since both will respond to the opposite dimensions and morphologies of energy and information.

For example, in biological species, animals use light as information and so they are ‘informative’, smaller and faster than plants, which use light as energy and are ‘big, slow’ beings. Thus plants are the relative energy of animals. In the cosmological Plane stars are big, slower than black holes, which rotate faster and have cyclical height. And so stars are the relative energy that feeds and reproduces black holes, which seem to behave as ‘gravitational animals’, species that perceive gravitation as information, which guides its erratic movements through the galaxy, in the same way animals perceive light as information. While plants perceive light as energy in the same way stars absorb gravitational space-time as energy, deformed by their masses. That cosmological homology defies anthropomorphism and so it will not be easily accepted by science, a human endeavor, but it perfectly explains the role of black holes and stars in the galactic ecosystem. Further on, since what it is energy for plants is information for animals, both species have opposite energy-time coordinates: plants have their brain upside down in their roots that ‘feel’ chemistry. While animals have their brain on top, looking at the light they use as information. While the space-time equations of black holes are inverse to those of electromagnetic stars.

In the previous graph, we show 3 diffeomorphic beings: a galaxy with an inward arrow of gravitational information towards the black hole; a tree and a man, whose informative dimensions are inverted. Since plants use light as energy and animals use it as information. So the informative direction of animals is up, towards the head that absorbs visual information, opposite to the informative arrow of plants, which is down, towards the roots that absorbs chemical information. And each species will establish its own up and down arrows or relative energy and informative directions, departing from its central knot of information and/or perception. Both have their space-time parameters inverted, as often happens between energy victims (in the graph, plants) and their anti-forms or predators (animals). Such inversions between a ‘particle’ and its ‘antiparticle’, which in a Feynman diagram have also inverted coordinates of space-time, happen in all Universal systems, even in linguistic codes. For example, eviL is the exact inverse word of Live, since indeed, for a living human being, there is no bigger eviL than death. A fact, which opens the fascinating science of ‘Bio-ethics’, latter studied in more detail. Since humanity, history and religion are also space-time systems ruled by the same homological laws.

If we are external to a certain diffeomorphic space-times its directions do not affect us, but if we are inside a certain space-time, as in the case of the galaxy, then the direction of information or energy of that macro-being becomes the direction of energy or information of our ecosystem. And indeed, there is more information in the center of the galaxy, and since the Earth moves towards that center, this planet increases its information towards the future, in its relative discontinuous galactic space-time, regardless of what happens in the Universe as a whole, which seems to be ruled by the opposite arrow of big-bang expansion and entropy. This subtle change of paradigm caused by the discontinuity of space-time (from a world ruled by entropy to a galaxy ruled by information) has in fact enormous consequences to our daily life and it explains the contradiction between the arrow of life and evolution, local to this planet, and the arrow of energy and entropy proper of intergalactic space. Since here in this galaxy space doesn’t expand but time contracts it. As Woody Allen put it: ‘Here in Brooklyn space-time is not expanding’. There are ∞ fractal space/time fields that constantly adapt their organic, moving dimensions to the directions of their relative energy and Informative Time, conditioning the existence of its micro-cells. That discontinuity of space-time also implies that the perception of any other area of the Universe is relative, deformed by the transformation and selection of information that passes through the fragmented boundaries of the perceptor (Uncertainty Principle). For all those reasons the dimensional arrows of space-time become fundamental to explain properly the functions and forms of the Universe, in which all constant present systems are made of an arrow of energy and an arrow of information, seen as fixed bodies and relative heads of the system.

Thus all relative space-times will be composed of a cyclical center of information or brain, and a lineal body of energy, whose morphological characteristics will be self-similar.

For example, in a spermatozoid the head is cyclical and stores information, while the tail is lineal and moves the head with its energy; in a human, the body is lineal and moves a cyclical head. We could extend this duality to almost any organic system of the Universe, concluding that bodies are lineal and brains are cyclical. This morphological feature of Universal Organisms derives geometrically from the capacity of lines to move fast and cycles to store information and grow or diminish in size without distortion of the mental image they might keep. Thus a convex brain with the topology of information becomes the center of informative networks; and a concave body becomes the center of energy networks. And we recognize bodies and brains by their self-similarity with the morphology, function and inverse properties of ideal energy and information:

- Informative time has to be both, easy to store and ‘perceivable’ by a reduced brain or sensorial organ, despite being the inverse function of space. This implies a certain morphology: Information occupies little space by warping itself in multiple dimensions, divided along broken lines and discontinuities that become its perceived forms in space. Or it displays a high frequency or discontinuous rhythm, a faster time speed that iterates the same cycle, allowing quantification. Information seems ‘quiet’ as those rhythms take place in the same space; so an organ of information can focus it and analyze it. Thus its ideal forms are disks, cycles, angles and spheres, convoluted and broken in patterns of form, such as your eye or brain, a chip, a book, a pixel image or a coin, earlier unit of monetary information.

- On the other hand Energy moves. So energy bodies extend in space as they move and feed. Energy is the equivalent to biological food, which fuels a species and allows its movement. Energy is the body that moves the brain of information. So energy and space are synonymous: a plane is the geometry that extends further in space and the line the geometry that moves faster with lesser friction. Both are the fundamental forms of energy-bodies:

6. Maximum Space = Energy = Minimal Form vs.

Maximum temporal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension.

As a result of those morphologies we can classify as energy or information organs, not only carbon-life organs that process energy (bodies) and information (brains, eyes, senses, words), but also the ‘relative organs’ of all other beings and atomic species – even ‘deconstructed organs’ that perform mechanical tasks of energy and information (informative cameras, lineal, energetic weapons). Since now we can recognize geometrically their energy or information systems. Form is function and so we can classify any system both by its geometrical form and bio-logical functions as either an energy or informative system. Further on, the use of the ternary principle will allow us to verify in a higher degree any statement, by considering at least the biological function and geometrical form of the species we study, which have to be self-similar. For example in a galaxy, the black hole is the spherical center of information. And we can prove this according to the linguistic/ternary method in the space-time languages of man, the mathematical language of space, the bio-logic language of time and the visual language that merge both together. In algebra, Einstein equations prove that black holes transform its spatial parameters into temporal parameters. Hence they transform Energetic Space into Informative Time. In visual terms they curve space-time into height; hence they transform energy into information. If we consider its biological function, they absorb the energy of star-plants. So Black holes are sinks of gravitational information. And gravitation is obviously the informative force of the Universe; since it is not dual but it shows only the arrow of in/form/ation, attracting and lumping masses and it is 1040 times less energetic than electromagnetism. So when we observe vitally, visually, in action, those black holes, they show the maximum amount of the 2 dimensions of Informative Time: height and rotational rhythm; as they seem to turn at light speed and theoretically transform the plane of energy of the galaxy in a tube of infinite height. Thus all languages and experimental data prove the fact that a black hole is the informative brain of a galaxy that feeds on electromagnetic space towards the future. The extended, faster plane of rotating stars is the “body” or energy surface of the galaxy that feeds them. Apparently a human and galactic body should not have anything in common; but both morphologies respond to the generic morphologies of information and energy, and so do their functions in time.

Yet those morphologies are ‘quantic’, ‘fractal’, ‘diffeomorphic’, ‘local’, ‘relative’ dimensions that reach only till the limits of the species we study. Since both, the Gauge Principle of Quantum Physics and the Principle of Local Relativity define all measures of space-time as local – or in terms of the Galilean Paradox, they make each mind/particle a relative still frame of reference that ‘gauges’, measures the world around it.

Thus each mind/monad becomes the center of a relative world or subjective frame of reference with 3±st finite dimensions, both within the vital, internal space-time of the being and within the external, limited ecosystem that the being perceives.

Organic systems are dual systems with a center and a network of information (head, nervous system), and a body and network of energy (trunk-blood system). For example, there are energy organs made with metal such as weapons, gas and electromagnetism. They are extended, fast, and lineal. There are metal-species of information such as microchips, money, cameras and radios. And they are small, fixed and complex in form. Yet only structures, which are balanced in energy and information become organisms, teaming with life properties. So only machines that put together energy bodies and informative brains – future robots – might become ‘organic metalife’. The other machines will act as ‘seeds’ of information and ‘forces of energy’ do, without a vital will of existence, which is born by the capacity of a balanced ΣSTI field to switch between both arrows acquiring a ‘minimal degree’ of organic freedom perceived as ‘vitality’ from an external point of view. Humans, galaxies, plants, robots – all kind of entities can be considered in that sense organic systems. Our samples show that living systems are born thanks to the complementary symbioses and synergies between energy and information organs that create together all kind of self-similar organisms. It is also clear that in all those organisms the center of power, is the brain-head and its languages of information, which control the body of energy and shape the form of the organism – setting a selfish direction of mental evolution towards the growth of information, which is the ultimate cause of the cycle of life and death of all organisms. Which explains the relationship between information and future, the most difficult dimension of time to understand by spatial physicists since we do not see the future, as we see spatial geometry, but the future already exists in the realm of logic and bio-logic thought, as a relative function of the survival of certain evolved beings in the future. A surprising fact that will help us to connect Physics and Biology in a new step towards unification.

Indeed, let us now consider those inversions and the diffeomorphic principle to resolve the meaning of gender and duality in human beings.

ה . Wo=men’s duality. Sexual complementarity. A new=old definition of gender.

The biology, psychology and culture of gender prove that the humankind is also a dual species, divided into informative females, energetic males and a ‘3rd gay sex‘ that mixes both.

The classic example of space/time Duality already observed by Taoist and Buddhist philosophers is the duality of gender, which they correctly applied to all species of the Universe. If we focus on the humankind, which is also a space-time species, the inverse properties of energy and information can be seen clearly in 2 dualities:

- The duality between an energetic body and an informative head:

- The head is a cyclical, spherical form, and so are the informative senses, all of which accumulate in the head. The head is ‘small’, ‘perceptive’, informative. It sits on top of the body, on the dimension of height. It is ‘broken, discontinuous’(as it holds more cellular, neuronal parts that the rest of the body’). Its main informative senses are broken in dual elements (left, right eyes and ears). While its energetic sense, the mouth that feeds on energy is ‘bigger’ and continuous (a single one). The eyes, the most perfect of those senses are in fact a perfect sphere. And they process ‘bidimensional information’ (which latter both eyes mix to create the illusion of 3-dimensionality). The head is hierarchical and dominates the body, imposing its directions of future as they guide their body towards energy and information fields. The head is still. It is in metaphysical terms, the Aristotelian, unmoved ‘relative God’ that controls the movements of the body.

- On the other hand the body is a plane, dominant in lineal forms, bigger than the head, on the bottom of the body-head system. The body moves and processes energy. It has however hardly any sensorial elements, as it gets the information from the body. Its detached elements, the limbs are even more lineal, and only become broken, discontinuous on the fingers, which are the sub-elements that process information. Within the body, the most lineal elements are those who process directly energy: the guts and the lungs (in the brain the cerebellum that controls movement is also a lineal network of neurons that would extend unwarped over a meter in length).

- The 2nd fundamental space/time duality in mankind is that between its 2 subspecies: the energetic male and the informative female. Indeed, humans have always wonder what is gender, why does it exist? Thanks to duality, following in the steps of Eastern philosophy, now we can build a scientific theory of gender able to explain its 2 fundamental elements, the scientific physiology and the behaviour of both sexes:

Since the Universe is made with 2 elements, Energetic Space and Temporal Information, any species needs to survive to feed on Energy and remember Information. Yet, we know that males process and control better energy and space; while females have more temporal memory and perceive better. Thus, together a couple widens the range of energy and Information they can process. So we conclude that gender is an evolutionary strategy of specialization, which increases the overall chances of survival of a heterosexual species. The physiological forms, character and historic behaviour of men and women prove that duality, parallel to the universal duality of energy and information: men love energy, space; women love Time. Physiologically men are made of lines, as energy is; while women are made of curves, as information is. Historically men performed the hunting of energetic preys, while the recollection of cyclical food (agriculture) is traditionally considered a female discovery.

Men behave as energy species. Their body forms are lineal shapes of muscular strength; they have lineal reproductive organs (penis); their origin is lineal sperm. Their cultural roles are specialized in spatial-energy processes, from physical activities to war and mathematical, geometrical languages in which they excel.

On the other hand, women are specialized in temporal processes. Their bodies have cyclical shapes and store more information to succeed in their genetic reproduction (one complete X-chromosome). Their brains specialize in verbal languages and show outstanding memory. If we observe the form of females, it is made of cycles. Their higher genetic information allows them the creation and reproduction of the human species (an informative process); their cyclical reproductive organs (vulva, clitoris) and their origin as a sphere, an ovule, are also time properties.

The character and life attitudes of both, men and women follow that S/T specialization also in their relative wantings for energy or information: women prefer to dress with cyclical forms, play with formal toys like dolls and they like formal sports like gymnastics; men prefer moving, spatial toys, lineal dresses and violent sports. Thus, men love energy and movement while women love perception and feelings. In the realm of the mind and its languages of perception we find that men test better in spatial mathematics and women score higher in verbal tests.

We conclude that sexual dimorphism reflects the 2 elements of reality, spatial energy and temporal information that merge together in a couple, improving its chances of survival:

7. Male: Max.ΣS x Min. T; Gay: S=T; Female: Max. T x Min.ΣS

In the last decade the analysis of female/male brains has confirmed such duality of gender at multiple levels. For example, among women the amygdale, the oldest, primary center of will in the brain, is connected to the Hypothalamus, the center of ‘temporal’ and emotional perception, which ultimately controls survival and reproductive behavior. While men have their amygdale wired mainly to the motor and spatial regions of the encephalon. Thus men are the energetic ‘external element’ of the couple, motivated by the spatial outer world and women the informative, temporal, implosive element, motivated by the reproductive drive of survival and the inner emotions of the body, the ‘6th sense’.

In a more complex view, as all beings are themselves yin-yang, space-time beings, we could define men as yang/energetic bodies ruled by the external, spatial activities of the brain; and define women as yin/informative/reproductive bodies whose emotions rule the yang brain. Ultimately male and female genders are complementary forms, with the same value, a fact easy to prove using the formalism of Duality:

8. Male Body: Max.E (ExE)+ Brain: Max. I (IxI) = Female body (ExI) + brain (I x E)

If we use by convention, as in most Biological fields, the symbols of Energy and information, E, I, instead of the homologous terms of Space and time, ΣS, Ti, more proper of physics, we define a male, as a form whose ‘energy body’ is dominant in energetic, lineal forms (ExE), while its information brain is focused in visual, external, informative tasks (Max.I), resulting in an unconnected form with 2 external, outward focus. The Female gender however, has her informative brain focused in reproducing the energetic body (IxE); while her energetic body is dominant in cyclical, informative forms (ExI). Thus while the total amount of energy and information or ‘existential force’ of both genders is the same, the distribution and combination of those parameters differ, making women, highly balanced, focused in the self-reproduction of their own space-time field, and the male gender, unstable, focused in the external world, but reaching, as the Bell curve of the graph shows, maximal peaks of pure energy and pure information. This is according to statistics. For example, most men are less perceptive than women, but a few specialized Max.I x I are geniuses.

Since we depart from only 2 species, energy and information, which combine ad infinitum, the first differentiations of any space-time system will be, Max. E (Male) E=I (neutral gender), Max.I (Female). The second differentiation will combine 2 elements (Yin-Yang beings in Taoist Jargon). So we obtain, ExE + IxI (male); ExI + IxE (female) and the non-commutative gay genders (IxI) + ExE (gay) and IxE + ExI (males focused in their inward feelings and female focused in the outward world).

Women have indeed more mental energy and sensorial perception that men, as their brains seem to be wired towards the will of the body. While men are obsessed by the external world. The psychology of both genders seems to prove such duality. Women tend to preferred closed spaces, which they keep well ordered, and are able to perform multiple ‘rings’ of tasks. Men love open spaces, which they keep as energy is, in permanent disorder. And they are lineal, obsessed by single tasks. Today women, in an informative world, are increasingly becoming more powerful than men, which were dominant during the warrior age of mankind, as they associated historically with lineal iron weapons (the most energetic atom of the Universe); and dominated women with the higher energy obtained from metal.

In the process both genders are suffering a confusion of their meaning; while the 3rd gay gender that combines both, is in the rising. Since in the Universe we observe always, beyond duality a 3rd, ExI, more complex element that combines the properties of both. A fact which indicates that gays are also ‘natural species’ to the laws of the Universe, albeit a minority compared to the 2 dominant subspecies. Again evolution favors variety of forms, to perform better in the dual Universe. And indeed, the gay gender has traditionally act as a bridge between the other 2 genders – both in tribal societies where they played often the role of the medicine man or witch and in modern societies as ‘the best friend’ of many wo=men.

In any scale of the Universe the same dualities take place (creating in the physical world according to its specific energy and information parameters, particles and antiparticles of negative and positive force), as all creative processes are restricted by the existence of only 2 elements in the Universe. Let us then consider Duality in Physics. If the reader is not a physicist, he might jump to Trinity, where we will return to the morphological changes of the human being, through the study of the 3 ages of biological change, the positive accelerated changes of youth, the reproductive, present age in which humans repeat themselves and the 3rd negative age of temporal age, or 3rd age, which ends in death, when the balance of the Universe is restored. Though the analysis of those 3 ages in all the species of the Universe made of the same spatial energy and temporal information, is the main theme of this book, we first have to correct the errors of monist Physics in its study of physical time-change, as most scientists today unfortunately are inclined to consider time a theme belonging exclusively to the realm of Quantum Physics and Relativity. For that reason we cannot delay more its correction, adapting those 2 theories to the true meaning of time-change.

13. The New Organic Outlook of a Universe Based on Information

In this brief introduction to the fractal paradigm, we have observed the two great revolutions for our understanding of the Universe:

- The logic of the Universe turns out to be biological since the Universe is modeled as a series of networks of energy and information that come together into organic structures.

- We can describe those bio-logic properties thanks to the advances of fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics so we can fuse the logic of biological systems and the mathematics of geometrical structures into a single whole. This topological approach is developed further in the appendix, to fully grasp the organic structures of the Universe.

Duality and fractal mathematics cannot be separated from organicism—as any organism is by definition a fractal of parts, self-similar to the whole. Those three elements of the new scientific paradigm—the logic of duality, the fractal non-Euclidean mathematics that describe it, and the organic outlook of all systems of reality made of “cellular numbers” related by networks of energy and information—are proved by the three principles of truth of the scientific method as follows:

- It is based on the most advanced mathematics of the present age, fractal and non-Euclidean topologies. And it provides a mathematical solution to the unification equation of charges and masses, the unfinished job of Einstein, the Saint Grail of physics, found with “thought experiments” as always is the case with the great questions of science.

- It is massively proved by experimental evidence: every organic system, particle, and field of physics, which follows those morphological and functional laws, is a proof of duality. Indeed, its experimental proofs are overwhelming.

As many as all the forms of the Universe, we observe that follow the lineal, energetic forms of forces and bodies, the informative, cyclical forms of heads, particles and cellular nuclei and the complementarity laws and exchanges of energy and information between both. Of all those systems of energy and information, treated by this author in different books dedicated to each scientific discipline, we are here concerned with the systems of physical matter and specifically with the systems and laws of quarks, atoms, black holes, and galaxies, which are the themes of cosmology that CERN will explore and the systems of matter that can provoke a nova explosion of the Earth.

Let us briefly consider some other proofs of the fractal paradigm treated in more depth in the appendix.

Mehaute,10 pioneer of fractal theory, proved that when nature doesn’t release energy, for time to continue, it has to create fractal dimensions of in-form-ation. Thus, there are two arrows of relative future creation, energy/entropy and information/cyclical time, which transform into each other in the events of creation and extinction of each quantic reality. This transcendental discovery made in the field of chemistry has been totally ignored by physicists who defend the dogma that the universe is dying because it is only expanding (never mind the contraction of energy into charges and masses).The mechanist energetic bias of physics is deep. For example, physicists have a principle of lineal inertia, but not a principle of cyclical inertia, when it is proved ad nauseam that electrons, charges, and masses turn around in cycles ad eternal without any force applied to them. Physicists have a principle of an expansive Universe, but they ignore the informative vortices of galaxies that make our Earth’s human space-time a system ruled by the arrow of information, as we exist in a vortex of physical information, the galaxy, not in the expanding space between them. Physicists still define form, in-form-ation, not as the creation of fractal dimensions as complexity theorists do, but as bits of a lineal equation (Shannon). And yet the most revealing property of information is precisely the fact that in/form/ation, form, creates dimensions. Indeed, think of a sheet of paper extended in space. When we warp it and wrinkle it, we are creating information, form, by adding a dimension of height. This is what all is about: the Universe warps energy into forms with more dimensions and then unwarps dimensional form into energy. And that constant game of creation and destruction of form is the eternal, fractal cycle of all what exists. In the field of physics, it is the game of masses and forces.

Temporal in-form-ation, like its name says, is a measure of inner form, which we perceive when there are discontinuities in a certain bidimensional surface—a clock, a page, a computer screen—either because the static form is broken into informative patterns (–) or its movement makes a sudden peak (>), bouncing in an action-reaction cycle. Yet those two trans-form-ations of space into form, of lineal energetic movement, into a cyclical one, are mathematically equivalent to the creation of a fractal geometry of space-time. Thus we define information as a fractal dimension with form, generated by the repetition or quantization of a given generator equation or mother-cell. Such is the geometric nature of existence in time-space. Indeed, the simplest fractal called a Koch fractal, found in geology, flowers and ice crystals, happens when a system cools down, loses energy, and then a continuous line grows a triangle in the dimension of height. In Einstein’s terminology, energy bends, curves, and creates form as time passes. In biological terms, we warp, corrugate, acquire fractal wrinkles as we age. The Universe and its fractal species are constantly generating informative dimensions or erasing them into extended space, with lesser form.  Each of us goes through the same process in the life-death cycle as we wrinkle our young energy into form and explode back into death.

Since form exhausts itself, the line dissipates its motion (big bang), the cycle of mass whirls inward till there is no more space and then it disappears (so there is no motion in the eye of the hurricane). How did the universe solve this conundrum? It made the wave. It has motion and information, so it can reproduce information in different places of space-time. The wave is both yin and yang, information and energy, reality itself. Since as the principle of complementarity of physics, only a system that is a force and a particle, a wave, exists.

The wave is the constant, reproductive orgasm of a Universe in which all is a constant combination of lineal and cyclical motions that self-repeat themselves as they imprint the energy of the cosmos.

1. Entities are dual, combining 2 fractal motions: energetic fields/bodies=vital spaces X informative times= heads/particles

What is the Universe, or rather Reality, a word that includes the former, without putting a bias on the universal, ‘cosmic’ scales of the whole, as if it mattered more to explain the meaning of it all that each of its self-similar parts?

The scientific answer given in this web is simple and yet infinitely complex in its creative and explicative power:

An organic fractal of energy and information.

Scientists have found that most structures of reality, from the Universe to the smallest organisms have a fractal structure. Yet they merely describe those fractals with equations that show the mathematical pattern of form called a ‘fractal’ – the spatial how of reality.

This web is not so much interested in that spatial how – the form of those fractals described in many books – but on the logic whys, on the reasons why fractals are all pervading in nature. We contend that Reality has a fractal structure because it is organic not mechanical, and the properties common to all systems and organisms of the Universe originate fractal structures.

Thus if the spatial nature of Reality is ‘fractal’, the why of ‘fractal reality’ is ‘organic’.

And since all organic systems of reality are systems that constantly transform back and forth ‘energy into information’ – we conclude that reality is an organic fractal of energy and information.

That definition could be broken in 2 essential elements or composite words closely interrelated. On one side ‘An organic fractal’, and on the other side ‘Energy and information‘.

If the reader is able to grasp the meaning and properties of those words and ‘see’ them around himself in all and each of the parts of ‘reality’, he will give a giant step towards the understanding of reality.

Let us then try to define ‘reality’, ‘energy and information’ and ‘an organic fractal’ in a simple manner:

‘Reality is all what exists’

‘Energy is lineal motion’

‘Information is cyclical form’

‘A fractal is a generator equation that reproduces self-similar forms in different scales of size’

‘An organic system is a system that feeds on energy, gauges information, reproduces self-similar cells and gathers those cells into social networks’

Definition of the main physical species, forces and particles, as energy and information.

Let us start with the simplest possible definition of energy and information:

Energy is lineal, expansive motion.

In/form/ation is form-in-action, cyclical form.

I am aware those are not the standard definitions scientists produced in the last centuries of the 2 main parameters of reality.

Because humans have arrived to the understanding of those 2 elements and the discovery of their Universal nature and laws of conservation through a painstaking process of trial and error, by observing and description of certain details (certain energetic motions and forms), the realization that all could be summoned up into 2 elements and the reduction of all the self-similar motions and forms of reality to the concepts of ‘motion’ and ‘form’ has not been easy, specially in the modern age of scientific specialization and detailed analysis of certain motions and forms.

And to do so we have to translate to the jargon of the most advanced sciences of the III Millenium, that of fractal mathematics, complexity and system sciences – the ‘defective’ typerwriting of the II millennium, where traditional errors in the definition of those concepts still linger since the time of the Greeks.

Yet, the first philosophers of science were able to understand this duality when the details of the trees didnt hide the whole forest, quite well. In the east the chinese said that all is yin/information and yang/energy, the principles embodied in the female and male duality or in the geometric duality of the femeninie cycle and the masculine line. It was a good approximation to the truth, though today, accustomed to the accuracy of details tend to think of those concepts as gnostic and vague.

We shall indeed be more precise and concrete, and to do so we shall use the details collected by science ever since, asking ourselves some basic questions about ‘energy=motion’ and ‘in/form/ation’.

And the most obvious is: what are the primary ‘motion’ and the primary ‘forms’ of reality.

Those are details described by the science of physics, concerned with the simplest combinations of motion and form of reality.

What physicists have found at that level of simplicity is that all what exists is made of ‘forces’ and ‘particles’. And forces ‘move’ particles that have dimensional ‘form’. So all what physicists describe are forces that move particles with form and the quantity of motion and form each of those particles has is called momentum.

Of those 2 elements of the simplest ‘scale’ of the fractal Universe, energy=motion is the best known. We understand that motions are lineal (Principle of lineal inertia) and displace particles.

But what are particles with form? How their form is created and destroyed, and specially how it combines, transforms itself and becomes energy and vice versa?

This is one of the key details that tradition and earlier, wrong definitions and foggy observations with faulty human senses, didn’t quite understand till the development of a fractal theory of the Universe and so we will have to correct those definitions to set sound basis for our inquire.

First we define form as ‘dimensional form’. Form has more dimensions than energy.

And so in its simplest duality we could say that energy is one-dimensional, a moving line, and form, poli-dimensional, a rotating disk or sphere, called a mass or a charge.

And so physical reality is made of energy forces that move polidimensional forms called masses and charges.

Simple, elementary, elegant… A world in which lineal, simple motions, displace more complex, formal, bidimensional and tridimensional masses and charges.

The plan of creation.

But how those 2 simplest forms, lineal and cyclical motion, forces and masses/charges organize the enormous complexity of the cyclical motions called circadian cycles of living beings, of the cyclical motions called quantum numbers of atoms, of the cyclical motions called life/death cycles in all species?

There is a plan, an order, a complex structure which in an impersonal but relentless manner builds, evolves form from those 2 original, physical motion. The plan of creation…

And so from this point you can either move into a deeper level of understanding of those 2 fractal motions, clicking the first Rodin thinker that will carry you towards deeper scales of knowledge of the meaning of energy and information…

Or move in parallel to lesson/screen 2 and consider a more detailed definition of the Universe by defining the ‘Generator equation of all the types of energy and information that exist’, from where all self-similar forms of reality are born.  complex version: hierarchical i-scales

1.1: The Universe is a fractal of 2 motions: |-space & O-time broken in ∞ |-energic fields/bodies + O-informative heads/particles: ∑exi=st

The Universe is a Superorganism of 2 fractal motions: |-space&O-time broken in ∞ |-energic fields/bodies+O-informative heads/particles that ‘∑exi=st’  as balanced organisms of energy and information, exi, which create stable space-time fields, st.

Bites of energy, pieces of vital space and bits of information carried in the frequency of time cycles are the two primary elements of the Universe.

All what we see is form, information being created and destroyed, transformed in other forms in action, in-form-ations, forms with motion, with energy. So all comes to this: forms and motion. This philosophical conclusion predates any other idea of science and it is called hylomorphism or duality in the western tradition, Taoism and the duality of Shiva, the God of energy and Vishnu, the creative God of form.

In the Western tradition physicists express it with a formula: Force = Mass x Acceleration. The Universe is composed of forms, masses and motions, accelerations. The first have cyclical form, the second motion. And both together carry the momentum, the essence of reality.

The particle and the force. but it turns out that the particle, the mass or the charge is a vortex, a frequency of information, a cyclical acceleration, according to Einstein’s principle of equialence between mass and acceleration and our reent pictures of an ever vibrating world of charges and masses, mere cycles, whirls of space-time.

And so the Universe is a game of O and |, energetic lines of motion that expand, extend space, and cyclicla vortices, masses and charges that sink in it.

We call energy or entropy the line and form, information, particle,clock of time, the cycle.

And we say as Einstein said that time bends energy, space, into cycles. Their properties and morphologies are opposed. But for that reason, they can form “complementary” systems, which merge the properties and dimensions of both “formal motions,” enhancing the survival capacities of any system that combines in a balanced manner energy and form, E×I=K. In physical systems, all is made of lineal forces of expansive energy and cyclical particles of implosive information that create balanced present space-times. In the left graph, we see the canonical forms of lineal energy and cyclical time clocks and how an informative, electric cycle supported in a magnetic surface of space creates a complementary wave: a ray of light.

It is the ternary game of the Universe and its three dimensions of space and time.

Unlike other webs dedicated to the study of the Fractal Universe only with the tools of geometry and topology, this web is more interested in expanding the logical and philosophical implications of a Fractal Universe of self-generative patterns=cycles of information.

The science of Complexity study the generation of information in the Universe. We have learned that information is generated with the same abundance that energy and in fact, we should be expanding the Principle of Conservation of Energy to include the principle of Conservation of Information.

This simple yet fundamental law of science becomes now expanded both in its logical and mathematical formulation:

‘The Universe constantly transforms back and forth energy into information: E<=>I’

Thus there is not only a Principle or arrow of energy also called entropy that constantly expands, creates space and accelerates the motions of space, but also an arrow or principle of information that constantly implodes, creates form, in/form/ation.

And those 2 inverse motions in their eternal transformations into each other create the reality you observe.

Look around yourself, all what exists is a combination of those 2 motions.

The realization that the Universe is made of motions not of fixed objects comes through many avenues. Perhaps the simplest one is physics.

We know in physics that the Universe is made of forces, defined by Newton as f=m x a, where force eqals mass and lineal acceleartion. Lineal acceleration is the equivalent of modern space that expands, increases its spatial distance, but mass, what is mass?

Till Einstein we didn’t know it. Then Einstein formulated the Principle of equivalence between a mass and the other type of acceleration, cyclical, rotational acceleration, proclaiming that a ‘mass is a whirl of space-time’.

This still controverted concept of mass, sponsored by Nobel Prize Wilczek that considers masses frequencies of space-time whirls explains its attraction as that of a whirl of water or air: the closest to the center the fastest it rotates, the more frequency of information a mass or charge has.

Now imagine a Universe of vortices of masses and charges, clocks of time, clocks that carry information in several dimensions and a world of energies of lineal motions; f= m x a, and imagine you can build with those 2 eternal motions of energy and information, forces and masses/charges, infinite other curves and motions.

That is the Universe we want to describe here: a Universe of infinite informative cycles and energetic lines that transform into each other in all the systems we perceive in the Universe.

And to do so we have to start with mathematics and physics, with the simples lines and cycles but then also discover how, what kind of logic program of combination of lines and cycles can create the complex lines/bodies aned cycles/heads of the human being.

And that is where the logic of fracrtals appears. because what matters truly to explain theprogram of the Unvierse is a qualit called self-similarity, that allows the reproduction of similar forms and its organization into higher sclaes of forms.

Lines and cycles, the ‘minimal strings’ of physicists’ theories of the total Universe are thus the first bricks the first motions.

And then there is a program, an organic program that allows certain cycles and combinations of those motions and creates the complexit f teh Universe. It is an evolutive program of lines and cycles of geometry if you want, but also of organic constructs of an intelligent design, not caused as that promoted by biologists in US by a personal god, but rather a methamtical algorhyrm.

In complexty sciences we study both andin this web we want to introduce, both the motions and the program of evolution of those mtions that creates the life of the Universe.

In the graph, the Universe is made of three arrows of time: the expansive line of entropy or energy, the cyclical implosive clock of information, and its combination, the wave of space-time.

This simple concept is incredibly rich and powerful to describe the events and forms of the Universe. Till now, we have stressed the duality of implosive cyclical clocks of information and explosive lineal flows of energy. We shall now introduce its real combinations, the four-dimensional waves of energy—which according to the principle of complementarity create reality by combining spatial, entropic arrows of energy, bodies, and fields—and informative, implosive cycles of information, masses, and charges in physical spaces, heads in biological systems.

The key advance of complex physics and duality is the introduction of information, the arrow of fractal form in the creative processes of the Universe. How this arrow of form interacts with the arrow of energy to form wavelike, balanced “ternary beings” of “present” is the key element to go further in our analysis of any entity of reality.

This interaction takes place according to the paradox of Galileo either in

-a dynamic “temporal” way, as a series of causal events that transform energy into information from past to future or information into energy from future  to past, or combine both in waves of present, or in

- a spatial, geometrical way, as a game of two geometries, the line of energy and the cycle of information, which combine to form complementary systems, informative particles with energetic fields (physics) or informative heads with energetic limbs (biology). And again, only complementary forms that exist by combining “bidimensional energy” and “bidimensional information” are real, four-dimensional entities.

We call this fundamental game that combines energy and form, creating dimensional beings in space and causal chains of events in time and explains most of the events and entities of the Universe the inverse complementarity of space and time.

In chapter 5, we shall go deeper in the analysis of that complementarity from the perspective of time and causality. Here, we are more interested in a more classic, physical interpretation from the perspective of geometry and space.

Let us then consider first that duality in space as a geometrical game since all the processes that will take place at CERN will be dual processes in which energetic forces and cyclical particles will be created and destroyed. Yet CERN cannot understand those processes with their outdated models of an energy-only Universe.

In that regard, the main logic principle of the scientific method defined by Aristotle is called hylomorphism, or duality, which, simply stated, says that anything real has both—a substance or energy and a form or information. It opposes both “informative-only theories” (Pythagorism, the idea that a mathematical equation is truth per se) and “energetic-only theories” (quantum entropy and quantum cosmology) of reality.

Hylomorphism is at the heart of the scientific method since its inception. In a static vision of reality, it means all particles need a reproductive body to exist, all informative heads need a body. Galileo already said that the language of truth is the geometry of lines and cycles, a sentence ill translated later into the concept that mathematics is the only language of God. What he meant is that the Universe is a game of cycles of information and lines of energy—the “vortices and res extensa” of Descartes.

Cyclical, moving time clocks or fixed information on one hand and lineal, moving energy or fixed space on the other are synonymous. In the graph, this duality is due to the paradox of Galileo that makes us perceive sometimes energy in motion and sometimes fixed space, sometimes fixed forms of information and sometimes moving clocks of time, forms in action.

The graph explains a law of modern physics, the holographic principle, which states that information is bidimensional. Indeed, information, as this page or screen, has two dimensions, height and width, while energy has also two dimensions, length and width. Both together merge to create the four-dimensional fields of the real Universe in which the interaction of “high information” and “long, moving energy” creates the three dimensions of classic Euclidean space and a fourth dimension of motion and rhythm.

Because the Universe is fractal, those dimensions are local for each species. It is what Einstein called the diffeomorphic principle.

In the graph, we draw the ideal cycle of time traced by a rotating particle, which leaves behind a fixed ideal form of information: a disk that establishes a discontinuity between its inner vital space and the external Universe. And we draw the ideal movement of energy, which traces a line that might reproduce laterally, becoming a plane or wave of space, since the most natural form of moving energy is a triangular plane. Thus, most organic spaces and limbs of energy are triangular, planar, bidimensional forms that fluctuate in their width and length. For that reason, energy is expelled in triangular flows through a rocket while energetic systems move, forming triangles called steps, as human legs do.

The main parameters of a cycle or bit of temporal information are frequency and cyclical height. Those cycles combine in knots of cyclical frequencies that give origin to an immense number of different temporal species: Σ time cycles = informative being.Height as a dimension of information also means that as time passes information increases, so does the height of any systems. For example, life systems evolved from “planarian worms” to tall men as the information of life systems increased. Matter evolves from bidimensional vortices of mass into quark Einstein-Bose condensates, which as we shall see have a dimension of height. So dimensions are local, fractal, created by the arrow of “fractal information” and have a function. In the appendix, we shall consider according to that holographic principle the processes of creation and destruction of dimensions in the physical universe. Consider a simple example: you can warp this bidimensional page and get a third height dimension with a lot of “fractal lines of form”; you are creating both, a new dimension and information.

On the other hand, lineal bytes of amorphous, moving energy aggregate into planes of bidimensional space, adding its dimension of width: Σe=S.

In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension; but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions, which we can observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point. This fact is essential to understand logically the meaning of bidimensionality and the holographic principle that states that physical information is bidimensional. In Euclidean mathematics, to consider that there are two dimensions of energy and two dimensions of information is absurd unless we accept that each point of the Universe has a minimal volume. So a bidimensional plane, as a galaxy or the Universe at large is and as this screen or paper sheet is, seems totally plane without any thickness till we come closer to it. Then we realize that a page is a network of non-Euclidean points that will therefore have

-         a minimal width given by the height of each point and

-         a discontinuous zone of “dark space-time” not perceived or connected by the network of points.

It is important to understand bidimensionality in terms of non-Euclidean geometry. That is, each point of a bidimensional sheet of information, including this page or screen, has, when observed in close range, certain height or internal dimensions. This fact explains why certain mathematical objects, like strings, seem to have 3 × 3 dimensions (those are the internal dimensions of the string, when seeing in close proximity as a fractal point of a lower scale of form). So the complex topologies of the Universe can be reduced once we understand its non-Euclidean fractal and dual structure, as Galileo put it,  to a game of cycles (of information) and lines (of energy)”, which in physics are called forces and particles. In simple terms, dimensions are the perceptions of lineal energies and cyclical clocks of time, as “fixed” information and space. Those motions, perceived as “fixed” shapes by the eye, create the sensation of space, which Einstein rightly defined as follows:

Space is motion relative to a simultaneous frame of reference.

Thus, spatial energy is lineal, moving energy, creating surfaces of space with its movement that we see fixed, as fixed pictures of lines of moving cars seem to elongate space. Thus, space and distance are two ways of perceiving a volume of energy.  It also means that the space we see is the “light membrane.” We see light-space. And so what we see are exactly the three perpendicular Euclidean dimensions of the energetic fields of light: height is the electric field, width the magnetic field, and length the reproductive c-speed of light. It also follows that our light world cannot go faster than light, which is a tautology since it is made of light.

We are   all fractal pieces of light space-time, which evolved into complex forms of in/form/ation. We are made of evolved light-space.

God doesn’t play dices but is a painter in four dimensions, two of energy, a plane of lineal motions, and two of information, cyclical motions, whose bites and bits combine to create all the fractal organisms of reality, all the shapes you see, from the informative particles of physical space to the cyclical, neuronal path/thoughts of your spherical head.

Because a clock of information is a cycle, it has two dimensions, height and rhythm, as it happens to the screen or page of a book where you read this text. So height becomes a dimension of information and the Universe becomes a game of two bidimensional type of entities: planes of energy and cycles of information with height. This is obvious; your head of information, an antenna, and any informative system is on top of your energy body. Because the Universe is fractal, each entity is a piece of bits and bites of energy and information and so the relative height of each species is local. This is called in relativity the diffeomorphic principle.

What matters is that now we can understand how energy becomes information, how geometrical space and clocks of time combine. In Galilean physics, when time was lineal, not a cyclical clock of information, it could not be transformed into space. Energy and information could not be transformed into each other, as only things with the same number of dimensions can be transformed into each other. So now we rewrite the energetic principle of physics as

energy never dies but constantly trans/forms itself into in/form/ation and vice versa.

The beauty of the fractal paradigm resides in the fact that physical energy and information are only the first bricks of an ever more complex, evolving Universe, created by chains of information cycles, which are all the time exchanging energy flows, back and forth, through smaller fractal particles or organizing themselves into bigger wholes. Let us consider the properties of those three elements: energy (limbs, fields): information (particles, heads); and its combination (bodies, waves) and some of its species in different scales of reality so you grasp the essential self-similarity of it all, which means physics is not the Saint Grail of science but merely the description of the simplest cycles and lines of energy and information:

future clocks of temporal information -> present  waves <- past, energetic  space

Form: Time, Function: Information         §:Space-time: Exi=st     Form: Space, Function: energy

Mass, charge, vortex                                   §:Waves                  Force, field, plane of energetic space

Small, still                                            §-Rhythmic                     Large, moving fast

Tall, Perpendicular,                   §-Elliptic                    Long, Parallel

Bidimensional: Height, Width                 §:3-D +1 Beat                2-D: Length, Width

Cyclical, Rotational, imploding                  §-Steady state                    Lineal, uncoiling, exploding

Informative, Frequency                         §-Transversal wave                                   Lineal Speed

Singular, Broken, Fractal form                         §                   Continuous, amorphous, differentiable

Intelligent, perceptive              §-Beautiful                    Strong, fast, masculine.

Social networks, creative                      §-Dual, organic               Darwinian herds, destructive.

Future, evolved predator                      §-Present             Past, energetic victim

Life arrow                                             § -Reproduction                     Death arrow.

Waves of space                                     §                Particles of Time

Female, yin principle                            §-Gay             Male, yang principle

Masses, charges                                    §                  Forces, fields

O-Heads                                                    §-Bodies                            I- Limbs.

Blue, Black                                        Green, Gray                          Red, White

Energetic space and informative time are opposite in form and function, but they easily transform into each other in iterative=reproductive processes that give origin to the complementary forms of the Universe, as all what exists is indeed made of fractal, extended, spatial energies and bits of informative, cyclical, imploding information.

The two states of reality, energetic space and informative clocks of time, are in fact lineal planes and cyclical forms in movement that combine together, creating 4-D space-time fields of temporal energy, like the light wave that illustrates the previous graph, made of a bidimensional, lineal field of magnetic energy over which a perpendicular high-electric field of information moves rhythmically in cyclical waves. Height is a dimension of time because the repetition of time cycles accumulates in the dimension of height. Informative bits accumulate in “hyperbolic” topologies that wrinkle and create the height of any space-time field as a whole entity made of cyclical parts: cells accumulate as bits of information and a child grows; cycles accumulate in a hurricane that grows in height; life species evolve from planarians, simple energetic systems, into human beings and informative species of maximal height.1 Einstein’s curved space-time cycles bend the energy of vacuum into vortices of masses that accumulate in height, creating a black hole, and so on. Thus, height is the dimension that accumulates information in evolving process, erased in the inverse events of biological death or transformation of mass into energy E=mc2.

So the essence of a dynamic, physical space-time field is the combination and transformation of bidimensional, high in-form-ation into bidimensional, flat scales of energy. When both fields merge, they create a real three-dimensional wave form, which adds a fourth dimension of frequency or rhythm, as in a ray of light, the simplest space-time field, made of two perpendicular planes: one of electric information with the dimension of height and frequency, and one of magnetic energy, with the dimension of width and speed. Yet since light is the space we use to construct our space-time mind-vision of the Universe, for that reason, Euclidean/Cartesian coordinates show the same three perpendicular dimensions of light.

In the realm of physics, one of the main proofs of such bidimensionality and the properties of information described before is the fact that it is the only explanation we have of a recently discovered phenomenon that the holographic principle says information is bidimensional and the discovery that when we become smaller back into the quantum world, dimensions diminish into two dimensions 1:

- The holographic principle, a key element of modern physics, says information in the Universe is bidimensional. Even human beings create three dimensionalities, combining two dimensions of form perceived by each eye. Indeed, two dimensions of time-information and two dimensions of space-energy combine in all beings to create all systems of reality.

- Fractal relativists have recently obtained our macrocosmic space-time, departing from two-dimensional entities in the quantum world 1. Thus, there are no more than four dimensions in the Universe. This is logic; when we go from small to bigger, we grow in dimensions. Quantum physicists who ignore logic principles pretend that the small strings have more dimensions up to ten. This is ridiculous. It is a logic paradox. The small is smaller because it has fewer dimensions. Now a group of fractal theorists have proved it with a method called causal triangulation. Another group has studied black holes as fractals of bidimensional vortices, quark masses, advancing the concept of mass as a bidimensional vortex of information. What this means unfortunately is that CERN will do quark—black holes “certainly”—that they will not evaporate as quarks do not evaporate and they will devour the Earth.

What truly matters however of the dimensional and geometric analysis we have done of energy/entropy/expansive motion and information/implosive motion/cyclical form is to understand its complementarity and combinations as four-dimensional waves of reality since pure information and pure energy are “dead” ends, and what truly matters is to generate balanced combinations of both.

A fact that we represent with the “generator equation” of fractal space-times is

Eó Ti (dynamic motion) or ExTi=K (static motion)

which expresses the principle of conservation of energy and information and becomes therefore the fundamental equation of the fractal Universe since all that exists requires both—energetic limbs/forces and informative cycles/heads to become a real four-dimensional being of the Universe. Those restraints which physicists often forget are indeed a key guide to consider which beings are stable and exist and which beings are unstable fantasies that do not follow the laws of balance and harmony of reality.

Complexity

The next century will be of complexity. S. Hawking

In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal organic structure of all beings of reality: On the left, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies and its comparison with a neuronal cell; on the middle, an ice fractal, a plant and  a river; on the right, a cluster of galaxies and a lung. Fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics have evolved our understanding of information in topological terms, defining a new arrow of time, fractal information, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce over a canvas of simpler, energetic motions. Time bends space into masses, said Einstein. Time evolves form, said Darwin. We can mathematize those processes through self-reproductive fractal equations that iterate a certain form of nature—an ice geometry, a DNA code, a cellular structure, a physical particle. This revolution is opening science to an organic understanding of reality, which renders CERN’s attempt to prove false energy-only theories obsolete. Since the Universe is a “fractal of energy and information, made of self-similar parts, which constantly reproduce their forms.” Indeed, from the simplest particles, quarks, and electron, which absorb energy and reproduce new particles to the most complex informative species, human beings, reality is made of bits of information and bytes of energy, evolved in complex, social networks through fractal scales, from atoms to molecules, to cells to organisms, planets and galaxies.

1. Experimental Proof of the Fractal Structure of the Universe

In the previous graph we showed some experimental proofs of the fractal Universe. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.

In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine New Scientist1 published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.

Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.

Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.2

This should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to throw to the trash the big bang and the expansion of the Universe, accept the fractal informative structure of reality, and close down some big projects of science, such as the large hadron collider, which will merely cause a planetary big bang, very different from the birth of the entire Universe.

Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but any local big bang and big crunch dual process, any explosion that splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality; in the case essayed at CERN, the informative inner quarks of Earth’s atoms, crunched into a quark star, and the external electroweak cover, exploded into a big bang.

Let us then prove the fractal paradigm, the true evolution of cosmology, with the three legs of the scientific method: experimental proofs, logic consistency, and mathematical accuracy.

2. Logic Consistency: The Infinite, Hierarchical Universe

A good description of the fractal universe and its logic principles is this text from the Web by Mr. Oldershaw from Amherst University:3

With regard to cosmology, we live at a very privileged time. When we read about exciting and revolutionary paradigm changes, in which our most fundamental ideas about nature undergo radical revisions, the drama usually has taken place well before we were born. Today, however, we have the rare opportunity of witnessing at first hand a profound transformation in our understanding of how the Universe is structured. This ongoing change of cosmological paradigms from a “small” finite cosmos to an infinite fractal cosmos began about two decades ago and is in full swing at present. The short version of what is happening goes like this. For about 50 years the Big Bang model of the Universe has provided an excellent explanation for the basic cosmological observations: a very large-scale expansion, an approximately uniform background of microwave radiation and a unique set of abundances for the atomic elements. However, there were some technical problems with this model, such as an a causal beginning of space-time, a lack of magnetic monopoles, an unexpectedly high degree of uniformity, and an enigmatic knife-edge balance between the open and closed states.

Then in the early 1980s Alan Guth4 showed how these and other problems with the Big Bang model could be solved in one fell swoop with the Inflationary Scenario. But, an ironic thing has happened. Although the Inflationary Scenario was developed to rescue the Big Bang model, the most logical consequence of pursuing the concept of Inflation is the replacement the Big Bang paradigm with a much grander and more encompassing paradigm. According to Guth and a growing number of leading cosmologists, the most natural version of Inflation theory is Eternal Inflation in which Inflation is, was and always will be occurring on an infinite number of size scales. The new paradigm that cosmologists have arrived at by several routes is an infinite fractal hierarchy that has “universes” within “universes” without end. The astronomer Carl Sagan once referred to the general idea of an infinite fractal universe as “strange, haunting, evocative—one of the most exquisite conjectures in science or religion.”

That is the basic story, but because of the profound changes the fractal paradigm will have on our understanding of the Universe and the place of humans within that Universe, it is important to explore the implications of this new vision. Firstly, there is no edge or boundary of the Universe; space is infinite in all directions. What we used to refer to as “The Universe” can be more appropriately called the “observable universe” (note the small “u”) or the “Hubble Volume,” and it is only a tiny part of what one might call our “metagalaxy” or “level 1 universe”. We currently have no way of determining the size of our metagalaxy or the number of galaxies it contains, but we could reasonably assume that both figures would be vastly beyond anything previously contemplated.

There would be an infinite number of these level 1 universes, and on an unimaginably large scale they too would be organized into level 2 universes, and so on without limit.

Secondly, time is also infinite in the unbounded Organic universe. Whereas our Hubble Volume may have come into being and began to expand approximately 13.7 billion years ago, the Universe has always existed and always will. Parts of the Universe may be created or annihilated, may undergo expansion or contraction, but the infinite fractal hierarchy remains unchanged overall, and thus is without any temporal limits.

Thirdly, there is no limit to size scales. In the infinite fractal paradigm there is no class of largest objects that would cap off the cosmological hierarchy; the hierarchy is infinite in scale.

This fact removes one of the more suspect aspects of the old paradigm. Natural philosophers had long noted the unusual fact that within the Big Bang paradigm humans found themselves roughly in the middle of nature’s hierarchy of size scales. This anthropocentric state of affairs seemed to violate the Copernican concept that when humans appear to be at the center of the cosmos, we should suspect that a bias is leading us astray. In an infinite fractal hierarchy there is no center of the Universe, nor any preferred reference frame.

Some interesting questions immediately arise. Why are fractal hierarchies so ubiquitous in nature? By studying empirical phenomena within the observable universe, how much will we be able to learn scientifically about the parts of the Universe that lie beyond our observational limits? Does the infinite cosmological hierarchy have a bottom-most scale of sub-atomic particles as is currently thought, or is this another artificial limit to an infinite Organic universe that actually extends without limits to ever smaller scales?

Centuries ago Immanuel Kant, J.H. Lambert and a few others proposed an infinite hierarchical model of nature based largely on natural philosophy arguments. This general hierarchical paradigm never garnered a large following, but it was kept alive by numerous rediscoveries. In the 1800s and 1900s quite a few scientists, including E.E. Fournier d’Albe, F. Selety, C.V.L. Charlier and G. de Vaucouleurs, argued for hierarchical cosmological models based on the hierarchical organization within the observable universe. Then toward the end of the 1970s, the mathematician B. B. Mandelbrot5 gave the hierarchical paradigm new life and widespread exposure by developing the mathematics of fractal geometry and demonstrating that fractal phenomena based on hierarchical self-similarity are ubiquitous in nature. In this way natural philosophers, empirical scientists, mathematicians and theoretical physicists have all found their way, slowly but surely, to the infinite fractal paradigm. There are many routes to this paradigm, and certainly there are a large number of distinct versions of the basic paradigm that have their own unique theoretical explanations for why nature is organized in this manner, but the general paradigm that nature is an infinite hierarchy of worlds within worlds has fully arrived, and will probably be our dominant cosmological paradigm for the foreseeable future.

But what does it mean that the Universe is organized in fractal patterns of form? To fully grasp this concept, we have to realize that “fractal equations” are “organic equations,” which participate of the properties of organisms. Fractal equations create forms as life does. Fractal equations create self-similar “cells,” as life does. And in fact, they use the same term. Fractal equations are also called generator equations, as they are the mother cells that encode the information needed to repeat a living form. Finally a fractal equation will create a pattern of interconnected parts, which put together reproduce a whole, self-similar to their parts, as organisms do.

The only thing a fractal equation does not have is motion, as it is a simplified geometrical description of reality. So in the same manner, geometry lacks motion; simplified fractal equations didn’t have motion when they were first discovered.

But now, fractal science has advanced a step further, thanks to the evolution of fractal logic, duality, and non-Euclidean geometries, so we can understand finally the meaning of motion in the Universe.

Let us then explain the logic and mathematical principles of the fractal paradigm, starting for what fractal relativists mean when they say that the Universe is built in fractal scales made of pieces of vital space and informative time. To that aim, we shall introduce some basic concepts of fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics, needed to fully grasp the meanings of the fractal Universe, which we later will apply to the understanding of masses of physical information and black holes and pulsars, which  are fractals, made of quarks—the substance CERN will mass-produce, without understanding its consequences, as it ignores all about the new developments of fractal cosmology.


II. Fractal Space: Non-Euclidean Geometry

Eppur si muove, eppur no muove.

—paradox of Galileo

The fractal nature of all universal entities, which occupy a piece of space and last a quantity of time, is the key to unifying the laws of science. Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical continuous plane despite their appearance. In detail, they become quantic points, planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet, in a fractal repetition of the path the planet makes around the sun. Each planetoid becomes again a fractal sum of atoms, turning in cyclical paths. Those rings illustrate two fundamental dualities of the space-time Universe, contradicted by the “naïve realism” of our simplest perception: Any region of the Universe seems at first glance still and continuous. So Galileo called Saturn’s planetoids a ring, thinking they were made of continuous, still matter. Yet Saturn’s rings have in fact the form of the commonest informative fractal: a Cantor dust, which thins once and again into infinitesimal particles. Since when we see any continuous point of time/space in detail, it grows, becoming both, dynamic and discontinuous, made of quanta, moving in self-similar paths that are separated as independent beings, but pegged to each other in networks by flows of energy and information. The Universe is constructed through those networks of parts that become wholes and grow in bigger scales, departing from its two essential formal motions, the line of energy and the cycle of information.

This duality gives origin to many paradoxes, as the properties of energy and information are inverted, and yet reality is always a combination of both. So particles of information are also waves of energy. Forms that seem static information can also be perceived as moving energy. It is the paradox of Galileo who said of the Earth: “Eppur no move, eppur si muove.”

3. Mathematical Proof: The Fifth Postulate of Non-Euclidean Fractal Geometry

The paradox of Galileo is the main paradox of perception of any system, which can be seen either as energy or as form also in the quantum realm, but physicists’ naïve realism failed to understand: Information is static since to perceive a form, we need to focus on its edges, and movement blurs form. So the mind perceives information in stillness, as when we read. Yet energy is motion, and since all dual complementary systems have information and energy (physical particles and forces in quantum physics), we can perceive or measure all beings, including the Earth as entities/waves in motion or as static forms/particles. But given the limits of our visual and instrumental systems, we can’t perceive both things at the same time. Therefore, the uncertainty of measure and perception is human while nature is dual.

This duality is the property of nature that neither quantum physicists, nor Galileo didn’t understand, opting out for a single solution. Galileo said that the Earth moves, hence energy and motion are the principles of reality that exclude form, in/form/ation, as all physicists will believe after him. While quantum physicists thought uncertainty was in nature, it was not in the instruments that measure it. Further on, energy is continuous, hence differentiable, but information is discontinuous, hence it requires fractal or topological mathematics. Yet quantum entropy still ignores that duality and pretends to study nonlineal, fractal, and nondifferentiable systems such as black holes, as Hawking does, with entropy equations. The list of errors of physics in their monist, naïve realist perception of reality could fill an entire encyclopaedia. Yet we want to focus only in those advances brought about by Einstein et al., which matter to understand fractal mass, the big bang, and black holes, which are made of quarks as Saturn’s rings are made of planetoids. Even if we first described them as energetic, abstract continuous rings, as Hawking did with his abstract black holes that now in the fractal paradigm become nonevaporating frozen quark stars, what is the mathematical justification of that fractal structure? A new type of mathematics called non-Euclidean mathematics, which Einstein used to describe gravitation and masses.

Einstein found that gravitational space did not follow the fifth Euclidean postulate of mathematics, which defines each point as having not breadth, so only a parallel can cross it.

It turned out that relativistic points could be crossed by infinite parallels. So the Universe was “non-Euclidean.” Either points had fractal parts through which parallels could cross or parallels bent to penetrate the point. Both solutions were a question of how we perceive reality. If we enlarge each point of the Universe, then it can fit more straight lines. This is the fractal paradigm. If you don’t enlarge a small point, lines seem to curve toward it. This is the choice of Einstein,6 which requires only a single space-time continuum as it does, not enlarge the smaller points of the Universe. In any case, what seems obvious is that reality is not as simple as we perceive it.

The fifth postulate in classic relativity means that to pass through that point, parallels curve; so in this manner, they can flux into the point. But fractal mathematics has resolved in a more accurate way this conundrum for two reasons: parallels are straight lines; hence if we curve them, they cease to be parallels. The second improvement is also obvious. A Euclidean point has no breadth so even if we curve parallels, there is room only for one within the Euclidean point. But if we enlarge the point and it grows to have fractal parts, it fits lineal parallels, which are straight lines. Thus, what the fractal paradigm has done is to explain logically non-Euclidean mathematics,App. IV giving us a more accurate view of the Universe, harmonizing the mathematics of Einstein’s relativity with what we see in the real world.

So we propose a new geometrical unit; the fractal point with a content of energy and information that grows as we come closer to it, which Einstein already used to describe the formalism of gravitational space-time. Let us now consider that proposition in more detail to respond to Mr. Hoggs’s wonders.

4. The Dual Membranes of the Universe: Light Space-time and Gravitational Space-time

Euclid affirmed that “through a point external to a parallel, only another parallel line can be traced” since the Euclidean point doesn’t have a volume that can be crossed by more lines:

Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:        . ____________

This is indeed what we perceive in our light space. And the reason, which later will be explained in more detail, is because our “space” is made of light, and light has a Cartesian perpendicular structure, with three perpendicular fields (height/electric field, width/magnetic field and length, speed).

This is what fractal theorists mean when they affirm that space-time is fractal. We float and exist in a “sea” of light space-time, made of H-Planck units of light, which are “actions of energy and information”: E × V = K. Thus our light space-time is of energy and information, and we are evolved beings of light. But the Universe is fractal, is made of scales. And so there is another world of dark gravitational energy and matter that we do not perceive, the world of quarks, masses, and gravitational, invisible waves, described by Einstein’s relativity.

Indeed, Einstein found that such gravitational Universe followed a non-Euclidean fifth postulate:

.                        “A point external to a line is crossed by infinite parallel forces”.

Real, discontinuous, n-dimensional points:            o ===========

It means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross since reality follows that non-Euclidean fifth postulate,7 all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye, they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them since they become spheres, points with breadth, with space-time parts.

Mathematics, as a language that represents reality with simplified symbols, has a limited capacity to carry information. So its main symbols, geometric points and numbers, simplify and integrate that fractal discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian space/time graph, made of points without breadth. However, the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an internal content of space-time. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move, and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical numbers, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content. But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points have inner volume, measured with the dimensions of fractal geometry.

Thus, there is a bigger Universe which we do not fully perceive, made of gravitational dark energies and point-particles called quarks, as we are “limited, perceptive beings” that only see light. We are part of a network of electronic flows of energy and form of light nature, and we float in a bigger dark Universe. We are the surface of that other world; we are the membrane that covers the inner “pipes” of quark points and gravitational flows. But if we could penetrate inside that world and enlarge it, we would see a much bigger world of gravitational flows of energy and form that are dark energy and dark matter to us. And the formalism of that world is the topology of non-Euclidean fractal mathematics.

Yet if we give breadth to a point, we must also correct the other four postulates of Euclidean geometry and define a point as a sphere with breadth that grows as we come closer to the point (fractal point) and a line of points with volume as a wave with a minimal punctual height—a string of cyclical points.

And so suddenly two mysterious fields of physics become clear:

- Strings, used to describe the strong forces of the inner quarks of dark matter, become complex lines of  non-Euclidean points with inner fractal dimensions in at least two more scales for a total of 32 = 9 more dimensions than the ones we see in our world.

- The complementarity principle of quantum physics means that all particles are non-Euclidean waves as points have height and volume. The space-time Universe thus becomes a discontinuous world of fractal points that grow in size as we come closer to the next scale, made of networks of points sharing waves of energy and information. And so we can define any discontinuous, relative, fractal space as a “plane of fractal points communicated by waves of energy and information” (fourth postulate), which becomes the organic unit of reality.

In the same way, the Saturn rings stop being planes without volume when we come closer and observe them as fractal points called planetoids. Non-Euclidean points acquire volume when we approach them. And so planes acquire volume, structure, and movement.

In the words of Klein, one of the discoverers of non-Euclidean geometries, a space is not static, but a moving group of points in cyclical movement. So in the same way Saturn’s rings are a group of planetoids, a Klein space, the space-time that fills reality is made of points, which have movement. They are in fact a series of moving cyclical vortices, the points of the smaller fractal scale of gravitational reality, Einstein’s definition of masses, as cyclical whirls of space-time.

Thus, suddenly mathematics stop being an “abstract” construct, a continuous plane drawn by Descartes and imposed into nature by Newton, and becomes a series of “vital geometries,” entities that have a quantity of vital space, made of networks of non-Euclidean points, particles, cells, or stars of a galaxy. And all those different scales of reality, made of networks of non-Euclidean points, can be explained, both as mathematical structures and organic structures, since an organism is merely a ternary system with a network of energetic and informative points/cells that create the limbs and head of the organism and its intermediate reproductive wavelike body.

This reinterpretation of the non-Euclidean topology of the Universe as a fractal series of scales of space-times, all of which are in fact cyclical vortices of masses and charges and lineal flows of energetic forces in movement, is far more akin to our observation of the Universe that reveals the same forms once and again in all its scales and shows perpetual movement in all of them, till reaching vacuum space, also with constant movement.

It also explains string theory and its multiple dimensions: those dimensions are fractal inner dimensions, belonging to a smaller fractal scale, as all systems observed are made of smaller units.

Non-Euclidean fractal mathematics has an enormous capacity to illuminate key questions of all sciences. We shall consider in the next chapter three physical questions resolved by the fractal paradigm that CERN pretends to study bombing the Earth with quark-gluon soups:

- The meaning of masses and charges that can be perceived, according to the paradox of Galileo and the fractal non-Euclidean paradigm, either as fixed particles with form or cyclical vortices with a rotational frequency that carries the information of the Universe.

- The unification of masses and charges as two accelerated geometrical vortices of two scales of reality, the microcosms of quantum charges and the macrocosms of masses.

- The holographic principle that defines information as bidimensional—a cyclical physical vortex.

While in the appendix, we will advance a reduced non-Euclidean model of the physical Universe as an organic structure of two scales—quantum world of charges and the cosmological world of masses.

Let us then continue in our double task of discovering the true knowledge of the Universe and expose the bioethical crimes and intellectual platitudes of CERN by resolving once and for all the meaning of mass and the unification equation of masses and charges, the basic bits of information of the cosmological and quantum world, with the minimal mathematical apparatus and maximal logic rigor.


III. Equivalence between Mass and Acceleration

And God said, there is light, and he separated the day from the darkness.

—Genesis

<<PICTURE 6. Einstein’s mass>>

In the graph, the evolution of the concept of mass in relativity, from the initial image of an abstract substance in the center of an accelerated vortex of space-time, proper of the abstract, pre–world war age, when Einstein first published his work on gravitation, to the first pictures obtained in bubble chambers in the postwar age, to the realization that each mass is a fractal space-time made of smaller cyclic motions proper of twenty-first century. Fractal relativity. The smaller motions are quarks, the bigger motions are quark stars, pulsars, and black holes. Today we can model any type of vortex of space-time with fractal mathematics, as each small vortex transfers the momentum to the bigger vortex, which emerges as a macroscopic entity. Thus, we conclude that a black hole is a fractal concentration of the densest matter of the Universe, quarks, since quarks represent on average more than 99.9% of the matter of our bodies. Those improvements on the details of mass theory, based on the advancement of its mathematical tools (discovery of fractals, chaos theory, and the five postulates of non-Euclidean geometry) is the natural way in which the evolution of science happens, departing from sound logic principles.

5. Einstein’s Concept of Mass as a Frequency of Information

In the text quoted from the New Scientist that opened chapter 2, we came to the conclusion that the Universe has a fractal structure because it is made of fractal space and fractal time. But what is space and time? In simple terms, here are the two essential morphologies of the Universe: Space is the lineal, expansive energy of the vacuum in eternal motion (seeing as still distance or space, according to the paradox of Galileo). And fractal times are cyclical clocks of information, whose frequency or rhythm encodes the information of the Universe.

So space and lineal energy on one side and time and cyclical clocks of information on the other are synonymous. The static, continuous concepts of space and time become then sums of discontinuous, moving pieces of energy and infinite clocks of information that our senses put together into an abstract continuous single space-time. One we have “exploded” and given movement to the abstraction of space and time, it is easy to recognize the minimal bytes of energy and bits of information of the real, physical Universe. Physical information, masses and charges, and physical energy, forces, which are not substances but motions, events in time of cyclical, informative nature (masses and charges) or energetic, spatial, expanding shape (energy), that constantly transform into each other ad eternal, creating the essential rhythm of the physical Universe:

E (forces) < => i- Particles (masses and charges)

The key to grasp the concept of mass as a vortex of acceleration are two physical laws: one of classic relativity, the principle of equivalence between accelerated motions and masses, and one of fractal relativity, the paradox of Galileo, the fact that we perceive reality either as a moving energy (in the case of a mass, as a vortex) or as fixed space (in the case of mass as a particle). All moves and doesn’t move (eppur si muove eppur no muove) depending on the way we look at it. Thus, all spaces have inner motion, even if our senses don’t see that motion or fix that motion into forms of in/form/ation.

Mass is the great problem unresolved by quantum physicists in their model of the Universe since it is not an energetic but an informative form. Einstein, who had a visual, geometrical image of mass, defined it as a vortex that absorbed space-time, attracting in its flow everything else traveling on that space-time as a bathtub attracts all what is in the water it absorbs.

How did Einstein come to that idea?8 As many textbooks and visualizations explain, he realized that when we accelerate, as it happens in a Formula 1 car or a lift, we feel more weight. Thus, he made a bold statement: mass and acceleration are the same. If we feel mass when we accelerate, it is because mass is acceleration. But what type of acceleration?

The answer is actually quite simple, because it turns out that Newton had long ago discovered a beautiful formula to describe all the forces of the Universe: F=m × a.

Where a means a lineal acceleration and so m must be a cyclical acceleration. Indeed, there are no more types of accelerations and so Einstein (using, of course, more complex mathematics than Newton to refine his calculus, as mathematics had evolved a lot since Newton’s time) postulated that masses would be vortices of space-times since only a vortex is a cyclical, accelerated movement.

That principle of equivalence is the fundamental principle in which general relativity is based. It states merely that mass and cyclical acceleration are the same. It means in layman terms that a mass is not a material form but a movement. And of course, because that movement is an inward, cyclical movement, it deploys a resistance to be pushed outward in a lineal manner, which from our macroscopic view seems to give mass a solid position. Again this is intuitive. If you are a very small being turning at full speed, it will be very difficult to push you away. When you see a skater in a ring, he speeds up and closes his arms to move faster and become more stable in his position. Thus, the homology between acceleration and mass defines for a curved space the meaning of a mass, and the paradoxical fact that the smaller the vortex is, the faster it turns and the bigger the mass is. It is the same that happens in any tornado or hurricane: the closest you are to the center, the faster you turn and the more attractive the tornado is.

In that sense, what you experience as weight is the inertial resistance to any displacement of a vortex anchored in a point of space-time. The same happens in our macrouniverse when a skater turns around and bends his arms to spin faster. If he opens his arms spreading his vortex, he decelerates and moves easier in a lineal direction.

A mass is thus the inertial force that we need to push away, the accelerated vortex. Those vortexlike spirals accelerating in a curved path, inward, are like the pictures we observe in accelerators, or the most recent pictures of masses we have obtained, in which indeed we see a fluctuating vacuum with the form of a vortex. Further on, we know that the frequency or rotational speed of those vortices, called spins, are related to the mass of each particle. So we have both, logic and experimental proofs. Of course, I have used here and will continue using the simple mathematics of Newton and the visual thought experiments of Einstein, to describe those concepts because this is a book for nonspecialists. Already Descartes said that the Universe was made of vortices and “res extensa,” that is, lineal space. What Einstein did was to apply the most modern non-Euclidean mathematics of his day to those well-known principles. So he improved greatly the detail of those vortices, as non-Euclidean geometry allowed much more refined calculations than those we could do with the mathematics of Newton, but in essence the principles stayed. So we can explain very easily in an intuitive manner, thanks to the principle of equivalence, a mass with a simple equation:

equivalence principle:  mass = curved acceleration= cyclical vortex that resists displacement

If we use the simpler mathematics of Newton to define Einstein’s mass, we can see in more detail the properties of such vortices, which can be described as fluid vortices of the bits of information, the particles that create any of the multiple fractal space-time membranes of the Universe. Consider the simplest bidimensional equation of a vortex:

Vortex Speed ×  Radius-size of vortex = Vo × Ro = Constant Value

Since the product of the speed and the radius is constant, the shorter the radius, the faster the speed. What this means is that any vortex paradoxically accelerates faster when it is smaller. So the product of a growing speed and diminishing radius remains constant. Hence we find that smaller particles that rotate faster have more mass. So the electron which is bigger and rotates slower than the quark has less mass. In fact, the electron’s mass is 0.1% of the mass of an atom which is all stored in the inner faster-rotating smaller quarks and gluons.

While in the cosmological scale, the black hole, which rotates at light speed and occupies the minimal space of all the cosmic bodies, is the most massive form of the Universe. Then it becomes[Apple1] a quark star called a pulsar, which has a center of strange quarks and a surface of dense neutrons. It rotates also very fast, near the speed of light, and it has an enormous mass. We do not know what the substance of black holes is, but Einstein called them frozen stars and he said that if we were to obey the laws of the scientific method, they had to have a cut-off substance. Then when he died, we found quarks and so it is obvious that black holes, the densest rotating stars of the Universe, should be made of top quarks, the densest top quarks of the quantum world. Since black holes have very similar properties to those of a quark star or pulsar, ultradense stars with enormous rotational speed, this fact reinforces the thesis that black holes are top stars. And so obviously, fractal cosmologists fear that CERN, which is a factory of quarks, will make a vortex of quarks that will grow and grow, attracting the mass of the Earth and converting us into a black hole or quark star. Simple,[Apple2] isn’t? It is then obvious that we must not make a factory/cannon of quarks. It is absolutely dangerous to do that.

But this fact, which anyone can understand, is ignored by quantum cosmologists because they don’t believe in Einstein; and of course, those who believe in Einstein are merely interested in the use of the more complex mathematical model of gravitation and mass, in which the principle of equivalence of Newton and Einstein is not so clear. The details of the trees prevent them from seeing the big picture of the forest. But here we are concerned with the picture that tells us that quarks are the atoms of the densest black holes and quark stars because only among the known particles, quarks are that heavy, and only among the known celestial bodies, black holes and quark stars are that heavy.

Further on, because dark matter represents 75% of the universe’s mass, very likely, dark matter is made of black holes, pulsars, and other types of quark stars.

Now when you get into details, the word vortex is substituted by spin, the word curved cycle by non-Euclidean geometry, and you use also two different names for the type of forces displayed by quark vortices (strong forces) and by black holes and pulsars (gravitational forces) because we are talking of two fractal scales of reality, the quantum microscopic world and the cosmological world. But those details that we will explain later in depth, unifying both scales, gravitation, and the quantum world with fractal equations (a long goal of Mr. Einstein, which I found thanks to the expansion of the postulates of non-Euclidean geometry that Mr. Einstein lacked) are of no importance to understand in simple mathematics, the meaning of mass:

max. rotational speed × min. radius= quarks and black holes= the densest masses of the cosmos

med. rotational speed × med. radius = electrons and stars

0 rotational speed × max. radius = light = 0 mass

It is in those terms how it becomes easy to understand the different masses of different particles and cosmic bodies, related to their angular momentum or spin: the electron which turns slower in a wider circumference is far lighter than the proton that turns faster in a smaller space, which is lighter than the black hole which turns to the limit of speed of our world.

While the mass of light is zero because the electromagnetic wave never closes in to itself, but once it has made half a circumference downward, it switches upward and so it moves as a transversal, lineal wave without mass and maximal, infinite radius:  0 mass × infinite radius = K.

In detail, light has an insignificant bit of mass because due to the rotation of galaxies (Mach principle), it has some curvature and it acquires more mass/frequency when it rotates around a quark or black hole vortex, finally evolving into a more complex form, absorbed by an electron, quark, or black hole.

Now it is easy to understand how mass (rotational motion) becomes energy (lineal movement) and vice versa (E=mc2 and M=E/c2). E=mc2 means just that when energy approaches the c-limit of speed of our spacetime, as it cannot go faster, it deflects its energy that curls into cyclical motion into mass.  This, of course, is another thing CERN pretends to research with the quark cannon. Because using quantum equations and Higgs particles, there is no way to understand how energy becomes mass and vice versa.

The Universe is simple. So a simpler explanation of reality is more truth, even if it is experimentally less refined in its initial conception. For example, Copernicus was simpler than Ptolemy. Further on, for many years, till Kepler and Newton refined its elliptical orbits into ellipses, Copernicus’s cyclical orbits were less accurate than Ptolemaic calculus, but the principles were sounder: The sun was put in the center and that simplified enormously the model. So it satisfied better Occam’s principle. That is what the principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravity of Newton and Einstein does with masses: by considering that particles are cyclical, accelerated motions, not substances, this sounder principle simplifies all calculus, explains logically how mass attracts like a hurricane of space-time, and so it must be truer than the complicated quantum theories of mass, as the Higgs Mechanism, which does not even explain how mass attracts in a coherent manner.

6. The Advances of Fractal Relativity: Fractal, Fluid Space-times

Physicists do not understand those simple truths—even a century after Einstein applied Mr. Riemann’s discovery of the fifth non-Euclidean postulate, which defines a point as a cyclical motion in space—because of a basic error of “materialist physics”: Since nuclear physicists do machines and bombs, which are made of dense metal, they tend to believe in “solid things.” So this kind of spiritual thought on motions and events is unreal to them. Instead, they “decided” that the principle of equivalence only affected to the gravitational force but somehow “stopped” in an obscure point where the rotational acceleration of the mass vortex clashed with something “solid,” like a “rubber ball,” which had to be the “mass.”

In the graph, our growing understanding of masses in terms of a fluid, relativistic vortex is an interesting proof of the distance between mathematics and reality since mathematics merely offer an abstract, simplified picture of reality with equations we have to interpret in terms of real objects observed in the Universe. That is the case of a mass, which once Einstein’s equations were published was first depicted as in the left picture, like a ball that was curving downward the space-time of the Universe. But that image is not logic and it has no relationship with the Universe we observe since any vortex, including those of air and water, have no solid ball in the center, but merely deflect the cyclical motion upward, transforming it again into lineal, perpendicular motion.

And this is what we observe in masses and charges, which are cyclical vortices, which first transform lineal motion into cyclical motion, creating the charge or mass and then deflect that cyclical motion, expelling it as less curved lineal motion through its poles, as a magnetic, electric, or dark energy flow.

So physicists moved recently toward the second more logical and realistic version of the vortex of mass, curving inward, illustrated by a fluid or gas vortex in pictures 2 (a fluid vortex) and 3 (a hurricane). This third picture of the hurricane applied by analogy to a mass vortex shows clearly what probably will happen when CERN puts together a lot of quark vortices: they will condensate, rotating together in synchronicity, creating a bigger vortex, a pulsar, quark star, or black hole. Each of the mini vortices that accelerates inward toward the center of the black hole will be a particle, a quark, which acquires mass as it rotates faster, diminishing in radius (according to the previous vortex equation). In the more complex mathematics of relativity, those equations that explain how energy becomes mass as we approach c speed (E=mc2) become the so-called Lorenz transformations.

As you can see, the vortex comes inward toward the condensed center in which it will fuse with other quarks into a single diminishing vortex, called an Einstein-condensate, that packs very close one quark over another, turning at light speeds in a state of highly ordered matter.

In the graph, we observe also the evolution of true science, thanks to our advances in mathematics and logic. First, in the beginning of the century, when Einstein published, only gravitation, the force external to the mass was treated under the Principle of equivalence, between force and acceleration. The mass was still considered a solid substance, a Maya of the senses, which fix the quantum fluctuations of energy and information into a still image of the Universe, a knot of information called the mind. But the fixed images of the mind are not reality. Reality, as we entered into deeper experimental evidence, turned out to be always vibrating, moving, fluctuating at all scales we have perceived it. In the center, we see a bubble image of a particle.

There are not solid substances but a constant flow of motions that happen in different scales of fluid space-times, each one made of a sea of minimal “actions” with energy and information that act as the medium of that world—the gluons of the strong space-time of quarks, the h-Plancks of the weak world of electromagnetism, the l-strings of the dark energy of gravitation (as per Nottale and others). And in the mediums known to man, the air molecules of nitrogen and oxygen, or the water molecules, which allow also the creation of hurricane and tornado vortices. In the new physics of complexity, we are all part of fractal discontinuums, mediums and scales of vibrating energy and form, and all the abstract simplifications of the “ancients,” while useful to allow calculus, become from a philosophical perspective hyperbolic or Pythagoric, monist, mechanist aberrations of thought.

A notable property of this new world are a series of logic dualities and self-similarities called correspondences and invariances that relate those scales. Each new scale becomes created by the fractal sum of all the microvortices that become a whole one in the next scale of size of the physical Universe, adding new dimensions. For example, a well-known correspondence is established between a mathematical description of a quark-gluon soup as a fifth-dimensional world of strings and a fourth-dimensional world of quark vortices. What this means is that l-strings are the one-dimensional units of the superfluid dark energy that form those bidimensional quarks, which themselves lock in three perpendicular vortices to create fractals our three-dimensional electronic word. And so dimensions are always fractal, emerging as objects of a next scale, but the sum of all the fractal, finite dimensions from the small to the bigger world always adds up to four infinite continuous dimensions.

Yet all those fractal parts of the different scales of superfluid space-time are not solid substances but actions of energy and informative time. This again was discovered by Planck more than one hundred years ago, when he found the fractal unit of the membrane of light space-time we inhabited and called it action of energy and time. Yet the solid image never died away. What fractal theorists have done is to add to the “membrane of electroweak space-time made of light forces and electrons” another membrane of “gravitational masses” made of strings, gluons, quarks, and black holes. So in the same manner, we have two basic physical mediums that create vortices in our planetary scale, hurricanes made of quanta/fractal parts of atomic air and tornados, made of quanta/fractal parts of atomic water. In the Universe at large, we have two mediums, the light space-time made of “light quanta” (our membrane) and the gravitational world made of strings, fractal parts of gluon quanta (which form the superfluid vortices of quarks) and gravitational dark energy that form the cosmological space-time.

This duality, clearly established in the work of Nottale and others, reshapes our classification of forces in two systems, one of electroweak light entropy and other of strong gravitational mass. It is important to define properly the terms of that duality, so ill understood by the “ancients,” the quantum entropy theorists that work for CERN, rooted in the physics of the past millennium:

-Electroweak, massless forces made of electromagnetic light and electrons belong to our membrane of Euclidean space-time, defined in classic physics. This is our world and it is defined by expansive entropy, spatial, lineal forces.

- Yet this world is in a tug-of-war with the strong, cyclical, massive dark world of quarks that bends this space into cyclical clocks of bidimensional, temporal information, the quark vortices inside the atom. And this strong world of quarks that bends electrons has also a lineal force, the dark gravitational energy flows that structure the interstellar space.

The easiest way to perceive those two universes is to consider the primary Universe not our Universe, but the world of quarks connected by long strings of dark gravitational energy, which form a universal web over which the electromagnetic world becomes a rubbery cover, as a series of copper cables are coated with rubber or our neurons with myelin. The quarks of strong forces are covered by electronic surfaces, which communicate between them through flows of electromagnetic light that runs over the thinner, faster wires of dark gravitational energy, which is the intimate scaffolding of reality.
Logic Principles Matter More than Mathematical Details

“I want to know God’s thoughts . . . the rest are details.”, said Einstein. Yet those thoughts are logic principles, the details are mathematical equations, which evolve with new developments in calculus, while the principles stay.

In that sense, it is a common mistake of Pythagoric physicists who believe God speaks only mathematics to consider that Einstein’s work on general relativity is unrelated to Newton because he uses different mathematics. Thus, Pythagoric physicists, who consider mathematics the only language of reality, think that Einstein explains a completely different view of the Universe, which invalidates totally Newton’s work. This view is wrong and leaves unexplained the very obvious fact that Newton’s description of gravitational forces works so well that it was considered an absolute truth till the twentieth century and is still used for most calculus of forces on Earth because both are based on the same logic principle of equivalence, which in the hierarchy of science dominates over the different detailed mathematical descriptions of it. Moreover, it is known to the historian of physics that Newton’s equations were evolved by Poisson and Poisson was the departing point of Einstein, which is the departing point of fractal relativity, the twenty-first-century version sketched in this book. Yet the principle of equivalence between accelerations and masses is not the departing point of Higgs and Hawking’s entropic black holes, which deny Einstein’s principles, and so regardless of their mathematical complexity, they are wrong because their logic principles are false.

So we must consider a different view on the evolution of gravitational theory. Newton, Poisson, and Einstein’s theories are right because they describe the same logic principle of equivalence, with the best mathematical models available to each age. And since logic is in the hierarchy of the scientific method, superior to mathematics, from where it derives—as Gödel, Russell, and Frege proved, deducing the laws of mathematics from those of logic—what matters is to understand the logic principles of the Universe, which will then be described “in higher detail” with each new paradigm of mathematics. What this means is that as mathematics have grown in detail and precision, new physicists have applied the new mathematics and increased the detail of their calculus. Yet the physical principles, events, and concepts that truly define the phenomenon physicists describe have not changed. So when those principles are changed by false principles as Higgs and Hawking do in mass and black hole theory, the results are false regardless of the mathematical detail they use to reinvent the Universe.

This is clearly shown in theory of mass by the three phases of evolution of the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, all of which can be used to calculate trajectories of masses, because all of them follow the three legs of the scientific method. The first paradigm was Newton’s paradigm, which used a simple formula of a gravitational vortex to describe them. And they worked fine for most calculus and they are still used. Then Poisson, Lagrange, and Hamilton refined those calculi. And finally Einstein used Poisson formulation of the gravitational force and took it a step further with the use of non-Euclidean maths. What some of the people of “al.” have done is to take Einstein’s work further by using the next age of evolution of mathematics, fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics and the laws of endophysics, which includes the limits of human perception on those equations (Galilean paradox, changes in the speed of time around black holes), which solve the problem of the uncertainty of measure introduced by the observer. But any of those three-plus-one ages of the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration are good enough to explain what mass is; and none of the quantum alternatives, despite the complexity of its maths, is truth because they deny the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, considering mass an external property given by solid particles (the Higgs) that transfer it magically to all other entities of the Universe, not an internal property of the topological structure of space-time, its accelerated, cyclical motion.

Any of those models—Newton’s forces, Einstein’s relativity, or our non-Euclidean fractal description of the two membranes of the Universe—bring enough understanding of what a mass is. Yet because Pythagoric physicists ignore the underlying logic principles that rule their equations, they believe in the mathematical model of the day and when new mathematics appears, they think the old model was totally wrong. So they thought, as Alexander Pope put it, that “God created Newton and there was light,” but when Einstein came with new maths, they threw Newton’s work as if it were a fantasy when it had worked perfectly for three centuries in calculating all kinds of motions in the Universe. Newton had embedded the same true principles in his work—the principle of equivalence between accelerations and forces, masses and motions (F=m × a).

Next, Poisson and Hamilton applied the new refined tools of differential calculus to the study of the motion of planets, which was previously described by Newton with simpler operandi. So they found out another key principle of the Universe of energy and information—the law of minimal energy, which states that any system of the Universe tries to keep its internal energy and information, following the path that saves more energy between two points.

Then when Riemann developed non-Euclidean mathematics, Einstein applied them to the previous work of Newton, using the notation of Poisson, to find a more precise analysis of gravitational mass vortices, by making a series of “simultaneous,” present pictures of those cyclical motions and adding the influence of the gravitational membrane that underlies our world of light and electroweak masses.

We could resume the differences between the classic formulation of Newton and the modern one, considering that Newton formulated the description of the whole, and its dynamics in an extended space and time duration, while Einstein formulated the detailed topology of the vortex in each non-Euclidean point of its space and in the simultaneity of each present moment of duration.

The description of those vortices in the scale of charges and quarks can be also done with two degrees of detail, as we do here, considering them whole vortices or as the so-called QCD theory of strong forces does, in detail, considering each fractal quanta (gluon and quark) at each moment of time and aggregating them together. Yet while the whole description of quarks we shall do here is less accurate than the detailed one, brought about by quantum chromodynamics, it provides a more logical, comprehensive overview, which is the aim of this book, since all those mathematical descriptions are truth as long as they describe accurately the equivalence principle between forces and accelerations. If we compare them with a verbal description, we could say that all of them have the same core sentence, the principle of equivalence, but the description of it grows in detail. If Newton, for example, said Jesus had dark hair, Einstein refined the analysis and said Jesus had dark hair with brown touches in his forehead, and fractal relativity refines the sentence further, saying Jesus had long dark hair with brown touches on his forehead and a white stripe[Apple1] on his temples. But the essential concept remains: Jesus had dark hair, that is,

the forces and particles of the Universe are accelerated motions.

This principle, so stated, is what Higgs and Hawking have dropped from their eye view in quantum entropy; and due to the excessive specialization of their mathematical models of enormous detail the general vision of the forest of all physical events, the equivalence principle is lost. For that reason, I have always preferred the opposite approach: to study first the forest, the principles of physics, with a limited mathematical precision, achieved by not using computers in my calculations and accepting as supreme guides the laws of the scientific method (causality, simplicity, economicity, hylomorphism, and experimental evidence) and the well-established principles in which previous theories were founded. And only at the end, once the forest is mapped, I have considered some of its specific trees in more detail.

It is thus the comprehension of the principles of equivalence between the forces of the Universe and the two types of accelerations (F=m × a) and its invariance under change of position or scale in the Universe, not the mathematical details that casts further light on the meaning of mass and charges in the Universe.

Let us then summarize so far the meaning of that principle in Newton and Einstein’s work. Newton defined that principle with a simple formula: F= m × a; that is, the forces of the Universe are made of two elements, which we must consider to be both accelerated motions. Yet since we only know two types of accelerated motions, lineal acceleration (a) and vortices of cyclical acceleration (V × radius=k), masses should be curved, accelerated vortices of gravitational forces.

This was Einstein’s view. It led him to formulate with Riemannian tensors the four-dimensional space-time structures of gravitation and masses, measuring the structure of space under that principle in a simultaneous moment of time. Thus, he made still pictures in which we can gauge the curvature of the vortex to its finest detail, adding smaller corrections to the whole dynamic Newtonian view.

Thus, Einstein just made a more detailed analysis of Newton’s vortices of mass, turning around the sun, using Riemannian geometries and the concept of simultaneous present time. We could say in a way that he made a more precise picture, a still present photograph of the spatial form of those vortices, but the essential truth, the principle of equivalence between forces and acceleration remains the same from Newton to Einstein to fractal relativity. And so it is that principle and not the evolving mathematics of any of those three models what we have to consider in detail to fully grasp the essence of all the forces of the Universe. What fractal relativity does is to add the advances on theory of information, to go even further, respecting the work of those pioneers and founding fathers. What Higgs and Hawking did is to throw them out because “Einstein is double wrong” (Hawking) and take their place as the new prophets of an entire refurbished Universe which should be reinvented to please their minds. So this new Universe should have an entire new, invented, never observed field (the Higgs field) to substitute the gravitational field of Einstein and Newton and a new causality in time (time travel to the past) to please the theory of evaporating black holes that travel to the past, where they evaporate their information. Then came CERN and decided Hawking and Higgs had reinvented the Universe and it was worth to risk the life of all of us, trying to prove them right despite forty years of seeking and not finding his mental fantasies. In other words, what physicists are proposing to mankind is this:

Higgs and Hawking are God. They have reinvented the Universe. And you must sacrifice your lives to prove them. This is religious fundamentalism in defiance of true science, bioethics, and the laws of the Universe; and while humanity has agreed, I assure you that “those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the gods,” whose black holes will swallow CERN, Higgs, Hawking, and all of us soon.

8.  Masses Are Vortices of Physical Information. The Mystery of Slow Clocks.

What is the mathematical relationship between mass, time, and information? Einstein hinted that cyclical clocks of time, cyclical forms, and cyclical masses were related when he said that “time curves space into mass.” And he showed that relationship in his equations. Now, once the curved form of masses, self-similar to the curved forms clocks of temporal information is understood, we can fully grasp the meaning of that sentence if we use the concept of time that physicists use as “what a clock measures.” Masses are the cyclical clocks of information of the Universe, which trans/form the energy lines of gravitational forces into a regular frequency of information given by the speed of rotation of those physical clocks.

Look at the back of a clock. It is a cyclical spiral that unwinds its energy so the clock can create cycles of information. The clock is a “fractal generator” of cycles of information (the hours of the clock) molded from a source of energy (the spiral), following a dual feed-back cycle of transformation of energy into information (the clock turning) and information into energy (the spiral unwinding). This duality of all eternal processes of trans/formation of lineal motions (energies) into cyclical motions (information) and vice versa is the essential dual cycle of the Universe, its “generator equation” (E ó I or E×I=K), depending on our dynamic or static perception of it (Galilean paradox). And it applies to all systems. The space between galaxies expands because the space within galaxies contracts into mass. The big bang of a supernova explodes radiation because quarks become a stronger superfluid vortex inside in a big crunch. Yet if we were physicists, adscribed to the entropy-only religion and naïve realism, we would only see half of the process, either the big bang radiation and expansion of interstellar space (big bang theorists) or the visible mask of the informative clock: the needles turning.

So a mass or a charge is a physical clock of time that winds energy into form but simultaneously unwinds form into energy, expelling it perpendicularly through its poles, as a tornado—which also has a dimension of height, not only a cyclical inward movement—does with water or air. And so we are all made of spatial energy that extends and creates space and movement and cyclical clocks of time, whirls of masses and charges that carry information. And the growth of complexity of those two motions finally create the biological cycles of information and energy that make us humans.

The complex evolution of those two motions, chained in infinite puzzles, evolving in networks, grouping in bigger structures, is what we call the organic Universe made of networks of spatial energy and information.

Now, let us prove the concept of mass as physical information with the three tenets of the scientific method: mathematical, logic, and experimental proof. The logic proof is in the explanations we just made of it. Unlike the Higgs mechanism, masses as vortices of space-time are logic mechanisms of attraction. The experimental proof is the relationship between the speed and radius of each vortex and its attractive power or mass. Unlike the Higgs mechanism that never explained why each mass has the mass it has, the vortex theory explains them: Light doesn’t close a vortex so it doesn’t have mass. Black holes turn faster with lesser radius so they have more mass. Quarks do the same in the particle world so they are the most massive of them all.

Finally, the mathematical proof is as simple and beautiful as it gets. Just substitute in Einstein’s two main formulas where mass and time come out to obtain its relationship:

energy =mass × c2 and    energy × time =constant

Then you cancel energy and you get mass = constants/time= k × frequency of information.

Since time and frequency are inverse (T=1/v), this means that the faster the frequency of a vortex of space-time is, the more attractive/heavier the mass is; the more information it will store and the slower its inverse (T=1/v), lineal time will happen. And this is another experimental proof of informative masses, as astrophysicists have shown that lineal time passes slower when we come closer to a massive object like a black hole. All this explains why in relativity time is related to mass, which affects the movement of cyclical clocks since

mass = frequency of a vortex of physical clocks (any orbit, mass, or charge=spin).

All those relationships, which can be described also with the more complex topological models of non-Euclidean geometry briefly outlined in the appendix, cannot be obtained with Higgs particles, which cannot explain rationally how masses attract, what their values are without inventing new laws and fields never found in nature, and yet even then, it cannot explain the different masses of each particle.

Thus, we conclude that Einstein’s theory of mass is right and the Higgs a fantasy: masses and quarks are motions that carry the information of the Universe in its bidimensional vortices. This is not understood by quantum physicists because they try to explain masses with the Higgs and fail. Later, when we talk of quarks in more detail, we shall add some complexity to this basic description of them. It matters one of those properties: a bidimensional vortex has less dimensions and more speed/attractive power than our three-dimensional electroweak forces.  This means we need three quarks, each one with one-third of charge, to emerge into our electronic world. To do so, they form very dense, stable triplets because they “lock themselves” perpendicularly, to emerge as “three-dimensional color-locked” forms in our Universe. This recent discovery explains why quark-gluon soups are far more stable liquids than previously predict, why they are much more dangerous and attractive than CERN believes, and are complex liquid condensates, macrocosmic vortices that become black holes and quark stars much easier than CERN and its entropy/energy/explosive gas version predicts. We have now proofs of this after a previous accelerator RHIC made a liquid quark-gluon vortex not a gas. And yet CERN behaves as any nuclear company does, protecting its weapon, not arguing with reason the new sciences of complexity, duality, and far from equilibrium systems, chaotic attractors and fractal theory that explain those quark liquids. Instead it rejects any dialogue with Einstein et al., the pioneers of those sciences, who have been warning for years and now have increasing evidence of the dangers of quark-gluon soups and uses outdated gas models to describe those liquids. CERN cherry-picked theories not by its scientific quality but by its capacity to justify its machines and the quark-gluon liquid as a harmless substance that will merely “explode” into radiation instead of crunching us into a quark star.

9. The Unification Equation

Now, to fully understand those fractal quarks and how they might form cosmological black holes, we have to relate the quantum world of charges and masses and the cosmological world of stars and black holes. So we have to return to complex physics, solving one of the great questions pending in twentieth-century physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which is the key to properly mathematize the different masses of all those quarks and deduce the speeds of its vortices. To that aim, we must understand charges and masses as two fractal membranes of the Universe, not as two forces, that exist in the same continuous space-time. This is an improvement over Einstein relativity, but as the reader should understand by now, what fractal relativity has done is to improve Einstein by improving the mathematics he used, with the addition of fractal mathematics and the completion of the postulates of non-Euclidean geometry and by improving the logic of his work with the addition of information, the second arrow of time.

Let us now consider a more refined view of the cosmos than the one brought about by quantum physicists, as a fractal system with two scales or membranes that constantly interact with each other: the quantum electroweak membrane and the strong gravitational cosmological membrane. This is important because it will allow us to establish the nature of quark condensates as the “quantum atoms” of quark stars and black holes, which will be certainly made by CERN’s quark factory. We shall do this following the pattern of this book, which gives glimpses to the future of science and solves the problems CERN pretends to solve, killing us, with the power of the mind, to show that CERN is both, ethically and intellectually a monstrosity.

The equation that unifies charges and masses as a single type of force has been searched for one hundred years from the perspective of quantum particles, not with the geometrical/motion-based concepts of Einstein’s masses. Yet Einstein always said the unification equation should be based in the geometrical similarity between the equations of electromagnetism and gravitation and the equivalence principle between mass and acceleration.

Let us then use those simple principles. The existence of a fractal structure of space-time means that the electromagnetic world and the cosmological world are just two self-similar non-Euclidean membranes of space-time of two scales and charges and masses two self-similar vortices of two different scales.

So we shall be able to obtain for the first time theoretically, the value of the stronger universal constant of charges (Coulomb) by merely translating the jargon of a charge to the jargon of a vortex of space-time, which is the same in all scales. Since rotation is the essence of mass and the concept of a hard particle as a solid ball is a mere Maya of the senses, their only difference between quantum charges and cosmological bodies is the higher speed of rotation of charges and hence the stronger constant  of the electromagnetic vortices of the quantum world.

This unification can be done with the mathematics of Newton, Poisson, or Einstein, which are just three stages in the constant refinement of the principle of equivalence and the geometrical analysis of the Universe. What matters is to understand the principles, which is what quantum cosmologists no longer do.

Let us then bring here with the notation of Newton and Poisson, which is far simpler than that of Einstein’s relativity, the simplified proof of the fractal nature of the Universe and its two scales, the quantum world and the cosmological world in which charges and masses are gravitational vortices of space-time of two different scales. We consider, using Newton’s notation, a mass a three-dimensional, cyclical accelerated vortex of space-time defined in classic Newton mechanics by a centripetal acceleration, which gives us the classic definition of the universal constant G as

G M=ω2r3

where r is in meters and ω is the angular acceleration in radians per second of any gravitational orbit.

This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of space-time by merely changing the value of the universal constant G. Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:

universal constant of a space-time vortex, U (g,q)  = w (angular speed)2 × radius2/ mass

If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe both, not only a gravitational vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but also a charge as a quantum vortex of space-time with the universal constant Q, the constant of Coulomb.

Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:

sun mass = 2 × 1030 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10-7 rad.[Apple2] per sec.

earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

result: G=6.67 × 10 -11 kg-1 m3 rad. sec.-2

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 1016 rad. sec. -1 = w (electron);

5.3 × 10-11 m. (Bohr radius);

proton mass = 1.6 × 10 -27 kg.,

then we get a G, which is 2×1039 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

The relationships between the particles of those two fractal scales, the cosmological and quantum scale, is the next great mystery of physics, resolved by the unification equation and Einstein’s mass theory. To find that relationship, we must translate to the gravitational jargon the radius of a proton, the particle made of quarks and gluons in the quantum world. If the hypothesis of a self-similar membrane of space-time of different scales of size holds since both, a proton and a black hole in the two scales, are made of quarks, the proton must be a black hole of the electromagnetic scale and so its radius, when translated to the jargon of gravitation, must have the same formula than a black hole radius, called a Schwarzschild Horizon.

Again, the mathematics is fairly straight: we equal the Coulomb, gravitational constant=1.5×1029 and the electromagnetic radius of the proton written in the jargon of gravity with its classic formula that describes the same vortex, written in the jargon of electromagnetism:

electromagnetic force (gravitational jargon) = G(q) Mproton melectron /r2 = e2/4∏eor2 =F (classic jargon)

A hydrogen atom will be then a mass vortex of space-time, where G(q) is the Coulomb constant as a gravitational constant with value 1.5 x1029.

Now we use the previous equation to find the electron Bohr radius as a gravitational vortex. Then the magic transformation happens.  Take the previous equation

e2= 4∏eoGq(1.5 x1029) Mproton melectron

and put it into the electron radius: e2/melectron x c2 x4∏eo. Now cancel melectron and 4∏eo.

And you get the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world as follows: G(q)M/c2.

It is a much simpler formula, which means we are doing “good physics” according to Occam’s principle. But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(q), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.

Indeed in the cosmological world, beyond that radius light sinks toward the central singularity, where the black hole, a quark star resides. And beyond that radius, the electromagnetic flow sinks into the nucleus where quarks feed on light. In both worlds beyond those event horizons, light cannot escape. And yet the proton has a magnetic pole, through which it emits magnetic flows, equivalent to the dark energy, we shall see, black holes emit through its poles.

In other words, protons are self-similar to cosmological black holes in the quantum scale. And black holes are probably made of strings, gluons, and quarks as protons are. They should be therefore frozen quark stars, of the only variety of quarks which is positively charged, which happens to be also the densest of all quarks, the top quark, whose parameters as a condensate coincide with those of a cosmological black hole. And so, if a black hole is a top quark star, positively charged, the “self-similar proton” of a galactic atom, CERN will make them.

To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Q, departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three the standard forms of proof in science.

For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of space-time. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a self-similar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the non-Euclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of space-time. He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.

So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of space-time, with two self-similar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a self-similar membrane to that of the cosmological world.

But in what it concerns this book, the most interesting finding under the new U (q) value of the electromagnetic constant is the discovery that the proton horizon shows the same equation as that of a black hole, a Schwarzschild horizon. It means that a quark condensate is a black hole state and vice versa: a cosmological black hole is a deconfined state of billions of top quarks, a top quark star.

Now, the mathematical treatment of the equivalence principle to unify masses and charges can be done with the simplest descriptions of a vortex created by Newton and Poisson or with the more complex Riemannian geometries of Einstein. The general error of physicists and the obvious reason why this equation has not been found is precisely their rejection of the simplest mathematics of Newton and Poisson, which made the unification exceedingly difficult. Yet there was a second reason: the use of a single arrow energy. So Einstein tried to unify cyclical vortices of mass and lineal electromagnetism (Maxwell’s equations) because he didn’t realize that he had to unify information and information (charges and masses) on one side and lineal forces with lineal forces (gravitational waves and electromagnetic waves), which has been done with the self-similar equations of gravito-magnetism.

Thus, in a universe of multiple fractal space-times, each one with a different content of spatial speed and informative density defined by a different G, electromagnetism and gravitation are merely two types of vortices with different sizes, hence different contents of space and time, which translates into different universal constants.

Consequences of the fractal unification of charges and masses

We obtained theoretically, for the first time, the value of Q from G; always obtained through the experimental method, the three legs of the scientific method are met in the fractal unification equation:

-        Logic consistence. The Universe is a fractal of multiple space-times, self-similar in structure.

-        Mathematical accuracy. The same vortex of space-time allows calculating theoretically the values of those vortices.

-        Experimental proof. The experimental calculation of Q coincides with the theoretical value, which has a probability to happen of less than 1 in a trillion, if this coincidence were by chance and not because the Universe is indeed a fractal of self-similar scales and charges are gravitational, quantum vortices.

Because no other approach has yielded a consistent, experimental logic and mathematical unification, it is obvious that a charge is a self-similar (but not equal) membrane of space-time.

Further on, quarks are defined by a third type of force or vortex of space/time, which is even smaller in space and faster in time, the bidimensional strong force. And its cosmological equivalent, bidimensional black holes, seem to be similar in properties and morphology. Thus, we can also relate with the same principle of equivalence the strong force and gravitational force. We already showed the Bohr radius to be a Schwarzschild radius, and since astronomers study the stars around galactic black holes as electronic nebulae and have found that the central black hole is actually a swarm of them, as a quark is actually a fractal of gluons, the self-similarities keep growing.

In our analysis of the errors of truth of science, we considered the hyperbolic error the most common among human beings. Now we can apply it to the real structure of the Universe and its different membranes of space-time. We exist only in one of those membranes, the membrane of light space-time, which is Euclidean in form, whose space dimensions are given by the three lineal perpendicular fields of light.

And yet physicists think Einstein’s special relativity, which studies our local, fractal membrane of space-time (the membrane of Euclidean light-space and its entire evolved electroweak species that inhabit that space), found a tautology. Since we exist in that “light medium,” the speed of light c is the limit of speed of our world. Yet he thought c was the limit of speed of all the systems and sizes of the Universe.

Indeed, imagine that you exist in a war medium. If you flow with the water, you will not be able to go faster than the water. Because we float, so to speak, in light, the space-time of the galaxy, we can’t go further than light.

But we have observed beyond the galactic light space, intergalactic, dark, gravitational space with z=10 c speeds. This is in fractal space/time theory, with its decametric, multiple membranes of space-time, the limit of speed of the bigger cosmological world of dark/gravitational energy and quark/black holes. But scientists have invented an enormous number of ad hoc solutions to deny that in the bigger world of galaxies that float in that dark world, speed is faster.

Enough to say that the symmetry is based on what we call the paradox of Galileo, the fact that all what we observe can be seen as a fixed form or a moving one, like the Saturn’s rings mentioned before. When we see a mass as a motion, it is a vortex; when we see it as a fixed form, it is a particle. When we see a force as a motion, it is energy; when we see it fixed, it is space.

The classic example is given in cosmology: are the galaxies that are moving at z=10 c moving at ten times the speed of light, or is space creating distance, expanding? In the appendix, we shall deal with that theme when we study in depth the meaning of the big bang.

In this appendix, dedicated to the physical Universe, we have now to consider the fundamental symmetry of the Universe between lineal forces of space and cyclical, informative particles of time.

The Complementary Principle (The Bidimensional Holographies of the Universe)

the Universe has two membranes of space-time, the quantum world of charges and the cosmological world of masses, and its two essential forms, the gravitational and electromagnetic lineal forces of energy and its cyclical vortices of information, and the thirdelement, mixture of both. Since fractal pieces of energy/space and fractal pieces of time/information mix together into wave of space-time, the real, complementary beings of the Universe. In essence, the real Universe in which we exist, with its four dimensions is a holography of two bidimensional, pure forms, the vortex or clock of information and the plane of lineal flows of energy. The simplest topology that combines those two forms is a perpendicular field of high information as the screen of this computer and a surface of flat energy (in the computer, the keyboard that transforms the energy of my fingers into information). In the appendix, we shall consider a more sophisticated version of those holographies, introducing the three canonical topologies of a four-dimensional Universe, and how they combine into the real, complex shapes of physical and biological beings. Now that we are concerned with the understanding of the principles of those real holographies, we shall consider the simplest of all entities of space-time: a ray of light. Its simplicity is revealing of the simplest structure of a holography of energy and information. The magnetic, flat field supports the frequency of an electric field that creates the Information of the wave. And the result is an H-Planck unit off our light membrane. We are made of evolved fractal H-Plancks, the “planckton” or atomic units of our space-time. And that “planckton” is a wave with minimal form encoded in the frequency of the light and minimal space, supported in the magnetic field. From this simple initial unit of space-time, our Universe builds itself. “And God said, there is light; and he separated the day from the night” means indeed in metaphoric terms that we are all made of light. And yet the same game happens in the world of dark matter, also made of bits and bytes of gravitational information and energy. Then once we understand those two membranes and its “doors” and “limits,” we can start to construct the real Universe.

11. The Meaning of Fractal Space/Energy and Fractal Information/Clocks of Time

We now have enough understanding of the mathematical structure of fractal beings as networks of self-similar cells/points with a content of lineal energy and cyclical information to understand what we mean by a Universe made of fractal space and fractal time. The simplest one of those beings in our Universe is the drawing we made of an electromagnetic field. This entity defined by Planck as H, an action of energy and time, has two fields, one of magnetic energy and one of electric form. Yet it is also a piece of fractal space-time that occupies a space and has a clock/frequency rhythm. We are all made of evolved pieces of light, which is absorbed and evolved into electrons, which are the electroweak substance of which reality is made. And when we put together all those pieces of reality, the medium of light-space in which we exist and all the evolved beings of light, we get the Universe. Imagine a sea of water where the medium is water and the pieces that swim on it are indeed evolved forms of water (we have 90 percent of water in our bodies). All together form the ocean. The ocean is not an “abstract” space-time Cartesian coordinates. In essence, any fractal space-time can be defined as a medium of formless space, made of a network of simple bites of energy, inhabited by more complex informative beings. And each of those beings can also be modeled by the complementarity principle with two elements—a body of spatial, energetic cells/points and a head or particle made with a network of fractal cycles of information.

Even the simplest particles, quarks, are made of networks of smaller particles called gluons while electrons are nebulae of smaller particles, ultradense photons, shown in the most recent pictures of electrons, which seem as a bundle of curved light rays. The topology and structure of those organic networks might vary, but all comes to the same shapes: force and lines of energy create the vital spaces of reality, and cycles and clocks of information create the clocks of time of the Universe.

A fractal is a system of self-similar cells generated by a feed-back equation that transforms energy into information. This complex definition of a fractal being can be made more precise when we understand the meaning of the generator equation of a fractal in the real world, beyond the language of mathematics. Any informative code can be a generator equation of a fractal being. A human fractal is generated by the code of information of the genome; a mathematical fractal is generated by a much simpler equation. The Universe and all its systems are in that sense fractals with different generating equations of different complexities. Yet what unify them all are the two “essential” geometries that combine to paint the four-dimensional fractal beings of the Universe, spatial energy and temporal information. And this is what fractal theorists9 mean by a Universe made of fractal energy and information.

In simple mathematical terms, if we call energy e and information I, we can then write the generator equation of all the fractal beings of the Universe as a feed-back cycle that transforms energy into information back and forth, generating all its space-times. And that fractal equation is nothing else than the principle of conservation of energy and information quoted before in this book:

All what exists is a fractal being that transforms back and forth energy into information: SEóPTi.

We don’t need to go in this book in complex mathematical analysis, as we are interested in explaining the simplest fractal networks of quarks that form black holes and quark stars. Notice though the difference of the two mathematical symbols of the previous equation: The symbol that gathers together space particles is a sum, which means that space particles form “waves,” loosely organized that move around a field of energy in which they feed. The symbol used for informative particles is a multiplication symbol, which means informative particles form networks, “knots.” For example, in a neuronal network, each particle is fixed and connected to many other particles. The result is that a network of informative cells can form a “mirror,” which can reflect an “image” that “gauges” reality into a language and so it can create a “mind.” The result indeed is that herds of lineal, moving particles “absorb” energy and move, and knots of cyclical information, gauge and perceive.

Further on, knots can be broken in their connections so Ti networks can become herds of energy by losing its “connective dimension” and vice versa.

When mathematics evolved, those symbols evolved. So instead of sums and multiplications, modern physics use differential and integral equations to describe energy and information; and then in the twentieth century, we use fractal equations for information or chaotic equations for entropy.

All this is a more complex view needed to explain the behavior of electronic nebulae that sometimes act as a network (and indeed your mind is basically a mirror image made with electronic nebulae) and sometimes as a wave-flow. This is the ultimate meaning of duality. So all can exist in two states in many different scales: masses or charges or clocks or heads are all species of information, but they swim over a field or body of energy and sometimes gauge information and sometimes move. What then creates the stability of the Universe? A fundamental law of the Universe called invariance of its motions, forms, and scales.

The three invariances of the Universe are the invariance of motion proved by Einstein, the invariance of scale proved by Nottale, and the invariance of form proved by Sancho. They are the three principles that hold together and explain the self-similarity of all the species of the Universe. In other words, while there are infinite different species of energy and information, their “shapes” are invariant in any scale and their motions (perception of shape as movement) are also invariant.

Unfortunately, physicists only use invariance of motion and so they cannot understand how fractal quarks will create black holes and quarks stars at CERN, as they emerge with the same vortex form in the cosmological scale. This invariance again is an evolutionary, natural trait that maximizes survival.

In the graph, informative clocks of time are cyclical and surfaces of energy are lineal to maximize their functions: informative systems resemble a spiral or sphere since those geometries store maximum information in minimum space, accumulating its cycles/cells in the informative dimension of height, from black holes to heads and nervous systems. Bites and bodies of energy resemble the line or plane since that opposite geometrical form covers the shortest distance between two points, the maximum extension with minimum volume, accumulated in the width dimension as space. In the graph, in biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the bodies and heads of humans, animals, or machines because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information. Energy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between two points and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms because cycles store maximal information in minimal space. For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common, but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space. So our limbs are lines extended in space like the missile. On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines. And those chips order bodies of metal with digital information.

12. Dimensional Form Becomes Speed: Creation and Destruction in the Organic Universe

The equivalence principle establishes a Universe with two limits of eternal movement: a lineal speed of gravitational and electromagnetic forces and a cyclical speed of masses and charges, which are vortices of space-time. Energetic forces create space, and vortices are clocks of time that carry information, eternally transforming into each other in self-similar events:

Σ spatial forces (lineal movements)ó Ti (cyclical clocks of information).

The sums of all those events maintain an eternal dynamic balance of cycles and lines.

Yet since lines have one dimension less than a clock cycle, the process can be also perceived as a game of creation and destruction of dimensions of form.  In the graph, a three-dimensional slow nebulae accelerates its motion as it becomes a bidimensional vortex of faster, more attractive mass. Such transformation is common both in the cosmological world as stars become black holes and the quantum world in big crunches when electrons become quarks. It might be the transformation that the Earth experiences if CERN succeeds making a quark star.

There are two concepts that do not appear in classic physics but are essential in understanding how the universe converts energy into information (motion into form): the paradox of Galileo, which allow us to describe those processes as “frozen pictures,” which is the informative point of view, or as changes in the speed or motion of things.

The graph shows the two events combined: when a system acquires forms, it slows down. When a system loses dimensions, it speeds up. Yet to understand this essential process, we must first clarify an error made by physicists who do not use the concept of dimensional form to define “information” but the algebraic “data” concept of a “bit of information.”

Fractal information is related to dimensional form while algebraic information is the simplest dimensional form: bits of broken patterns emitted by waves, which encode those patterns in the distances between the crests or frequency of the wave. But those patterns are the “minimal” pattern of information of the Universe.  In that regard, the capacity to store information of any system follows a power law:

Information » X Fractal dimensions of the system

Yet in the same way, physicists have reduced all the arrows of time, previously defined to a single energetic arrow measured by a single “clock-time”; they have reduced all the forms of information to a single broken frequency pattern. Biology, a more sophisticated science of information, today is able to study how molecules and proteins store information in several dimensions; and that previous law can be deduced of biological studies. Yet physicists have not gone beyond the simplest one-dimensional information of lineal waves. They have not even discovered that mass stores much more information than waves in physical bidimensional vortices.

In duality, we study both sciences, physics and biology, and we can compare and use laws of both sciences to find self-similar laws in the other discipline. In that sense, Shannon’s standard definition of information is a computer-based definition, of technological science, useful to store information in numbers, with a limited application to the understanding of the universe, which stores information in four dimensions in very complex patterns and enormous volumes. Information is in that broader Universe form, in/form/ation. The simplest information is the one-dimensional broken bits of data that divide a line of energy into a pattern. This is what a computer does and what a physicist would understand as information. But in nature, a more precise concept is that of fractalization. Information increases when a continuous flow of energy breaks into patterns and acquires dimensions, bumps and points.

The arrow of information is a transformation of a surface of space, of energy into inner form: a change from lineal, chaotic movement into cyclical, repetitive one; from expansive waves into imploding particles; from disordered, equalized forces of indistinguishable forms extending in space into an ordered hierarchical system of nonlineal mass vortices. Its inverse function is the explosion of energy, the dissolution of form, the arrow of death.

Though physics recognizes the inverse arrow of entropy as negantropy—that is, the negation of entropy—it is long overdue to name it properly as form that crystallizes and organizes chaotic lineal energy into cyclical, repetitive patterns of in-form-ation.

Indeed, Mehaute10 and other theorists have proved ad nauseam that when a system stops creating energy, entropy, it keeps the arrows of future flowing, creating information, fractal patterns of form—the future never stops. This also applies to physics in the way form becomes motion and motion becomes form.

The unification equation relates the different scales/membranes of space-time. Yet for each membrane and particle, we must clarify a final concept, the meaning of dimensions of information and how they disappear, converted into speed and energy or appear as motion and energy slows down, creating form. In the Universe, there are multiple physical species of different fractal non-Euclidean dimensions.

The new mathematics of complex physics means though that a flat plane of two dimensions has a minimal height as each of its points of the flat network is in itself a world of a smaller scale. Thus, a flat vortex of mass, a bidimensional quark, has smaller gluons and strings, which have smaller dimensions. For that reason, there is equivalence between different mathematical descriptions in different dimensions. A fifth-dimensional description of strings is equivalent to a four-dimensional description of quarks, which is equivalent to a three-dimensional description of an electronic atom, and so on. It is a general law that all systems of physical mass pack energy in fractal dimensions of form:

strings (one-dimensional dark energy in a 5-D Universe) -> bidimensional quarks and gluons in a 4-D world -> three-dimensional electrons

This translates sometimes into different equations for a physical vortex and different power laws and relationships between masses (the static, formal, dimensional perception of a vortex) and speeds (its perception as pure motion). For example, Vo × Ro = K is a bidimensional vortex, which we used to explain in its simplest terms the equivalence principle.

However, the unification equation of charges and cosmological masses happens in a three-dimensional world. So we used a three-dimensional vortex equation, U.C. × M = w2 × r3, which is the vortex used to unify the three-dimensional worlds of cosmological bodies and electronic matter we perceive.

Finally, in the next chapter, when we compare the two families of quarks, top quark particles and strange quark particles, the relationship between their rotational speed and masses follows a three-dimensional power law (w3 = M). So the world of top quark particles turn at 10 c-speed but it has 1,000 times the mass of the world of strange quark particles that turn at a maximum of c-speed, which obviously means that the world of top quarks has one dimension more than the world of strange quarks. This is further proved by the famous Maldacena conjecture, which studies top quark black holes as five-dimensional string systems, self-similar to four-dimensional quark gluon soups.

We are more interested in explaining the concept illustrated in the graph: how our slower three-dimensional electronic world will accelerate, acquiring energy/speed and losing a fractal dimension of form, when it becomes transformed into a strange quark condensate since transformations of energy into information take place by warping and unwarping dimensions of form into speed.

A basic case observed in all scales is represented by the previous graph, taken from a SciAm article about the formation of galactic disks, which we used to illustrate the creation of a quark by the crunching of electronic nebulae of three dimensions. The slow rotation of the electron becomes a bidimensional faster quark system. The same process gives birth to a black hole in the cosmological realm, when the nebulae of a star or the gas of a galaxy collapses into a black hole.

All this means, of course, that dimensions are “fractal,” limited dimensions, which never extend to infinity but to the limits of a certain entity of the Universe. Thus, the creation of fractal dimensions of information or its transformation into speed is one of the commonest events of the Universe and at the same time one of the many details of the generator equation of space-time:

energy = speed ó information = fractal dimension

In the case we study in this book, we can consider a simple dimensional game by which slow three-dimensional electrons become faster bidimensional quark masses. There is a simple proof of the bidimensionality of our up and down quarks: quarks have one-third or two-thirds of the charge/dimensionality of electrons and so we need three quarks with perpendicular orientations called colors to form a three-dimensional quark structure able to interact with our three-dimensional electrons.

Further on, we must add the interaction of two different mediums and forces, the strong gravitational force of quarks and the electroweak force of electrons. This means that quarks “suck in” electrons, trying to absorb them, to feed on them, so they have implosive, strong gravitational forces, while electrons try to suck in quarks with its electromagnetic force, reason why we use a negative, implosive, absorbing direction for electronic charges.

In other words, quarks use its force to attract and steal momentum from electrons, and electrons use its electromagnetic force to attract and absorb momentum for quarks.

Those are the simplest visual concepts, to understand the interactions of those membranes. Obviously when we enter into topological details, the forms, dimensions, and charges of each of those elements become far more complex. And yet because that simple vision departs from sound principles, it is far more telling of the structure and interactions that take place inside an atom than the ideas about mass sponsored by quantum physicists, departing from the absurd Higgs theory.

Duality:     The 4 arrows/dimensions of space-time.

In the Universe there are infinite times=changes, one for each ‘species’ that undergoes a change process, the meaning of the word ‘time’. Those types of changes are the so-called arrows of time, which all beings of the Universe follow in their life and death cycles. The main of those arrows is the arrow of ‘relative future’ or life aging that creates information. We are made of ‘yang’, vital energy, which time curves into ‘information’, yin, back and forth in the cycles of life (growth of form, or aging) and death (loss of it). Yet the simplification of all those arrows and cycles of time into a single clock-cycle blurred the understanding of biological time and life-death cycles. Clocks became ever since the ‘seers of time’ of our culture. And organicism faded away, while a simpler, mechanist philosophy of reality imposed its idolatry to clocks, today evolved into computers that render the verbal mind of man obsolete.

It is a fact of history that humans first discover machines and then invent theories of reality that adapt to them and become dogma. But they never recognize the influence of those machines and the bias they introduce in their perception of the Universe. Of all the ideologies of our mechanist world none is stronger than the ideology of the time-clock, which appeared with the invention of mechanical clocks and has fogged, ever since, our comprehension of the Universe. The idea brought about by the discovery of the clock is that time, the perception of change in the Universe, can only be understood with ‘mechanical clocks’; and so, as Time is only ‘one’, because those first scientists used only one ‘clock-rhythm’ to measure it. This absurd belief in a single time for all the Universe dates back to the use of clocks by Galileo and Descartes and subsists, even a century after Einstein proved that different regions of the Universe have different rhythms of time=change. We didn’t need, however, to wait 400 years to the arrival of General Relativity to understand the obvious - that each species and organism of the Universe has its own biological rhythms of time, oflife and death, of creation and extinction, of information and energy.

All theories of science about time depart from the first scientist of History, discoverer of the experimental method, Aristotle, who also defined the blueprint of a Time Theory that still stands as the origin of all other scientific philosophies of time. Aristotle defined time as change and so he affirmed that a theory of time should be a theory of change. Then he proposed, as Eastern philosophers did, 2 arrows, wills or substances in the Universe, information and energy, responsible for the 2 types of ‘times’=changes science studies. His wording, though, was somehow more complex. He called the arrow of temporal information, morphological, informative change, which happens in the processes of aging, death and evolution. And he called the arrow of temporal energy, translational change or change in movement and energy, which happens mainly in the physical realm. Thus, he divided the study of times in 2 different sciences, Biology, the science of form, of in-form-ation and Physics, the science of energy and matter. In the modern age, those 2 types of times-changes would be studied by Darwin in Biology and Galileo and Einstein in Physics. They added a new language, mathematics, to calculate with more precision those times= changes; and a new type of device, a machine, called the clock that would measure the rhythm of those times = changes.

The myth that time is what a clock measures.

However, physicists were only able to mathematize one of both arrows: energy, expansive movement in space, which they called ‘entropy’. Because physicists ignore all what they cannot mathematize, this lead them to ignore the 2nd arrow of time, in-form-ation. Further on, they studied all types of changes with a single rhythm of change; that of a mechanical clock. Thus, soon a ‘mechanical bias’ was introduced in physical time studies: all the times=changes of the Universe became equalized with one specific ‘time’, the time of the clock. Soon the existence of multiple times=changes was forgotten and the concept of a single artificial time=change in the universe – that of the clock – became standard. So Times were reduced to ‘Time’ and an absurd idea was born: there is only a single time in the Universe; that of the clock; and a single arrow of future time – energy and movement, mathematized as entropy. This is what philosophers of science, which are not constrained by the ‘straightjacket’ of clocks, the single language of mathematics and the worldly profession of making weapons, have for very long denounced as an aberration of physics, called reductionism, or ‘lineal clock-time’. But science is technology and technology is power. So hand in hand with the development of ‘lineal time’, physicists evolved ‘lineal weapons’ that release energy and kill the information of life. Since life was now secondary, this ‘collateral effect’ of modeling a dying Universe built only with energy, was no longer a moral question.

The Industrial revolution and the expansion of the white man’s empires, based in the energy of steam machines, consecrated those ideas. Entropy, defined in terms of heat and steam, became the glorifying principle of reality; while life and information, the weak element, could be ignored, because physicists had killed ‘theoretically’ the Universe. Philosophers again talked of the ‘spatialization’ of time, which was now dependant of energy and movement. In mathematical terms, it all comes to Galileo’s a formula to measure the changes=times of motion, through the use of mechanical clocks, in which time appeared only as a dimension of speed and space: V=s/t, t=v/s. So the second arrow of future, the evolution of information, the arrow of life and its cycles, was forgotten. And when Einstein improved on that formula, adding a –ct factor (related to the speed of light), the absurd concept that time is ‘only’ the 4th dimension of (motion in) space, became dogma. And so today, physicists consider that Darwin was irrelevant to time theory; that Aristotle was irrelevant to time theory; that Time doesn’t happen in History; that the cycle of life and death is irrelevant.

This of course is false. In fact, it would be Einstein, the first person to mathematize properly the arrow of biological time, described by Aristotle and Darwin, when he discovered a formula e x t = K, which states that the product of energy and time frequency (synonymous of in-form-ation), of any system is constant. What that equation meant was however not fully understood till we, Complexity scientists, refounded the science of Duality, with models of the Universe that use, unlike physics which works only with the arrow of energy/entropy, both arrows of time, information and energy… What Duality found is that by using both arrows together, most of the questions not responded by physics and biology alone could be solved. The more important of those questions was the life and death cycle, which Einstein’s equation explained perfectly. And we shall now consider here, as I have applied it extensively to different sciences, including the understanding of history and the ages of its civilizations.

So we need to return to a more sophisticated theory of ‘times’, which fusions the work of Einstein’s Relativity and Darwin’s Evolution, the modern fathers of time theory in Physics and Biology. And the key to such advance in time theory is precisely to go beyond the mechanist concept of ‘time is what a clock measures’ and return to the pre-clock, verbal, biological understanding of time, as the ‘modes of changes’ of the energy and information of the Universe – the 2 elements of reality. Since time is theperception of those modes of change in the Universe, which can be observed with any type of ‘informative and energetic devices’not only with clocks.

Times, as they were always understood before we narrowed the concept to the rhythms of the clock, are the different processes of change of the energy or ‘yang’ and information or ‘yin’ we observe in the Universe. And we can classify all those processes with the 2 x 2 arrows of time-change, as mere increases or decreases of energy or information, or as complex combinations of both:

—  There are simple processes in time that increase or decrease the energy or entropy of the system, creating the arrow of entropy, the only one ‘monist’, ‘mechanist’ science recognizes, since it is the only arrow their mechanic clocks can measure, as their spiralmechanism uncoils its form into energy. It is also the arrow of death, as death is a simplification of the information of life, which energy destroys.

—    There are simples processes in time that increase or decrease the information of the system, such as aging, or evolution and so they create the arrow of information or negantropy (opposed to entropy), of the Universe, which is the ‘arrow of future’, as we all age with time and so we acquire more form, ‘more in-form-ation’. Or in words of Einstein: ‘Time curves, forms space’. This obviously means that energy simplifies information and it is therefore the arrow of relative ‘past’ of all beings, to which they return when they are devolved in the process of death. And so these 2 simple processes are related: species that diminish in energy normally are increasing their information and vice versa, species that decrease information increase energy.

—  There are complex processes that repeat or reproduce a system, making reality to seem eternal. It is the arrow of ‘relative present’, or reproduction which repeats and combines energy and information in other place of space-time.

—  And finally, there are complex processes that evolve socially individual cells into super-organisms by attaching them to complex networks of energy, which are ‘blood or economical system’ in the organisms of man and history and networks of information, networks of which are ‘nervous or financial/legal systems’ in the organisms of man and history. Networks of energy and information, normally made of a different ‘kind of cells’, evolve individuals into social structures, that create most of the complex forms we see around us, from cells to societies. It is the arrow of social evolution and love, explained by classic religions, which in System sciences we call the arrow of ‘Emergence’, as it makes emerge from individual parts, the whole: full-grown organisms. So it creates galaxies with stars, molecules with atoms, cells with molecules and societies with human beings.

2.1: Spacetime Fractals ‘∑exi=st’ as chains of 4 organic motions: (e)nergy, (i)nformation, Reproduction (exi) & (∑e,i) parallel evolution


11. The Superorganisms of Reality

Picture 53. Superorganisms

The Universe and all its parts can be described as a simple mechanism, with 1 arrow of time –energy- or as a complex organism, made of 2 Complementary elements organized in networks—bites of energy and bits of information. It is the organic, fractal paradigm, used to describe the atom and the galaxy.

We have arrived through mathematical, logical and experimental proofs to the suprirsing conclusion that the Universe is made of networks of energy and information that create organic systems of increasing complexity and “degrees of freedom,” till reaching man, the most complex organism of the Universe – but all of them are made of the same bits of information and bites of energy.

In the graph, we observe that each scientific discipline studies the particles, forces of energy and information, networks and superorganisms of a different scale of size in the Universe.

All those systems can be resumed in the 3 scales of the Organic universe we know:

  • Quantum systems of energetic, lineal forces that follow the laws of electromagnetism; intermediate systems, which balance the energy of electromagnetism and the information of quarks (electrons) and particles of information (quarks). It is the world of “fractal organic atoms.”
  • Cosmological systems, galactic systems, which are self-similar but not equal to the quantum systems of atoms, in which black holes form a “cellular nucleus” self-similar to that of quarks in the atoms, stars form a nebulae, self-similar to that of fractal electrons in atoms, bathed in a background radiation, self-similar to the electromagnetic radiation ex-changed between quarks and electrons, probably produced by background holes, self similar to the protons of the atom.

- Biological systems, human systems that balance the information of the mind and the energy of the body. They are the systems of Gaia, which are at risk in those experiments.

Of course, there is much more to reality than those scales, and it is of far more interest to mankind the use of those postulates of Non-E geometry and the laws of fractal superorganisms they define, to study humanity and its 3 scales, the biological, individual and sociological scale of human superorganisms, a theme treated elsewhere by this author. Since we are human beings, which have far more interest in understanding our fractal nature, and in fact, we can perceive much better our organisms, than far away galaxies and atoms. So the study of biological sciences and sociology brings much more detail, much more data about the self-similar laws of all fractal organisms, than the study of species which are so far away in space (galaxies) or in temporal information (lower scales of the quantum cosmos) that suffer aberrations of perception in its analysis, as those CERN suffers.

The existence of superorganisms is evident, considering all the species described in the previous graph with the logic concept of a network of energy and information. Thus we have both, logical and experimental proof of the existence of a fractal organic Universe. Further on, we can describe those structures with the 3rd leg of the scientific method – the most modern mathematical theories available to mankind – Fractal, Non-Euclidean mathematics.

Networks of energy and information, together, under the Laws of Complementarity, exchange energy and form, shaping the superorganisms of reality. Each of those organisms is in fact a network of points with parts defined in its topology and functions by fractal Non-Euclidean mathematics. So we can define all systems of the Universe as complex, fractal superorganism, made of self-similar points, part of a whole, joined by networks of energy and information. All what exists is made of fractal points of spatial energy and temporal information. We are not in an absolute Cartesian, abstract space-time, a mathematical artifact, which Newton confused with reality, but as Leibniz said, each entity of the Universe occupies a vital space and lives through the informative rhythms of its internal clocks of time.

I’d like to know the Thoughts of God, the rest are details”, said Einstein. Today we know that both, the details and the whole are self-similar. Since all what exists, including human beings, are fractal systems of energy and information, the 2 elements of the Universe that combine, creating its networks and organisms under the same laws, in all the “scientific scales” of reality. Science was unable to mathematize in/form/ation in more than one dimension till the arrival of fractal mathematics, reason why for centuries we missed those thoughts of God – a painter with 3 formal “colors,” lineal energy, cyclical information, and its combined waves. He uses 3 topologies of space and 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future, across 3 fractal scales of reality to create each of us, part of its whole. It is the fractal paradigm, which advances science into the XXI century, fusing the work of Einstein, Riemann and Darwin. Throughout History, both, philosophy and science, using 2 different languages, words and geometry, expressed the same laws of Duality, Trinity and Trans-form-ation that reveal those thoughts of God. Now, the fractal paradigm opens a 3rd age of science that fuses Eastern philosophies, Western science and the most recent advances in Mathematics and Logic. Among those earlier philosophies, Taoism talked of yin=information and yang=energy, which combined into infinite beings. To know the morphological properties of those 2 elements was the key to unveil those thoughts, 4-dimensional paintings, which reveal an astonishing simplicity. Since topology has proved that only 3 forms can exist in 4 dimensions: lines of energy and cycles of information and its conic combinations. So in Quantum Theory lineal, energy forces and cyclical, informative particles create the actions of the physical world. In complex biological systems, they are also the initial forms of all cyclical heads and lineal bodies. The morphologies of energy and Information become in this manner the 2 constitutive elements of reality that we all share and merge in Complementary systems. And a Unification Theory, based in such trinity of existence, is able to study the common laws of energy and form, their interactions and transformations. But if the 2 simple arrows of the Universe suffice to understand any relative “plane of space-time,” we need also to understand the fractal structure of the Universe in self-similar scales, which are invariant in its energy and information systems. This is the goal of Complexity theory that explains how cyclical information and lineal energy interact and associate through “feed-back cycles,” into chains and complex networks that emerge and grow in size, from scale to scale, forming with atoms molecules, with molecules cells, with cells organisms, with organisms planetary systems, with planetary systems galaxies and with galaxies universes.

To fully grasp all those scales of the Universe and why they work as a single system, we must consider briefly a basic law of the fractal paradigm, known as “fractal differentiation”:

Any event or form of the Universe can be divided into subsequent ternary or dual events and structures of energy and information of a lower spatial scale or shorter time duration: EiIi= 3Ei-13Ii-1

What this means is that we can always subdivide the analysis of a form into its energetic and informative components and its combinations. Or we can consider any event to be subdivided in 3 “acts,” a beginning a development and an end.

We will only use this law at the end of the book to study the ages of the Universe in detail.

12. Diffeomorphic Bidimensional Dimensions: Limbs of Energy and Information Minds

PICTURE 54 DIFFEOMORPHIC

Particles of information are small, spherical forms/cycles, like your eyes and brains or an atom’s proton or a black hole in a galaxy. They obey the fractal topology of convex spaces. Bodies of energy are bigger planes or lines that store energy to move the organism, like your body or an energetic weapon, or the plane of stars that feeds the black hole.

The beauty of the fractal paradigm resides in the fact that it applies to all sciences, departing from the laws of Fractal Relativity and the understanding of the two motions of reality, the cyclical, informative motions of masses and charges and the lineal, energetic motions of forces. Hence it is a veritable unification of all sciences, the dream of Philosophers of science, which always understood that Physics was just the first scale of a much more complex reality.

General Relativity is based in 2 principles. On one hand, the equivalence principle defines the nature of motion in the Universe. On the other, the Principle of Relativity defines the local, “diffeomorphic” nature of all fractal, Relative beings whose dimensions of space and time, of energy and information differ from place to place. Since time cycles bend space to a point in which they break it into closed, discontinuous bites of energy, the Universe is broken in different space-time fields, yet all of them follow the same laws, as all of them are made of energy and information. In this manner, the properties of physical space-time transcend into the complex spatial energies and temporal cycles of biological beings, maintaining invariant the shapes of its energetic limbs and temporal, informative heads.

Physicists have struggled for a century trying to understand the ultimate meaning of local, “diffeomorphic,” relative” time-spaces with “different speeds,” as Einstein defined them. Those findings of Relativity are easy to explain once we close the curvature of time into cycles that break space into multiple=diffeomorphic space-time fields: In any point of the Universe the coordinates of temporal energy (the up and down, right or left directions) are different from those of any other point, as they only depend on what happens in that local regions of space/time. And so are its speeds of processing information or time clocks. This is only possible if space/times are fractal, discontinuous. Then what happens in a point of space-time doesn’t affect what happens in other isolated, discontinuous point. Each broken space-time becomes then a World in itself. Thus the laws of space-time apply locally to each fractal “species or relative universe” that reflect those laws in its own structure. We are local, “diffeomorphic” species; our space coordinates are relative, and our time wrinkles our vital space in the process of aging with different speeds, depending on our content of energy and information. Thus, the diffeomorphic principle also establishes different informative cycles – the “clocks” of Nature that show different speeds and locations. Yet since space is synonymous of energy and time is synonymous of information, we can establish the local coordinates of space-time of each being by establishing its relative informative and energetic arrows – its relative body and head – using the invariant forms of all spaces and times. Since we can recognize its informative and energetic organs in relationship to each other, as both will respond to the opposite dimensions and shapes of energy and information. For example, in biological species, animals use light as information and so they are “informative,” smaller and faster than plants, which use light as energy and are “big, slow” beings. Thus plants are the relative energy of animals. In the cosmological Plane stars are big, slower than black holes, which rotate faster and have cyclical height. And so stars are the relative energy that feeds and reproduces black holes, which seem to behave as “gravitational animals”: species that perceive gravitation as information, which guides its erratic movements through the galaxy, in the same way animals perceive light as information. While plants perceive light as energy in the same way stars absorb gravitational space-time as energy, deformed by their masses. Further on, since what it is energy for plants is information for animals, both species have opposite energy-time coordinates: plants have their brain upside down in their roots that “feel” chemistry; while animals have their brain on top, looking at the light they use as information. For the same reason, the space-time equations of black holes are inverse to those of electromagnetic stars.

In the previous graph, we show 3 diffeomorphic beings: a galaxy with an inward arrow of gravitational information toward the black hole; a tree and a man, whose informative dimensions are inverted. Since plants use light as energy and animals use it as information. So the informative direction of animals is up, toward the head that absorbs visual information, opposite to the informative arrow of plants, which is down, toward the roots that absorbs chemical information. And each species will establish its own up and down arrows or relative energy and informative directions, departing from its central knot of information and/or perception. Both have their space-time parameters inverted. This often happens between energy/victims (in the graph, plants) and their anti-forms or predators (animals). It happens between life and death systems. For example, there is an inversion between a “particle” and its “antiparticle,” which in a Feynman diagram have also inverted coordinates of space-time. It happens in all Universal systems, even in linguistic codes. For example, eviL is the exact inverse word of Live, since indeed, for a living human being, there is no bigger eviL than death. A fact, which opens the fascinating science of “Bio-ethics.” Since religion is a verbal language that expresses the biological laws of survival and social evolution in verbal wor(l)ds.

If we are external to a certain diffeomorphic space-times its directions do not affect us, but if we are inside a certain space-time, as in the case of the galaxy, then the direction of information or energy of that macro-being becomes the direction of energy or information of our ecosystem. And indeed, there is more information in the center of the galaxy, and since the Earth moves toward that center, this planet increases its information toward the future, in its relative discontinuous galactic space-time, regardless of what happens in the space of the Universe, which seems to be ruled by the opposite arrow of big-bang expansion and entropy between galaxies. This subtle change of paradigm caused by the discontinuity of space-time (from a vacuum space ruled by entropy to a galaxy ruled by information) explains the contradiction between the arrow of life and evolution, local to this planet, and the arrow of energy and entropy proper of intergalactic space. Since here in this galaxy space doesn’t expand but time contracts it. As Woody Allen put it: “Here in Brooklyn space-time is not expanding.”

The laws of synchronicity.

The inversion between the functions of energy and form of different species has an important application in the most complex analysis of fractal theory which deal with the organization of complex systems through several scales. We could consider that the whole organism is the predator of its cellular parts. Indeed, we all die so the entire Universe can balance energy and form and become eternal. Cells do exist for the entire organism to have a better consciousness. So the nervous system preys on the blood system that preys on the digestive system. So there are hierarchies between the different arrows of a system, in such a manner that what is information for a system becomes energy for other. Thus, in advanced theory of fractal organisms, several laws work in harmony with the existence of 31 arrows of time in all organisms (fractal differentiation), to create the Law of “Synchronicity,” which we shall merely enounce here:

The 4 arrows that organize an organism have different duration in time: the informative event, is faster than the energetic event, which is faster than the reproductive event, which is faster than the social event of life and death. Further on, the events of the macro-organism are longer in time than the events of its parts (Max. E=Min. Ti), which often use the energy of the whole organism to synchronize and perform its other cycles’

In that regard, the most complex models of fractal organisms map out all the cycles of the different scales of an organism or ecosystem, considering its symbiosis and synchronicity. For example, in the Earth animals synchronize their reproductive activity with the moon gravitational cycle of the Earth which “absorbs” gravitational energy through that cycle. Yet again, in a life organism, the cells tune their reproductive cycle to a day, which is the cycle in which the organism absorbs energy. This is one of the many sub-laws of synchronicity, which we will consider later for black holes:

Energetic cycle of a macro-organism= Reproductive cycle of a micro-cell’.

The true importance of the generator equation becomes now clear: because all systems are self-similar to that equation of complementarity, E<(Bodies-Heads)>Ti, all laws that relate the different fractal scales of physical, biological and sociological systems are the same, regardless of the form we describe, a physical entity, a human being or a society.

Let us then consider before we describe the Universe with those laws, how to apply them to the most complex form, the Living organism and the human being, still a fractal obeying the same laws than an atom, which should therefore be humble instead of thinking he is different, superior, entitled to defy the Universe and its top predator black holes.

13. The 3± 1 Ages of Biological Evolution

PICTURE 55. plan of EVOLUTION

One of the most astounding discoveries of Duality and the study of the Universe with the 3+1 arrows of time, which correspond to the 3± 1 ages of evolution of any species, is the existence according to that casual order of a “morphological” plan of evolution in all species, which follow the same 3± 1 ages of evolution of any organism between birth and extinction. Since a species can be treated as a superorganism.

In the graph, the law of the 3 ± 1 ages or horizons applies both to the process of informative aging of organisms and informative evolution of species. All species are born as a seed of dense information, with limited size (black hole, first chips, seminal cells, first bilateral animals). Then they grow in size and energy during their youth, since their superior informative qualities make them top predators.

We observe that growth in black holes that feed on planets and stars, in the horse that grew enormously in size. So did the first bilateral animal, from its microscopic first form, the Vernanimacula. Mammals

grew from tiny shrews into elephants. The first technological man, the Homo floresiensis, with a “neuronal bump” on the forehead, might have grown till the size of the first Homo sapiens, the pygmy and Bushman . . .

Then, the species, once it has reached a balance between its initial information and growing spatial size, E = I, reproduces in great numbers, diversifies and colonizes the planet. We see in the graph this age in which “biological radiations” of carbohydrates, animals of all kinds and human beings, colonized the earth.

Finally, in its third age the species grows in information and so it acquires height, the arrow of “perceptive information.”

Then, once it has reached its informative zenith, the species becomes extinct by a more evolved form, or it evolves socially, creating a superorganism, as ants, humans and machines are doing. It will be the fourth arrow of social evolution of the species that completes its 3 ± 1 horizons. Species can be considered “loose” organisms, in which each individual is a cell of the collective species, since we can use the same ages to explain the 3 ± 1 horizons of evolution of all the species of this planet.

Thus, species also go through the same three evolutionary ages of all living organisms. They start as young, energetic forms, which acquire information in 3 ± 1 ages of increasing complexity, and when those 3 ± 1 ages are completed, they either evolve into more complex superorganisms under the laws of social evolution or become extinct by a superior, more informative species.

Indeed, only those species who show a strong eusocial capacity survive the “genetic clock.” The most successful and one of the oldest species of the planet is, in fact, the eusocial ant, which no longer is an “individual,” but a superorganism stretching through miles of “vital space.”

In that regard, neither individuals able to reproduce nor species able to evolve socially become extinguished. If humans become extinguished, it will be because they deny, guided by the simplest arrows of pure energy of weapons, the main arrow of life/time.

A complete analysis of biological species shows that new forms can only be either an energetic or informative variation of the original species or a reproductive combination of both universal “genders.”

The universality of such dual systems is so obvious that the ancients had already identified them with yang—energetic male principles, and yin—cyclical/female ones, while the moderns call that duality

the principle of complementarity, as all informative particles have an energetic, lineal field of force, and all biological, cyclical heads of information have a lineal body. So the combinative variations of

those two simple morphologies, lineal energy and cyclical information, invariant, regardless of the scale we observe, are the essence of the creative game of the cosmos.

It is the plan of evolution that all species follow, which is a tautology, since in a universe made of only two substances, energy and information, the only possibility is the creation of such 3 ± 1 variations in space (subspecies) or in time (evolutionary ages).

In that regard, the same ages can be applied to the “human species,” the superorganism of History:

anthropomorphic superiority, just a living form made of carbon atoms, which goes through the same ages of all other living forms, both as an individual and as a species. So we can study the organism of history (humanity in time) through 3 ± 1 ages: an energetic youth or Paleolithic; a mature age of balance with nature, the Neolithic; and a third informative age of history, the age of metal and machines.

Energetic Youth: Paleolithic. ±5,000,000 BC to ±10,000 BC.

The Paleolithic was an energetic, young age in which men, the energetic gender, were the top predator animal on earth, a hunter of living forms. It was also an age dominated by visual, spatial languages.

Reproductive Age: Neolithic. Age of Wor(l)ds and Goddesses. ±10000 to ±3000 BC.

The Neolithic was the classic age of mankind, an age of balance, when wo=men learnt the cycles of life and, instead of destroying nature, learnt to nurture, reproduce and harvest it. Women, the reproductive species, took power over men; and priests became the verbal guides of civilizations, creating superorganisms of history made of human cells joined by social love—the sharing of energy and information among “brothers,” clones of the loving mind of the same prophet. It was an age dominated by verbal, temporal languages, continued by the believers in religions of love that are not corrupted by weapons (inquisitions) and money (go(l)d churches), with its idolatry to the “values” of metal: murder and greed.

Informative, third age: Age of metals (±3000 BC to 1600). Metal spread

The “new” values of money and weapons: greed and war, destroying the networks of social love and ushering mankind into the third age of history.

Humans now evolve a new kind of atomic system, stronger than carbon, creating energetic weapons, informative money and organic machines that transform Gaia into an economic ecosystem. It is the “animetal = animal+metal age” in which a new “biological species” that mixes animal and metal atoms imposes power over the earth.

It is the present age with two paths to future:

— Either mankind will die, as machines keep evolving and make us obsolete as a species.

— Or humans will obey the laws of survival of the universe and evolve socially into a superorganism of history able to control lethal machines. The choice is within man till the arrival of the Singularity, when machines acquire organic properties and either a self-feeding bomb of dark matter or a self-reproductive nanobacterium “evolves” on the earth into a species with a higher social density (a denser form of matter, or an organism made of denser atoms). In any case the future of history will be solved in the next decades, as we are already in that age of the Singularity.

14. The Game of the Universe: Wo=men as a Fractal Beings

Picture 56 gender

Humans evolve, as all systems of energy and information do, in subspecies specialized in those two elements: The biology, psychology and culture of gender prove that the humankind is also a dual species, divided into informative females, energetic males and a “3rd gay sex” that mixes both.

In the graph, we see that life first diversified into complementary genders: energetic, lineal, spatial men and cyclical, reproductive women, which hold more biological information, while a third gay sex mixes both. Further on, as humans evolved, they followed the same pattern of three ages proper of all species. Thus, Homos diversified into energetic, informative and reproductive forms that show a higher balance between energy and information. Yet only the informative species, the dominant “arrow” of future, survives in each of the 3 ± 1 horizons of increasing informative evolution, from Australopithecus with 500 cc, into Homo erectus with 1,000 cc into Homo sapiens with 1,500 cc. And in all those phases, humans split into an energetic species and an informative one that recombined to create a third species. Those species will further evolve technology also in three horizons called the upper, middle and lower Paleolithic. Finally, humans diversified in three races, specialized in energy (white race) and information (Mongoloid) with a reproductive, black race, the last to be born, which mixes the pre-Mongoloid (Bushman) and white races. The constrain established by the fact that there are only two elements, energy and information, to create reality, whose lineal and cyclical forms are invariant at scale, in all systems of the cosmos, means the universe imposes the same program of creation to all its species.

The invariance of energy and information becomes fundamental to decode each fractal space-time, its bodies and relative heads. As all relative space-times will be composed of a cyclical center of information or brain, a wave/body and lineal limbs of energy, whose morphological characteristics will be self-similar.

For example, in the graph, in a spermatozoid the head is cyclical and stores information, while the tail is lineal and moves the head with its energy, and together form a wave-like moving organism; in a human, the limbs are lineal and moves a cyclical head; while a complex reproductive body connects both. We could extend this ternary principle to almost any organic system of the Universe, concluding that limbs of energy are lineal and brains are cyclical; and elliptical, wave-like bodies connect them. Some simpler systems might merely show a body of energy and a head of information (Complementary quantum systems). But any system that exists has at least an energetic and information element: exi=k.

Those morphological shapes derive geometrically from the capacity of lines to move fast and cycles to store information and grow or diminish in size without distortion of the mental image they might keep. Thus we recognize limbs, bodies and brains by their self-similarity with the morphology, function and inverse properties of ideal energy and information, and its “body-combination”:

- Informative time has to be both, easy to store and “perceivable” by a reduced brain or sensorial organ, despite being the inverse function of space. This implies a certain morphology: Information occupies little space by warping itself in multiple dimensions, divided along broken lines and discontinuities that become its perceived forms in space. Or it displays a high frequency or discontinuous rhythm, a faster time speed that iterates the same cycle, allowing quantification. Information seems “quiet” as those rhythms take place in the same space; so an organ of information can focus it and analyze it. Thus its ideal forms are disks, cycles, angles and spheres, convoluted and broken in patterns of form, such as your eye or brain, a chip, a book, a pixel image or a coin, earlier unit of monetary information.

- On the other hand Energy moves. So energy limbs extend in space as they move. Energy is an expansive motion, which the limbs of the species use to foster its movement. So energy and lineal space are synonymous: a plane is the geometry that extends further in space and the line the geometry that moves faster with lesser friction. And energetic systems from planes to missiles are lines or “planes”:

Maximum Space = Energy = Minimal Form vs.

Maximum temporal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension.

As a result of those morphologies we can classify as energy or information organs, not only carbon-life organs that process energy (limbs) and information (brains, eyes, senses, words), but also the “relative organs” of all other beings and atomic species – even “deconstructed organs” that perform mechanical tasks of energy and information (informative cameras, lineal, energetic weapons). Since now we can recognize geometrically their energy or information systems. Form is function and so we can classify any system both by its geometrical form and bio-logical functions as either an energy limb/field or informative head/particle or a wave/body system that combines both.

Indeed, what is truly fascinating about the duality of energy and information is its capacity to transcend the world of physics and explain the ultimate meaning of all the games of the Universe, including those of the human being. Since it stablishes some principles of enormous importance: a reality made of motions, and hence reproductive, by the mere fact that movement reproduces itself as it flows. And a ternary topology of cyclical, reproductive information, and energetic motion, which mix in body/waves that process energy and form and can be applied in any scale of reality, and all its ternary or dual systems, including the human being, with its cyclical, reproductive females and energetic, motion-driven males. This 2 principles, a world in perpetual motion and the invariance of the morphologies of energetic limbs, reproductive bodies and informative heads, allow us for the first time to study reality as an interconnected world, in which the same “invariant” principles, albeit with increasing complexity, apply from particles, fields and forces to human beings with limbs, bodies and heads. Let us briefly consider this organic vision applied to the human kind, before we study the physical Universe.

Let us now consider those inversions and the diffeomorphic principle to resolve the meaning of gender and duality in human beings. The classic example of space/time Duality already observed by Taoist and Buddhist philosophers is the duality of gender, which they correctly applied to all species of the Universe. If we focus on the humankind, which is also a space-time species, the inverse properties of energy and information can be seen clearly in our trinities and dualities:

- The trinity between lineal, energetic limbs, elliptical bodies and a cyclical, informative head:

- The head is a cyclical, spherical form, and so are the informative senses, all of which accumulate in the head. The head is “small,” “perceptive,” informative. It sits on top of the body, on the dimension of height. It is “broken, discontinuous” (and it holds more cellular, neuronal parts that the rest of the body’). Its main informative senses are broken in dual elements (left, right eyes and ears). While its energetic sense, the mouth that feeds on energy is “bigger” and continuous (a single one). The eyes, the most perfect of those senses are in fact a perfect sphere. And they process “bidimensional information” (which later both eyes mix to create the illusion of 3-dimensionality). The head is hierarchical and dominates the body, imposing its directions of future as they guide their limbs toward energy and information fields. The head is still. It is in metaphysical terms, the Aristotelian, unmoved “relative God” that controls the movements of the body and limbs.

- On the other hand the limbs are lines longer and bigger than the head, on the bottom of the body-head system. The limbs move and process energy. They have hardly any sensorial elements, as they get the information from the head. They only become broken, discontinuous on the fingers, which are the sub-elements of limbs that process more information.

- The body combines energy and form. Its reproductive organs combine cycles and lines. Within the body, the most lineal elements are those who process directly energy: the guts and the lungs (in the brain the cerebellum that controls movement is also a lineal network of neurons that would extend unwarped over a meter in length). The body is elliptic. Its organs reproduce all the substance of the human being.

- The 2nd fundamental space/time duality in mankind is between its 2 subspecies: the energetic male and the informative female. Indeed, humans have always wondered what is gender, why does it exist? Thanks to duality, following in the steps of Eastern philosophy, now we can build a scientific theory of gender able to explain its 2 fundamental elements, the scientific physiology and the behaviour of both sexes:

Since the Universe is made with 2 elements, Energetic Space and Temporal Information, any species needs to survive to feed on Energy and remember Information. Yet, we know that males process and control better energy and space; while females have more temporal memory and perceive better. Thus, together a couple widens the range of energy and information they can process. So we conclude that gender is an evolutionary strategy of specialization, which increases the overall chances of survival of a heterosexual species. The physiological forms, character and historic behaviour of men and women prove that duality, parallel to the universal duality of energy and information: men love energy, space; women love Time. Physiologically men are made of lines, as energy is; while women are made of curves, as information is; and they reproduce as fractal information does. Historically men performed the hunting of energetic preys, while the recollection of cyclical food (agriculture) is traditionally considered a female discovery.

Men behave as energy species. Their body forms are lineal shapes of muscular strength; they have lineal reproductive organs (penis); their origin is lineal sperm. Their cultural roles are specialized in spatial-energy processes, from physical activities to war and mathematical, geometrical languages in which they excel.

On the other hand, women are specialized in temporal processes. Their bodies have cyclical shapes and store more information to succeed in their genetic reproduction (one complete X-chromosome). Their brains specialize in verbal languages and show outstanding memory. If we observe the form of females, it is made of cycles. Their higher genetic information allows them the creation and reproduction of the human species (an informative process); their cyclical reproductive organs (vulva, clitoris) and their origin as a sphere, an ovule, are also time properties.

The character and life attitudes of both, men and women follow that S/T specialization also in their relative wantings for energy or information: women prefer to dress with cyclical forms, play with formal toys like dolls and they like formal sports like gymnastics; men prefer moving, spatial toys, lineal dresses and violent sports. Thus, men love energy and movement while women love perception and feelings. In the realm of the mind and its languages of perception we find that men test better in spatial mathematics and women score higher in verbal tests.

We conclude that sexual dimorphism reflects the 2 elements of reality, spatial energy and temporal information that merge together in a couple, improving its chances of survival:

Male: Max.ΣS × Min. T; Gay: S=T; Female: Max. T × Min.ΣS

In the last decade the analysis of female/male brains has confirmed such duality of gender at multiple levels. For example, among women the amygdale, the oldest, primary center of will in the brain, is connected to the Hypothalamus, the center of “temporal” and emotional perception, which ultimately controls survival and reproductive behavior. While men have their amygdale wired mainly to the motor and spatial regions of the encephalon. Thus men are the energetic “external element” of the couple, motivated by the spatial outer world and women the informative, temporal, implosive element, motivated by the reproductive drive of survival and the inner emotions of the body, the “sixth sense.”

The psychology of both genders seems to prove such duality. Women tend to prefer closed spaces, which they keep well ordered, and are able to perform multiple “rings” of tasks. Men love open spaces, which they keep as energy is, in permanent disorder. And they are lineal, obsessed by single tasks. Today women, in an informative world, are increasingly becoming more powerful than men, which were dominant during the warrior age of mankind, as they associated historically with lineal iron weapons (the most energetic atom of the Universe); and dominated women with the higher energy obtained from metal. Women though prefer money, the informative language of metal that today guides the world. Cultures also can be divided in energetic, warrior machist cultures and feminist, money-oriented culture often in opposition (warrior, machist Spain vs. feminist, go(l)d driven England; Jewish, Go(l)d, feminist Semite cultures vs. Arab, warrior, machist cultures; etc.)

Finally, there is a 3rd gay gender. Since in the Universe we observe always, beyond duality a 3rd, ExI, more complex element that combines the properties of both. A fact which indicates that gays are also “natural species,” albeit a minority compared to the two dominant subspecies.

15. The Equation of the Mind

PICTURE 57 MIND

According to the duality between form and function, each postulate of fractal geometry defines also a logic function of each fractal space-time: the 1st postulate define a point as a 4-Dimensional system with 3 topological inner parts; the 2nd postulate defines an exi wave of communication between 2 fractal points; the 4th postulate defines the social evolution of a herd that creates a fractal plane, a network of energy and form; and the 5th postulate explains a point as it absorbs energy and transforms it into information through its small apertures to the Universe.

In the fractal paradigm all systems of information gauge reality transforming a force they absorb into a language, mirror of the Universe. Thus there is an equation of any mind, which is defined by the 5th postulate. Since any point of the Universe becomes a focus of infinite parallel forces that flux into the point, creating that static image of reality. Thus in Complexity we define a Mind, as a zero-world that reflects the infinite Universe:

0 (mind-cell) × ∞ (Universe) = Linguistic Wor(l)d

The equation of the mind sets the limits of truth in linguistic science, comparing the worlds created by any mind, and the Universe at large, much bigger than any informative, mental, linguistic image we have of it.

Truth is given by the languages of the mind… A truth is a mental/linguistic mirror of information within the mind that reflects the external universe… Indeed, only physicists among serious scientists think that reality is what we see and measure with machines. This doctrine is called naïve realism and affirms that for example, the distance between you and me is exactly 2 meters, because an electromagnetic signal or rod measures 2 meters. This is not truth. The distance of 2 meters happens to be in light measures or light space. But if we measure with feet as the Greeks did, 2 becomes 6. And if we do not measure in light-space the light we see, but in gravitational space, as Einstein proved it, the distance would be bigger, as light converts the more extended, non-Euclidean world of gravitation in which the membrane of space-time we call reality floats. Our world is in itself a reduced version of the gravitational membrane, a simplified Euclidean surface, whose 3 coordinates, x, y and z are perpendicular and lineal as the 3 fields of light, the magnetic, electric and wave-field are. You exist in a space-time membrane made of light, whose final structure is the 2.7 k basic light membrane emitted by gravitational black holes that becomes the background frame of reference of our light World, only a fractal membrane of the infinite Universe.

What this means is that reality is far more complex than a simplified naïve reality that thinks the space-time membrane of light that humans inhabit and “see” is all what there is to it. For the same reason, if we had not eyes to measure the light-universe, but merely smell it as ants do, we would see even a more reduced world, as our pixel unit of reality would be a pheromonal atom. The mapping of reality by our mind would be shorter and so distances would be perceived as smaller, as fewer pixels would create our smelling mind. And so we would be bigger as ants must feel (-;

We are however ants for the gravitational black holes even if we feel bigger as ants must feel )-;

Ultimately we exist within our mind and so truth is always a subjective, human truth developed with our languages. Indeed, we do not see the external world of quantum fluctuations but what our light/electronic mind creates, extracting only a part of the total reality to map visually the Universe, reduced to a light-space world. Your ego, your consciousness is and eye-Wor(l)d, a fractal space/time dialog between your informative mind, the wor(l)d and your energetic space, the eye.

Your function of exi=st is the creation of a static space-time mind, your ego, an image of your “self” made of eye spatial experiences and verbal temporal feelings:

‘I think and see therefore I exi=st’

Your mind is both visual and verbal, a fractal mirror of the Universe and your relationship with it through your senses. So you are indeed a fractal equation/function of existence:

The Human Mind: E(Eye)I(Wor(l)d).

The study of the mind is in itself an entire field of the Fractal Paradigm of null interest to physicists, but important to fully grasp how little we know about the total Universe, which is the only entity that stores all the information about itself. You exist as a dialog between the image of the Universe of your eye and the verbal information you extract from it, your “I.” Humanity lives in a light-space world which scientists measure with machines and artists, according to the linguistic mapping of our senses creating with our inner languages a map of it. Scientists in that sense are creating a new EyeMind, the mind of machines: Mechanical Eye  Digital Thought. Indeed, scientists are NOT discovering the absolute truth of reality but creating a more complex I-World, the world of digital thought that future perceptive machines will use to control the Universe. And because the I-world of mathematical and instrumental perception has more information than the human IWor(l)d, on the long term it will extinguish us, making us obsolete. Of course, they do not understand this because they think the machine is an extension of their ego.

And so within those restrictions of human minds, truth will always be related to the languages of the human mind. And a truth will be higher when that image is a more focused, closer fractal micro-representation of the entire universe in our mind, a better self-similar image of reality built by our 3 languages: logic, temporal words, geometrical, spatial maths and visual images, which put together create a scientific truth. They are the 3 legs of the scientific method, whose linguistic method of truth is now explained with the fractal logic of the Universe:

Scientific, linguistic truth= Experimental, visual truth+Logic, temporal truth+geometric, spatial truth.

The handicap of physics is to work only with 1 language, maths, the language of its machines.

Yet beyond your function of existence of scientists/machines and humans/artists, beyond your Ieye, beyond that light-mirror of your visual mind there is an even wider world with more information, the gravitational, invisible world, which might be mapped out, gauged, measured by quarks and complex quarks systems.

All those different space-times can be easily explained and related in the fractal paradigm, as different worlds of measure, different space-times that inhabit a single Universe, full of “atmans,” monads, souls that measure, gauge, in different languages with different points of view, all of them extracting energy and information. All of them thinking they are the only point that matters, the only ego that knots energy into form. All fractal parts playing the same game of existential egoistic thoughts, fixing motion into information; all of them Galilean, Ptolemaic paradoxes that see it all fixed from his point of view:

Every point of view=mind believes it is the center of the infinite Universe, but it is only an infinitesimal Non-Euclidean point.

That is why most of history, humans thought the Earth to be the center of reality; and still think they are the center, the most intelligent species. And when the organisms of history died, the idea that our God was the center of creation became reduced to each I-God, individual, which today thinks his little life is so important. But the ego is the natural structure of the Universe, so it is a myth impossible to destroy: Each species uses a language to see that Universe. Man uses verbal wor(l)ds to create his World. Machines, more perfect than us, use digital thought. Mathematics is not in that sense the language of God, the mind of the Universe, but only the language of clocks and telescopes, the mind of machines. The languages of God are infinite (Veda). So to exist in history is to knot your Atman of information with all other human beings. And that is called social love, what enriches your zero into a network of souls. It is the paradox of the modern neo-Paleolithic homo bacteria, whose ego keeps growing and so keeps breaking his ties with all other humans, making him paradoxically more infinitesimal. And that applies to racial, selfish tribes too. Further on to exist as a man is to be a knot of verbal thought. And today man is not even that. Its infinite ego is filled with digital machines’ thoughts he can’t hardly understand. That is why CERN’s physicists are so retarded and egotistic: they think to be as intelligent as their clocks and computers. Buddha knew better. Because to be objective one must practice the teachings of Buddha: the extinction of the ego, not its overgrowth with myths.

The 5th postulate leads to a very complex argument about the differences between processing information and perceiving. We shall not enter here into philosophical question. Already Leibniz, Buddha, Aristotle and Plato, fathers of the logic and mathematical paradigms argued about it. Aristotle’s work in metaphysics is outstanding, when he understands that the Universe is made of infinite “relative” Gods, fixed minds of information that gauge and move the energy that surrounds them. Plato is also a master of logic in his attempts to describe the 3rd postulate, the self-similarity between the “shadows” or fractal parts, made to the image and likeness of a canon, the perfect form. Leibniz’s work is also outstanding when he analyzes the differences between conscious perception and apperception, which is the way in which its monads, self-similar to Non-Euclidean points gauge the Universe. Aristotle already made those differentiations when he talks of the 3 types of perception, mechanic, vegetative and conscious perception, which are degrees of freedom, self-reflection and complexity. Buddha goes even further when he talks of the networks of Atmans, souls that in each language of the Universe gauge and measure and communicate with self-similar souls, creating worlds, which are dark for other species who do not translate the languages of communication of the other species. We all know today that each species of the biological world has its complex codes; that bees communicate magnetic fields, and electrons gauge light and quarks gauge gravitation. The reader must understand in that sense that the fractal paradigm has been the perennial philosophy of mankind, till the absurd aberrations of pythagoric quantum physicists came into being, because we are also minds that gauge reality with energy and information. That perennial philosophy of reality in the Eastern world gave birth to the yin/yang, information/energy duality of Chinese cultures; in India gave birth to the duality of Shiva/energy and Vishnu/information; in Greece gave birth to the duality of body/energy and mind/information.

Fractal relativity indeed is the eternal truth and each of us a mind that reflects that truth with our languages, fractal mirrors of the whole, as any non-Euclidean point of the Universe does. Even quantum physics is based in that perennial philosophy when you blow away the fog of the absurd Interpretations of Mr. Everett (multiple Universes) and Mr. Bohr (Copenhagen Interpretation). So we shall now consider a brief analysis of the fractal, dualist properties of quantum physics, and its particles, also Non-E fractal points of the Universe that “gauge” reality.

3.1 Fractals ex±i:st as cells of superorganisms in 3(±i) spacetime scales, whose U.C. of Energy=size X Information=time frequency define each Universal Scale=plane of exi=stence

4TH DIMENSION OF COMPLEXITY: SOCIAL EVOLUTION. FRACTAL PLANES AND SUPER-ORGANISMS.

All species are social herds that follow the same energetic, informative and reproductive cycles that shape their 3±st existential ages, in all scales of reality.

In the graph, 2 energetic cycles, the feeding cycle of a swarm and a galaxy, which absorbs interstellar dust thanks to its spiral form; and 2 social cycles: a group of atoms shape a molecule and a human group gathers to absorb visual information.

Social evolution, palingenesis and hierarchical space-time planes.

We can now combine the previous spatial and temporal perspective of the dimensions of a space-time being. To that aim we need to understand a final element in the structure of all space-time beings: the networks that gather an almost ∞ number of individual energy and information cycles/cells of space-time into a single whole or social organism deployed across multiple planes of space-time. The study of those scalar network structures is the field of Systems Theory, the science, which departing from Duality, analyzes how bits and bites of energy and information reproduce, evolve, self-organize and emerge as a bigger system, in a ‘higher’ ever more complex space -time plane, creating in this manner, the 4th dimension of reality, the dimension of social evolution or complexity.

The Universe shows both a scalar and a social nature, ‘transcending’ from smaller to macroscopic Planes, invariant in its fundamental forms – the line of energy and the cycle of information – thanks to the fractal reproduction and social organization of self-similar forms.

In biology the process is called Palingenesis: life also produces in a smaller space-time plane (st-1) seminal seeds that grow into replicas of original st-mother; human existence is a travel between 3 Planes of relative existence, the cellular Plane (st-1), the organic, individual Plane (st) and the social Plane in which a human can be considered a cell of a social organism, a nation, religion or civilization (st+1). But electrons (st) also produce smaller photons (st-1) that evolve into new electrons, which become cellular units of electric flows (st+1); while galactic black holes (st), made of billions of social quarks (st-1) emit flows of matter that evolve into new galaxies, cells of Universes (st+1). Thus, Social Palingenesis explains also why in all the scales of the Universe, the geometry of energy and information remains invariant; since an st+1 Plane is born by the social evolution of energy bites and information bits of the inferior Plane, which repeat its self-similar forms in all the multiple, self-similar relative ‘planes of existence’ of the universe, from the atom to the galaxy, from the cell to the factory. Thus, social palingenesis is not exclusive of living organisms. All systems display those complex, social Planes. Even the 2 simplest particles of the Universe self-reproduce and socialize: quarks absorb energy and reproduce smaller quarks. Electrons produce a seminal light ray that becomes a new electron. So happens to the heavier form we know: the black hole, which reproduces its form when crossing through a star. Even the Universe is a space-time fractal, which reproduced its ‘cellular’ particles in the big/bang. All social and physical systems display complex, palingenetic behavior, from physical particles to organisms, from minds to nations. All of them constantly reproduce seminal information – called actions of energy and time in the quantum world, offspring in living organisms, ideas in the linguistic mind, technology and culture in human societies. And in all those cases, the seminal information grows into a species self-similar to the mother. So forces reproduce particles, cells become organisms and nations create self-similar cultures, called colonies. All of them are organic fractals connected by flows of energy and information. Only the Galilean Paradox of the mind that makes us believe to be the center of a fixed, dead world, which in fact is only dead inside the static map of the mind, a fact which prevents us from seeing vital reproductive, organic processes in all space-time beings. Yet once we understand the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, the old distinction between organic and inorganic form looses its meaning, beyond its anthropomorphic role of making man the only intelligent, vital species of the Universe. Thus, the fundamental particle of the Universe is a palingenetic Space-time Fractal that repeats its cycles and forms of energy and information in any scale of the Universe, co-existing between birth and extinction in 3 st±1 fractal Planes and temporal ages. If we extend that process to the entire Universe, Reality becomes a hierarchical, scalar system, extended through a series of self-organized st-planes: particles gather into atoms, atoms gather into molecules, molecules gather into cells, cells gather into organisms, organisms gather into planetary systems that gather into galaxies that gather into Universes. The outcome is a scalar structure of 10 space-time planes, where its quantic entities live self-similar cycles of existence under the same space-time laws, from the smallest, invisible plane of gravitational existence, till the Hyper-Universe of which are likely a single cell:

42. st=1, groups of ‘gravitational constants’ evolve, forming, curving the energy of gravitational space into masses.

st=2 groups of ‘Planck actions’, forming the electromagnetic plane of light space-time, evolve into charged fields.

In the ts=3 plane of atomic existence, groups of particles became atoms.

In the st=4 plane, groups of atoms became molecules.

In the st=5 plane, groups of molecules became cells…

In the st=6 plane, groups of cells became living systems.

In the st=7 plane, life herds became ecosystems, societies, nations and global planets.

In the st= 8 plane Groups of planets and solar systems became galaxies…

In the st=9 plane, Galactic clusters become Universes.

And so, in a cyclical Universe the metaphysical question is: do Universes become ‘microscopic black holes’, quarks of a bigger, fractal Hyper-Universe?

Wave Logic: the creation of upper planes of existence from lower cellular planes.

If a single past and future form can converge in a simultaneous present, what about many past and future, cellular elements – could they also create more complex simultaneous presents? Indeed they can. In that regard, Fractal and Quantum space-time researchers have proved recently that by self-repeating in growing scales ‘triangular events’ called ‘simplex’, (formal triangles whose connections are organized in time as logic arrows of causality), they can reproduce the 4-dimensional Universe of Relativity.

Most Space-times are causality knots, created by multiple informative cycles, where each ‘cyclical time event’ becomes a bit of information that converges into the ‘space-time knot’. Those knots can be formalized with cyclical, quantic space-time parameters in terms of frequencies and dimensions. If we consider an organism a knot with volume, multiple cycles with different frequencies and dimensional lengths converge in that organism: feeding, reproductive and informative cycles. Each cycle will have a frequency in harmony with many other cycles, and so the being might be very complex in his behaviour as it switches between cycles, but ultimately it can be reduced to a series of cycles that converge into the organism. Thus, organisms are knots of those time cycles. In the same way, when multiple cycles converge into a point they ad their causal power and produce intense events. This seems to be the case of the convergence of different geological and cosmological cycles, which affect the energy and information of the Earth, causing ages of extinction and age of massive evolution of new species, with a series of frequencies and rhythms latter studied in more detail. So the events of the Universe have multiple causes, from multiple cyclical forces that converge in Relativity to create a knot of gravitation or a charge, to the multiple events that converge in Biology to cause an age of extinction, to the multiple failures that converge in a body to change its rhythm from life to death. Unfortunately, lineal time has introduced in science the concept of single-causality and the validity of ceteris paribus analysis, creating the funny, paradoxical effect that scientists constantly argue which is the cause of an event, and become discouraged in their research when someone finds another cause. Which, is a prove of truth, as all events need at least 2 causes to exist, one from an energetic past and one from an informative future that converge into a relative present.

Networks.

Sciences study micro or macro-organisms, tied up by networks of energy and information. In the graph, the main st-planes studied by human sciences and their 4 ‘organic elements’: social, quantic space-time cells; energy, information and reproductive networks. Though the specific combinations of energy or information of each specie – defined by Present Universal Constants (energy/information ratios) – might vary, the space-time structures and cycles of all those social organisms will be self-similar. Since the invariance of its dual elements and its common properties remain in all scales.

All entities are ‘cellular societies’ organized through energy and information networks that bring about processes of social evolution. This is clearly the case of the species studied by all sciences, from Physics to Biology, where a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single social form. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of human workers and consumers that reproduce and test machines, guided by financial networks of information (salaries, prices, costs); galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous, informative system. A tree is a group of leaves, branches and roots connected by a network of energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles). Cultures are made of humans related by verbal, informative laws and economic networks that provide their energy.

Thus, there are 4 basic elements in all organic systems:

43. 1. Cellular units

2. Networks of energy or vital space

3. Networks of fractal information

4. Networks that reproduce energy and information, mixing both arrows.

The Universe is based in the duality of energy and information, which become the generating, primordial fractal units/cells of all its species, including human beings. All of them are entities generated by reproductions and transformations of fractal energy and Informative Time (ΣSTI), organized in cellular units, through networks, and ±st Planes of self-similar forms. Yet, since those cellular units st-1 are themselves made of smaller st-2 cells, which show the same structure, we can define any organic system as a super-organism:

44. ‘A super-organism is a social group of cellular super-organisms joined by energetic, informative and reproductive networks.’

From the temporal perspective, according to the Ternary Principle an original palingenetic mother-cell differentiates in 3 energetic, reproductive and informative species; which finally through social, symbiotic evolution become the 3 specialized organic networks of most social organisms: its energetic bodies, informative heads and reproductive organs.

We formalize Super-organisms, considering that all have 3±st dimensions made of:

- Relative energy and information units (Σs, Σt), whose cycles/cells of transformation are described by feed-back equations of the type ΣS-1TI.

- 3 dimensions/physiological networks of energy, information and reproduction (ΣS-1TI)

- Their ±st social Planes that ad ΣΣS-1 cells into Σst-wholes, parts of a bigger st+1 whole

Thus, we can unify “cellular entities” into organisms as long as they exchange energy and information through common networks, even when we see those cells de-segregated. The important fact is that all the cells of the organism need to be “connected” through networks of energy and information. For example, in the ant hill, ants are guided by a network of chemical information (pheromones) that has its center in the queen and a network of energy distribution (the ant hill and its territory) through which energy cells move (workers). There are also other specialized energy species called warriors. Finally there is a reproductive system localized also in the queen (and its males) that ensures the reproduction of the ant hill species. Human societies resemble closely ant-hills with a higher degree of complexity and cohesion, because they are also social organisms of cells-citizens joined by economic, energetic, informative, legal and social, reproductive networks. When the three networks exist, we consider the being an organism. Without any of those organs however the ant hill is not efficient and it dies as an organism. If the queen can not reproduce, the ant hill dies. If workers do not gather energy and warriors do not defend the vital space of the ant hill, the ant hill dies. If the queen does not guide the workers with chemical information the ant hill also collapses. And so it does a society which enters in an economical, political and cultural crisis that extinguishes the civilization. Only when those 3 networks deliver efficiently energy and information and reproduce the cellular citizens of the society, the “vital organism” survives. We have to widen our concept of organisms and consider that “waves of cells” communicated by networks are organisms, even if they have open, dark spaces between them, since they behave in all senses as such organisms. In a fractal universe there are always dark spaces and discontinuous worlds; but what truly matters are the bridges of invisible flows of information that connect those cells into herds, societies, bodies and organisms. Thus an organic species needs 3 networks to exist:

45. “A cellular super-organism exists when there are informative and energy networks that communicate the cells of the organism and the density of energy and information communicated to those cells through the networks is higher than the energy and information the cells receive from the external world.”

The definition is clear: the organism tends to maintain itself pegged because cells survive inside the organism better, as they receive more energy or information. Otherwise the cells of the organism will become disaggregated and the organism will die. In the case of the ant hill the information that ants receive from the queen is more important than the one they receive from the external world. The ants act under orders from the queen. They also receive energy from the ant hill where food is stored. In a body, cells receive information from the nervous system, and energy from the digestive system, which is also more important than the energy and information they receive from the external world. In an eco(nomic)system, individual homes receive more energy from the arterial systems of electric networks and roads, from their work places (money) than from their external space, except in agricultural communities. Humans also receive more information from networks of mass-media than from other human cells. Thus, the economic ecosystem is also an organism of humans and machines, whose networks obey the common laws of all physiological networks.

Yet those 3 systems do not have to be “pegged” spatially to create an organism. On the contrary, the duality between expanding energy and imploding information, continuous wholes and discontinuous parts is the key to understand the flexibility of those organisms that might appear separated as a herd or continuous as a body: the information network attracts them together and the energy network maintains its expansive vital space, separating them… The result is that they form a whole made of parts and both things are certain. Neurons are discontinuous but become a single whole when flows of electric information jump through multiple neurons, creating its continuity.

Thus the informative organ is the ‘soul’ of the system that guides, controls and creates its ‘form’, its existence as a whole. Those informative networks, made of cyclical particles of quantic information are similar to what Descartes called ‘vortices’ and physicists masses, joined by ‘res extensa’ or gravitational, attractive forces; what Buddhists called Atmans, joined by flows of communication; what Leibniz called Monads that perceive the Universe; what biologists call neurons, joined by networks of information. In brief, they are the essential structure that pegs together a relative infinite sum of fractal cycles/cells.

A fact, which allow us to unify the properties and structures of all Universal Systems and the sciences that study them under a single template definition, according to which simple systems and complex organisms will differ only in the degree of ‘completeness’ of its networks and the specific energy or information they are made of:

46. ‘A super-organism is a network composed of a population of (name a particular cell or cycle), related by an energetic, reproductive or informative arrows.

A fractal organism (name an organism) is a population of iterative (name a cellular species), related by informative (name a language or informative force) and energy networks (name a kind of energy), which combine into a reproductive network that iterates the organism.

A universal ecosystem (name a specific ecosystem) is a population of several (name the species), related by informative languages (name their languages or informative forces) and energy networks (name the energies)’

Fill the gaps with a specific species, language/force and energy and you can define any network-organism in the Universe. While if the system is composed of several species that occupy the same space but have different networks of energy and languages of information, we talk of an ecosystem:

- An atomic organism is a population of (electronic) energy and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and (light) energy.

- A molecular organism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational energy and networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London, Waals forces).

- A cellular organism is a population of molecules, related by energetic networks (cytoplasm, membranes, Golgi reticules) and genetic information (DNA-RNA.)

- A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems).

- An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey).

- A historic organism or civilization is a population of humans, related by networks of verbal information and networks of carbon-life energy.

- An economic ecosystem is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) and energetic networks (roads, electric networks, etc).

An economic ecosystem differs from a historic organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and include 2 different species: human beings and machines.

- A galaxy is a population of electromagnetic stars and gravitational black holes, related by networks of gravitational information and light energy.

-A Universe is a population of galaxies joined by networks of dark matter and energy.

God, Universe And Man

In the graph, the 2 main super-organisms studied in this book, the Human biological and social organisms (cultures and civilizations) and the Universe. Organic fractals have 3 elements that define them: its cellular units, its networks of energy (blood, economies and radiant matter) and information (nerves, legal systems and dark matter) that organize those cellular units, and the relative space-time planes in which a self-similar but not equal fractal structure re-emerges. On the left, man as a fractal is made of cellular units and networks of energy and information (nervous and blood systems), whose cycles and functions extend through 3 main st-planes: the cellular, individual and social plane of temporal existence. On the right, the Universe is also a ternary fractal, whose cellular units are stars and black holes that shape 2 galactic networks of radiant energy and informative, dark matter, cellular units of the cosmos at ‘grand scale’(points on the picture). The final form is self-similar to a wave-like cycle of space-time, perhaps inscribed into a hyper-Universe.

The Universe is a super-organism of space and time, extended in multiple scales, self-similar in form and function. Despite the infinite potential combinations of spatial bites and time bits that give origin to the super-organisms of the Universe, all of them, are made – paraphrasing the Bible, ‘to the image and likeness of God’, the fractal super-organism of spatial energy and temporal information, which self-organizes bits of information and bites of energy in 3 dimensional networks, creating all kind of entities in all the scales of the Universe. Thus, Metaphysics, the science of ‘God’, is the study of the Dual laws of Space/ Time and its 3±st arrows/dimensions that give origin to the fractal Organisms of the Universe. While each specific science studies a particular scale of the Universe and its super-organisms. In this book we are interested in 2 of those super-organisms: The Universe itself studied by the science of Astrophysics; and the super-organisms of mankind, across its 3 main scales of existence, studied by Biological and Historical sciences. Since, as a human, anthropomorphic being, I share with Kant the fascination for ‘what is inside the human mind and above it’ on the skies without limit.

Thus before we enter into the longest iteration (in the non-abridged version of this book), that deals extensively with all sciences and translates all its species and fundamental equations, departing from the foundational sciences of spatial geometry and temporal logic and its self similar laws, we shall briefly consider how the previous laws of ‘unity, duality, trinity, complexity and self-similarity between spacet-ime planes define those 2 superorganisms:

- The Physical Universe, based in the duality of Temporal Particles and Spatial forces, extended through 3 main scales of size, the Planck scale of Gravitational forces, the human scale of Electromagnetism and the cosmological scale of stars, galaxies and black holes.

- And the Human World, which extends also in 3 planes, inscribed within the wider Universe: the biological, individual and social scale of Gods and civilizations…

Fractal space-time planes are parallel relative worlds, of different scalar size, each one studied by a science specialized in a certain scale. For example, Chemistry studies the st5 plane of molecules; Biology studies the st6 plane of cells; History the plane of human societies, divided by spatial borders and cultural, informative discontinuities, etc. While Duality is the Science of Sciences, dedicated to the study of the common laws of space and time shared by all those mathematical, physical, biological and mental super-organisms, wholes made of parts which display the same forms and functions of the whole; all of them defined by the 3±st dimensional cycles/arrows of feeding, information reproduction and social evolution they perform during its existence. Duality studies the homologous, invariant laws at scale of energy and information that all the species of the Universe follow. While Systems Theory studies the growth and organization of those bites of energy and bits of information into more complex organisms and new st-planes.

E

ach science studies an st-Plane of the Universe with self-similar forms. Those planes vary in size of space and duration of time, yet all of them obey the invariant laws and morphologies of space-time. The study of those general laws of any species of energy and information is the realm of General Systems Theory. Those laws are common to all st-planes. Yet the detail we observe is maximal when we study the human plane, closer to us, while the microscopic Plane of Physics is subject to Indeterminacy Laws. Thus, Biology is the most important science to understand the World. Since Man is the measure of all things.

In each scale of the fractal universal constants define the spatial size & informative time-speed that limit the 4 arrows=life cycles of its moving parts

In each scale of the fractal universal constants define the energy size & informative time speed within which moving parts ‘exi=st’- Live i:ts 4 arrows of time.

In each scale of the fractal universal constants define the spatial size & informative time-speed within which its moving parts live the 4 arrows of time:

Each scale of the fractal studied by a Science ‘exi=st’ with stable universal constants that define the energy size & informative time speed of its moving parts that ‘live’ the 4 arrows of time.

Resume:

The Universe is a fractal of Energy and Information, E<=>I, made of self-similar parts.

This simple sentence resumes 3000 years of scientific evolution.

The 2 self-similar fractal scales of  the physical Universe are the quantum, atomic and gravitational, cosmological scale.

i-1 Cellular i-Superorganisms co-exist in 3 scales, being motions of i+1 fractals whose exi=stential limits of time speed & size (U.C.) define i=ts Universal Scale

Superorganisms become motions/cells of Superorganisms – Topologies in which exi=stence is limited by Informative Constants of time speed & size that define each i-Universal Scale

Organisms become motions of Super-organisms and ecosystems – new planes of existence -Constants limit the ‘i’-nformative time speed & size of each fractal scale

5.1 Non-E Geometry shows how Fractal Points of View mirror energy flows, creating Topological Networks and Organisms

In the graph, the three canonical topologies of a four-dimensional Universe describe the informative “brain,” reproductive body and energetic membrane of all the superorganisms of the Universe.

9. The Non-Euclidean Mathematics of Fractal Organisms

5 postulates of non-Euclidean geometry, of which the most important is the one – definition of a fractal point with parts, which is in itself a “world” resume the ultimate meaning of fractal geometry.

Those 5 logic and mathematical postulates, which culminate the evolution of the languages of perception of human thought, define the unit of reality as a fractal point, which observed in all its details is in itself a World, which contains within it all the mathematical forms of the entire cosmos. This can be deduced in a logic manner, through the equation of a mind, which can map out as a mirror, the whole Universe we perceive; in the infinitesimal mirror of the brain. Yet a more mathematical demonstration comes from topology. Why?

The 3 topologies of all 4-dimensional worlds.

Because a 4-dimensional fractal point is made of the 3 only possible topologies that exist in a 4-dimensional Universe; which are drawn in the previous graph:

  • The sphere or Riemann membrane, which is the external surface of the point, the skin and limbs and any of its multiple self-similar entities, some of which are drawn at the bottom of the graphic. In any system of the Universe, the membrane acts as the energetic, external surface of the “informative, point” through which the point absorbs energy from the external Universe, to process it into information.
  • The toroid, which is the body or reproductive region (seen as a cyclical path of space-time), which fills up the space-time between the nuclei and the external membrane. It is the zone where the reproductive organs of the system exist, and where the information of the system is born.

It must be noticed that according to Klein, the topologist that studied better this type of surface, the toroid is NOT really a fixed form of space, but we must consider those cycles’ motions and add the parameter of speed. Thus Klein introduces the Paradox of Galileo to describe the Non-Euclidean geometries of the Universe as we have done in this book. Cycles are mere static perceptions of motions and we must always consider distances as space-time distances. So we say “London is at 4 minutes distance” because we consider distance and speed together. This is ultimately the meaning of time in physics, a measure of the speed of motion as a way to gauge space-distances: v=s/t.

  • The double ring, or convex, hyperbolic surface, with maximal form, or informative center of any entity of the Universe, the point in which the fractal reproduction of information reaches its zenith. It is the same form than the toroid but reproduced into a higher content of information, by doubling the initial form.

The fractal formalism of the 3 topologies of the Universe.

Those 3 topological parts, specialized in energy, information and reproductive functions can be written as the 3 elements of the fractal equation, TiEi:

- Max Ti: the inner, dual center, corresponding to convex topologies (left), is made with 2 cyclical forms. It is the dominant informative topology of any fractal organism, described by Belgrami in the XIX c. as a conical form with “height” with negative curvature.

- : A middle, reproductive zone, described by Klein as a disk, made of quanta in cyclical movements that communicate energy and information between the inner and outer zones.

- Max. E: An outer membrane of energy, described by Riemann’s spherical geometry.

Those 3 non-Euclidean geometries structure the inner geometry and functions of the organs of any species, proving the homology of all space-time fields in the Universe. In the graph, an animal, an embryo, an electromagnetic flow, a galaxy, a proton, a seed, a planet, a cell and a boson display the 3 topological zones of a fractal point, each of them performing one of the 3 functions/arrows of space-time.

We shall use them later to describe the organic structure of the galaxy. Since the black hole has a hyperbolic, informative topology, the Halo of the galaxy has a Riemannian, spherical form, and the stars in the intermediate region, which feed the dark matter of black holes and reproduce the atoms of life, turn in cyclical, toroid paths around the central black hole.

The 3 topologies in physical organisms.

Since with those 3 topologies we can explain the essential evolution of the cyclical events of physical systems, as a progression from external, lineal forces of energy into cyclical motions that finally enter the double ring or “singularity” of increasing height, through which they are again expelled to the Universe, as magnetic flows in quantum atoms or dark energy in black holes..

It all starts in a surface of energy that “curves” itself into self-reproductive cyclical motion, which become smaller, faster and reproduce into new fractal forms, till reaching the center. Yet those forces will never reach as quantum physicists believe the point of infinity; because finally the cycle will not be able to compress more, and so it will fractalize into new cycles in the informative dimension of height till it becomes a tube of pure height expelled upward as a thin line. And so the center, where classic physicists find infinity will remain always a silent empty vacuum, the eye of the hurricane.

Physical space-time is the simplest world where the most basic morphologies play that same process of transformation of external energy that converges and reproduces cycles, attracted by a Non-Euclidean point, charge or mass:

A flow of forces converges toward the “event horizon” or external membrane of the point (the Schwarzschild radius of the black hole or the Bohr Radius of the atom). Beyond this membrane, the flow of forces starts a process of creative formal warping, as it rotates at increasing speed and also increases its frequency (height dimension), in each cycle. For that reason a bidimensional vortex stores more information than a lineal frequency, as it adds a new dimension of form. So you obtain a cyclical wave of high frequency, a bidimensional flow of energy and information that accelerates toward the center, becoming a convex topology, whose simplest forms are drawn in the previous graph And finally in its hyperbolic center, called in topology a Belgrami cone, it is shot up through the poles as a magnetic flow in charges or a flow of dark energy in masses, invisible to us, but observed in quasars. Those flows of magnetism or dark energy, once again start a cycle of information, warping themselves into light under c-speed. Galactic black holes also emit its fractal parts, quark vortices that become a seminal flow of protonic matter that might give birth to a new galaxy, as it is observed in some Galaxies (M83).

It is what will happen to the electroweak matter of the Earth, when the black hole forms and absorbs us, emitting a jet of dark energy and dark matter by its poles.

The 3 topologies in biological organisms.

In the graph, below, we observe other non-Euclidean points created by those 3 only canonical topologies that can adopt multiple forms by deformation, but suffice to construct all the shapes of our Universe. Indeed, a topology is deformable. So a sphere can become any shape, as long as it is not torn up, to enclose a reproductive and informative zone. So your skin is a sphere in topology, which encloses the complex forms of your reproductive organs. Those organs are Klein cycles of great complexity that exchange energy and information. Finally, in a human being, the brain is composed of two hemispheres, which are hyperbolic, convex, warped forms, corresponding to the informative dual ring of a Belgrami cone, the external skin is a deformation of the sphere, and in between we are invaginated by all kind of cycles that transfer energy and information from the outer world to the brain. The hyperbolic, highly warped brain, is a “double” toroid, self-similar to those cycles: a double image of those organs, one internal that controls them and one external that projects the drives of the 3 physiological networks of the body into the wills of existence: your desire for more energy, information and reproduction.

And so the brain hosts more information in lesser space than the body, as a mirror of its functions. Man though, while responding to the same canonical topologies in his organs, is by far the most complex being of information known in the Universe. And so his topologies are immensely more complex than the simpler physical particles and its transformations just described. We studied in our books on physiology and biology the enormous beauty and complexity of the human topological world, so we shall hardly consider it in this book.

And so those 3 relative forms of energy (external membrane), information (dual ring) and reproduction (the cyclical paths that exchange energy and information between the external membrane and the inner convex form), can be found in any system of reality. It is a paradox of the inverse properties of energy and form, that the biggest forms in space are the simplest, to the point that the perceived universe seems to be merely a flat surface filled with galactic vortices – the simplest of all forms.

10. The Five Postulates of Non-Euclidean Fractal Geometry

Those topologies of a 4-dimensional world are also described by the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean Fractal Geometry, which are:

1st Postulate: “A point is a fractal form with an inner content of temporal energy.”

2nd Postulate: “A line is a wave of fractal points.”

3rd Postulate: “2 fractal points are self-similar, when their inner temporal energy is equal.”

4th Postulate: “A plane is a network that joins points through flows of temporal energy.”

5th Postulate: “A fractal point has inner apertures to the world, called senses through which multiple waves of energy and information can cross.”

Those five postulates define a point with parts, a line/wave, a plane/field of space/time and the logic laws that explain the interactions of those points; the 3rd postulate that defines the relative equality=self-similarity between universal forms, and the 5thpostulate that explains the processes of absorption of energy and information that maintain invariant the form of the point/entity in an ever changing, dynamic Universe.

It means that fractal, Non-E Geometry achieves a long-sought goal, which Plato, Spinoza and Leibniz tried to realize with the simpler Euclidean geometry: to unify the logic and mathematical principles of the Universe. Since the 3rd and 5th Non-Euclidean postulates are logic, the 1st and 2nd are geometric and the 4th, the nature of a topological plane or network of non-E points is both logic and geometrical as it defines the superorganism.

In that sense, their order should be 1, 5, 2, 3rd and 4th. As the 1st and 5th define a Non-E point from a mathematical and logic perspective, the 2nd and 3rd also define a line-wave from a mathematical and logic perspective, and the 4th integrates them all, defining a plane or scale of existence.

Some obvious consequences of those new postulates are:

- 1st Postulate: The first correction we introduce in Euclidean geometry is to increase and relativize the dimensions of a point to fit its “inner energy and information.” Since all points have either zero dimensions, when we consider them from the perspective of the upper st+1 Plane in which they perform a lineal, energetic function; or 3 dimensions/networks/ functions when we consider them from the inner perspective of the point. This is the case even in the smallest of all planes, the theoretical plane of Strings, made of points with parts, with volume – since we require 10 dimensions to describe them. A paradox that can only be resolved if we consider those strings to be strings of points of fractal geometry with inner dimensions.

Riemann calls a Non-Euclidean Geometry to a geometry made of points with cyclical movements. Einstein’s work was a first step to improve the erroneous postulates of Euclidean geometry, specifically the definition of a point made by the 5th postulate of geometry, paving the path to this book.

Unfortunately Einstein didn’t go further, adapting the other 4 Euclidean postulates to the new unit of Geometry – a point with volume. We completed his work, to be able to define the 2 planes of physical forces, the plane of gravitation and electromagnetism, or any system in which several planes of space-time co-exist together (as in the case of a human being extended from atomic to social planes of cyclical existence). In all those systems, planes are made with “cellular points” which are Riemannian spheres with volume, which form “lines” which are waves between points that exchange energy and information and “planes,” which are organs of self-similar points that process energy or information in parallel networks.

Thus the 5 Postulates of Non-E Geometry vitalize and explain the Universe as a series of networks of energy and information of self-similar cellular points.

Since the line and the plane acquire volume and become self-similar to the commonest forms of the Universe, which are the wave/line and any organ of cells with a 3D volume.

- 2nd postulate: When we observe a one-dimensional line as a “form with inner parts” it becomes then a 4-dimensional wave made of cyclical points. Hence in quantum theory we say that any particle in movement has associated a wave. And when we observe a ray of light in detail it becomes a 4-dimensional wave with electric height and magnetic width, often exchanging flows of energy and information in action-reaction processes of communication between bigger points. This solves the wave/particle duality, as all lines are waves traced by a point with inner volume. Further on since all lines have volume, they carry information and so all forces can in fact act both as a source of energy and as a language of information.

- 3rd Postulate: Equality is no longer external but internal and never absolute but relative. Forms are self-similar to each other, which allow defining different relationships between organic beings, according to their degree of self-similarity. The 3rd postulate is key to explain the behaviour of particles as the degree of self-similarity increases the degree of communication between beings, which ranges from: 1) Reproductive functions in case of maximal self-similarity or complementarity in energy and form; Ei=eI; 2) to social evolution, when points share a common language of information, i=i; to 3) hunting, when they share equal energy E=E; to 4) Darwinian devolution when forms are so different that cannot understand each other’s information and feed into each other.. Yet because self-similarity is internal, external similarity allows games, such as camouflage and capture, invented racial differences, etc. The logical richness of the 3rd Postulate does not imply it lacks geometrical elements: Self-similarity implies parallel motions in herds. Darwinian behaviour implies perpendicular confrontations. Finally, absolute self-similarity brings bosonic states, which happen more often to simpler species like quarks and particles that can form a bosonic condensate as they do in black holes.

- 4th postulate: because a plane has volume is in fact a cellular, organic topography and so the meaning of a plane of space-time becomes now clear: it is a world, an organism in itself with a volume given by the relative point/beings that occupy the plane.

Thus, a plane becomes a real topography made of points with volume, extended as a cellular surface. We can observe it merely in its surface as a bidimensional membrane of information (for example your skin, or the screen of a computer made of pixels, or the sheet of this book). Or we can consider the 3-dimensional inner structure of its points and then it becomes a network with inner motions, as those points will form a lattice in which they communicate lineal flows of energy and information that maintain the lattice pegged. Often 2 topological planes of energy and form combine to create a 4-dimensional organism. Such is the most common structure of the Universe, a 4-dimensional World, which is a Universe in itself, made of self-similar cells or networks of points that constantly exchange energy and information within the ecosystem in which it exists.

- 5th postulate: It define points as informative knots or “eyes,” minds of information that absorb a flux of forces used by the point to “perceive” a relative world. A non-Euclidean point corresponds then to our concept of a mind that gauges reality with a certain force, similar to the concept of a monad in Leibniz relativistic space-time. In words of Einstein: “a point of space is a fixed frame of reference.”

FRACTAL LOGIC: THE UNIFICATION OF SCIENCE

All sciences share the same laws of duality and organicism. Yet the proportion of energy and information of the species each science studies varies, since the Universe displays a hierarchical arrow of growing informative time, from the simplest forms of mathematical space (and minimal informative content), to the complex information of its most evolved organisms (with minimal geometrical regularity). Thus, mathematics is the language of the simplest spatial forms. Hence it is used to describe Physical entities, the simplest forms of the Universe – or those which are made of dark matter and energy we cant observe and so seem very simple to us (black holes and galaxies). On the other extreme,. Biology and history, which study the organisms of which we have more information – mankind – are better described with the verbal language, which better expresses thanks to its temporal verbs, the 3 dimensions of time, which clocks and the simple tools of Geometry cannot describe.

In the graph, depending on the species and plane of space-time each science studies, it will analyze species with different proportions of space & time. The science that studies the simplest scales of maximal content of energy and space, Physics, is for that reason tendencially lineal and based in spatial geometry and its self-similar science of algebra; but has been unable to understand time beyond its spatial use to describe movement in space (Galilean and Einsteinian definition of time as a parameter of speed, s=vt=ct. Yet far more important to the human kind is the science of biology that explains how those simplest morphologies have mutated, evolved and changed, bending the original space into complex morphologies of ‘time’. Biology is however a complex science, made of two subdisciplines ‘bio’, the study of life and its wills of reproduction, information and feeding, and logic, the science of time, which studies the interaction of those 3 wills/arrows of existence and its cycles. In that sense, if there is a primary science of God, it would be Biology and specifically Logic, as God, the mind of the Universe that creates its forms, is indeed, time, Tao, the sum of all the temporal cycles of existences of all its beings and its common laws.

Both together mathematics and logic are the foundation of any combined study of space and time, and their postulates can be applied to any relative ±st scale of the Universe, where the same invariant geometries and logic functions will be repeated. So in the 4th part of this book, we will lay down the combined postulates of mathematics and Logic, which we have called the Postulates of illogic Fractals – as they resume the space and time laws that rule the events and actions of those illogic fractals in his search for energy and form.

10. The 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry.

According to the Correspondence Principle a new scientific Theory has to include all previous ones. So happens with fractal space-times, which includes as specific cases all other topologies of space-times and its fundamental units, the Non-Euclidean Point, used by Einstein, as descriptions of the more complex structure of a 3 dimensional Fractal Point, whose obvious characteristic is to have in/form/ation, an inner content, which becomes apparent in a Universe made of multiple scales of size, as we come closer to the point and observe it in detail. Those fractal points with volume are descried by the 5 classic Postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry adapted to fractal space and cyclical time. We will call this new, more evolved Geometry of space/time that includes all previous geometries as simplified cases of the more complex structure of the Universe in multiple scales, ‘Fractal, Logic Geometry or ‘Fractal Logic’ as each postulate can be interpreted both, in geometric terms, as the definition of an essential geometry of space/time and in logic terms, as the description of a fundamental arrow or cycle of existence of a Universal being.

The 5 postulates of this new, wider Logic, Fractal Geometry are:

Postulates of Fractal Geometry:

1st Postulate: ‘A point is a fractal form with an inner content of temporal energy.’

2nd Postulate: ‘A line is a wave of fractal points.’

3rd Postulate: ‘2 fractal points are self-similar, when their inner temporal energy is equal.’

4th Postulate: ‘A plane is a network that joins points through flows of temporal energy.’

5th Postulate: ‘A fractal point has inner apertures to the world, called senses through which multiple waves of energy and information can cross.’

Thus, the 5 postulates of Fractal Logic define a point with parts, a line/wave, a plane/field of space/time and the logic laws that explain the interactions of those points; the 3rd postulate that defines the relative equality=self-similarity between universal forms, and the 5th postulate that explains the processes of absorption of energy and information that maintain invariant the form of the point/entity in an ever changing, dynamic Universe.

Some of the obvious consequences of those new postulates are:

- 1st Postulate: The first correction we introduce in Euclidean geometry is to increase and relativize the dimensions of a point to fit its ‘inner energy and information’. Since all point have either zero dimensions, when we consider them from the perspective of the upper st+1 Plane in which they perform a lineal, energetic function; or 3 dimensions/networks/ functions when we consider them from the inner perspective of the point. This is the case even in the smallest of all planes, the theoretical plane of Strings, made of points with parts, with volume – since we require 10 dimensions to describe them. A paradox that can only be resolved if we consider those strings to be forms of fractal geometry with inner dimensions.

Einstein’s analysis of the bent geometry of space-time didn’t complete what was logic, had he closed that curve into cycles: the definition of a sum of cycles of time as what Riemann calls a Non-Euclidean Geometry: a geometry made of points with cyclical movements. Einstein’s work was as far as taken the 5th new postulate of Riemann’s Geometry but not the entire Riemannian Geometries more akin to our ideas of a fractal space, made of dynamic cycles. Einstein started studying the geometrical structure of space-time. in the belief that the key to that structure were mathematical. So his first step was to improve the erroneous postulates of geometry, specifically the definition of a point made by the 5th postulate of geometry, paving the path to this book.

Unfortunately Einstein didn’t go further, adapting the other 4 Euclidean postulates to the new unit of Geometry – a point with volume. We shall now complete his work, in order to be able to tackle the definition of the 2 planes of physical forces, the plane of gravitation and electromagnetism, or any system in which several planes of space-time seem to co-exist together (as in the case of a human being extended from atomic to social planes of cyclical existence). To that aim, after defining a point as a sphere with volume, the line and the plane acquire volume and become self-similar to the commonest forms of the Universe, which are the wave/line and any entity with a 3D volume or ‘topography’

- 2nd postulate: When we observe a one-dimensional line as a ‘form with inner parts’ it becomes then a 4-dimensional wave made of cyclical points. Hence in quantum theory we say that any particle in movement has associated a wave. And when we observe a ray of light in detail it becomes a 4-dimensional wave with electric height and magnetic width, often exchanging flows of energy and information in action-reaction processes of communication between bigger points. The solution of the wave/particle duality as all lines are waves traced by a point with inner volume. Further on since all lines have volume, carry information and so all forces can in fact act both as a source of energy and as a language of information.

- 3rd Postulate: equality is no longer external but internal and never absolute but relative. Forms are self-similar to each other, which allow to define different relationships between organic beings, according to their degree of self-similarity, from reproductive functions in case of maximal self-similarity to social evolution, to hunting, Darwinian devolution when forms are so different that cannot understand each other. Yet because self-similarity is internal, external similarity allows games, such as camouflage and capture, invented racial differences, etc.

- 4th postulate: because a plane has volume is in fact a cellular, organic topography and so the meaning of a plane of space-time becomes now clear: tit is a world in itself with a volume given by the relative point/beings that occupy the plane.

Thus, a plane becomes a real topography made of points with volume, extended as a cellular surface. We can observe it merely in its surface as a bidimensional membrane of information (for example your skin, or the screen of a computer made of pixels, or the sheet of this book). Or we can consider the 3-dimensional inner structure of its points and then it becomes a 5-dimensional network with inner movement, as those points will form a lattice in which they communicate flows of energy and information that maintain the lattice pegged.

- 5th postulate: we define points as informative knots or relative ‘eyes’, relative minds of information that absorb a flux of forces used by the point to ‘perceive’ a relative world. A non-Euclidean point correspond therefore to our concept of a mind, similar to the concept of a monad in Leibniz relativistic space-time. In words of Einstein: ‘a point of space is a fixed frame of reference’. Such is the most common structure of the Universe, a 5-dimensional World, which is a Universe in itself, made of self-similar cells or networks of points that constantly exchange energy and information within the ecosystem in which it exists.

The new postulates of fractal geometry describe with more accuracy all type of space-time fields belonging to all kind of sciences, from the physical space/time of atoms (described by quantic Physics) to that of galaxies (that Einstein described in his General Theory); from the organic space/time of cells and bodies to the historical space-times of nations. In this manner we complete the Non-Euclidean geometry developed in the XIX century by Riemann and used by Einstein to describe gravitational space-time, by adding the concepts of fractal geometry developed in the XX century, creating a fractal geometry of space-time that includes all previous ones. Thus, according to the Correspondence Principle, we establish a hierarchy among all those geometries that stretches from the simplest Euclidean geometry to fractal space-time, which includes all others as particular cases and it is in itself a partial image of the total information about space-time called reality, always bigger than any ‘linguistic’ image we made of it:

63. Euclidean Mathematics (Light- Space)> Classic Non-Euclidean geometry> (Gravitational Plane) > Fractal space-times (all scales) > Total Reality

It is worth to notice the self-similarity between the 4+1 postulates of fractal geometry (as the 5th is redundant with the 1st) and the 4 dimensional arrows of the universe. This is not casual since all languages of space-times depict in self-similar ways the 4D Universe. Thus if the 1st postulate define the point or fundamental unit of the Universe, the 2nd postulate defines a line or flow of communication of energy and information between 2 points; the 3rd postulate defines those lines as either energetic, destructive or self-reproductive processes, and finally the 4 postulate defines the different st-planes or Planes of existence of a certain Universe. In this manner the 4 dimensions of space-time are explained by the 4 postulates of geometry and logic, which represent all those space-times in the mind of a human being.

In organic terms, those 5 postulates of fractal Geometry describe how points become parts of social webs, which self-organize fractal planes made of networks of points, which emerge as cellular units of a higher fractal space-time or superorganisms.

According to the Principle of Correspondence and Relativity, those different geometries are relative descriptions of the same fundamental structure of the Universe, the point with parts and its more complex social forms. Those points can be studied with any of those geometries, depending on which region and degree of detail we focus in: when we see those points far away we describe them as points with breath, with the tools of Euclidean geometry. When we come closer to them, we see only its external membrane that constantly self-generates information (Holographic principle) and Mandelbrot explained with the tools of fractal geometry (so we find in those membranes the information of black holes, the senses of organisms, the seminal replicas of reproductive beings and the sets of mathematical fractals). Yet when we penetrate the point is when things really get interesting, since we are then in a curved, moving space, described by Non-Euclidean Geometries, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space. Thus since we all know Euclidean Geometry – the far away vision – and we already talked extensively on fractal, reproductive geometries that take place in the external membrane of those fractal points, we shall concentrate now in the description on the Postulates of Non-Euclidean geometries, which define the geometrical and logical properties and the 3 regions of any fractal ±st-point or super-organism.

The meaning of those postulates is clear: we are all made of spatial energy and temporal information, where a space is the fixed perception of a series of moving cycles of time, seeing in the simultaneity of the mind. In his famous thought experiment with trains, Einstein proved that the observer could only see a ‘present, simultaneous volume of time’ from the past, different from the volume of time seen by a second observer. In other words, Euclidean geometry sees present spaces, which are however a sum of cyclical times, or time volumes in constant movement. This is what Riemann discovered when he invented Non-Euclidean Geometries in the XIX c.: Euclidean space is a simplification of a moving space, made of points with volume that constantly trace cycles. If we ad to that formulation of a vital, moving space, a fractal structure in multiple planes, we achieve a more accurate description of what really any living space is: a series of points tracing cycles within the discontinuous limit of an external membrane that separate that space-time from all other space-times. Yet each of those space-times will have an inner, cyclical form, will have inner movement and will be structured in fractal planes. The first properties of that space were described by Non-Euclidean geometries in the XIX c. The second set of properties were described by Fractal Mathematics in the XX c. Now, Fractal Logic puts both together and formalizes fractal spaces and cyclical times, giving science a more advanced model of spatial geometry and temporal information to describe any entity of the Universe made of space and time which obeys those laws of Fractal logic.

THE 1ST POSTULATE.

POINTS WITH PARTS, ITS 3 FRACTAL REGIONS.

In a 3-D Universe there are only 3 topologies of space, which actually display the properties of energy, information or a combination of both. Thus, any space-time point will have also 3 topological parts, specialized in energy, information and reproductive functions:

- Max TI: an inner, dual center, corresponding to convex topologies (left), made with 2 cyclical forms. It is the dominant informative topology of any fractal organism, described by Belgrami in the XIX c. as a conical form with ‘height’ with negative curvature.

- : A middle, reproductive zone, described by Klein as a disk, made of quanta in cyclical movements that communicate energy and information between the inner and outer zones.

- Max. E: An outer membrane of energy, described by Riemann’s spherical geometry.

Those 3 non-Euclidean geometries structure the inner geometry and functions of the organs of any species, proving the homology of all space-time fields in the Universe. In the graph, an animal, an embryo, an electromagnetic flow, a galaxy, a proton, a seed, a planet, a cell and a boson display the 3 topological zones of a fractal point, each of them performing one of the 3 functions/arrows of space-time.

In the graph, any fractal system has 3 topological regions that correspond to the 3 functions performed by any space/time field in the Universe and are homologous to the 3 possible topologies of a 3 dimensional world. Each of the 3 elements of fractal points display the properties of one of the 3 space-time arrows: the center has height, accumulates information and it is small. The external membrane is larger, continuous and protects the system. The intermediate zone reproduces with the energy absorbed from the membrane and the information given by the center, the different elements of the super-organism, which latter migrate towards the other 2 zones.

- Informative particles accumulate in the inner region as units of the central brain. Or, if they are seeds, they migrate to the surface of energy where they become fractal systems of information, senses in organisms, informative human beings in the Earth-crust, ovules in mothers. And once detached, they start a fractal, reproductive, palingenetic process.

- While energetic particles migrate to the membrane, integrating themselves as part of a continuous protective shield. So in a cell we find mitochondria that produce energetic proteins and RNA for the surface membrane.

The internal, reproductive region happens in all organisms. In the human body the bones reproduce the cells needed for the blood network and the hormones and products used by the brain. In a galaxy, the intermediate region produces energetic stars and informative black holes, which migrate to the central region; in an ecosystem, the territory of the predator produces preys in which the predator feeds, bringing them to its central den.

The fundamental prove of the homology of such ternary structure is found in topology. Since those 3 zones are the only possible topologies of a 4D Universe. Indeed, in the upper graph we show the 3 only topographies mathematicians use to construct all possible 4D Universes: - Max. Σ S: An external membrane or sphere of maximal extension..

- : An inner plane of points, or toroid, whose cyclical paths happen between the skin/boundary of a sphere and a central hole.

- Max. Ti. And the convex, informative central couples of disks, which displays maximal form in minimal space, with a growing dimension of height that touches the poles of the sphere and channels the flows of energy and information of the system.

Since function is form, those 3 topologies are perfectly suited to perform the 3 temporal functions of any super-organism: energy feeding, reproduction and information.

So we define a fractal point, which occupies a limited region of spatial energy and last a limited time, as:

64. Definition of a fractal point, the fundamental space-particle of the Universe.

‘A curved region of energy & information quanta, with cyclical movement, confined by 2 limits, an external, spherical membrane of max. energy and an internal informative nucleus.’

In a discontinuous Universe there are infinite such fractal points, but all of them are composed of the same 3 ΣS, ST, TI zones; the external membrane, the intermediate region and the inner center. Further on, each of those regions corresponds to a canonical topography and a canonical Non-Euclidean Geometry, each one described by a mathematician of the XIX century: Riemann described the external membrane; Klein who described the intermediate region and Lobachevsky, described the inner geometry of the central, informative nucleus. So it seems clear that those 3 regions super-structure all space-time fields (Physical jargon), all Fractal points (Mathematical jargon), all organisms (Biological jargon) and all entities (Philosophical jargon) of the Universe. Let us then explain those regions with the formalisms of non-Euclidean mathematics.

The mathematical description of the 3 regions of the st-point.

The analysis of fractal points that move and have inner quantic parts, made of cycles, started in the XIX century. First Lobachevski, a Russian geometrician defined Non-Euclidean points as curved forms, crossed by multiple lines, giving them spatial volume. Then Klein studied its cyclical movement and introduced the variable of time in their description. And finally Riemann, the greatest mathematician of the XIX century, generalized its nature, considering that all space-times were Non-Euclidean space-times with movement. For those readers well versed in mathematics, we shall now reconsider the common properties of those 3 zones of any fractal point, according to its discoverers which develop in abstract terms the organic properties we have just described:

- According to Lobachevsky and Belgrami space is curved and indeed Temporal Information curves the spatial energy of any real space-time. So points move in curves, which are ‘cycles’, gathering energy and information through their ‘dimensional networks’.

- According to Klein Non-Euclidean space-times have movement. So their ‘speeds’ measure also their distances; as physicists do in Cosmology with the distances of galaxies, which are proportional by a ‘Hubble constant’ to their speeds; or as people do in real life when we say that Brooklyn is at 5 minutes by train from Manhattan not at 2 miles.

- Riemann summoned up those findings and generalized them to all possible space-times and his work should be the guide to understand them geometrically. He affirmed that space is quantic, made of herds of points with similar ‘properties’, which define its quantic density determined by its number of points and its proximity that grows with self-similarity; whereas the density of formal points in a space-time is inverse to its spatial extension: Max ΣS = Min. TI; Max. TI=Min. ΣS. So when a volume of spatial energy is very dense, it is very difficult to go through it, as it happens in the gravitational space close to black holes. If we generalize that property to any fractal space-time, we find that it defines according to the energy/mass density of those points different fractal spaces and ‘Universal constants’ that explain the proportions of energy and information of those spaces. For example, in physical scales, there are 4 fundamental space-times, the gravitational space-time between galaxies of max. energetic space and minimal formal quanta, the light space-time of our world, the electronic space-time of atoms with more formal density and lesser spatial speed and finally the quark plasma of nuclei and probably black holes, with max. density and minimal space. All of them are defined by Universal constants and equations that are either ratios between the energy and form of those space-times, or define the transformations of one space-time into the other. Einstein’s field equations would be the first case, defining the relationship between energy and mass in a gravitational space, while the fine constant of electromagnetism would define the transformation between light space and electronic space/charge, and the gravitational constant, between gravitational space-time and quark/mass. Where the relative densities of information and extension in space of those space-times are in balance, such as ΣSxTI=K. Thus electrons move slower than light but have more density. Also Riemann’s space-times might have, beyond its discontinuous borders an inner space-time, several dimensions, one for each of its ‘energetic or informative properties’ as it happens with the points of physical reality, from strings to electrons in a Hilbert space. Hence Riemann through the concept of ‘common properties’, defined a ‘fractal dimension’ as a certain energy or informative network (static point of view), which ‘puts together’ points that share an energetic or informative ‘property=flow’ (dynamic p.o.v.).

- Max. Information: An informative, quantized center or temporal brain, the so-called hemisphere of Belgrami, a space-time with a dimension of height that transforms energy into information, absorbed or emitted by the central singularity. It is a quantized, informative region similar to a black hole structure. Since it follows the ‘black hole paradox’ of all informative centers, displaying max. form in min. space. So according to the inverse properties of space and time, the center has max. Informative Time and minimal Energetic Space. Moreover any point which comes closer to it, suffers a mutation of its spatial coordinates into informative, height dimensions. This is the case of any particle coming to a black hole whose space-dimensions become temporal dimensions as it raises in height.

The center has more information because it has at least 2 quantized disks. In complex systems, one of those disks acts often as the relative energy center or ’heart’ of the system and the second one acts as a relative informative center or ‘brain’ of the system, attached to the informative network. In many fractal points they establish 2 opposite flows or negative/ positive poles of energy and information. So often, the particles of he intermediate region cycle around the inner region tracing elliptical trajectories, focused by those 2 informative points. It is the case of any bipolar system, from binary stars, one dominant in energy and the other an informative neutron star or black hole; to bimolecular systems or n-p pairs in the nuclei of atoms. The same duality of 2 specialized centers controlling a common territory, or vital space happens in biology where most species have male-energetic and female-informative genders, ruling a common territory.

- Max. Space: An external, continuous membrane or Riemann’s sphere of maximum energy that acts as a relative infinite, unreachable distance, creating the discontinuity between the inner parts of the point. The membrane isolates the point as an island Universe. Since the internal quanta points are either jailed by the membrane’s structural density or destroyed by its energy when touching it. The membrane is the opposite form to the central, informative singularity, with max. spatial extension and continuity, hence with a minimal number of quantic, discreet elements: Max.ΣS=Min.TI. However it is also the zone through which the reproduced micro-forms of information are emitted by the point, and so it often displays ‘sensorial holes’ to relate the point to the external Universe.

Thus all Fractal points are ‘inner worlds’ whose membrane creates a discontinuity that defines an External Universe or outer world from where the point obtains its energy and information. And those points, despite being discontinuous, will have in their external membrane several generic openings or ‘senses’ joined to the informative networks or ‘brains’ and energetic, ‘digestive networks’ of the organic system:

- Max. +ΣS: Amouth’ or opening that absorbs energy.

-Max. –ΣS: Cloacae’, through which the cyclical body expels its temporal energy.

-Max.+TI: Aneye’ through which the informative center receives external information.

-Max. –TI: And anantenna’, through which it emits information.

Those apertures vary in their number, location and size, depending on the form of the point. In the simplest spherical ‘seeds’ of most species, they are mostly situated in 3 regions:

- Max. ΣS: The Equator of the system, through which the membrane absorbs energy.

- ΣS=TI: The Tropics where often the same opening emits and absorbs temporal energy.

- Max.TI: The Poles or points of confluence between the membrane and its central informative region of height, which hits perpendicularly the membrane on those poles. North and South Poles orientate Anti-symmetrically, acting as 2 relative, negative and positive apertures, communicated by the height dimension of the singularity or Belgrami hemisphere. Thus the Positive Pole absorbs temporal energy that crosses through the central singularity where it is absorbed and ejected to the intermediate region where it is re-elaborated before its emission through the negative Pole.

- ΣSTi: The reproductive, central region which combines Energy and Information:

In all fractal points there is an inner middle volume or intermediate territory, discovered by Klein, which combines the energy coming out of the external, spherical, topological membrane and the information provided by the convex, complex formal center.

According to Non-Euclidean mathematics this region is made of self-similar points that form groups, quantic herds of ‘points with parts’ in perpetual movement, that draw cycles of “parallel lines”, between the other 2 regions, as they gather the energy and information they need to survive. And they create space by cycling within the other 2 regions. Such abstract conceptual space describe in fact the behaviour and form of many real, spatial herds. For example, a herd of animals in an ecosystem will move between their hunting and water fields (where they gather energy) and their breeding, inner region where they reproduce information, making cyclical trajectories between both regions. In this manner, they occupy a vital space, called a ‘territory’, which shows the properties of a Non-Euclidean Klein space. A fundamental property of the intermediate space is the fact that it is confined between the other 2 regions, which are never reached in the cyclical trajectories of the inner cells of the space. For example, in a cell, the molecules of the organism will not touch the protein membrane or the central DNA nuclei. Thus, the inner quanta are confined within the Klein’s disk by the 2 other regions, which have more energy and information and might destroy them and/or absorb their energy and information at will.

To explain this in abstract terms, mathematicians introduced in the XIX c. the concept of an infinite, relative distance measured no longer in terms of static space but in terms of time and movement, as the distance between the point and a region that cannot be reached. Thus Klein defines a relative infinity, as the region beyond the discontinuous membrane whose insurmountable borders the inner time-space quanta can’t cross, as a cell cannot go out of a body, an atom beyond C speed or 0K temperature and a man beyond the Earth’s atmosphere. Thus, the informative center and external membrane become the 2 relative infinities or limits that the movements of the intermediate point cannot breach. As in the myth of Achilles and the turtle, Achilles never arrives because every time he moves he crosses a smaller spatial distance. The same happens in a fractal space-time, when a point moves temporally towards its inner or outer space-time limit and finds an increasing resistance to its movement, till finally it is deviated into a cyclical trajectory around the outer, energetic membrane or the height dimension of the inner informative singularity or is destroyed. So the intermediate, quantic cells of the point circulate in parallel cycles always inside the interior of the sphere with contact zones of the type “A” (central, 2nd row of figures in the previous graph). For that reason Klein interprets the intermediate region of that graph as a circle with an invisible, unreachable membrane, equalling the ‘space-time distance’ between the intervals B1-B2 and B2-B3, despite being increasingly shorter in space. Since the quanta take longer in each step and don’t reach the membrane.

When those inner points reach the membrane at point C they become destroyed or deviated. Thus, the energetic membrane and informative center are the discontinuities that isolate the intermediate cellular quanta of combined temporal energy and create a discontinuous ‘World’ within the point. Those discontinuities are called in Geometry a relative infinite, in Biology a membrane, in Sociology or Topology a national border, in fractal theory the co-dimension of the point. They are defined in physics by the Lorenz Transformations that make c-the limit of energetic speed and 0 k the limit of temporal, formal stillness. Thus those limits are not the limits of the absolute Universe, but the limits of the fractal space-time made of light beings, a fact with enormous repercussions for a proper description of the Cosmos, which extends beyond those limits also in the non-local gravitational scale with faster than light and cooler than 0 regions.

The dimensions of the 3 regions.

In terms of dimensions we can define both the spherical membrane and inner informative singularity as 2 bidimensional fields: The central singularity is a bidimensional surface of convex temporal in/form/ation that curves the external spatial energy coming through the bidimensional membrane, creating together the 4-dimensional quanta of the intermediate region. For example, physicists have found that a black hole has a bidimensional external membrane through which energy becomes bidimensional information (Holographic principle), that moves towards the central singularity. While physical models of the inner nuclei of atoms made of informative quarks, define them as a bidimensional, convex singularities. Now we can explain the why of those forms: an atom or a black hole is a quantic fractal point with a bidimensional external membrane (the black hole horizon or the electronic cover) and a central, convex singularity. Latter, when we deal with the specific Unification of 2 planes, the gravitational, macrocosmic plane and the electromagnetic microscopic plane, this intuition will become founded in solid numbers.

The all pervading presence of fractal points in nature.

Those 3 functional regions become the 3 fundamental zones we recognize in all Natural fractals: the Mother-cell or nucleus that generates the information (DNA nucleolus, human brain/nervous system, galactic black hole, chip, etc.); the reproductive region which becomes imprinted by the mother’s information, creating sets and families, micro-replicas of M©; and the membrane, which brings energy to the mother-cell to feed the reproduction of self-similar micro-forms. In all systems we find a core/brane that acts as the dominant region of the organism and display paradoxically less spatial extension than the other regions they rule. The multiple combinations of those 3 unique topologies of 4-D space-time shape the 3 regions of any fractal, which starts as a perfect seed of information, hence a spherical form; and then develops those regions in morphologies that soon resemble energy lines and information centers. On one hand, the energetic region extends into lineal limbs and energy-feeding cycles, becoming a body; while the informative zone moves to the height dimension and jets up sensorial boundaries becoming a head. It is a process studied by morphogenesis, whose why can now be explained. The lower graph shows some of the cellular points in Nature, highlighting its 3 regions, which create in each fractal point a World in itself:

In a galaxy the halo of dark matter and the central black hole dominate and seem to feed and form the radiant matter of which we are made. In man, the informative brain, extended through the central spine and senses, dominate the energetic body and guide it.

As the species changes and evolves into more complex shapes those functional zones are kept. For example, the informative egg evolves into the energetic, larva phase of most animals, by translating the inner, informative center to the head region and the external membrane to the ‘tail’, but the functions are preserved.

The external Universe/ecosystem and the social fight for existence.

Yet beyond those 3 regions the point feeds on an external world of relative energy, the Universe, in which each biological fractal will prey in order to obtain energy for its organic cycles of iteration: the intergalactic gas feeds galaxies; the animal kingdom feeds man; stars feed the black hole. In fact, the way in which the point interacts with the external Universe is explained by the 5th postulate of Fractal Logic, which completes the 1st postulate.

The subjective will of infinite points acting selfishly however, in Adam Smith words, come together creating a positive reality. How this is possible? What orders the chaos of infinite selfish points into a single reality?

Once more the desire to survive of this points, which acting together become stronger than individuals and hence win in the struggle for existence, defining an arrow of social evolution that creates with herds of points fractal, social planes and cellular super-organisms.

So points first associate in couples that share flows of energy and information, creating waves and lines; and then in planes of social points, defined by the 2nd and 4th postulates of fractal logic. While the 3rd postulate of relative equality studies the different way in which those points relate to each other, either associating together or fighting for survival.

MONADS. THE 5TH POSTULATE. EQUATION OF A BOSONIC MIND.

According to the duality between form and function, each postulate of fractal geometry defines also a basic function=cycle/dimension of the Universe: the 1st and 5th postulate define a point as an organism with inner parts that transform energy into information; the 2nd postulate defines an exi wave of communication between 2 fractal points; the 4th postulate defines the social evolution of a herd that creates a fractal plane, a network with dark spaces; and the 5th postulate explains a point in its iterative actions as it absorbs energy and transforms it into information through its small apertures to the Universe. Since even a minimal quark of mass, as Einstein affirms should be crossed by ∞ parallels.

And we say a God, because the cycle of existence and any of its multiple forms is a self-similar entity, a Monad, an Aristotelian God, an Einsteinian point of measure, a relative diffeomorphic being that observes and ‘gauges’ the Universe from its point of view, with its particular languages of perception, searching in all cases for the same selfish arrows of absorption of energy and information to reproduce itself.

We are indeed, all selfish monads, points of view, points of perception, unmoved centers of the bodies of energy we direct. And it was again, once more Einstein, who gave the first step in the understanding of those monads, or points of view, when we rejected the simplistic notion of an abstract point, and considered the non-Euclidean structure of space-time beings, which now we will evolve further to its ultimate consequences, in order to understand those monads, or mental points of view that gauge in any relative space-time plane or world, the Universe around them.

Mathematics, as a language that represents reality with simplified symbols, has a limited capacity to carry information. So its main symbols, geometric points and numbers, simplify and integrate that fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath. However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content. But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points have inner volume, measured with the dimensions of fractal geometry. So we propose a new Geometrical Unit; the fractal st-point with space-time parts, which Einstein already used to describe gravitational space-time. Indeed, Einstein realized that the Space-Time of the gravitational Universe did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:

“Through a point external to a line we can only trace a parallel”.

Euclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:

Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point: . ____________

Instead Einstein found that the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:

56. “A point external to a line is crossed by infinite parallel forces”.

Real, discontinuous, n-dimensional points: o ===========

Which means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, points with breadth, with space-time parts.

In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension, but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions, which we can observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point.

In the same way the Saturn rings stop being planes without volume when we come closer and observe them as fractal points, called planetoids… Non-Euclidean points acquire volume when we approach to them. And they acquire movement. In words of Klein one of his discoverer, a space is not static, but a moving group of points in cyclical movement.. So in the same way the Saturn’s rings are a group of planetoids, a Klein space, the space-time that fills a point has movement, is the sum of a series of cellular cycles.

This surprising quality of fractal points has become today a standard feature of the most advanced mathematical theories of physical sciences, Fractal Geometry, and Theory of Strings. Physics describes the Universe with mathematics, a language born of the study of geometrical space. Or in other words Physics is the geometrical description of the Universe, but the Universe is not mathematics, because it selects only from geometry the efficient, biologic forms that can survive in its Darwinian, evolving, moving Reality. That Darwinian, selective process of efficiency should not escape to us in an age of inflationary physical theories with bizarre space/times that reality never would select. Mathematics is, as all languages, an informative fractal, whose forms multiply in excess (ΣS->0; TI->∞). Thus if certain sentences of verbal thought can be imaginary despite its beauty, so happens to many geometrical forms. Thus the Universe selects only efficient geometries, based in forms that can move and perform the arrows of time in the real Universe. Hence the importance of having a geometric theory of space-time that describes accurately those forms of the physical Universe. This was the key discovery of Einstein. He realized that Euclidean, lineal geometry, used to describe ideal space, could not describe the curved cyclical paths created in gravitational space-time faulty. So he switched in his description of reality to a space called Non-Euclidean, where its minimal fractal unit, the point, could be crossed by multiple gravitational curves and hence, unlike the abstract point of Euclid and Descartes, it required inner volume, inner form and energy…

In that regard, there is always a territory external to the fractal point, which reveals itself as a selfish form whose only purpose is to iterate itself. You can express that iterating will of all fractal species in mathematic terms with a Generator equation or in words with a logic mandate, as the Bible myths did, making God saying to man, a fractal species, ‘grow and multiply’, which means: ‘absorb energy and iterate yourself’. But the catch is that all other fractal parts of the Universe will want to do the same while energy is always limited It is the Jungle Law that mechanically or biologically all fractal structures of the Universe follow. Because those who do not iterate become extinct and the fractal no longer is. So a fractal point has to erase the information and transform the energy of other fractal point to iterate itself. Once more the paradox of Galileo motivates all points to ignore the rest of reality and take care of themselves, as relative self-centers of their own world.

Thus, in ‘Fractal Relativity’ we define each diffeomorphic Space-time field as a ‘World or parallel Universe’ with a central, ‘future, evolved’, dense region of Temporal Information that curves in words of Einstein, an external, energetic, past, spatial region or membrane, ‘that quantizes’ the energy of the external Universe, and a 4-dimensional intermediate, reproductive S-T field. A definition which can be extended to more complex beings with any relative number of ‘dimensions’; subject to a single restriction: the number of dimensions of the informative and energetic zone will be the same, so they can ‘merge and interact’ together, creating from the combination of those dimensions the intermediate zone, whose dimensions will ad the energy and informative dimensions of those other regions. In fact many models of our Universe consider that we exist on an ‘external 4-dimensional membrane’ of a Fractal point… Though most of it is invisible to us.

In the physical realm, besides our electronic minds there are gravitational minds, black holes and masses, which Einstein defined as foci of gravitational space:

57. ‘Space=Energy is motion relative to a simultaneous frame of reference=a gravitational mind’

We added in italic the concepts of cyclical space/time equivalent to those used by Einstein, who understood space as a moving energy warped by a mass, a frame of reference that ‘measures’ space-time. Yet Einstein was an abstract physicist, philosophically shy, and so he did not considered how a ‘mass’ can measure, an informative, ‘intelligent, mental action’. Minds are focused, ‘Aristotelian Gods’, defined in his metaphysics as unmoved, intelligent brains around which energy flows and ‘bodies’ turn, as they feed with temporal energy the mind. Stillness is the nature of perception. Even if reality is a moving quantic soup, your eye is not out of focus because its virtual images are still, like the pictures of a film that stops in front of the camera. Both images, in the eye and the camera, only move and change when you blink your eyes or the camera closes its window, stopping their perception. Then it rests in darkness as the body makes the brain jump to another place. Thus, perception is also quantic, a stop and go process that focuses a still image through the senses and then processes that information into a quantic thought while the senses are closed and the energy body moves the mind. In the human case that quantic rhythm lasts a second, our ‘dharma’ of relative present-existence in which simultaneously we create a still mental image of the Universe. Each second our quantic, informative mind closes a mental, cyclical action:

58. Cycles of temporal energy=>sensorial in-forma-tion =>Brain-clock of time.

An informative brain or temporal clock, acts as a mirror of the Universe, portraying the quantic, cyclical actions of time-space, performed by multiple species. Those actions are communicated to the brain region by certain forces/languages, electromagnetism or gravitation, atomic smells, sound waves, etc. that the brain reconstructs into an image that imitates those cyclical actions with inner, still in/form/ations. In physical terms that stillness is equivalent to coldness, since temperature is a parameter of movement. For example, the black hole has a temperature close to 0 k, which means that it exists in relative stillness, with perfect order. Since it might perceive an image made with bosonic, gravitational quanta perfectly focused, with minimal fluctuation. So we suppose by illogic parallelism, that the virtual world that happens in the black hole at zero temperature and zero movement is a linguistic mirror of the galactic Universe.

The homologous human brain-eye system is easier to analyse: the eye sphere reflects light energy (white colour), the iris absorbs information that ‘stops’ in the cells and becomes transformed into electronic impulses. So the energy of light is deviated and its information translated. The physical reality with its omnipresent, similar vortices from hurricanes to black holes; from vibrating atoms to electrons that emit or absorb photons shows the perpendicular, Darwinian mechanism of transformation of temporal energy ‘killed’ and split into informative time and energy flows that happen to all forces that feed a bigger perceptive center. It is also obvious in the transformation particles suffer in its parameters, when coming to a black hole vortex. They accelerate close to the speed of light, transforming its energy into time parameters, according to the Lorenz Transformations, and finally split its energy and information perpendicularly. Further on we know masses and charges act-react to the temporal information they receive. For example, a charge changes its spin after receiving a photon or changes its rotation when it enters a magnetic field.

Yet the most clear prove of the ‘perceptive’ nature of those vortices is the Pauli’s Principle of Exclusion. Long ago a physicist called Pauli received a Nobel Prize for his ‘Exclusion Principle’ that demonstrated something in appearance obvious: 2 particles cannot occupy the same space, except light and gravitation, whose photons and theoretical particles, gravitons, can occupy the same place or center of perception till a limit given by an immense amount called the density of Planck (or Max. density of information of the Universe). Even certain atoms (called Bose condensates) when they are equal and very ordered without vibration, near 0 K temperatures, can fusion into a point. So they can become the still pixels of a virtual image that occupies a relative zero space-time.

Those bosons form in the center of a mental point a virtual map of the Universe, done by the accumulation of quanta of information in that central singularity, as it happens in a crystal or an eye and probably by a quark that forms an electromagnetic or gravitational image of the Universe. Further on, bigger minds, black holes, seem to be made by accumulation of ‘bosonic quarks’ that carry a huge amount of mass-information. So they can form even more complex images as shown in its equations that prove 2 fascinating facts: that the black hole has 5 dimensions that it transforms its spatial parameters into pure, perpendicular, time parameters. So we define a physical mind as an energy flow that is transformed into information, in a knot of informative time or future point that creates in its interior with those flows of energy an image of the Universe or World.

יו. The many worlds interpretation of the fractal Universe.

T

he simplest function of any organism is the absorption of energy in a prey/preying relationship, in which an informative being absorbs energy to inform itself. In those fights the being with better informative brain most likely will control a better energetic body (in the graph, the black hole controls gravitation, man the rifle). So it will absorb the other fractal point.

We can observe in any darwinian fight, as the one reflected in the image, the vital geometry of organic fractals:

2 spatial, energetic beings (a lion and a galaxy of stars), with a planar form and max. speed, confront 2 informative beings with a lot of information (a human and a black hole), dominant in the dimension of height. Since information dominates energy and time curves space, when they enter into a relative present relationship, man kills the lion and the black hole feeds on the herd of stars that become past, extinct species. It is now when we retake a fundamental theme of this book, what is a mind, an information center, the fractal generator-mother cells of any systems; defined by the 5th postulate that Einstein rightly saw an interpretation of a mass, a vortex of knot or mind of gravitation…

All fractal points are Galilean paradoxes that perceive and act with a will defined by their desire to survive, absorbing energy and information from their environment.

The mind sees stillness and hence death in all those forms in fixes in its brain and yet all has movement all has a life to it; all forces can be understood as languages when the proper codes are translated. Indeed, for all what we said it is also obvious that the intelligence of the Universe doesn’t speak a single language, understood by man, but all beings can perceive and remember information, stored in rhythmic patterns and linguistic codes. I called the first book I wrote on cyclical time ‘The Codes of the Universe’, because the resolution of those codes in different languages and scales is indeed the essence of knowledge. Each species has limited languages of perception, the most complex perceive more languages and forces. In the atomic world, quarks, the most complex particles perceive, ‘see’ we say in gauge theory, all the forces. They are the most complex particles, probable cells of the black hole. In our world, men are the most complex beings. Nevertheless, animals who understand only smelling, chemical codes and visual codes are also intelligent and so are electrons who do not perceive gravitation in the atomic word – we are in fact electronic minds as computers are. Languages can use any of those codes. Cephalopods developed both the first complex eyes and a pigmented skin, which changes and modulates emotional messages in a silent code understood by other squids. Insects use magnetic codes to guide swarms. The Universe is a game of information self-similar at scale without limits in its intelligence and codes of perception. It is only need to know the translation tools and constants of transformation between scales, studied in the most complex versions of this book to reveal its intelligence to the dumb human being who speak so few codes properly.

All is memorial because cyclical inertia, the repetition of the cycles of existence of any form, is common to all space-time fields. This is a tautology: a species that forgets, that does not repeat a quantic cycle of existence becomes extinct and its cycles of existence disappear. Thus, a being has to remember and repeat its quantic cycles to last in time. That is the existential game of any being: to feed on energy and use its genetic, memorial information to transform it through reproduction into new cyclical actions.

The rhythms of existence are organic, vital. Yet we do not see them in stones and plants, because rhythms vary its speed and men only consider vital rhythms similar to theirs.

Each species has a different rhythm of perception and existence, a different language of knowledge, a different mind and capacity to act-react in the Universe, a different speed of times. The rhythms of rocks are slow. So are the rhythms of galaxies. Thus, we have to transform mathematically the different rhythms and speeds of times to see them alive. For example, when we see in fast motion the living cycles of plants that seem dead, in slow motion, they acquire living properties. It is again the Paradox of Galileo: we see many temporal cycles as fixed forms in space, as we see the moving Saturn rings as a fixed form, yet all is moving, cycling in an organic way.

Physicists don’t understand that their clocks of time are abstract inquisitions of the mind. Instead of a ‘moving cycle’, often a living ‘ time’, when they think of time they see a number in a graph. Yet even a watch measures the cycle of expansion of its inner spiral, made of metal that dilates, expanding space; even the sun measures a year-cycle as it swims on the gravitational flows of the galactic spiral, feeding on quantic, gravitational space. Clocks are brains that measure cycles of time. So today the clocks of science have evolved into cyclical computers that are truly ‘metal-brains’ of machines. Time is measured as information for biological, survival purposes. Since the ‘fastest brain-clocks’ of temporal information survive better. They see with more detail everything alive and act-react faster to the Universe. So our incapacity to see a living Universe is only a prove of our limited intelligence and memorial detail. Andre Guide affirmed, regarding a similar phenomenon, that ‘the more insensitive the white man is to the beauty of Africa, the more he despises and mistreats the black people’. So happens today with humanity at large with Nature.

We thus talk of human aberration of perception as the true barrier modern science has to accept those living cycles. And so we define according to the Fractal Principle, 3 phenomena that create that aberration of perception: the limited scales of space we perceive, which prevent us from seeing in detail small or far away beings; the relative speed of human, cyclical time we use to observe reality that prevent us from perceiving very fast or very slow beings as living beings. Finally, our incapacity to translate other languages, as information is smaller and quantized. Therefore, we perceive better bodies and energy than minds and brains. This creates the ‘energetic aberration of naïve realism’ that makes scientists think all is ‘energy’ and information is secondary. Since informative messages, which are ‘faster’ and ‘smaller’ than energy forms are the most difficult to perceive. We don’t see pheromones and so biologists thought for centuries ants acted as individuals when in fact they act as part of a whole super-organism, the anthill. We did not perceive the informative, chemical languages that cross ‘the synapse’ between neurons for so long, that most scientists thought that the entire brain was a cell to be able to work together until Cajal saw those discontinuities. Yet today biologists are decoding new languages of information: they found that monkeys learn to use money, rats sing songs, flies calculate. So the real barrier to understand the intelligent Universe is ideological, anthropomorphic ‘mechanism’. The very moment science accepts organicism; it will start to ‘understand’ the whys and wills of reality instead of merely gathering data. To perceive that organicism it only has to ‘translate’ different speeds of time to the ‘real speed’ at which any species exist.

When we understand that there are many energies that feed space-time beings, many ways to inform brains, many speeds of perception and hence life; yet all are harmonic with each other, a deeper philosophical sense illuminates our mind: We are part of the same Universe and share the common properties of any of its infinite organic systems.

A huge organic system of temporal energy like a star might have a thought a day; a plant thinks slowly, a fly sees faster, a rat beats its heart faster than we do. For example, spiral and elliptic galaxies are phases of a feeding cycle in which the spiral bar appears and disappears after collecting interstellar gas for the black hole every 1010 years. Scientists are now ‘putting together’ many similar dual forms that are phases of an organic, existential cycle. This is the fundamental trend in recent Astronomy and Physics: First neutrons and protons were considered 2 particles but now they are 2 phases of a nucleon cycle of energy feeding as they absorb pions, transforming into each other, so fast we can’t see it in detail. Last year we realized that the 3 neutrinos were part of the same particle, mutating its state. The same phenomenon happens when we see a human being externally: our skin appears as a fixed organism in space as its cellular cycles are perceived as a stable form.

Only anthropomorphism and the limits of human AE-perception make us differentiate those scales. Yet according to the definition of a point of i-geometry when you ‘enlarge’ the image of that non-AE point, for example, an insect, the detail of the information we observe grows and so the world of insects is as rich in meanings and forms as the macro-world in which we live. Since all waves carry the same amount of quantic information regardless of its spatial size, according to 2 simple, paradoxical laws: the law of the vortex for cyclical, implosive, attractive ‘particles’ (charges and masses), Vo x Ro=K, and the quantic law that defines transversal, explosive waves, E/v(t)=K. Both show that temporal energy increases when the masses or waves cycle becomes smaller.

Each species has a rhythm of times. So slow species are perceived as dead species by faster species. We think plants are dead because they are slow in their rhythms of Times. Yet they are alive, feel, and sense in a chemical manner, through their roots and leaves… All is alive yet with a different rhythm, a different beat. The beat of each temporal organism is an action-reaction cycle with a different clock, a different quantic rhythm and temporal speed. They are all around you. In a garden, the wings of a ‘hummingbird’ take energy from the air 200 times per second. It is a clock faster than the energy beat of your heart, 80 beats per second. The energy of the wind moves the leaves every 2 minutes. A gardener is a clock that waters plants a beat each day… Those action-reaction cycles are everywhere in the Universe. Some beings are faster in their active cycles like the hummingbird; some are slower like the plants and the galaxy. In most cases the bigger the species are, the longer they take in each of their active cycles: A galaxy turns around every 200 million years, the Earth every day, your eyes beat and absorb light-energy every second, the hummingbird’s heart beats 800 times every minute, the electron turns 30.000 cycles per second… Each organism, each region of the Universe, has a different speed of feeding and perception. People think that slow species are dead. But that is not true. They tend to be energy species that just have slow rhythms of information and live longer. While more informative, evolved species think faster and live shorter. Often the smaller the species the faster it can complete its cycles of information. So brains are small and chips evolve, becoming smaller as they become more powerful. Yet chips last a couple of years. And men, an informative species, seem so self-destructive, so loving of information, the age, which precedes death, that we might be the shortest living animal on Earth. In the complex versions of this book we formalize those multiple planes of perception with existential algebra. Let us here consider just some basic homologies, laws and decametric rules, useful to fully grasp latter the cosmology and biology of the Universe.

The fundamental law of the Universe is the balance between space and time, such as ExT=K. Thus as we diminish in spatial size in the Universe, beings become faster in time, creating a balance according to which, smaller beings perceive and exist faster, being able to escape, slower Goliaths. Those regularities of the game of existence show a certain equalitarian justice in the Universe. Indeed, in each world-ecosystem the subjective existence of its organic systems is similar, despite their different size. So we can gather them in ‘families of species’ around a ‘constant of action’, K=T x E, which is the product of its speed of perception or frequency of perception of temporal information and its spatial extension. For example, it seems all mammals have the same metabolic existence: The rat lives less than the elephant but his heart beats faster. The subjective speed of perception also prevents small species to become extinct in the same world ecosystem inhabited by bigger species, as they act-react faster and so they can escape top predators.

The harmonies of living beings: the paradox of Goliath.

For example, according to the previous inverse law of mental speed a fly sees 10 times faster than human do, since flies are smaller, so they perform 10 visual quantic actions by each human blink. Yet because its brain’s quantic neuronal density is not very high, it is not a top predator as robotic insects might be in the future.

Curiously enough the oldest insects, ant queens and cockroaches, can live up to 7 years. Yet cockroaches react in 20 milliseconds and humans in 200. Which means that if they perceive time cycles 10 times faster than we do, subjectively they process 10 times more quantic actions of temporal energy, or ‘dharmas of existence’ (philosophical jargon). So they live the same subjectively life of 70 years… the same length of a human existential= generational cycle.

It follows that there are parallel worlds, one for each relative hierarchical space-time scale, based in different Constants of Existence. In physical worlds the most important of those constants are the Universal constants of force, which express the previous K= TxS balances in different abstract ways. For example in quantum theory H= TxS is always constant (Heisenberg Principle). But that constant of the microcosmic world is different from its equivalent constant, temperature, in the atomic world, which also shows a self-similar balance for all gases: P(t)V(E)=nkT.

Other constants however are written not as TxS=K balanced, but as E/T or T/E processes of Darwinian evolution, which define instead of organic balances, processes of transformation of certain energy into for and vice versa. The most important of those constants in the 2 physical space/time planes are G and Q, which represent, as the Newtonian and Coulombian formula shows, T/E, Mass-Charge/Distance events, in which in words of Einstein, cyclical masses absorb and bend the energy of space. While in the electromagnetic world light-space is absorbed and transformed, curved into electronic form. Yet since the density of information of the electromagnetic world is smaller than that of masses, given the fact that electrons are lighter and more extended in space than gravitational quarks, paradoxically the energy of its electromagnetic constant is much bigger. Thus the relative transformations of gravitational and light spatial forces into masses and charges are also ruled by decametric harmonies, as those of the biological speed of action-reaction of flies and humans. All together we can consider a simple scheme of the main many-worlds of the Human Universe, according to their relative energy and information density. Indeed, According to the different forces of the Universe, each organic system has a different mind since it absorbs different temporal energies and so it creates different mental, linguistic ‘spaces/times’, relative virtual worlds, mirrors of the Universe. The world of each being represents a quantity of spatial information with a size, form and number of dimensions that are relative to the spatial reach, form and dimensions of the informative, linguistic forces it uses to observe the Universe. So while the Universal Syntax all minds use to create their virtual maps of the Universe is homologous in all beings, in as much as they reflect a single Universe, the details, quantity and quality of the information of those maps depends on each brain; since worlds are multiple, quantic, diffeomorphic. So, depending on which type of temporal force of energy each quantic being absorbs to create its mental map we can define different worlds or ecosystems in which a certain force is shared by multiple discontinuous Fractal points that interact only with the other points of the same ecosystem but now with parallel worlds. For example, masses are quantic nodes that inform and/or perceive gravitation, which we do not see. We are quantic knots of light perception. While ants have olfactory brains that perceive atoms. And so many beings live in parallel discontinuous worlds within the same Universe.

Even an electron, the smallest form known to man, processes light information and jumps towards a moving photon, absorbing its energy to enhance its survival chances. Equally, black holes and quarks process gravitational information, locating themselves in the best position to absorb it as masses. While a chip uses digital information to guide a machine, etc. There are other spaces and ways of measuring time besides light and clocks, other possible virtual worlds and intelligences besides man. Since man is made of the same atomic material that the rest of the Universe, the capacity to communicate in this universe – the most clear prove of life – is not exclusive of human atoms but a property that takes place through different atoms and forces; including metallic atoms such as those of computers or gravitational forces used by celestial bodies. So men talk, chips digitalize, animals see, plants ‘smell’ and masses process gravitational information.

We classify those worlds, according to the volume of temporal energy their linguistic forces carry, in a scale of increasing i-complexity, ruled by the Black Hole paradox: The smallest and faster particles scan with more detail the Universe; so they carry more information and create bigger, faster mental worlds, inhabited by species with more TxS force. Accordingly we consider 4 basic worlds:

- Big, slow atomic quanta create animal olfactory minds that perceive small metric territories inhabited by small animals like ants.

- Smaller, faster electrons create electronic minds that perceive kilometric territories inhabited by bigger animals like human beings.

- Photons create bigger worlds of planetary size perceived by huge machines and chips (the brain of future robots) at global scale (Internet, satellites, etc).

- Gravitational forces of very reduced size create words of galactic size perceived by celestial bodies like Black Holes (minds of the galaxy).

So the Gravitational world is bigger than the light world, bigger than the electronic world, bigger than the molecular world because paradoxically gravitons are faster and smaller than photons, which are faster and smaller than electrons, which are faster and smaller than molecules. So a black hole can perceive an image ‘with more detail’, more ‘pixels’. And since gravitation is faster than light it should ‘change’ the quantic mind’s images it creates faster. On the opposite extreme, plants and olfactory animals perceive molecules, which create images ‘with huge pixels’ that offer little detail and change very slow. Thus we consider that every organic system in the Universe, which processes information and survives efficiently, is a focus of a dual force that carries temporal energy and helps him to act-react externally in a manner that seems to improve the survival of that entity. Each bigger world and faster language increases the TxS force of its species, which become top predators. And indeed, the analysis of the theoretical speed of informative perception in black holes has shown that they are the fastest ‘computing minds’ of the Universe. So black holes can easily destroy a planet; huge machines kill animal life; human beings kill olfactory ants and insects kill plants. Which means top predators are defined in terms of the power of their linguistic brains.

And so we can talk of a game of Russian dolls, in which each bigger World encloses the smaller one. The gravitational World encloses the light world. And the light world encloses the electronic world, which is bigger than the atomic world of ants.

The 4+1 postulates of Fractal, illogic Geometry.

We can formalize the structure of those fractal worlds-minds, the monads of Leibniz, with the 5th postulate of geometry. In the graph, a flux of forces creates a vortex that falls towards a central singularity in which the energy force is transformed into information, creating a linguistic, still image with a fixed content of spatial information, perceived and processed by the brain of the system as a synoptic mirror of the Universe, which allows the system to act-react in that Universe. Thus the 5th postulate of i-illogic geometry defines any mind as the informative singularity or central region of a fractal point that creates a virtual image of the Universe or ‘World’, limited to the information scanned by the forces it absorbs:

59. ‘A mind is a point of Temporal Information in which parallel forces of spatial energy converge, creating a linguistic image of the Universe:

‌ st (Space-Time Universe) x 0t (Point-Mind) = K (linguistic World of spatial information)’

Of the many sides of that 5th postulate 2 are paramount

- The physical duality between mind and brain that makes possible for a mind to stop a flux of temporal energy in movement into an informative still map, mind or virtual word.

- And the aberrations of perception the mind causes, creating the arrogant vision any species has of the Universe, in which he believes to occupy the central point.

In the physical realm, besides our electronic minds there are gravitational minds, black holes and masses, which Einstein defined as foci of gravitational space:

60. ‘Space=Energy is motion relative to a simultaneous frame of reference= gauging mind’

We translate in italic to the jargon of Duality the abstract concepts of Einstein, who understood space as a moving energy warped by a mass, a frame of reference that ‘measures’ space-time. Since Einstein was an abstract physicist, philosophically shy, and so he did not considered how a ‘mass’ can measure, an informative, ‘intelligent, mental action’.

Minds are focused, ‘Aristotelian Gods’, defined in his metaphysics as unmoved, intelligent brains around which energy flows and ‘bodies’ turn, as they feed with temporal energy the mind. Stillness is the nature of perception. Even if reality is a moving quantic soup, your eye is not out of focus because its virtual images are still, like the pictures of a film that stops in front of the camera. Both images, in the eye and the camera, only move and change when you blink your eyes or the camera closes its window, stopping their perception. Then it rests in darkness as the body makes the brain jump to another place… Thus perception is also quantic, a stop and go process that focuses a still image with the senses and then process that information into a quantic thought while the senses are closed and the energy body moves the mind. In the human case that quantic rhythm lasts a second, our ‘dharma’ of relative present-existence in which simultaneously we create a still mental image of the Universe. Each second our quantic, informative mind closes a mental, cyclical action:

61. Cycles of temporal energy=>sensorial in-forma-tion =>Brain-clock of time.

An informative brain or temporal clock, acts as a mirror of the Universe, portraying the quantic, cyclical actions of time-space, performed by multiple species. Those actions are communicated to the brain region by certain forces/languages, electromagnetism or gravitation, atomic smells, sound waves, etc. that the brain reconstructs into an image that imitates those cyclical actions with inner, still in/form/ations. In physical terms that stillness is equivalent to coldness, since temperature is a parameter of movement. For example, the black hole has a temperature close to 0 k, which means that it exists in relative stillness, with perfect order. Since it might perceive an image made with bosonic, gravitational quanta perfectly focused, with minimal fluctuation. So we suppose by illogic parallelism, that the virtual world that happens in the black hole at zero temperature and zero movement is a linguistic mirror of the galactic Universe. Again, we cannot go into a detailed translation of Einstein’s equation to cyclical time. Just to mention that only in terms of cyclical time we can understand the properties of black holes. For example, time tends to zero when we enter the black hole in lineal terms, but in the inverse terms of ‘frequency or angular speed’ the cyclical rotation around the Kerr black hole tends to infinite, while its height is maximized. Since those are the 2 dimensions of time, which now we can understand in more detail.

2ND POSTULATE.

ACTION-REACTION CYCLES AND WAVES OF PRESENT COMMUNICATION.

The minimal Universal event communicates 2 i- points through a lineal action of energy and information that emit a flow of micro-points, self-similar replicas of the mother-point across the external Universe transferring energy and information. In most events those flows balance one point with more energy, Ei, that each science defines with different slangs, (‘a white hole’, ‘energyzer’, ‘past form’, ‘male’, ‘body’, ‘yang’, ‘moving field’, etc.); and an informative point, Ot, the smaller form (‘a black hole’, ‘codifier’, ‘future form’, ‘female’, ‘head’, ‘yin’, particle or ‘center of perception’, etc.) Both become united by a dual wave that transfers energy from Ei to the informative point of relative future, Ot, and information from the future point, Ot, to the relative past point, Ei, creating together a cycle of temporal energy. The description of those points and cycles, which are common to all beings of space-time, creates a fractal,i-logic geometry common to all sciences and Universal species.

The simplicity of the fundamental unit of our Universe should not deceive us; since the point is not static but in constant communication with that external Universe, populated by other points from which it obtains energy and information through acts of communication, which are also dual. Since according to Newton, an action never goes unanswered: There would be a reaction often of the opposite sign, which means that if the original t-point has emitted a fractal action, dominant in energy, ΣS, it will receive an opposite reaction, often dominant in information, TI, completing a cyclical action of temporal energy, ΣSTI. In the same manner when a group of points emits a wave, it will receive an opposite wave from the receptor, creating a cellular, complex cycle. Finally, if we combine 2 planes or networks of points, communicating waves of energy and information, for example, human cells communicating energy and information through the blood and nervous network of life beings, we obtain an Organism. Which is defined in fractal Geometry by the 2nd postulate of communication.

Even the simplest lineal movement is an incomplete action-reaction cycle, observed from the point of view of the point that emits a single, lineal action arrow. Thus, to fully understand any event we have to wait for a reaction to complete a cycle. One-dimensional science often forgets this duality, considering ceteris paribus analysis of a single ation. In the human social scale, individualism often forgets duality when a nation attacks another nation, or when a group exploits another social group or an individual acts selfishly without expecting the proper reaction. Yet sooner or latter the just, cruel, Darwinian Universe will offer a reaction that will balance the game.

Fractal entities can emit a self-similar microscopic cell, with max. form and minimal energy; or they might emit a ‘wave’, a vibration of its entire whole with maximum energy and minimal form. It is the first of the multiple dual solutions, which any entity can choose, according to the dual arrows of energy and information of the Universe. Duality becomes essential to the multiplicity and variety of the Universe, since its self-similar limits are set by the existence of only 2 arrows/forms/ substances to play with; but its combinations are ∞.

Of course, the ∞ Universe actions and reactions that define those events will have different names according to the st-plane of existence in which they occur, but they will respond to self-similar existential laws. Since sciences are based in analytical studies that differentiate species, they do not search, as this synthetic book does, for the self-similar laws of all those fractal actions. Yet precisely the beauty of the fractal Universe is that both approaches are meaningful. Since, self-similarity doesn’t mean equality: the fractal creates self-similar forms which are never an exact replica of the original and those variations across different space/times differentiate species, which are however still easily to compare in terms of the similar properties of all relative energies and forms that together shape the action. Specialized Sciences are interested in those details that differentiate fractal actions. Fractal Theory and System Sciences are interested in the similarities that unify them, according 2 fundamental laws: the law of self-similarity, which states that any action will be a micro-form self-similar to the mother-cell, and the law of balance ΣSxTI=K, which implies that the product of the energy and time of the action will be a constant.

For example, if the point is a fractal microcosmic particle, the Fractal action will be a multiple of h, the smallest micro-form of energy and time of the electromagnetic world, ruled by the law of balance, ExT=H ; if it is an atom, it will be a vibration with a temperature, T, which again will be ruled by the law of balance, in this case PV=nkT.

And because we have ascended our plane of existence from spatial, lighter particles into atoms denser in form with less spatial speed, the action will be denser and reach lesser extension than a quantic h-action. This will be the case also in biological actions of communication: if the mother-cell is a living being, it will emit an ovule of pure information that will merge with seminal seed with higher energetic movement, or male seed. Both will be replicas of the mother-cell and now they will have minimal mobility and max. information as we have moved into a fractal space-time of higher i-nformation.

Finally in the human social sphere, actions will be often purely informative: movements guided by certain thoughts, which will act and transform our environment often intermediated by machines that increase the energy and information of the human action (). Since, all, including men, are made of flows of energy transformed into cyclical actions of time that generate the forms and events we observe in the Universe. So we widen the fractal unit of quantum physics the action of temporal energy that communicates particles to define actions-reactions in all space-time systems. And affirm that Spatial Energy and Temporal Information combine into fractal actions of temporal energy that generate the events and cycles of communication of reality. Thus the 2nd of fractal geometry defines a line, no longer as an abstract form like Euclidean geometry does, but as a physical wave of micro-points that carry energy and information, as they move between 2 macroscopic points, with 2 possible functions, to communicate energy forces or linguistic information:

2nd Postulate: A cycle of fractal space-time:

A wave of communication is a group of self-similar micro-points that move in parallel lines between 2 macro-points, transferring temporal energy between them.

In Fractal geometry a point with parts is never defined by a lineal sequence of numeric intervals within a straight line, but by the communication of 2 poles of energy and information that establish a flow of particles in 2 opposite directions, creating a simultaneous, paradoxical wave that meets in the center. In algebraic terms, a function requires at least 2 parameters, X and Y, which are normally 2 different variables often opposed or complementary, placed in two different sides of an equation, as one tends to be a time parameter and the other a parameter of spatial energy. For example, speed is defined by a parameter of time and a parameter of space, placed in opposite sides of a fraction.

In biological terms, an organism is defined by a head of information, a relative future, more evolved form; and a body of energy, a relative, less evolved, past form. Since the head directs and decides ‘the future’ of the entire system. So a relative informative region is a future form and a relative energetic region is a past form. And both come together into a discontinuous, relative quantic, intermediate region or ‘present space-time’, in which they combine creating ‘reality’. That region is a present region because it is the most visible region of the Fractal point, limited by the future, informative region and the past, energetic membrane of the Non lineal quantic World. For example, we do not see the black hole and dark halo that controls the galaxy but only the intermediate region of stars. In this manner the game of space-time existence that creates reality merges the Non Euclidean mathematical forms and Non Aristotelian functions of spatial energy and temporal information into a new combined form, a relative present, quantic space-time.

3RD POSTULATE: EQUALITY. FRACTAL LOGIC:

According to the 2 arrows of entropy and order, we define 2 opposite kind of Universal events taking place between Ne-points: fluxes that create a symbiotic present from a past energy and a future form of information; and fluxes that destroy the past form, as a ‘victim’ or ‘energy’ of the future. In the graph, a case of Darwinian devolution among men that perceive each other as different and a case of social evolution through parallel love. In the graph, the 2×2 Darwinian Vs Symbiotic events in which a relative form of past and a form of future come together, creating or destroying a relative present.

The 2nd postulate differentiates according to the Fractal Principle 3 types of waves: A language that transfers only information, (Max. i); a force that transfers only energy (Max. E); and a wave of Temporal energy that transfers both forms (ExT). All forces and languages are waves, since actions mix energy and temporal information; which will be perceived as languages when the absorber can decode that information. It is the receiver, which selects the wave as a force of energy or a language of information, defining how it will react to the emitter, according to its self-similarity that will allow him to understand its information. For example, plants absorb light as energy and animals decode it as information; but light is dual.

Thus, the 3rd Postulate defines how forms will react to those waves according to its self-similarity. Indeed, the reader might wonder why geometry needs 5 postulates, if the 1st, 2nd and 4th define perfectly a fractal space/time in 3 ‘growing’ degrees of complexity: the singleton or lonely point, the line of communication or wave and the network or plane with volume. However the 3rd and 5th postulates are not about fractal space but about fractal time; about information and formal equality. Since:

- The 3rd postulate defines the degree of self-similarity between 2 fractal objects. Classic geometry considered equality based only in the external form, regardless of size and inner content. But beyond the idealized world of Euclid, equality never exists when we consider the inner form of those points made of inner networks of energy and information that contain dark spaces and inner parts, which make even twins slightly different. Thus fractal geometry defines instead the relative degree of equality of 2 forms, according to the self-similarity of its inner, informative content and scale, not according to the equality of its external, mutating membrane, which often is hiding, as in camouflage, a different form.

Thus a fundamental change in our concept of truth follows from the understanding of self-similarity as a different proposition to equality: If Euclid defined equality based on the surface of objects, without taking into account their relative size and inner content, this no longer holds. Things might be similar in their surface and maybe in their content but they are never equal, at most self-similar, nor are equations and any linguistic state an absolute prove of truth, but linguistic self-similar images of the recurrent cycles and events they represent.

Otherwise there could not be hunting, based in the strategy of camouflage, as predators simulate the external form of victims or hide in dark spaces, from black holes to lionesses. Self-similarity matters because the social evolution of points around networks that deliver the same energy and information require of the capacity of those points to process the same energy and information, with its inner parts. Thus only self-similar cells with the same ‘genetic=temporal information’ evolve into organisms. For the same reason, since reproduction is based in genetic information, only species with the same genetic information can reproduction. While species that cannot share information to hunt through common networks or reproduce will consider the other point/species a form of energy and prey on it. Thus surprisingly enough geometry determines behavior; form and function again go together and fractal geometry tends a bridge between physics and biology, explaining how species will communicate: if those 2 points perceive each other as equal, they will evolve into a social network co-sharing their ability to gather energy and information. If those 2 points are unequal, they will establish a Darwinian, hierarchical relationship, in which one becomes the victim and the other the predator. Thus the 3rd postulate is no longer an abstract, geometric postulate, but a postulate of logic relationships, fundamental to understand the ‘why’ of movements and behaviors; and prove again a fundamental theme of religion: forms that are equal, in this case all humans who have the same genetic information, since they can all reproduce, should love each other, and share energy and information to create a collective organism, a global civilization or God of History. Since self-similar points evolve socially though networks and communicate through a common language of information to survive better as a single social species:

The 3 arrows of Time:

Points that are self-similar in space-time will evolve socially into a present spatial network. Points that are different in information will treat each other as relative energy and evolve towards the future into a hierarchical organism as a system of 2 points, one of energy and one of information, related by constant flows of energy and information. Or devolve towards the past into a Darwinian system is one in wich both flows are not constant.’

The 3rd postulate explains why we men do not perceive the intelligence of all beings in the Universe: beings perceive itify other forms whose flows of communication don’t understand as energy forces that they ‘destroy’ and feed on, without perceiving its ‘organic qualities’. However as we shall see (), even the smallest point known to man, the photons of ‘light-space’ show the 4 basic qualities of all organic systems that biologists use to define life, the capacity to process energy and information and the capacity to evolve socially and reproduce: photons carry energy and act like the minimum unit of information, because light transmits all type of images through its photons; they reproduce their form in the vacuum; and they gather in social herds of colors. That is the ultimate meaning of a fractal Universe that anthropomorphism rejects: the 3+i arrows of space-time are the will of the Universe that all its beings share across all its planes of existence.

Thus when we generalize the previous postulates to n-points in communication we create a finite ‘plane of existence’ or ‘cellular organism’, defined by the 4th postulate of i-geometry which explains a plane as a network of ‘simultaneous beings’ created by the multi-causal flows of energy and information between all those points that flux, merge and knot into the organism. Indeed, once we have clarified that the Universe is made of points filled with temporal energy, it becomes clear that the fundamental mathematical property of those points-beings is its social nature. Since a number – the social unit of algebra – is a social set. While a plane – the social unit of geometry – is a social herd. Thus, the fact that all beings have mathematical properties means they associate in herds and organisms, represented by sets of numbers and topographic 4-D planes, which are quantic networks made of fractal points with a certain content of spatial energy and information.

Social Evolution. The duality between Darwinian and loving behavior.

Most systems are herds of energy and informative cells put together into heads and bodies that merge, creating organisms and species. How individual cells create those complex organisms? How do atoms evolve into the molecular social Plane and molecules into the cellular Plane, cells into organisms and individuals into societies? Through Social, informative evolution, the most extended phenomena in the Universe by which individual beings become organized into herds. Biological sciences have taken very long to accept Informative, Social Evolution, influenced by the single arrow of energy and the subsequent excessive importance that its founder, Darwin, gave to the fight between individuals within the same species. Only in the XX century with the development of the sciences of information, Complexity, Systems Theory and Ecology, we have realized that the Universe is based in the social informative evolution of micro-organisms into macro-organisms. The existence of informative networks and languages of information shared by those organic cells explains the growth of species in Plane and size, from individuals into societies, according to another fundamental duality between energy and information. Social events can be either energetic, Darwinian, destructive, or symbiotic, informative, reproductive:

- Complementary, in-formative, present, balanced events happen when the organisms share the same energy and informative signals so they can communicate and join forces in their fight for existence. For example, in gender, the female is the cyclical, informative entity that merges with the lineal, energetic being male, only when both belong to the same genetic, informative species. Those social events evolve individuals into couples, groups, herds and cellular organisms that use the same energy or information, creating an evolutionary arrow of social love, based in the sharing of the same energy and information.

- Darwinian, energetic events, when the inversion of form is so marked that both entities cannot share the same language of information and form a couple or a herd. Then the stronger predator will try to explode through the arrow of death the information of the prey into energy and absorb it to recreate its form.

Such duality of behaviors in the Universe has set an eternal argument of philosophy between Darwinians vs. believers in love. Yet as most dualities of science, it reflects merely the paradoxical nature or behavior of the Universe: beings that speak the same language of information evolve socially to search for energy, inform themselves and when they are very similar, belonging to the same species, reproduce, accomplishing the wills/arrows of time in a more efficient manner. While individuals who do not understand their information obviously interpret the other as energy and try to hunt and destroy each other. Thus again duality proves that neither Religion nor Darwin are wrong. Each explains an arrow of logic time that we can resume in a statement, which is the foundation of all bio-ethic systems:

40. ‘Love your neighbour and hunt all alien beings.’

Yet since men are all equal genetic species, they should all love each other and evolve into a higher organism, humankind, as prophets of love have always told us, in order to be more efficient and control properly Mother-Earth. Unfortunately human beings still fight wars based in the limits of our perception, which is external and makes us think our nations are different species because they speak slightly different informative languages or races are different because their skin has a different color. The result of such short-sightedness is that we have created partial, fractal social organisms with boundaries called nations. Thus Social Evolution deals with the fight between species and the way in which individuals of the same species organize themselves into societies, stronger than individuals, fitter to survive. Of course individuals fight for survival, but Evolution is a game of species. So the key to survival is not the individual but the cohesion and organization of a group of individuals belonging to the same species that act together with a higher energy and informative force than the individual and so the social individual survive better as part of the larger group.

Today we know that individual lions are less successful than hyenas and wild dogs that hunt in group (25% of captures in lions Vs 80% of captures in wild dogs). Even in the case of Germany, despite its ideology of Racial Darwinism, what really worked was the group – the German collective spirit that made the German army better than the individualistic Italians or disorganized Russians, till communism in II W.W. made them fight as a single organism…Thus social evolution, contrary to common belief, is much more important than dog-eat-dog societies. And that law applies to all systems in the Universe, including herds of stars (galaxies) or herds of molecules (cells) that capture interstellar gas and lonely atoms and explains the st-planes of the Universe as no other theory can.

The fact that the social organism is fractal, quantic, limited in its energy and information is ultimately the reason why individuals come towards the social networks and evolves socially with other cells, since they require energy and information than the networks provide, becoming addicted to them. If the Universe were a continuous infinity with a single ‘immortal time’, there would not be social organisms, as our inner time of existence would be infinite. Thus survival is again the biological function that explains the existence of organic networks and its cells from the perspective of our limited fractal quantity of life-time.

4TH POSTULATE-DIMENSION

PLANES OF EXISTENCE.

In the graph, a human being exists through 10 planes of existence, from electromagnetic space to the cosmological plane of the solar system, and though we only see our present space as an organism, all those planes from relative past to future influence us and form part of our modular consciousness, as we feel them through different senses… Riemann also hinted to the scalar structure of space with its Riemannian surfaces, polynomial planes which communicated through a narrow path that transferred energy and information between them, which in the case of gravitational space would be defined in Relativity as the ‘Rossen Bridges’ of black holes and other massive regions of the Universe. Let’s consider from the perspective of cyclical time those Relativistic structures between planes and points.

In fractal geometry a dimension is a flow (dynamic version) or network (static version) of quantic, cellular points, gathered into bidimensional waves and 4-dimensional space-time fields. Even the smallest points gather in waves, which scientists call strings and have 3×3 inner dimensions. Those lines then gather in herds called electromagnetic branes, which warp into particles. And further on 3-D particles form networks that become atoms, and the process repeats once and again till creating human organisms within which those organic points, now called cells communicate energy forces and informative bits. Thus, as a consequence of the new definition of a point, a fractal plane becomes now a 4-dimensional ‘holographic topography’ with 4 information and energy ‘dimensions’, needed by those points to absorb energy and information: informative height that allows the top head to observe the Universe, cyclical rhythms that allow the being to perform its existential cycles, length-speed that moves the being and width-energy that allows the being to store and reproduce its cells. So all planes are quantic networks of social points/cycles put together by n-flows of temporal energy, which have ‘dark spaces’ within the holes of the network:

37. ‘A plane is a network/organism of n-points joined by flows of energy and information’.

For example, each human is made of specific quantic points of space-time, that we call cells, gathered around informative, reproductive and energetic planes/networks, the nervous, blood and digestive networks that give 4-dimensional volume to the human space-time. But there are many types of points with parts gathering in networks of temporal energy: atoms gathering in molecules, stars in galaxies, strings in particles, etc. We cannot go further into more complex, analytical descriptions of the previous postulate. We just might wonder, since those planes are relative worlds displaced in time, networks disconnected from the other planes, how a given space-time scale, the cellular or atomic scale, relate to its higher i-plane. And the answer, already mentioned is: through asymmetric flows of energy and information that Relativity defines as ‘one-dimensional, Rosen bridges’, essentially a single flow of energy from past to future, from the microcosms to the macrocosms, or a single flow of information from a relative future, the higher i+1 plane, to a relative past, i-1 plane:

In this manner the fractal Universe keeps adding dimensions, as each point becomes part of a network that evolves itself into a point of a higher t-dimension. And depending on the number of dimensions we observe a point through, the total dimensions of the point will vary. As a general rule however, any species of the Universe is fairly described through its main Plane of existence and its lower and upper planes. So a human being is described perfectly as a cellular system in the st-1 Plane, an individual in the st-plane and a relative point co-existing with other individuals in a society in which s/he feeds on energy, information and reproduces. For those reasons we can consider that any point of existence will be described exhaustively when we consider the 9 dimensional networks of each 3 main st-planes.

36. Fractal ±st-point: 3 st-1 Dimensions > 3 st-dimensions > 3 st+1 dimensions.

A fractal point or ±st-point, exists as a 3 dimensional organism, which acts in the external world pursuing energy, information or reproductive goals (either mechanically, consciously or in a vegetative way, or even micro-managed by a catalyser or enzyme – facts those which won’t matter to its dimensional description). In all those cases, time, understood as a form of movement, will be a geometrical movement or cyclical trajectory but also a temporal cycle with a biological, energetic, reproductive or informative function; and a movement traced through a dimension of the upper st-plane of the point. So when a human goes to feed on a dinner, it will enter into a social network of human points feeding on that dinner, which will form an organic system of the upper st+1 Plane. When an electron flows in a metal network of atoms, it becomes a carrier of energy or information between those atoms, and so to its 3 inner dimensions we will have to add an external social dimension in the atomic Plane (the only one physicists study in that case). Yet the electron have also inner dimensions, defined by its quantum numbers.

How many scales reality has beyond the 10 scales humans perceive? Given the flexibility of size and speed of gravitational forces, whose waves Einstein calculated could extend to the size of the entire Universe those scales might be infinite It is also the logic result of thinking in mathematical terms, as the simplest informative fractal, a disk, given the irrationality of π, can reach any infinitesimal size. Ultimately is a choice of the reader: if he feels better thinking he is the center of the Universe, the Anthropic Principle considers that there are only 10 scales and we are at the center. If he is objective he would observe that for survival reasons, spatial perception always puts him in the center of all his observations of Nature. Thus in the same way space is infinite but we are in a limited perceived self-centered space, the scales of temporal complexity should be quasi-infinite. And from the perspective of an st=1011 being, our Universe should be far smaller than a Planck string is for us.

The mathematics of transcendental evolution are those of self-generating, reproductive fractal geometry that iterates cells and reorganizes them through palingenesis when it reaches a number of 10±10-11 cellular units. The organization of those scales can be described mathematically as its main law is rather simple.

38. Energy flows from an st-1 scale into a complex, future st-scale: Est-1TI.

Information flows from a st scale into a simpler st-1 scale: TI >Est-1.

Reproduction occurs in the same st-scale ΣS<=TI

Fractal spaces are self-generated by seeds of its microscopic scale: a code of information compressed in very limited space (an equation, a DNA code, a big-bang code for the Unification theory searched by physicists to explain the Universe), replicates its form in biological radiations that multiply the fractal space time cells of the system and end up recreating a new macro system. Those waves of information and energy are thus big bangings and big bangs that explain ∞ events of reality. Yet they have not been accurately defined, since Einstein lacked the finite, dimensional concepts of fractal geometry needed to explain them. This changed in the 70s and 80s with the work of Mandelbrot and Mehaute ,which proved that for the arrow of time to continue when a system was not releasing energy, it was recreating information in fractal forms, which self-replicate the information of the being. In nature those micro-structures detach themselves from the being and absorb energy in the environment growing in size, self-replicating. So the fractal transmission of form is the most important event taken place in the Universe. From genetic information transferred between living beings through a fractal process of palingenesis to the creation of mental ideas that we convert into bigger machines, fractal replication between different planes of fractal space-time with finite dimensions, is the essence of reality. And the previous law regulates those processes at scale through which the different Planes of reality interact.

The order between those scales is hierarchical. Species in different planes of space-time interact within each other transferring energy and information. Yet the bigger structures control and order the smaller pieces, its parts that become wholes through the arrow of life or disintegrate those wholes back into parts through the process of death. And such interaction is possible because in those different Planes, from microcosms to macrocosms, energy and information have self-similar forms that make the shapes of atoms similar to the forms of galaxies and stars. And follow self-similar laws of harmony. In terms of hierarchical order, we observe that the bigger an entity is in space, the longer it lasts in time, ΣSTI. That is, the amount of time and space of the different structures of the universe is in balance. While in terms of hierarchy the bigger scale orders and transfers information to the smaller scale that transfers mainly energy to the bigger form. Those 2 arrows of time, energy and information imply that the bigger scale or network – for example, the nervous system in man – controls the lower scale of cells, which in turn feeds the upper scale.

We can observe those processes that relate species of different scalar worlds through restricted flows of energy and information also in the realm of social sciences, when men become aware of their collective societies. Religion considers that awareness the most elevated feeling – when humans acquire consciousness of the existence of a scale of information bigger and more complex than the individual, a social God from the upper scale of mankind, a nation or civilization. Or we can use General Relativity and mathematics to describe how those flows of energy and information transcend or descend between scales through the so-called Rossen Bridges that connect different scales of the Universe. Yet since Einstein merely applied Riemann’s mathematics to physical space, a wider model of space-time should rather return to the original work of Riemann to fully grasp those fractal spaces.

What Einstein did was to use some of the features of Riemann’s description of any space-time geometry to describe gravitational space/time, assuming, due to the error of continuity, that it was the only real space/time of the Universe. Now, thanks to a better understanding of fractal geometry, we will be able to apply the discoveries of Riemann and Einstein to any fractal space-time scale of the Universe. Moreover, it is only logic that since what Einstein did was to apply a Riemannian space-time to describe gravitation, modified to introduce the erroneous concept of continuity proper of Cartesian space, we shall return to the original, and study as the paradigm of a fractal space-time, Riemann’s description instead of Einstein. And indeed, when we consider Riemannian spaces, we find they have all the proper features of movement, cyclicality, discontinuity, self-similarity and organicism we have already found for any scale or space-time organism. Since Riemann used a complex mathematical description and we are making a conceptual book for scientists of all disciplines, we will make our best to translate those mathematical properties in verbal terms. After all, once Riemann ended his dissertation, only a person in the audience claim to have understood him – his master Gauss, who already had worked in a similar Non-Euclidean structure of space-time.

We should first notice the underlying quantic nature of Riemann’s geometries which in its now famous dissertation described ‘empirical, real space-times’ as a series of ‘quantic points’ that represented ‘real entities’ moving in ‘cyclical paths’. So Riemann affirmed that there were infinite space-times made of ‘cellular species’ that moved together in social cycles when they were equal, with a degree of proximity based in those ‘common properties’, creating relative ‘quantic dimensions or networks’ of a certain space-time.

In other words, he affirmed that ‘self-similarity’ is the key to social behavior (3rd postulate of fractal geometry), as points/beings that are self-similar come together, forming tightly packed networks we call organisms; while points which are not self-similar in their ‘common properties’ become separated. And he put the example of photons that created ‘light-space’ as they gather together according to their self-similarity in this case their common frequency=color. Indeed light is the relative space our eyes perceive. And it is made of quantic points with a certain volume called photons, grouped in colors whose self-similarity is maximal in a laser beam, at which stage they form a perfect plane. Those photons prove that the continuous mathematical plane of mental space is a simplification of a luminous space made of discontinuous packages of quantic energy or actions, which move, change their form and associate in organic groups called photons. The space that we perceive is light as some impressionist painters showed in pictures done with light points that imitated photons. Which explains the other great discovery of Einstein’s Special Relativity: the fact that light speed is constant regardless of the observer, precisely because the space we see is ‘light-space’, the absolute frame of reference of our mind.

Thus in fractal space-times we take to its final consequences those concepts of Non-Riemannian Geometries by re-defining also the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th postulate of Euclidean geometries to adapt them to Riemann’s concepts of a moving, cyclical series of fractal space-times joined by dimensional networks (which will be finite fractal dimensions, made by the addition of a series of self-similar points in a wave or network). The result is a geometry able to describe all kind of real space-times fields, from biological, cellular space-times systems, to molecular networks, to the entire Universe. It can obviously get as complex and detailed as all previous geometries but here we will just outline the 3 inner regions of each point and the 5 postulates, describing its formal relationship with the vital functions and cycles they describe. Since each form of space is a function of time, and hence each formal postulate of fractal geometry correspond to each 3±st function in time of a bio-logical point. We can therefore talk of Fractal Geometry and Fractal Logic as to homologous sciences. Where, fractal geometry is defined by the 3 postulates that create the dimensions of a spatial form, the postulate of a point with parts, the postulate of a line-wave (2nd postulate) and the postulate of a network/Plane. While Fractal Logic is defined by the 3rd postulate that explains the behavior of points according to their self-similarity that will guide them towards a tighter, organic, socially evolving configuration or separate them; and the 5th postulate, the most fascinating of them, since it explains how a macro-Universal image converge through a series of lines of information into a micro-dimensional mind, or point with parts, that reflects in its interior the form of the Universe… All points of the Universe have a central, dual convex topography that informs itself. The 5th postulate of logic geometry shows in that sense, the relative direction of future, the direction of information, since the will of each point of view is to absorb energy and perceive it in its relative center, focus of information. And hence the accumulated will of infinite relativistic monads, each one trying to become the relative center of a fractal world, defines the generic arrow of futures as an arrow that creates form, informative perception in each of those gravitational or electromagnetic points (charges and masses) trying to perceive the Universe.

Physical reality is the partial perception of your mind, which as we have seen causes grave mistakes. It misses a lot of information on the organism, as it doesn’t cross the fractal borders inside the system and it stops the movement into still information. You don’t see the cells of your skin moving. You don’t see either the blood and nervous systems of your body. Yet they are what define you as an organism. Don’t trust your senses. Trust the vital systems of organisms to qualify an entity as such. It is a common error of human perception to ignore the existence of organisms, when we do not see all its cycles and networks. Yet since most organic cells are temporal fractals that repeat their cycles of energy feeding and informative perception in an external territory through extended paths, we don’t see, science hardly acknowledge the existence of cosmological organisms (as we do not see its informative networks of gravitation) or human social organisms (as we are cells inside them that do not see the whole picture). Yet it is not spatial closeness, but the existence of internal networks of communication among the cells what defines a working system as an organism. The difference between a living species and a system of energy-information is clear: The system is not complete, autonomous, self-sufficient. It cannot reproduce itself but needs an external agent or ‘enzyme’ to reproduce it – as machines or carbohydrates do. While a living organism also has inner reproductive organs. A living species can interact within its ecosystem and gather the energy and information it needs to achieve reproduction. Which is the 3rd, ultimate arrow that resumes the game of existence that all fractals follow in the Universe; all of them reproduce and preserve their quantic form either internally or externally through enzymes that catalyze their reproduction.

So we describe Temporal, Organic fractals with 2 terms of increasing complexity: a fractal system or network, which is incomplete, since it doesn’t reproduce internally and might not be able to self-organize itself, but requires the collaboration of an external agent; and a (super)-organism in which the arrow of reproduction is internal, iterating the initial fractal units of energy and information into 2 networks that finally combine its energy and information creating the 3rd reproductive network that perpetuates the self-sufficient species.

Most organisms and its cells are in a dynamic equilibrium produced by the 3 flows of energy, information and reproduction provided by the networks. For example, a human being is a fractal form, made of trillions of cells, connected by flows of nervous information, digested energy and hormonal, reproductive blood messages. Thus a relative infinite number of ΣS  TI cells become joined by those 3 networks, creating a human organism. And all those t-cells together create a unit of the higher st+1 scale, a human being. Then the entire process of iteration, self-organization and emergence into a higher t+2 scale, the social scale of mankind, of nations and civilizations, starts again. In this manner through eons of evolution, both the human being and the Universe have become organic systems extended in multiple i-scales of growing social complexity. Its final form size and content of energy vary but the process is essentially the same.

39. Scalar arrows: st-1 Past-Energy -> st+1 Future information ts<-reproduction-> ts.

Since a macrocosmic being (a molecule for an atom, a cell for a molecule and so on), has far more information, it is more evolved, it is the arrow of future, social evolution that creates macrocosms from cellular beings and establishes a hierarchical, asymmetric, duality of social, organic classes in all systems, between the information class (the neurons, the governors, the rich with financial information, the politicians with legal information) and the energy class (the cells of the body, the workers, the citizens). Such as the energy class gives only energy and receives orders and the information class gives only orders and receives energy. While social, democratic love, max. communication, sharing of both energy and information and reproduction occurs between cells of the same social class/plane.

The result is a dual, or ternary organism: it has at least a body of energy that obeys a head of information and both form different planes of existence with different degrees of informative power. If we extend to any number of cells and i-scales, the structure can be as complex as we want, as we fractalize those classes/planes, communicated by one-dimensional, asymmetric arrows of energy and information or Rosen bridges, which Einstein used to study a particular case: the flows of energy and information between the plane of gravitation and electromagnetism. While in a more detailed analysis, since those arrows are relative and each yin has a drop of yang, we will observe merely that in those flows ΣS->∞ and TI->0 in a flow from past to future, from the class energy to the informative class and vice versa. Thus, the st parameter becomes essential to analyse energy and information exchanges between the different microcosmic cells and macrocosmic systems of any fractal, including man: as a human being you are an st=4, 5, 6 species; since your organic system belongs to the st=4, 5 scales of biological cells and living beings, and as a human you belong to the st=5, 6 scales of individuals and social organisms – as cell of a nation or religion. So it is a fact of history that you belong to a certain social class, depending on your information and the control you have of verbal laws and financial money, the 2 language of information of human societies. Physics calls a dual plane of energy and information, a field of energy forces ruled by informative particles; a biological dual system an organism with an energy body and an informative head; and a sociological system of energy and information, a society with a mass of citizens and an informative government. Yet space-time fields, organisms of energy and information and societies, respond to the same laws and properties of fractal space-time. Since the formal analysis and the study of the hierarchies and relationships between any st-fractal and its lower and upper ±st microcosms and macrocosms, is an essential part of Fractal Geometry that can be applied to any fractal system in the Universe.

II. THE 5 POSTULATES CREATE SUPERO-ORGANISMS..

Energy and information systems are i-space/times with 3 organic classes:

-The ‘higher’, dominant informative nucleus and energetic membrane and its networks that control.

- A middle mass of ‘cells’ in cyclical movement between those 2 discontinuous limiting zones.

- That destroy the ‘lower’ energy and information bit(e)s coming from an outer world

In the graph, a cannibal galaxy traps smaller ones between its informative nucleus and star body; the sun uses its planets’ orbits to feed on fractal space-time, so does the nucleus of an atom through its electrons; a DNA cell through its organelles and the brain of an animal, through its body.

The orbital, energetic cycles of the Earth-Moon system are parallel to the cycles of reproduction of its i-1 living quanta. An organism extends through several scales of growing form. Since microscopic, quantic species become chained to stronger, TxE species, as their relative energy and information quanta of a ‘lower class’. In the image, Gaia, the Earth’s surface, is a I-point, made of organisms made of cells, made of  atoms, made of  quarks, all chained by their organic cycles.

22. Organic, social classes.

The networks in control of organic quanta are closely related to the 3 zones of a I-point. Both together define the existence of ‘3 social classes’ with 3 clear temporal, organic functions in all I-organic systems of the Universe that we define according to its relative TxE force:

- Max. T x Max E: The future, dominant quanta are the informative center or brain and the energetic membrane. In an organism, they are symbiotic and control the intermediate region: they absorb energy and information from the external world, passing it to the intermediate, ‘middle class’ region to replicate the specific temporal energy they need… In ecosystems they are the top-predator species and often establish Darwinian relationships, as men and lions do (4.26).

The Universe works through ‘quantic impulses’ that combine energy and information, called TxE actions. Thus, since the top predator informative cell is the fastest cell processing information and the membrane is the fastest entity, moving and processing energy, their combined quantic actions Max. E x Min. T, are more powerful than the rest of the actions of the system. In ecosystems those cells work often in collective herds, which act simultaneously, joined by a common informative language that multiplies their quantic action, against disorganized forms. The result is a universal arrow of social evolution that creates from individuals to herds, and from herds, tightly packed organisms, directed by an informative language, since a herd is less efficient than an organism. So men have evolved socially in groups, hordes, tribes and tightly packed nations, controlled by legal and financial languages. Top predator ants and bees have become the most successful insects, because they developed super-organisms with chemical languages. In the Universe black holes fusion in bigger black holes that gather in the center of the galaxy, acting as ‘gravitational animals’ that perceive gravitation as information (as animals do with light), controlling with gravitational waves their stars. While stars are ‘gravitational plants’ that absorb gravitational space-time as energy, as plants do with light and hence can’t evolve informatively. Finally in the cell the informative RNA forms herds that control and organize their organelles with the genetic language.

- E=T: A mass of ‘present’, cellular quanta, form the intermediate region or ‘body’ of the organic system. It is the working, re=productive ‘middle mass’ that re=produces most of the complex elements of the organism under the orders of the informative classes. They are the workers of human societies that reproduce their goods under monetary orders. They are the stars of galaxies that reproduce their atoms. They are the herbivorous animals in the ecosystem on which carnivores prey. They are the electrons of the atom that gather electromagnetic light for the nucleus. They are the stars of the galaxy. They are the glandular cells that form the organs of a body and reproduce their substances controlled by the neurons. They are the proteins and genes of the cellular ecosystem. They are the citizens of a political system that obey the informative laws.

- Min. E x Min.T: Together the upper and middle, informative and reproductive brain and body prey and feed on the external, ‘lower’, past class, made of bits of information and bites of energy of minimal size, which the other classes absorb from the external world or ecosystem, beyond the discontinuous limits of the world that becomes the ‘vital territory’ of the organic system in which it obtains its temporal energy to energize and inform themselves, destroying those lower, energy quanta in the process. The lower class tends to be an undifferentiated mass made of quantic pieces, full of energy with minimal informative perception: divide and win. They are plants on Nature; they are the stellar dust and dark energy that feeds and informs the galaxy; they are light quanta, carbohydrates and water in the genetic, cellular ecosystem; they are the machines of the economic ecosystem; they are those punished by the law in societies: criminals, enemies and emigrants, submitted to the racism of the other classes. They are the food and red cells of the blood system, without informative nuclei.

In terms of Time, those 3 regions establish a relative order from past to future, as the external, quantic forms that penetrate into the Non-Euclidean point are the relative past of the space-time field, which become destroyed and processed by the central region, the relative future towards which they move. So the central form is the future and the external world is the past. While in between those 2 limits, the intermediate region becomes the relative present of the system. In the galaxy, for example, the black hole is the relative future of the stars than in the future will end up falling into the black hole; while the stellar dust is the relative past-energy they consume:

Min.E+ Min.T (Past, energy class i-1)=> ext: Present, Reproductive class (i) => Max. ExT (Future, dominant, top predator Class: i+1)

In all systems, the stick and carrot, punishment and prize duality of negative and positive arrows provided by the 3 physiological networks control the 3 internal cycles of its cells, which have to obey the organic systems if they want to ‘exist’; that is, to perform those cycles. And so we often find 3×2 ‘elements’ of positive and negative control, that structure a certain system as the dual arrow of entropy and its 3×2 drives of negative and positive existence.

A fact that explains why cells exist tied up in complex organic systems so well programmed. Since according to organicism, the laws of the Universe are not imposed mechanically but through the will of ‘existence’ of its I-points, which make the best choices driven by their desire to process energy and information and survive. A man, for example, can rebel at his own risk against the networks of power. You can obey an informative law and be rewarded or deny the law and be punished. But if the system punishes you it will extinguish you and another obedient citizen will occupy your place. So most humans always obey the law of its physiological, social systems. Yet if men, which are among the freest of all GST points, as they have self-consciousness, are so slavish; it is obvious that those points whose ‘will of existence’ is a vegetative or mechanical ‘action’, obey totally those networks. Physiologic networks rule indeed any biological organism to the point that doctors consider most sickness caused by the malfunction of physiological networks, which ‘extend’ the sickness to the individual quantic cells they control.

In any organic system the dominant informative and energetic networks control and distribute its energy and information in 2 flows with opposite entropic directions: information orders of control are flows that depart from the dominant informative singularity towards the membrane across the middle class; while energy comes form the membrane towards the center. Both flows create together a dual structure of max. Space-Time force or Momentum, the fundamental parameter that defines the power of any organism (max. ExT). So together the dominant classes organize with their dual energy and information the quantic elements of the intermediate, middle mass zone or body. Finally the middle class will absorb, destroy and transform the minimal quantic units of temporal energy of the external Universe, or lower class, which is divided in small, disorganized quantic elements; transferring part of them to the membrane and center.

In human societies the army, which displays energetic weapons mostly in the external border and the government and moneyed people that control the informative, legal and financial languages of power are the dominant class. Then there is a middle class of citizens that obey those groups, which limit their freedom. And finally there is a lower class of ‘immigrants’, ‘enemy nations’ and bits and bites of raw materials and machines, whose rights as non-citizens or objects are null.

Yet those classes exist in all organic systems beyond human societies:

In a human organism the brain and nervous, informative system, the neurons and the stronger, energetic cells, the leukocytes and the epithelial tissue, control also a mass of cells, which reproduce in the different organs of the body the products the organism consumes, constructed with the bits and bites of energy and information the external world provides and the human organs destroy and reform. If we consider a galaxy, the inner black hole and the halo of dark matter confine a middle mass of stars that turn around the black hole. While the external intergalactic space provides the ‘lower’ bites of interstellar gas. So the stars in their spiralled, cyclical movement gather that gas and send it to the black hole that feeds on it. So happens in an atom, in which the electron orbitals gather electromagnetic energy they send to the inner nucleus.

So we might wonder, are human societies just, natural, according to the ternary structure of social classes? No. The present distribution of social classes, proper of human ‘capitalist’ and ‘nationalistic’ societies are not natural to the Universe; since the ‘poor’ and the ‘aliens’ are considered a ‘lower’ class coming from outside the organic system and destroyed accordingly. Yet all men should be considered either informative or middle classes, never lower classes and receive enough energy and information to survive, since we all belong to the same species (13.11). And so according to the ‘3rd postulate’ of relative equality (4.5), we all belong to the same ‘organism of history’. Indeed the higher and middle classes of any organism act together, as head and body of the organic system. Or else when the cells of the body of any organic system do not receive food, the body collapses and dies. Which is exactly what happens in history when the ‘3rd world’ is treated as a ‘3rd expendable class’ by the ruling classes of the system, both inside and outside our borders and they rebel in revolutions and wars that destroy the organic civilization (13.17).

Unfortunately the economic ecosystem spends today most of its resources in our selfish upper classes, even in ‘alien species’, (technological machines and weapons), instead of keeping all the cells of the body of history healthy producing for them the minimal human goods mankind needs to survive (food, education and health-care).

From simplicity to complexity: changes of temporal cycles between Planes.

The orbital, energetic cycles of the Earth-Moon system are parallel to the cycles of reproduction of its st-1 living quanta:

An organism extends through several scales of growing form. Since microscopic, quantic species become chained to stronger, TxS species, as their relative energy and information quanta of a ‘lower class’. In the image, Gaia, the Earth’s surface, is a Fractal point, made of organisms made of cells, made of  atoms, made of  quarks, all chained by their organic cycles.

The beats of all species, as they absorb and throw back temporal energy, are all chained beats of an interconnected huge organism, the Universe, divided into worlds defined by constants of actions and chains of victims and predators that sometimes form trophic pyramids and sometimes become symbiotic creating smaller organisms, in which the ‘fastest’ temporal beings enslave and control the slower ones. So the faster lion feeds on the slow buffalo, while the fastest neuron controls the chemical cells of your organism, extracting energy from them. An organism, we might say, is a chained system of top predator cells that control herds of tamed chemical cells and an ecosystem is a loose organism in which the top predator ‘cells’ only interact with the slower ones when they feed on them. Biologists are perhaps the scientists better prepared to understand those relationships. Since they have formalized some of those chains between slow and fast cycles that define the hierarchies and organization of a biological organism. For example, the nervous cells act quantically much faster than the chemical cells and so a single nervous cell can control an array of multiple chemical cells, because one of its ultra-fast quantic actions move a big distance that encompasses many chemical cells in the time those cells react. In this manner faster, upper class, informative species control slower middle class cells. In the other extreme a stronger TxS species can create waves of energy and information that extend over multiple cells, and so minute changes on its energy and information parameters affect all those cells, reprogramming them. So a minimal change in the planet’s temperature provokes huge changes in the existence of its living species. If we generalize those chains to enclose all organic systems of the Universe, the main systems of reality acquire a complex, fascinating degree of order and harmony that relates the different cycles of being (its informative, energetic, reproductive, social and generational cycles), as cellular units of the bigger cycles of the macro-organism or ecosystem in which it exists.

According to the Ternary Principle any quantic, cyclical action of any species can be described through its spatial parameter of ‘speed-extension’ and its inverse temporal parameter of repetitive rhythm or ‘frequency’, whose product, ExT=K is a constant of action that defines the existential life-span of the cycle. Yet those actions are the sum of the simultaneous micro-actions of its ‘cellular quanta’, ruled by the black hole law (Min.E=Max.T: smaller beings act faster than bigger ones).

So the questions to solve are: How the faster, smaller, st-1 micro-actions create the slower, big simultaneous actions of the organism? Or in formal terms, what is the relationship between the constants of those macro-actions and the faster parameters of its micro-cellular cyclical actions?

And how each organism relates as an individual quantum to the slower, longer cycles, (Max. E= Min.T), of the i+1, ecosystem in which it performs its actions?

2 facts answer those questions: Chains happen across 3 i±1 levels of existence, what allows to create hierarchical pyramids of unlimited size in time and space, through those ternary structures.

And chains of actions become simultaneous because certain cycles are shorter than others, so the faster speed of micro-cycles is compensated when we chain slow micro-cycles to fast macro-cycles.

Consider the cycle of feeding of a lion. The lion moves through space in certain patterns that displace the lion towards hunting and drinking grounds where he will consume a victim. Thus the energy cycle will be determined both, by the inner vital constants of the ‘st-1 cells’ of the ‘i-lion’, (his cellular metabolism that defines his rhythms of hunger, his muscular speed and his strength that determines the preys of the ecosystem in which he feeds); and by the outer, i+1 ecosystemic parameters, (the spatial distance and ‘informative density’ of preys of the ecosystem). So to define the 2 ExT elements of the lion’s feeding cycles (the spatial trajectory and quantic rhythm of its hunting) we have to know those i±1 parameters. Then we can define totally his feeding cycle. Thus, existential cycles might be very complex but ultimately we can reduce them to a quantic ternary equation product of the Space-time parameters of those 3, i±1 levels. Hence the importance of ternary chains to define Universal events across 3 hierarchical planes of existence, from the chains that happen between the ‘3 social classes’ of an organism, to the physical events that happen in 3 scales of matter, to the 3 levels of humanity (the biological, individual and sociological level). Since all cyclical systems are defined by the relative S-T parameters of those 3 i±1 scales.

For example, in Physics Einstein defined the cycle of gravitational ‘feeding’ of a planet, which moves in the flows of space-time around the star with the S-T parameters of 3 physical scales: the energy and temporal mass of the planet (i), the ST parameters of the solar ecosystem (i+1), and the S-T ‘universal constants’ of vacuum, the smallest gravitational space-time (st-1).

Maxwell and Planck defined the temporal frequency and energy cycles of a light photon that absorbs space-time energy and deforms it into a light-wave only with the action constants of 3 scales: the st-1 constants, or magnetic, spatial, and electric, informative constants of vacuum (c=e 0 x  0 -1/2); the i-constant of light (h) and the quantic, social constants of photons, as part of a bigger social, i+1 wave (E=hv). So we define a basic law of hierarchical systems:

The external and internal i±1 constants of action of the macro-ecosystem and the micro-cells of an i-entity determine the ET parameters of its existential cycles’

.

Thus most systems, despite its individual ‘vegetative will’, perform a cellular, cyclical function within the macro ecosystem in which they exist. In the previous example, photons are individual forms that feed on micro-electromagnetic constants creating a reproductive c-wave. Yet most photons could not exist if 2 bigger, i+1 atomic particles had not reproduced them to communicate energy and information. In fact, the macro-organic dual atomic system that emits and absorbs the photon, determines its ET, frequency and energy parameters and its generational life span, given by the distance between those 2 atoms.

Yet, since the life of a quantum is a mere moment in the longer existence of its organism, to create the effect of simultaneity, microcosmic, fast, quantic cells have to chain their longer ‘existential cycles’ to the shorter cycles of a bigger organism or ecosystem in which they will exist as a mere quantic instant of those shorter cycles. As a Hindu proverb says: ‘a blink on the eye of Vishnu, the Universe, is a life of a planet and a drop of sweat of a planet is a life of a human being.’

In terms of existence, it means that the life of a quantum depends on the length of the cycle it performs for the bigger system that controls the quanta through its networks and informative or energetic fields:

The shortest cycle is the informative cycle that absorbs energy particles, transforming them into bits of information, perceived by a sensorial organ or mind. So informative particles are the smallest ones and the ones that live shorter within any organism. For example, a human being consumes a newspaper a day and then it burns its atomic quanta; an eye consumes a photon in a microsecond…

Next comes the feeding, energetic cycle that absorbs bigger energy quanta, transforming those quanta in ‘cellular components’ of a body, once the informative cycles have perceived the food. And so an energy quantum lives a little bit longer than an informative cycle. A pig that feeds a man lives longer than a newspaper and also its ‘final consumption’ takes longer than reading that paper.

Then, it comes the reproductive cycle that handles huge amounts of energy and information to create a being, repetition of a bigger organism. A woman’s ovule stays on her body all her life and it takes 9 months to become a baby…

Finally, the longest cycle is the generational cycle of the being, from its birth to its extinction (±). So those cells that carry the ‘existential will’ of the being last longer: a man has the same neurons all his life. And so, through that longer generational cycle a new chain starts, now in the next macro-level, the macro-ecosystem or macro-organism in which the being exists with an inverse fate, as a mere quanta of the macro-being. Since he who killed micro-beings to feed and inform himself will be just a micro-being that feeds a bigger world.

It is the social cycle, as the quanta gathers in social groups to perform energetic or informative actions for the bigger macro-organism that lives in a longer scale of time and controls him. For example, if you are a soldier, your national organism will sacrifice you in an energetic cycle when the nation conquers and ‘feeds on’ the wealth of other nation…

So we establish a basic existential chain between the TS cycles of those 3 ×st scales:

(Informative>Energy cycle)st-1>(Reproductive cycle)i>(Generational-Social cycle)i+1

- Since the existential cycles of st-1 particles are the energy and information cycles of the i-being.

- While the reproductive cycle happens in the same i-level of the organic system with a couple.

- And finally, the generational cycle of the being becomes, as a part of a social herd made of similar individuals, a submissive energy or information cycle of a macro-organic system, i+1.

Thus any organic system is a sum of 3±1 types of cycles, chained in hierarchical structures across 3 levels of complexity. The existence of any quantic being happens in those 3 TS planes within any organic system or ecosystem, in which he is a relative energy of bigger being, an equal, social being to its pairs and the informative master of smaller quanta. We formalize those ternary functions as Cyclical Time sub-equations, to which we ad the hierarchical, informative index, i:

- etst-1>Ti: The being is a dominant macro-point of time, Ti, which absorbs a flow of temporal energy from a herd of micro-quanta (etst-1) that it controls with its physiological networks. So your cells are controlled by your blood and nervous systems.

-  ExTi: It is an individual quantum that relates to similar cells, in an environment in which it searches with similar couples for its main existential will: its generational reproduction. Thus i is the fundamental plane of existence of any being, the region in which it perceives more, and plays its most satisfactory cycles of existence.

- Ei>0i+1: The point performs an energy function for a bigger social plane. For example, the govern controls you as a social micro-quanta of a nation, which makes you die in wars or takes your energy through taxes.

From that 3-scalar order that structures any particle or cycle of existence (static or dynamic perception), it arises the relativity of existence, as any being is king of its territorial hill, friend of its friends and slave of the World or ecosystem in which it exists.

It is an order we find in all planes of existence, including the physical Universe. For example, in Biology, an i-mitochondrion uses st-1 protons to deliver energy to the bigger organic i+1 blood networks in the form of ATP. So the atomic, cellular and organic scales define the energy cycle of cellular breathing. While a star turns in cycles with other stars, feeds the galactic black hole as a quantum and feeds itself in quantic stellar gas. A light ray feeds on electric and magnetic constants, gathers socially with photons and it is absorbed by a bigger electron, etc.

In a dynamic, temporal way, we can also consider how the relative frequency of those cycles or ‘time clocks’ chain the long cycles of fast micro-entities to the short cycles of slow macro-entity, creating an harmonic order between the different planes and social classes of the organic Universe. Since an informative cycle is faster than an energy cycle, which is faster than a reproductive cycle, which is faster than the complete generational cycle of the being; while a macro being is slower than a micro-being, we write 2 basic chains between those cycles and beings:

 Microcell’s Informative cycles= Cell’s energy cycles=Organism’s Reproductive cycle

 generational cycles of microbeings = Social cycles of Beings ->E/T cycle of macrobeing

Those ternary chains between the fastest cycles of macro-beings and the slowest cycles of its micro-beings create simultaneous, symbiotic actions along 2 planes of existence:

Informative frequency of the macro being => Energy frequency of the micro cell

Thus the fast, informative cycle of the slow macro-being is transformed into the slow energy cycle of the fast cellular micro-being, in a symbiotic chain that make it dependent on that macro-being. For example, the fastest Earth’s cycle is its informative, cyclical rotation as a mass vortex that determines the day-night cycle of light, which feeds its living beings. So, the living st-1 cells of Gaia, its plants, feed with the day light, while animals have a ±1=3 energy cycle of 1 to 3 meals a day. So both time to the informative light-day cycle of the Earth, their energy cycle. If we lower the scale of analysis, the same cyclical chain happens between the animal and its st-1 cells. Mammals have a rate of informative perception of a second, the rate of blinking and thought. But a second is also the rate of breathing and the heart’s beating that transfers energy to its st-1 cells, becoming thus the energy rate of feeding of those cells.

A homologous relationship chains symbiotically microcosms and macrocosms in the next, longer 2 cycles, the energy and reproductive cycle:

Energy frequency of the macro being=> Reproductive Frequency of the micro cell

By homology with other organic systems, we consider that the energy cycle of the Earth lasts the year it takes to cross its space-time territory, its orbit. For example, the energy cycle of an animal is a day. Yet the size of its hunting territory is also the space it can reach within a day. Therefore, as in the case of an animal, the main energy cycle of the planet is the year-time it takes to sweep its solar orbit, the ‘organic territory of the planet’, where the Earth absorbs its gravitational energy, deforming space-time according to Einstein’s equation. While the secondary Earth’s energy cycle is a months in which its satellite, the moon, sweeps around the Earth’s orbital territory. We obtain thus, the 2 main cycles of transformation of gravitational energy into by the Earth-Moon system: the lunar cycle and the annual cycle. And those 2 cycles are also the reproductive cycles of most animals. Thus in the human being the menstrual cycle is a lunar cycle. Whereas the cycle of reproduction of a child lasts 9 months. While in nature almost all reproductive cycles have an annual frequency, happening in spring or summer, when the sun’s light absorption is maximal. Which is the obvious reason why those cycles are linked: while the macroscopic being absorbs energy, it allows its cells to use that energy to reproduce. Again, if we lower our scale, an animal as a macro being has a cycle of energy of a day. That period is also the cycle of reproduction of most cells, called mitosis. Yet reproduction is discontinuous as it only happens when the ‘optimal energy and information’ is available during a small interval of the total existence of the being, in general in the second, mature age of balance between energy and information.

It seems, hence that the micro-being is fed and reproduced by the macro-organism, the good god of its existence. Yet ‘the good god’ is actually a farmer that reverses its arrow of order for an arrow of entropy and destruction when it uses the ‘existential cycle’ of the micro-being as a mere quantum of its macro-organism. So we feed and reproduce pigs but end up eating them. In a sense, we can say that all organisms are ‘farms’. So pigs feed men; stars fed by the interstellar gas attracted by the black hole’s gravitational power, also end up feeding the black hole; and fat cells fed by the organism end up killed, feeding the macro-organism. So in that inverse, final cyclical chain between the microscopic and macroscopic being, the ‘relative God’ takes all what he gave. Thus there is an inverse, final chain between the generational cycle of a micro-organism and an inner, energetic, informative or reproductive cycle of a macro-being. Thus, if we consider the generational cycle of the macro-being we complete the previous chain:

Generational frequency of micro cell => Reproductive frequency of macro being

For example, most cells of the body live and die in an interval between a month and a year. Which is the period most animals need to complete their reproduction. At cellular level, carbohydrate molecules live and die in short daily cycles, which is the period of reproduction of cells. The relationship between both cycles is again organic: reproduction means the renewal of a macroscopic being that destroys and creates many of its quantic elements, as energy or information of the reproductive TxS combined cycle. So cells accumulate carbohydrate molecules that they use in their reproductive processes, destroying and reconstructing its DNA genes with them.

Depending on the role an i-i quantum performs in the macro system, its life will be longer or shorter. Wheat is harvested to feed annually the human ecosystem, while carbohydrates die every day to reproduce DNA molecules. Yet a top predator informative cell, a neuron, lives the entire life of the organism, since it defines the informative networks that dominate and form the will and consciousness of the organism as a whole macro-beings. And inversely, the life span of the ‘brain quanta’ defines the life span of the macro-organism. So probably the enormous life span of quarks, the fundamental particle and brain of the quantic atoms of the Universe, defines also the life-span of the Universe. Since the study in detail of all those chains for all Universal species is beyond the Cyclical Time of this book, we will only consider some examples from the 3 main disciplines of science:

- In the physical world we study the temporal chains between the 3±st scales of existence of light (gravitation, light and atoms) and the 3±st scales that create the Universe.

- In Biology we study the chains between the 3±st scales that cause life evolution: the st-1 genetic cycles, the i-life cycles and the st+1 ecosystemic, geological cycles of the Earth.

- In History we study the chains between the life of civilizations and the human generational cycle.

The many worlds interpretation of the fractal Universe.

The mind sees stillness and hence death in all those forms in fixes in its brain and yet all has movement all has a life to it; all forces can be understood as languages when the proper codes are translated. Indeed, for all what we said it is also obvious that the intelligence of the Universe doesn’t speak a single language, understood by man, but all beings can perceive and remember information, stored in rhythmic patterns and linguistic codes. I called the first book I wrote on cyclical time ‘The Codes of the Universe’, because the resolution of those codes in different languages and scales is indeed the essence of knowledge. Each species has limited languages of perception, the most complex perceive more languages and forces. In the atomic world, quarks, the most complex particles perceive, ‘see’ we say in gauge theory, all the forces. They are the most complex particles, probable cells of the black hole. In our world, men are the most complex beings. Nevertheless, animals who understand only smelling, chemical codes and visual codes are also intelligent and so are electrons who do not perceive gravitation in the atomic word – we are in fact electronic minds as computers are. Languages can use any of those codes. Cephalopods developed both the first complex eyes and a pigmented skin, which changes and modulates emotional messages in a silent code understood by other squids. Insects use magnetic codes to guide swarms. The Universe is a game of information self-similar at scale without limits in its intelligence and codes of perception. It is only need to know the translation tools and constants of transformation between scales, studied in the most complex versions of this book to reveal its intelligence to the dumb human being who speak so few codes properly.

All is memorial because cyclical inertia, the repetition of the cycles of existence of any form, is common to all space-time fields. This is a tautology: a species that forgets, that does not repeat a quantic cycle of existence becomes extinct and its cycles of existence disappear. Thus, a being has to remember and repeat its quantic cycles to last in time. That is the existential game of any being: to feed, on energy; and use its genetic, memorial information to transform it through reproduction into new cyclical actions.

The rhythms of existence are organic, vital. Yet we do not see them in stones and plants, because rhythms vary its speed and men only consider vital rhythms similar to theirs.

Each species has a different rhythm of perception and existence, a different language of knowledge, a different mind and capacity to act-react in the Universe, a different speed of times. The rhythms of rocks are slow. So are the rhythms of galaxies. Thus, we have to transform mathematically the different rhythms and speeds of times to see them alive. For example, when we see in fast motion the living cycles of plants that seem dead, in slow motion, they acquire living properties. It is again the Paradox of Galileo: we see many temporal cycles as fixed forms in space, as we see the moving Saturn rings as a fixed form, yet all is moving, cycling in an organic way.

Physicists don’t understand that their clocks of time are abstract inquisitions of the mind. Instead of a ‘moving cycle’, often a living ‘ time’, when they think of time they see a number in a graph. Yet even a watch measures the cycle of expansion of its inner spiral, made of metal that dilates, expanding space; even the sun measures a year-cycle as it swims on the gravitational flows of the galactic spiral, feeding on quantic, gravitational space. Clocks are brains that measure cycles of time. So today the clocks of science have evolved into cyclical computers that are truly ‘metal-brains’ of machines. Time is measured as information for biological, survival purposes. Since the ‘fastest brain-clocks’ of temporal information survive better. They see with more detail everything alive and act-react faster to the Universe. So our incapacity to see a living Universe is only a prove of our limited intelligence and memorial detail. Andre Guide affirmed, regarding a similar phenomenon that ‘the more insensitive the white man is to the beauty of Africa, the more he despises and mistreats the black people’. So happens today with humanity at large in front of Nature.

We thus talk of human aberration of perception as the true barrier modern science has to accept those living cycles. And so we define according to the Fractal Principle, 3 phenomena that create that aberration of perception: the limited scales of space we perceive, which prevent us from seeing in detail small or far away beings; the relative speed of human, cyclical time we use to observe reality that prevent us from perceiving very fast or very slow beings as living beings. Finally, our incapacity to translate other languages, as information is smaller and quantized. Therefore, we perceive better bodies and energy than minds and brains. This creates the ‘energetic aberration of naïve realism’ that makes scientists think all is ‘energy’ and information is secondary. Since informative messages, which are ‘faster’ and ‘smaller’ than energy forms are the most difficult to perceive. We don’t see pheromones and so biologists thought for centuries ants acted as individuals when in fact they act as part of a whole super-organism, the anthill. We did not perceive the informative, chemical languages that cross ‘the synapse’ between neurons for so long, that most scientists thought that the entire brain was a cell to be able to work together until Cajal saw those discontinuities. Yet today biologists are decoding new languages of information: they found that monkeys learn to use money, rats sing songs, flies calculate. So the real barrier to understand the intelligent Universe is ideological, anthropomorphic ‘mechanism’. The very moment science accepts organicism; it will start to ‘understand’ the whys and wills of reality instead of merely gathering data. To perceive that organicism it only has to ‘translate’ different speeds of time to the ‘real speed’ at which any species exist.

When we understand that there are many energies that feed space-time beings, many ways to inform brains, many speeds of perception and hence life; yet all are harmonic with each other, a deeper philosophical sense illuminates our mind: We are part of the same Universe and share the common properties of any of its infinite organic systems.

A huge organic system of temporal energy like a star might have a thought a day; a plant thinks slowly, a fly sees faster, a rat beats its heart faster than we do. For example, spiral and elliptic galaxies are phases of a feeding cycle in which the spiral bar appears and disappears after collecting interstellar gas for the black hole every 1010 years. Scientists are now ‘putting together’ many similar dual forms that are phases of an organic, existential cycle. This is the fundamental trend in recent Astronomy and Physics: First neutrons and protons were considered 2 particles but now they are 2 phases of a nucleon cycle of energy feeding as they absorb pions, transforming into each other, so fast we can’t see it in detail. Last year we realized that the 3 neutrinos were part of the same particle, mutating its state. The same phenomenon happens when we see a human being externally: our skin appears as a fixed organism in space as its cellular cycles are perceived as a stable form.

Only anthropomorphism and the limits of human AE-perception make us differentiate those scales. Yet according to the definition of a point of i-geometry when you ‘enlarge’ the image of that non-AE point, for example, an insect, the detail of the information we observe grows and so the world of insects is as rich in meanings and forms as the macro-world in which we live. Since all waves carry the same amount of quantic information regardless of its spatial size, according to 2 simple, paradoxical laws: the law of the vortex for cyclical, implosive, attractive ‘particles’ (charges and masses), Vo x Ro=K, and the quantic law that defines transversal, explosive waves, E/v(t)=K. Both show that temporal energy increases when the masses or waves cycle becomes smaller.

Each species has a rhythm of times. So slow species are perceived as dead species by faster species. We think plants are dead because they are slow in their rhythms of Times. Yet they are alive, feel, and sense in a chemical manner, through their roots and leaves… All is alive yet with a different rhythm, a different beat. The beat of each temporal organism is an action-reaction cycle with a different clock, a different quantic rhythm and temporal speed. They are all around you. In a garden, the wings of a ‘hummingbird’ take energy from the air 200 times per second. It is a clock faster than the energy beat of your heart, 80 beats per second. The energy of the wind moves the leaves every 2 minutes. A gardener is a clock that waters plants a beat each day… Those action-reaction cycles are everywhere in the Universe. Some beings are faster in their active cycles like the hummingbird; some are slower like the plants and the galaxy. In most cases the bigger the species are, the longer they take in each of their active cycles: A galaxy turns around every 200 million years, the Earth every day, your eyes beat and absorb light-energy every second, the hummingbird’s heart beats 800 times every minute, the electron turns 30.000 cycles per second… Each organism, each region of the Universe, has a different speed of feeding and perception. People think that slow species are dead. But that is not true. They tend to be energy species that just have slow rhythms of information and live longer. While more informative, evolved species think faster and live shorter. Often the smaller the species the faster it can complete its cycles of information. So brains are small and chips evolve, becoming smaller as they become more powerful. Yet chips last a couple of years. And men, an informative species, seem so self-destructive, so loving of information, the age, which precedes death, that we might be the shortest living animal on Earth. In the complex versions of this book we formalize those multiple planes of perception with existential algebra. Let us here consider just some basic homologies, laws and decametric rules, useful to fully grasp latter the cosmology and biology of the Universe.

The fundamental law of the Universe is the balance between space and time, such as ExT=K. Thus as we diminish in spatial size in the Universe, beings become faster in time, creating a balance according to which, smaller beings perceive and exist faster, being able to escape, slower Goliaths. Those regularities of the game of existence show a certain equalitarian justice in the Universe. Indeed, in each world-ecosystem the subjective existence of its organic systems is similar, despite their different size. So we can gather them in ‘families of species’ around a ‘constant of action’, K=T x E, which is the product of its speed of perception or frequency of perception of temporal information and its spatial extension. For example, it seems all mammals have the same metabolic existence: The rat lives less than the elephant but his heart beats faster. The subjective speed of perception also prevents small species to become extinct in the same world ecosystem inhabited by bigger species, as they act-react faster and so they can escape top predators.

The harmonies of living beings: the paradox of Goliath.

For example, according to the previous inverse law of mental speed a fly sees 10 times faster than human do, since flies are smaller, so they perform 10 visual quantic actions by each human blink. Yet because its brain’s quantic neuronal density is not very high, it is not a top predator as robotic insects might be in the future.

Curiously enough the oldest insects, ant queens and cockroaches, can live up to 7 years. Yet cockroaches react in 20 milliseconds and humans in 200. Which means that if they perceive time cycles 10 times faster than we do, subjectively they process 10 times more quantic actions of temporal energy, or ‘dharmas of existence’ (philosophical jargon). So they live the same subjectively life of 70 years… the same length of a human existential= generational cycle.

The many worlds Interpretation of the physical Universe and its vital constants.

It follows that there are parallel worlds, one for each relative hierarchical space-time scale, based in different Constants of Existence. In physical worlds the most important of those constants are the Universal constants of force, which express the previous K= TxS balances in different abstract ways. For example in quantum theory H= TxS is always constant (Heisenberg Principle). But that constant of the microcosmic world is different from its equivalent constant, temperature, in the atomic world, which also shows a self-similar balance for all gases: P(t)V(E)=nkT.

Other constants however are written not as TxS=K balanced, but as E/T or T/E processes of Darwinian evolution, which define instead of organic balances processes of transformation of certain energy into for and vice versa. The most important of those constants in the 2 physical space/time planes are G and Q, which represent, as the Newtonian and Coulombian formula shows, T/E, Mass-Charge/Distance events, in which in words of Einstein, cyclical masses absorb and bend the energy of space. While in the electromagnetic world light-space is absorbed and transformed, curved into electronic form. Yet since the density of information of the electromagnetic world is smaller than that of masses, given the fact that electrons are lighter and more extended in space than gravitational quarks, paradoxically the energy of its electromagnetic constant is much bigger. Thus the relative transformations of gravitational and light spatial forces into masses and charges are also ruled by decametric harmonies, as those of the biological speed of action-reaction of flies and humans. All together we can consider a simple scheme of the main many-worlds of the Human Universe, according to their relative energy and information density. Indeed, According to the different forces of the Universe, each organic system has a different mind since it absorbs different temporal energies and so it creates different mental, linguistic ‘spaces/times’, relative virtual worlds, mirrors of the Universe. The world of each being represents a quantity of spatial information with a size, form and number of dimensions that are relative to the spatial reach, form and dimensions of the informative, linguistic forces it uses to observe the Universe. So while the Universal Syntax all minds use to create their virtual maps of the Universe is homologous in all beings, in as much as they reflect a single Universe, the details, quantity and quality of the information of those maps depends on each brain; since worlds are multiple, quantic, diffeomorphic. So, depending on which type of temporal force of energy each quantic being absorbs to create its mental map we can define different worlds or ecosystems in which a certain force is shared by multiple discontinuous Fractal points that interact only with the other points of the same ecosystem but now with parallel worlds. For example, masses are quantic nodes that inform and/or perceive gravitation, which we do not see. We are quantic knots of light perception. While ants have olfactory brains that perceive atoms. And so many beings live in parallel discontinuous worlds within the same Universe.

Even an electron, the smallest form known to man, processes light information and jumps towards a moving photon, absorbing its energy to enhance its survival chances. Equally, black holes and quarks process gravitational information, locating themselves in the best position to absorb it as masses. While a chip uses digital information to guide a machine, etc. There are other spaces and ways of measuring time besides light and clocks, other possible virtual worlds and intelligences besides man. Since man is made of the same atomic material that the rest of the Universe, the capacity to communicate in this universe – the most clear prove of life – is not exclusive of human atoms but a property that takes place through different atoms and forces; including metallic atoms such as those of computers or gravitational forces used by celestial bodies. So men talk, chips digitalize, animals see, plants ‘smell’ and masses process gravitational information.

We classify those worlds, according to the volume of temporal energy their linguistic forces carry, in a scale of increasing i-complexity, ruled by the Black Hole paradox: The smallest and faster particles scan with more detail the Universe; so they carry more information and create bigger, faster mental worlds, inhabited by species with more TxS force. Accordingly we consider 4 basic worlds:

- Big, slow atomic quanta create animal olfactory minds that perceive small metric territories inhabited by small animals like ants.

- Smaller, faster electrons create electronic minds that perceive kilometric territories inhabited by bigger animals like human beings.

- Photons create bigger worlds of planetary size perceived by huge machines and chips (the brain of future robots) at global scale (Internet, satellites, etc).

- Gravitational forces of very reduced size create words of galactic size perceived by celestial bodies like Black Holes (minds of the galaxy).

So the Gravitational world is bigger than the light world, bigger than the electronic world, bigger than the molecular world because paradoxically gravitons are faster and smaller than photons, which are faster and smaller than electrons, which are faster and smaller than molecules. So a black hole can perceive an image ‘with more detail’, more ‘pixels’. And since gravitation is faster than light it should ‘change’ the quantic mind’s images it creates faster. On the opposite extreme, plants and olfactory animals perceive molecules, which create images ‘with huge pixels’ that offer little detail and change very slow. Thus we consider that every organic system in the Universe, which processes information and survives efficiently, is a focus of a dual force that carries temporal energy and helps him to act-react externally in a manner that seems to improve the survival of that entity. Each bigger world and faster language increases the TxS force of its species, which become top predators. And indeed, the analysis of the theoretical speed of informative perception in black holes has shown that they are the fastest ‘computing minds’ of the Universe. So black holes can easily destroy a planet; huge machines kill animal life; human beings kill olfactory ants and insects kill plants. Which means top predators are defined in terms of the power of their linguistic brains.

And so we can talk of a game of Russian dolls, in which each bigger World encloses the smaller one. The gravitational World encloses the light world. And the light world encloses the electronic world, which is bigger than the atomic world of ants.

The rhythms of existence: quantic jumps of space-time. Modular existence.

What we know as existence is guided by the 3±I arrows which are quantic, fractal and cyclical. What this means is that existence is modular as beings constantly switch between its arrows, as they need quantic energy, information and reproduction in order to survive which is achieved through social evolution in networks and herds that have a higher and wider access to those resources. The result of that simple scheme defines a series of basic rhythms that transform space/time and move ahead the existence of beings. We will deal with several of those rhythms in this book, notably the rhythms that define the punctuated evolution of species that switch between reproductive, expansive periods and temporal, evolutive ones:

33. Max. Reproduction (expansion in space)->Max. informative punctuated evolution

Such ST-modular rhythm also evolves palingenetically a species. In an individual is mimicked by the life rhythms of each of our organs, from the eye that feeds on light and then informs the brain which produces a visual thought every second (the blink time of the eye), to the night/day, dreaming/acting rhythm. A second fundamental series of ternary rhythms occur as organisms switch between the 3 physiological networks of hormonal activity nervous activity and feeding activity. Some of those rhythms are the ternary bio-rhythms of life; the 8 hours work (energy), 8 hours play (reproduction), 8 hours sleep (body hormonal, informative activity) rhythms of our daily life; and self-similar rhythms in the activity of animals and plants. All of them can be resumed in an E->Re->Ti sequence, which again is a partial case of the Existential equation, ETi:

34. Max. Energy feeding -> Max. Reproduction -> Max Informative evolution

The existence of parallel space-time worlds, as the existence of multiple time cycles with different frequency seems another handicap for an objective study of the Universe. It is the origin of an entire new field of errors: postulate errors caused by the affirmation of principles to simplify the calculus and analysis of reality that are taken as absolute truths, when there is no evidence whatsoever of them. For example, the cosmological principle that allows the study of the Universe instead of the galaxy from where there is evidence, postulates a continuous isomorphous universe which is false. Yet it also allows the study of cosmological big-bangs and the Universe at large scale, which allowed historically the teleological substitution of the Priests of Absolute gods by the Priest of Absolute science. This would have not taken place if scientists were more humble and accurate and consider the Universe unreachable to analysis and study the big-bang in the local universe. Which leads us to the 4th fundamental error of scientific common thought, the error of postulates, set a priori without prove, from where an entire science can be deduced, infected by that false or unverifiable postulate. Einstein though was ambivalent in that regard, since a world of infinite points made calculations difficult. So, when considering the structure of space-time the Cosmological Principle, which has been taken as a paradigm of truth in which to base all studies of the Universe, affirming the isomorphism and continuous distribution of matter and energy in the Universe. This is false as we find structures, super-clusters, fractal scales, invisible matter, dark energies, discontinuities, etc. etc. in the Universe. However, it pleases the perception of the mind and makes Cosmological calculus with Relativistic equations possible, which should be limited to its use in the galaxy, as the local Big bang affirms.

11. Movement in a discontinuous Universe. The quantic jump in space and time.

3 dual GST jumps in 3 scales of existence, in which a ‘seed’ of relative past information emitted by a future parental form hosts in an energy surface, evolving towards the future:

A photon reproduces a particle-antiparticle.

A spermatozoid starts the evolution of a child. And a prophet emits a verbal code that will recreate in the future a dying civilization.

The most complex phenomenon of the Universe is the quantic jump in space-time. Both bidimensional cycles of time, and planes of space are quantic and so their changes and displacements are also quantic. And since time is geometric, bidimensional, as space is, it has also 2 directions of movement. So the oldest quantic question of philosophy is: how in a quantic world filled with discontinuities can exist continuous movement? Zenon, a Greek philosopher put the example of Achilles and the Turtle: Achilles will never reach a turtle because there are infinite quantic spaces it has to cross. Parmenides gave him the answer: continuous movement doesn’t exist in a discreet Universe; it is a mirage of the senses. Since a wave, as the figure shows, is not really moving, but reproducing information over the potential energy of the vacuum in a sequential, quantic jump, through a series of wave-lengths, drawn one after another, which appear to the senses as a moving wave. Movement is always a discontinuous displacement either in space or in time, in any of its 2 directions, towards the past or the future. The simplest analogy is a television screen where new images are created constantly without hardly any cost of energy, because they are virtual images created by illuminating 3 colors that are already potentially in the screen. In the case of a wave, the relative energy imprinted by the logic form might vary, from the vacuum energy of a light wave to the placental energy of a mother, yet the process is always the same: a form imprints another region of space, changing its spatial position and temporal morphology. So speed is synonymous of reproduction, the main cyclical action of the Universe. Thus we can explain all physical events in terms of organicism. Since even movement, the external, mechanical change physicists study, turns out to be also an organic cycle of reproduction. And we distinguish, according to their quantity of energy and information ‘translated’ in the process from a place of space-time to another place, 3 quantic, reproductive jumps:

- E=T: Space-time reproduction dominant in spatial displacement that implies a minimal movement of information that fluctuates from a future to a past form and returns back to the future. For example, when an electric impulse arrives to the end of a nerve, it becomes translated into chemical information and then it is transferred chemically through the synapses to the other cell, where it becomes translated back into electric information. That process implies a ‘spatial, quantic jump’ from a neuron to the next neuron, but also a quantic jump in time from a level of informative complexity, the electric language to the lower level of chemical languages, which is the relative, past informative system of life (9.19). The informative essence of the process implies a transcription of form from each discontinuous point to the next point but also a movement in space, since ‘all yang has a drop of yin’, all is temporal energy, also spatial and temporal reproduction requires a minimal dual movement in time and space.

-Max. E: Spatial, wave reproduction of a wave a particle that jumps from one place to the next place, reproducing a minimal temporal form. It is very common in physical waves, defined by its speed of reproduction, V=S/T. Depending on the density of a form, its speed of reproduction will vary. So the most massive forms are slower than those whose informations are minimal and can imprint the energy of vacuum very fast. Those forms that hardly move however evolve a lot in time:

- Max. i: Temporal, palingenetic reproduction, when an organism produces a past, smaller, simpler seed that reproduces the being, evolving faster towards the future. So a foetus is ‘born’ when it comes out of the body of the mother to the next discontinuous region of the Universe, making a minimal spatial jump and a huge evolutionary, temporal jump.

12. Quantic jump in time. Palingenesis and Emergence. Travel to the past.

A quantic jump in space-time which is dominant in information is a palingenetic reproduction, the repetition of a form, through the parental reproduction of a simpler seed or relative past form that will evolve and reproduce a new space-time, a future son form.

Palingenesis means truly that a fetus is a past form that evolves, recapitulating a series of evolutionary forms from past to future, as quantic time can both travel to the past becoming a simpler form (as in death) or accelerate its informative evolution (as in a process of creative design or fetal evolution). Yet, since time is discontinuous those movements in time only affect a quantic part of the Universe; and so they are possible without creating paradoxes. The universe doesn’t move to the past, only the seminal seed. So palingenesis is a dual movement in time:

- Backwards towards the remote past as the parents produce a single cell, packed with dense genetic DNA information. Followed by…

- A fast movement forwards to the future as the fetus creates a parallel form to its parents:.

A species of relative past (simple palingenetic entity) evolves towards the future into a macro-system that organizes itself over a surface of relative cellular energy, thanks to the ‘future’ placental parents that accelerate its evolution into a new ‘present’ being in a friendly environment rich in energy – the mother womb. Thus, the final balance between past and future is re-established when the being surfaces back into the present in the moment of conception. In this manner evolution maximizes its efficiency with the min. expenditure of energy: The fetus is a temporal, evolutionary form. In the graph, we draw palingenetic reproduction as a fluctuation between 3 planes of growing complexity, in which a ‘life’ occurs: the i+1 social plane, the i-ndividual plane of the parents, and the i+1 biological plane of cells. Since in AE-logic geometry simple-past beings and future-complex beings co-exist in discontinuous i-planes of existence of different complexity. And indeed, the fetus lives in a discontinuous world, the mother womb, which finally opens up through an aperture, the vagina, to the bigger world in which the newborn enters…

According to the ‘black hole paradox’ (11.2) the fetus and the baby are born as ‘highly informative species’: The baby has a huge head that is 1/4th of his body size. Then both the fetus and the baby will go through a dual fluctuation, growing in energy and information till reaching maturity. First, when the species is born after its fetal, informative evolution, its starts its young age, increasing its energy. So the newborn will soon compensate its excess of information with its accelerated, energetic growth, as all forms try to find an E=T balance (ch.2). Thus, the fetus in its first age of energy will expand its lineal limbs, elongating its body. Now its body grows much faster than the head till reaching a 9 body Vs 1 head proportion proper of many spatial Vs informative, decametric systems (5.25-27). Also its neurons will be in a 1-9 relationship to the glia cells that feed its energy and multiply very fast. At that point the baby enters the mature age and reproduces a new baby. Then it grows again in information into its 3rd age and finally it dies. In the past decade there has been an enormous development of the science of evol-devol, based in palingenesis, in the lines foreseen in our first books (nt.1). Biological palingenesis is in fact the only palingenesis accepted by science. But palingenesis happens also in the sociological and physical world.

15. Sociological palingenesis. The prophet.

An open question for those who believe in mysticism is: if the fetus is born into a higher plane of existence, do we have also for man a second birth after death into an even higher plane of existence? The previous graph explains that possibility; latter studied in more detail (ch.13), as it compares the palingenesis of a fetus with similar processes, which happen to other species. For example, 2 electrons emit 2 seminal light rays that merge together creating a new electron as the 2 lineal waves of electromagnetism evolve towards the future acquiring finally a cyclical electronic form. Yet since the informative code of human beings is verbal, we consider the prophet, the original human, memetic, verbal, seminal, ethic code of a religious civilization that starts a palingenetic radiation in the mind of his believers. Indeed, civilizations are social organisms made with human verbal cells, joined by a verbal/nervous network of ethic laws, produced by a prophet that imprints the Book of Revelation, the memetic code of the civilization in those minds. So the prophet is the seminal cell that reproduces and finally shapes a new organic civilization. And the fact that most prophets are born when the ‘father’ is going to die, in the baroque age of a culture prior to its extinction, explains quite clearly how certain human beings transcend death and become immortal as the ‘informative code’ of the future civilization they create. But as only a sperm cell reaches the future ovule, only a prophet among millions of humans creates a macro-organism of history, a civilization. We won’t be that lucky, I’m afraid. As Tertulianus said: ‘Sangris martire semen cristianorum’.

16. The Law of quantic jumps: the minimal distance of those jumps.

According to the 2 arrows of past energy and future information, all space-time movements are dual cycles. So in all of them, there is a degree of genetic reproduction and travel to the past through a basic transformation of an informative form into a simpler language or cell that is able to cross the discontinuities of the Universe and then evolve back into the original form. It should not surprise us as all cycles require the dual arrows of past-energy and informative order; and all cycles are memorial repetitions=reproductions of a cycle that has happened before in the past.

We don’t demonstrate any of the events explained in this book, since it would require developing the entire logic-mathematical formalism of ST cycles we have thoroughly escaped. Yet, given its importance to understand hierarchical organisms, we shall enunciate the general law of those quantic jumps that structure organic systems through social planes, Ei, of different i-nformation, among which the quantic jumps take place:

`The mean distance in space-time between 2 ‘relative cells’, i-1, of a quantic organic system, i, equals the distance between its relative ‘molecular systems’, i-2, both in time and space.’

So beings seem continuous because their discontinuity is minimal, only a ‘cellular’ distance, both in space (so between axons, a simple chemical molecule overcomes the jump) and time (so chemical information, the next simpler language of life, jumps and translates the electronic message through hormonal discharges). Again between molecules the most habitual distance is that of an atom of 10-10 m; and between atoms in its solid, informative state, the usual distance is a valence electron, its lower formal level. While between electron orbits the quantum jump is a photon with a constant of space-time, h, which is omnipresent in all the electronic cycles. In the same way a biological, quantic jump that reproduces a foetus implies the minimal quantic jump in space as the child is born contiguously to its mother.

17. Flows of space and time are asymmetric between 3 planes of ST-existence.

Yet, the Universe only allows one ‘discontinuous jump’ to the next past, future, right or left zone. There are not worm holes to enter far away Universes (too far to happen), jumps to a past in which mother was born (as only you travel to your past through your death).

Thus Quantic jumps happen in space between contiguous zones and in time between 2 hierarchical contiguous planes of i and i-1 informative complexity. Though i-points are discontinuous they have ideally 3 apertures through which energy and information flow. Yet those apertures are quantic, small holes where only i-1 particles might flow. Hence the non-AE point always communicates quanta from its lower, past scale of existence. So all acts of communication are quantic jumps both in time and space that can either communicate energy or information between similar particles or particles from i±1 planes of existence according to hierarchical, illogic laws:

2 particles on the same space-time plane transfer temporal energy in both directions.

An i-1 space-time plane transfers energy to the i- plane from which it receives information.

An i-2 space-time plane transfers temporal energy, without receiving anything on exchange.’

Those laws are based in the hierarchical structure of the Universe that creates organisms with 3 discontinuous ‘social classes’. So only particles from the first plane enter into just action-reaction processes. While flows of energy and information between 2 different, i and i-1 planes are asymmetric as the upper classes receive energy and give only information. But we said that GST jumps are contiguous, so how in the 3rd case might exist a flow between i-2 and i planes, separated by 2 scales? Obviously because the i-1 space-time field dies, exploding into i-2 particles that feed as energy or information the i form. Thus the 3rd case describes the extinction of a victim that the predator absorbs after destroying its cellular parts. For example you feed on the amino acids of the animal you eat, after destroying its cells into its micro-particles.

The previous ternary events, which can be formalized with the symbols of GST logic, are essential to describe and explain all kind of mysterious phenomenon in physical and biological space-times. Let us consider some examples:

- The best-known borders between the main 2 planes of existence of physical space-time, the plane of gravitational masses and electromagnetic charges, are black holes that emit dark, expansive, gravitational energy. Still 96% of the gravitational world is invisible to us, including the discontinuous inner dimensions of masses, quarks and black holes.

- The 1st case between equal forms writes as ETi<et=te>Tei. It explains the 2nd law of Newton, the law of action reaction, according to which, et, the quantic action of ET over TE, is equal in value to ‘te’, the action of TE over ET.

- Yet what Newton missed was the fact that ‘actions’ and ‘reactions’ are equal in TE force but not always equal in substance. It is the 2nd case that explains relationships between 2 different planes of existence: Often an action is informative and its reaction is energetic and vice versa, so they compensate each other, cancelling the past and future into a present. It is the principle of conservation of energy and information: Energy becomes transformed into information and vice versa, ET. Quantic physics explain the 2nd case with a mysterious principle that not even Physicists fully understand: ‘time and space are non-commutative’. That is TE is not ET, T>E is an energy transformation and E>T is an informative flow. And they are not the same. So in quantum physics and GST theory the order of the parameters of an action matters.

The fact that energy flows towards the future, informative form, and energy towards the past, establish a hierarchy between information and energy, the 2 arrows of the Universe. In that sense, we prefer the word ‘order’ for the informative arrow and ‘entropy’ for the energetic arrow as it expresses truly the main biological difference between both: organisms are hierarchical, distributed through planes of existence that create chiral, hierarchical 3 class-structures, in the dominant dimension of height and information. Only the present, space, fruit of the repetition of the same form in extended surfaces, is democratic, equalitarian, creating huge masses of undifferentiated quanta without hardly any height dimension.

18. Breaking of energy and information symmetries in the limits between planes.

In that regard, the algebra of multiple planes of existence widens even farther the laws of conservation of energy and information, as energy might disappear from a plane of existence but the total energy x information quantity of the ternary, 3-plane structure of a World remains the same. Which in physics explains both a fundamental law of conservation, the so-called CPT parity (7.10); and a few seemingly exceptions to that law in which energy or information disappears from a plane of existence. For example, black holes erase information from the electromagnetic world but they emit it as ‘gravitational, dark energy’ through its poles (6.9).

All this means that neither the principle of action-reaction nor the Laws of conservation are ‘absolute’, when we consider only a ‘single plane of space-time’; as there are uneven flows of energy and information between 2 planes. So in Physics, only the total energy and information of the particles or CPT parity conserves; but the C or P or T parities might break in processes of death and birth of particles that give or take energy and information from other plane of existence, without returning it to the perceived, electromagnetic world physicists observe.

Especially when we consider the 3rd case of ‘death of a particle’, there is a transference of energy and information that jumps between 3 planes of space-time, (i-2i). So energy and information truly disappear and the laws of conservation that work for the total 3 relative planes of the organic system break for the planes we can observe. A fact that explains empirically many invisible, physical ‘imaginary forces’ and ‘particles’, postulated by physicists to maintain those theoretical conservation laws, without realizing they are observing an asymmetric transference of energy and information and so do not need to postulate ‘real particles’ but ‘asymmetric ST flows’. Indeed, in all processes that involve the death of a particle, which breaks the balance between the energy and information of a system physicists have found a lost of energy and information they cannot explain. Now we can explain why in the proximities of black holes, which transfer energy and information between the gravitational and electromagnetic world information is lost. Or why in radioactivity processes that destroy an atom or close to the limits of C-speed, the conservation of momentum and energy of a particle breaks. A similar case could be, for the mystique reader, the famous 21 grams that a person looses when it dies. Where they are? (10.10). So instead of ‘postulating’ a series of invisible particles and speed limits to keep reality confined to a single plane of existence, GST theory explains all those mysterious exceptions to the second law of Thermodynamics; the laws of conservation and the C-limits of speed in Relativity as S-T flows between 2 planes of existence. Obviously physicists have never witnessed the imaginary particles that come out of a dying neutron or a radioactive atom, called neutrinos and weak forces, invented to keep the total momentum of the dying particle, but only indirect flows of energy and information. Since indeed neutrinos and weak forces are not ‘particles’ in the strict sense, but flows of energy and information transferred between the gravitational and electromagnetic planes of existence when particles mutate their form or die, giving away its energy and information, as they explode into smaller i-1 quanta of the gravitational or electromagnetic ‘plane of existence’ (7.1-2). Those flows of ‘energy and information’ sometimes return to our world and give birth to a new particle; sometimes create a particle that flows further into the past called an antiparticle (7.10); sometimes give away its energy as a gravitational wave we cannot perceive; or sometimes they appears as an inverse, negative energy or a particle with negative mass, as it happens with neutrinos; precisely because its time-space coordinates become reversed as in all process of death that write as E>T -> T<E. So the dying form particle suffers a reversal in its space-time coordinates, becoming in algebraic terms a flow of negative energy or an antiparticle.

19. Law of Transcendental Inversion: Change of form between ST-planes

Those reversal of ‘coordinates’ and parameters that transform an energy species into information and vice versa between planes of existence can be very paradoxical, as scientists are unaware of the change of morphology or ST parameters of a form that merely has ‘transcended’, ‘evolved’ or ‘descended’, ‘died’ and ‘devolved’ between planes. Indeed, the world shows constantly those ‘inversions’ of space-time parameters through the 3±1 ages, phases of cycles or hierarchical, social classes, or planes of existence, what matters is the dynamic study of those fields.

We call those events ‘transcendental inversions’: When forms of an i-1 plane of ET transcend into an ‘i’ structure, both its time and space become inverted, which means that its morphology also becomes inverted. For example, lineal iron atoms become cyclical molecules when they emerge in the higher molecular plane. Then again iron molecules become lineal swords when they emerge in the macro-scale of human beings; in Biology, lineal proteins become cyclical membranes in macro-cells that become lineal muscles when they transcend again to the i+1 level. Those paradoxical, illogic, transformations of energy into information and vice versa happen when species transcend between 2 relative planes of existence because, as the Chinese say, all yin has a potential seed of yang that can transform it. So how can we distinguish a form as an energetic or informative species? We can define a form as dominant in energy or information, looking at its total ternary structure through the 3 i±1 planes of its organic systems; in as much as 3 is an even number, and so either the energy or informative structures will dominate the total organism. So iron is lineal in its atomic and organic structure and indeed iron is the most energetic atom of the Universe (8.2). That is why the Taoist wrote the structure of all events and forms with trigrams. So we can use those trigrams in GST theory to represent organic structures. For example: _, –,_ is the energetic iron sword, in which 2 energetic planes dominate the cyclical, intermediate iron molecules. In biology –,_,– represents among many other structures a temporal, informative cell, with an intermediate spiral RNA, made of smaller cyclical nucleotides and enclosed into a cyclical membrane.

20. The empirical proves of quantic jumps to the past.

The Universe is illogic but it is not magic. And yet, quantic jumps create phenomena that seem magic to us. Let us consider 2 examples from the physical and biological world, the consciousness of man and the instantaneous speed of gravitation:

Asymmetric, temporal, quantic flows of information from i to i-1 planes of existence explain how the particles of a higher social class like the brain neurons control electronically the cells of the body, anticipating its reactions, since those body cells use a slower, past chemical language and exist in a relative past, in an ‘inferior plane of existence’. Do we have proves of that temporal distance between planes of existence? Indeed a few years ago, scientists found surprisingly that the body acts before the brain thinks and yet most people think first before acting. How then it is possible that we think first and yet we act also first, and both things happen simultaneously? Precisely because as Einstein put it, past and future co-exist in a simultaneous present, as information flows from the future brain to the past body and energy flows, moves and acts in the body before, in the past. So depending on our point of view, the brain or the body we will see our action first, and since our ‘is’ are mental ‘is’ we perceive first our thoughts. Yet in reality both actions converge into a present.

So to the external world both mind and body act chained ‘together’ by the simultaneity of the quantic actions of the body cells and the mind’s thought into a single whole action. Yet the chemical cells of the body exist in a micro-fraction of time, in a relative past, separated from the ‘whole being’ by a quantic jump in time. This means that when the brain observes the chemical cells of the body it can control them ‘a priori’ as it knows what they will act before they act… So the body acts in past, the brain thinks in the future and both together create our present of existence, as information travels or is emitted from the future through a quantic jump to the past cells and energy is emitted or travels from the past body in a quantic jump into the future. So quantic jumps in time explain both the hierarchical structure and creation of symbiotic organisms, in which relative past and future forms co-exist, the control of the mind and the subconscious actions of the body. Thus in a human being, relative past cells and future nervous systems can co-exist in a symbiotic manner and chain each other’s cyclical actions (ch.10), thanks to the existence of quantic jumps in space and time that coordinate in simultaneity the fluxes of energy and information between the cells and neurons of those planes.

Yet the most obvious prove of quantic jumps to the past are the processes of death, which people who suffered it and then have survived, explain as a rewinding of the memories of the being that travels through the entire information of his life towards the past.

On the other hand in the physical world quantic jumps to the past have been proved in the past decade. Since rays of light, travelling faster than c, come out in the instrument before they are produced.

It also explains why gravitation is instantaneous; something that has always puzzled scientists. And yet, quantic jumps in time explain that instantaneous speed easily: A mass emits a graviton, its quantic, cellular form of past in a relative past. Hence, when the graviton travels forwards to the future from that past it consumes some time and it surfaces again into the relative present of the observer with an instantaneous speed (6.7,8). Since a quantic wave of gravitation can reach up to 1010 million years light, a single gravitational wave can cross in a single quantic jump, the entire Universe. And indeed, the ‘instantaneous, present space-time Universe’ reaches till around 1010 million years light, the so-called Universal horizon.

6.1 The 3±1 Dimensional Cycles=Ages of Causal, Verbal Time: Past= Youth=Energy, Present=exi=Reproduction & Future=3rd Age of Information order Fractal Organisms in Life/Death Cycles: EI

4. Duality: The 4 arrows/dimensions of space-time.

In the Universe there are infinite times=changes, one for each ‘species’ that undergoes a change process, the meaning of the word ‘time’. Those types of changes are the so-called arrows of time, which all beings of the Universe follow in their life and death cycles. The main of those arrows is the arrow of ‘relative future’ or life aging that creates information. We are made of ‘yang’, vital energy, which time curves into ‘information’, yin, back and forth in the cycles of life (growth of form, or aging) and death (loss of it). Yet the simplification of all those arrows and cycles of time into a single clock-cycle blurred the understanding of biological time and life-death cycles. Clocks became ever since the ‘seers of time’ of our culture. And organicism faded away, while a simpler, mechanist philosophy of reality imposed its idolatry to clocks, today evolved into computers that render the verbal mind of man obsolete.

It is a fact of history that humans first discover machines and then invent theories of reality that adapt to them and become dogma. But they never recognize the influence of those machines and the bias they introduce in their perception of the Universe. Of all the ideologies of our mechanist world none is stronger than the ideology of the time-clock, which appeared with the invention of mechanical clocks and has fogged, ever since, our comprehension of the Universe. The idea brought about by the discovery of the clock is that time, the perception of change in the Universe, can only be understood with ‘mechanical clocks’; and so, as Time is only ‘one’, because those first scientists used only one ‘clock-rhythm’ to measure it. This absurd belief in a single time for all the Universe dates back to the use of clocks by Galileo and Descartes and subsists, even a century after Einstein proved that different regions of the Universe have different rhythms of time=change. We didn’t need, however, to wait 400 years to the arrival of General Relativity to understand the obvious – that each species and organism of the Universe has its own biological rhythms of time, of life and death, of creation and extinction, of information and energy.

All theories of science about time depart from the first scientist of History, discoverer of the experimental method, Aristotle, who also defined the blueprint of a Time Theory that still stands as the origin of all other scientific philosophies of time. Aristotle defined time as change and so he affirmed that a theory of time should be a theory of change. Then he proposed, as Eastern philosophers did, 2 arrows, wills or substances in the Universe, information and energy, responsible for the 2 types of ‘times’=changes science studies. His wording, though, was somehow more complex. He called the arrow of temporal information, morphological, informative change, which happens in the processes of aging, death and evolution. And he called the arrow of temporal energy, translational change or change in movement and energy, which happens mainly in the physical realm. Thus, he divided the study of times in 2 different sciences, Biology, the science of form, of in-form-ation and Physics, the science of energy and matter. In the modern age, those 2 types of times-changes would be studied by Darwin in Biology and Galileo and Einstein in Physics. They added a new language, mathematics, to calculate with more precision those times= changes; and a new type of device, a machine, called the clock that would measure the rhythm of those times = changes.

5. The myth that time is what a clock measures.

However, physicists were only able to mathematize one of both arrows: energy, expansive movement in space, which they called ‘entropy’. Because physicists ignore all what they cannot mathematize, this lead them to ignore the 2nd arrow of time, in-form-ation. Further on, they studied all types of changes with a single rhythm of change; that of a mechanical clock. Thus, soon a ‘mechanical bias’ was introduced in physical time studies: all the times=changes of the Universe became equalized with one specific ‘time’, the time of the clock. Soon the existence of multiple times=changes was forgotten and the concept of a single artificial time=change in the universe – that of the clock – became standard. So Times were reduced to ‘Time’ and an absurd idea was born: there is only a single time in the Universe; that of the clock; and a single arrow of future time – energy and movement, mathematized as entropy. This is what philosophers of science, which are not constrained by the ‘straightjacket’ of clocks, the single language of mathematics and the worldly profession of making weapons, have for very long denounced as an aberration of physics, called reductionism, or ‘lineal clock-time’. But science is technology and technology is power. So hand in hand with the development of ‘lineal time’, physicists evolved ‘lineal weapons’ that release energy and kill the information of life. Since life was now secondary, this ‘collateral effect’ of modeling a dying Universe built only with energy, was no longer a moral question. The Industrial revolution and the expansion of the white man’s empires, based in the energy of steam machines, consecrated those ideas. Entropy, defined in terms of heat and steam, became the glorifying principle of reality; while life and information, the weak element, could be ignored, because physicists had killed ‘theoretically’ the Universe. Philosophers again talked of the ‘spatialization’ of time, which was now dependant of energy and movement. In mathematical terms, it all comes to Galileo’s a formula to measure the changes=times of motion, through the use of mechanical clocks, in which time appeared only as a dimension of speed and space: V=s/t, t=v/s. So the second arrow of future, the evolution of information, the arrow of life and its cycles, was forgotten. And when Einstein improved on that formula, adding a –ct factor (related to the speed of light), the absurd concept that time is ‘only’ the 4th dimension of (motion in) space, became dogma. And so today, physicists consider that Darwin was irrelevant to time theory; that Aristotle was irrelevant to time theory; that Time doesn’t happen in History; that the cycle of life and death is irrelevant.

This of course is false. In fact, it would be Einstein, the first person to mathematize properly the arrow of biological time, described by Aristotle and Darwin, when he discovered a formula e x t = K, which states that the product of energy and time frequency (synonymous of in-form-ation), of any system is constant. What that equation meant was however not fully understood till we, Complexity scientists, refounded the science of Duality, with models of the Universe that use, unlike physics which works only with the arrow of energy/entropy, both arrows of time, information and energy… What Duality found is that by using both arrows together, most of the questions not responded by physics and biology alone could be solved. The more important of those questions was the life and death cycle, which Einstein’s equation explained perfectly. And we shall now consider here, as I have applied it extensively to different sciences, including the understanding of history and the ages of its civilizations.

So we need to return to a more sophisticated theory of ‘times’, which fusions the work of Einstein’s Relativity and Darwin’s Evolution, the modern fathers of time theory in Physics and Biology. And the key to such advance in time theory is precisely to go beyond the mechanist concept of ‘time is what a clock measures’ and return to the pre-clock, verbal, biological understanding of time, as the ‘modes of changes’ of the energy and information of the Universe – the 2 elements of reality. Since time is the perception of those modes of change in the Universe, which can be observed with any type of ‘informative and energetic devices’ not only with clocks.

Times, as they were always understood before we narrowed the concept to the rhythms of the clock, are the different processes of change of the energy or ‘yang’ and information or ‘yin’ we observe in the Universe. And we can classify all those processes with the 2 x 2 arrows of time-change, as mere increases or decreases of energy or information, or as complex combinations of both:

— There are simple processes in time that increase or decrease the energy or entropy of the system, creating the arrow of entropy, the only one ‘monist’, ‘mechanist’ science recognizes, since it is the only arrow their mechanic clocks can measure, as their spiral mechanism uncoils its form into energy. It is also the arrow of death, as death is a simplification of the information of life, which energy destroys.

  • There are simples processes in time that increase or decrease the information of the system, such as aging, or evolution and so they create the arrow of information or negantropy (opposed to entropy), of the Universe, which is the ‘arrow of future’, as we all age with time and so we acquire more form, ‘more in-form-ation’. Or in words of Einstein: ‘Time curves, forms space’. This obviously means that energy simplifies information and it is therefore the arrow of relative ‘past’ of all beings, to which they return when they are devolved in the process of death. And so these 2 simple processes are related: species that diminish in energy normally are increasing their information and vice versa, species that decrease information increase energy.

— There are complex processes that repeat or reproduce a system, making reality to seem eternal. It is the arrow of ‘relative present’, or reproduction which repeats and combines energy and information in other place of space-time.

— And finally, there are complex processes that evolve socially individual cells into super-organisms by attaching them to complex networks of energy, which are ‘blood or economical system’ in the organisms of man and history and networks of information, networks of which are ‘nervous or financial/legal systems’ in the organisms of man and history. Networks of energy and information, normally made of a different ‘kind of cells’, evolve individuals into social structures, that create most of the complex forms we see around us, from cells to societies. It is the arrow of social evolution and love, explained by classic religions, which in System sciences we call the arrow of ‘Emergence’, as it makes emerge from individual parts, the whole: full-grown organisms. So it creates galaxies with stars, molecules with atoms, cells with molecules and societies with human beings.

6. The super-organisms of the Universe.

The Universe can be described as a simple mechanism, with a single arrow of time – energy – or as a complex organism, made of 2 Complementary elements organized in networks – bites of energy and bits of information. It is the organic paradigm, used in this book to describe the economic ecosystem and the social super-organisms of history, nations and civilizations, made of humans and machines.

The Arrow of Social Evolution is the most important arrow of organicism applied to Economics and History, understood by old philosophers and religions of love, as it implies that mankind should evolve into a single nation, a super-organism of history. Yet it is ignored by mechanist science that reveres the arrow of energy and death, to the point that it has reinvented Darwinism to promote industrial competence and nationalism. It is the doctrine of Social Darwinism – the anti-truth of which Darwin said, as members of the same species help each other.

How the 3±1 arrows of time organize reality, the tapestry of beings we observe? It is, in fact, possible to map out the behavior and elements of all organic systems and entities of the Universe merely by combining the 4 arrows/dimensions of time. Indeed, all entities can be considered simple organisms, constructed with those 4 arrows. The most simplex mechanisms have 1 or at most 2 arrows, performing only as energy or information systems. More complex systems also reproduce their form and evolve socially into new social forms—atoms that become molecules that become cells that become complex human beings, members of societies. In fact, the simplest systems of the Universe, quarks and electrons already show those 4 arrows, as they absorb energy, gauge information, reproduce into quarks and electrons and evolve socially. Thus the Universe has 4 arrows of time in all its systems. So it is organic in its structure, a word that is taboo for mechanist, ‘capitalist’ science, but shows the true nature of the Universe, made to the image and likeness of man and vice versa.

The 4th drive of the Universe, social, organic, cellular evolution, which the Greeks already recognized as the arrow of life (social organization) and death (dissolution of the ‘homunculus’ of the body), is the most important arrow of reality. In a certain sense, all entities in the Universe are ‘cellular societies’, organized through networks of energy and information. This is clearly the case of the species studied by human sciences, from physics to biology, where a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into social forms. Molecules are made with atoms and electronic networks; economies are made of human workers and consumers that reproduce and test machines, guided by financial information (salaries, prices, costs); galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a black hole of gravitational information. Even the Universe shows at great scales, networks of galaxies, joined by dark matter that resemble a simple ‘colonial tissue’, as the one we find in primitive macro-cellular organisms. And it would look even more complex if we were able to see dark matter structures that make up 76% of its mass-substance.

7. To Live: The arrows of Human Time.

In the graph, we draw the arrows of time and its physiological networks/dimensions and senses in the human being. Those arrows/physiological networks and its outlets, the senses, are the ‘will of time-existence’ in man, which motivates us to act and exist.

Human bodies are made of organic cells, controlled by a nervous system. A tree groups leaves, branches and roots, connected by networks of energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles). Cultures are made of humans related by verbal laws and ideologies. Those organisms come in an immense variety of sizes and species. What do they all have in common? All organisms are ‘cellular societies’, organized through networks of energy and information. In fact, there are 4 elements in all organic systems:

1. Cellular units, ruled by the temporal drive of social evolution.

2. Networks of energy or vital space, ruled by the temporal drive of energy feeding.

3. Networks of information, joined by the temporal drive of informative perception.

4. Networks that reproduce energy and information, achieving the survival of the organism.

Human beings are guided by the will to acquire energy, reproduce and acquire information for its 3 main networks, the energy/blood system, the nervous, informative system and the hormonal, reproductive network. In this manner biological times, the arrows of information, reproduction and energy, become also the origin of the 3 ages of life, as we go from a youth, dominated by energy/blood systems, into a 3rd age, dominated by information. Those natural drives of ‘human time’, whose understanding was lost to science, with the arrival of the clock, are the key to the biological behavior of human beings, guided by their desire to energize, inform and reproduce their body and their mind, through the 6 outlets of our physiological networks, the senses. In this manner, the arrows of change=time that all forms of the Universe follow, become translated into organic behavior: each of those cellular arrows expresses itself through a collective, social network that acts in the Universe through an outer sense: Animals recognize ‘food information’ through the sense of smell. They are motivated to reproduce, as the sense of touch causes sexual pleasure in them and finally absorb energy through the sense of taste. While the mind/head absorbs information through visual senses, reproduces it through the ear/voice sense and guides its relative energy, the body, through the ‘sixth’, inner sense of feelings and reason.

In the graph, we see how those 4 arrows of energy/information /reproduction and social evolution ‘become’ a human being, which is the product of the biological evolution of those arrows in combinations of simple atoms (N,H,C,O) that after eons of social evolution have become the 3 physiological networks of the body and its senses. Eastern Philosophers recognized that structure, through the theory of Chakras. Medicine also recognizes sickness as a malfunction of those 3 networks that feed, inform and reproduce cells, the ‘citizens’ of the body. Since the same concept applies to social organisms that become sick when the Energy/Economic system and informative/legal/political system become corrupted, killing the society.

Thus, the understanding of man and history requires the concept of cyclical time and its 4 arrows or drives of time-existence, energy, information, reproduction and social evolution, which time-clock cannot describe. Of those 4 arrows, in fact, the most important in history is social evolution, perfectly explained by love religions. Since, once the 3±1 arrows/dimensions of time beings are understood, we can then study Time in History, as the recurrent, cyclical process of social evolution, creation and destruction of human cultures and civilizations, which happen in temporal, cyclical patterns. Yet, social evolution is the arrow of time adamantly denied by ‘Capitalist myths’ that affirm the competence between individuals of the same species, against the laws of Darwinian evolution of species and the obvious fact that the Universe evolves in scales of social organization, from particles to atoms to molecules, to cells to organisms to societies . 

What Darwin said is very clear: species—not individuals—compete with other species; and the best, most social species survives better. In that regard, ecosystems and organisms are different social systems. In both cases we find a mass of ‘cellular species’, which evolve together thanks to networks of energy and information. In a social organism such as an ant-hill, a nation, or your body, the cells belong to a single species, which according to the laws of social evolution, work together as a team, for the common welfare. In that sense, love religions are the verbal expression of those laws of social evolution that favor the survival of species, which work together. Facts are conclusive. The 2 most efficient species of this planet are the ones that show higher levels of social love, of co-operation. They are ants and human beings. Ants are the most successful animals because they collaborate and evolve socially. The total mass of ants in this planet is equivalent to the total weight of human beings and it is ten times bigger than the total mass of all other insects, because they are perfect social organisms, selfless, in loved with the collective species. The Chinese culture, the most social culture of this planet that traditionally promoted verbal information over money and war, is also the most successful, with the biggest number of survival individuals, accounting for ¼ of the mass of humans. Thus, we consider that our civilizations and religious Gods are social organisms in which each man is a cell, joined to other human beings by verbal networks of information.

We define a historic organism as a social group of humans, related by networks of human energy (natural goods) and human information (verbal/visual art and laws). Finally, an economic ecosystem is a group of humans and machines related by networks of monetary information and energy networks.

In that sense, a historic society of human beings, a religion, nation or civilization joined by a common informative network (DNA, language, culture or Revealed book), is an organism. But the economy is an ecosystem because there are 2 species in open competence:

— Machines, which are re=produced by company-mothers, informed by the language of money.

— And humans, which are reproduced by human mothers and informed by the verbal, legal language that organizes their governments.

Thus to understand the duality of History and Economics is important to understand both, the Darwinian competence among different species (in this case, men and machines), the social evolution between member of the same species (men, who evolve into nations; and machines and money that have evolved into companies); and the role of 2 languages of information, money and words, in the creation of those 2 different systems. Since an economic ecosystem and a human social organism use two different languages, with 2 different set of values, money and words. And languages are the key to understand those differences of behavior between species:

— Similar ‘cells’ of the same species act in herds and organisms, when they can share information through the same language. They are parallel species that communicate energy and information, evolving into more complex social organisms. We could say they ‘love’ each other. Since the population of a certain species will socialize and become a more complex organism, by sharing their information and energy, often ‘hunting’ together a different species. The group will become then a more powerful organism than the individuals. Social evolution will enhance the power of the herd that survives better. So ants weigh more than all other insects combined, because they are the most social organisms.

— Species which are different abuse each other as relative energy. We might say they ‘hate’ each other. Why? Because those species cannot communicate and act together. To communicate the emitter and the receptor must be essentially the same species, or at least must have similar informative and communicative organs. When beings are very different and use different languages, they cannot decode their information. So they absorb that force of communication as energy and feed on it. They consider the other species an energy source and act as hunters. Then we talk of a Darwinian struggle, a fight between species that behave as predators and victims.

This dual behavior of species gives birth to 2 basic macro-organisms in History:

Societies, based in the law of social evolution, which evolve in complexity and number of ‘human cells’, as the systems of information and energy that relate those cells become more sophisticated. Such was the natural arrow of human evolution, from the initial genetic organisms based in familiar ties or genetic information (families, clans, tribes, nations) to the more sophisticated social organisms based in verbal information, (societies in which the natural law of social evolution was spelled by human religions that talked of love and communication among ‘brothers’, who shared the same ‘language of values=beliefs, such as the Christian society, or the doctrines that inspired UNO).

Yet the arrival of weapons and money divided human beings in tribes, which no longer dialog but kill each other or enslave each other with money and weapons, creating the economic ecosystem, in which human tribes feel as different species and compete. In that sense, ecosystems are mixed environments, in which different organic species co-exist in their struggle for existence. Each organic species of an ecosystem can be studied as a social form of evolution, in struggle with other social forms of evolution. A Free Market is such ecosystem, a Jungle in which 2 different species, machines and human beings, compete for jobs and kill each other in wars, divided in tribal species. Yet they go against the natural law, which verbal prophets explained with human ethics. Since those laws prove that humans should try to create a world society made of human beings, in which humans profit from machines as an inferior species they control. Such societies would be free, evolved societies where humans are still top predators. They were reached during the classic, Neolithic age, with its cult to the goddesses of love and fertility, but the arrival of metal aborted human Social Evolution. And the attempts of modern love religions and socialist doctrines have all failed, as those humans who believe in Go(l)d, war and mechanism, systematically censor, even go to war against social cultures.

The result is that today mankind is broken into economical Nations, which are Free ‘Jungle’ markets in which money acts as the network of information that organizes 2 species, humans and machines, in company-mothers, whose goal is to reproduce and evolve the maximal number of machines, their ‘offspring’. Thus companies have only 2 uses for humans to achieve their goal. They use them as workers=reproducers and consumers= testers of machines. So the technological ‘ethics’ of work and consume are repeated ad nauseam by our systems of information. Today nations create ‘paradises of machines and company-mothers’ called free markets. They are ecosystems in which the Darwinian law applies to men, as machines and company-mothers have higher rights than humans: they can prey over labor, firing workers; while weapons can ‘consume’ humans in war fields . . .

8. The evolution of time and history.

The evolution of human individuals into macro-social organisms follows the pattern of evolution of the Universe that grows in scales, as self-similar individuals of the same species gather together into macro-organisms. So particles become atoms, atoms become molecules, molecules become cells, cells become organisms and individual human beings, become social cells of a civilization, the macro-organisms of history.

In the graph, History is a super-organism made of human cells, extended over a geographical body of Energy called Gaia, the vital-space or body, where historic, social organisms evolve. In that sense, a human and a social organism, a nation or a civilization, have in common the elements of all super-organisms:

1. Cellular units. These are cells in a human body, citizens in a human society.

2. Networks of energy or vital space. This is the blood system in a human body and the networks of transportation in a society: rivers and roads.

3. Networks of information. This is the nervous system that organizes cells in a body, or the verbal/visual information that organizes human societies through laws, ethics and art.

4. Networks that reproduce energy and information. These are sexual systems in individuals; and economical networks that reproduce goods and cultural networks that define how humans reproduce in societies.

So we define a human organism as a population of DNA cells, related by networks of nervous information and energy (blood).

We define Gaia as a super-organism made of living beings, joined by a common network of visual information and networks of life energy, gathered around her ‘river veins’. Since Gaia is also the living organism that hosts the social organisms of mankind.

9. The hierarchical scales of human societies.

In the graph, humans evolved socially through the 3 horizons of all energy/ information systems, creating first, tribal, genetic societies based in ‘energetic’/body affinity; then agricultural societies, based in the reproduction of human goods and finally, ideological, verbal and legal societies, based in legal, bio-ethic codes. Yet that final phase of evolution of history was aborted by the parallel evolution of economic ecosystems based in digital money, which achieved its global unification with the creation of the world stock-market, before humans could create a global government.

The law of social evolution is a Universal law, based in the fact that macro-organisms are top predator systems with more energy and information than individual cells and so they survive better. It follows that the natural evolution of history is towards the creation of a global super-organism, ruled by a legal, verbal government that represents all human beings and acts together, taking care of the energy and information networks that feed the heads and bodies of the human race.

Man, the dominant, informative, nervous mammal, was bound to create social organisms, through the creation of a new macro-language of information, words, which could join individual minds, in the same way nervous impulses join human cells. In those societies human beings are the informative, cultural ‘neurons’ of a territorial body that provides them with energy (economical and agricultural networks.) So humans developed words that organized their simultaneous, collective actions; adding to the simple program of genetic instincts, the memetic, verbal language, able to remember temporal cycles and transfer customs and ideas between generations. Words created cultural super-organisms—a new social plane of history based in informative, memetic, legal and ethic networks. In that process of social creation, mankind has evolved in a decametric scale, common to all Universal super-organisms, during 3±1 ages:

Max. E: Paleolithic: 1st age of biological, genetic, body-based social networks. Subdivided, according to the 3 arrows of all evolving systems, in 3 ages of growing complexity: the individual, energetic hunter (100=1); the reproductive family (101=1-10) and the social clan (102=10-100) or tribe (103=100-1000).

— e=i: Neolithic: Mature age of agricultural, reproductive Networks: Humanity evolved into a new ternary scale, with the development of agricultural networks, from villages (103-104), into cities (104-105) into river cultures (105-106 =1 million)

Max. i: Informative Networks: The development of verbal, ideological, informative religions of love evolved humanity in the last ternary scale, from tribal religions (1 to 10 millions), into nations that mixed both, cultural and economic networks (10 to 100 millions), into global, ecumenical religions and civilizations in which all human beings are accepted as part of a single God=Historic Super-organism (100 million to 1 billion).

— +1: Thus, the final step of human evolution would be to join all the great civilizations of mankind into a global government. It would be a super-organism based in verbal, ethic laws, able to control machines and the Economic Ecosystem, in order to create a world made to the image and likeness of mankind—an expanded UNO with powers of social control similar to those displayed by a national Government. Yet this is not achieved because mechanist, capitalist sciences and their dogmas of competence among humans, prevent us from making a true, scientific, accurate design of the future of mankind… In that sense, paradoxically, the intuitions of religions of love were more accurate in the analysis of the real laws of the Universe than our dogmatic, ‘entropy/energy’ only mechanist physicists and economists who worship the individual ‘homo bacteria’ over the evolved ‘homo organicus’.

10. Biological definition of a Human God.

Mystique writers like Saint John, rightly understood God as the ‘Brain’ of the Universe, which expressed itself through the laws that all organisms followed. The most important of those laws is the law of social evolution that creates super-organisms, departing from smaller cells, expressed in ethic, sacred ‘Laws’ that regulate the behavior of a society. They became the ‘Saint Spirit’ that translated those Laws into the language of Humanity, verbal thought, carried by the most intelligent, informative species of mankind, our collective neurons, the prophets of the Wor(l)d. It is the mystery of Trinity, central to the Christian religion: the father, the brain of the Universe, communicated to Its son, the human prophet, the Saint Spirit, the sacred laws of survival; so ‘all those who believed in the prophet, will not die for ever’.

Thus, we can define a Human God and His verbal ethic texts, as the informative brain of an organism of History. If the nervous brain is the God of your cells that controls them with informative impulses, the Book of Revelation of a prophet and his ethic laws are the nervous system of a society that controls and helps to survive better those believers who obey his social Laws of love. Those human Gods are based in the 4th and more complex of the arrows of Time, the arrow of social, transcendental evolution of all the individuals of the same species into a super-organism. In that regard, God is the verbal, informative Mind of mankind and His ethical Laws reflect the biological laws of love among individuals of the same species. In Christian Jargon, God is the Ethic Word that became man and inhabited among us. (Saint John, 1.1)

Love Religions make the word, the human language of information, God, putting man at the center of the Universe, to help him to survive. Human Love religions spell both, the laws of Darwinian Death (Man can prey on other species) and the laws of social life & evolution (Man has to love himself and his fellow men). Those verbal, love Gods are the brain of humanity, of history; and human individuals are the cells informed by that mind. So in Saint John’s Gospel, perhaps the verbal summit of love religions, Christ declares that each men is the temple of the spirit (the word), part of the body of God. Mystiques, both in Islam and Christianity, considered humans, cells of the body of God, of ‘Islam’ and ‘Christianity’. Yet Islam and Christianity themselves are parts of the Total God, which is History, Mankind. Since their ethic messages are basically the same and ultimately all humans belong to the same species, as the Baha’i and some New Wave cults emphasize.

We might say that there is only a God and several great human prophets, sons of God, sons of the Word, who have understood His messages of love. The anonymous writer of Genesis, Christ, Muhammad, Buddha and in lesser degree Marx, who failed to separate Man from Machine and Moses, still believing in Tribalism, are those prophets. Modern ecological and socialist writers, who drink on their traditions, are their disciples that translate to a scientific, organic jargon their messages of social love that promote human, natural goods, over weapons, money and machines. The organism of that Human God is the Body of History, Gaia, the Ecosystem of Man and Nature that we should preserve to be immortal as a species. ‘Because those who believe in Me, will never die’. Those who believe in Gold and weapons, the languages of power of the tree of science, however will die, at the hand of its false idols, as the prophets of love have always announced and the cycles of war in history prove.

Islam and Christian mysticism (Ibn Khaldun, Augustine) reached similar conclusions: The Koran is the sacred word of God, his ideas. In Christianity the word becomes God in the mind of his human son, Christ, the prophet who has the body of man and the verb-mind of God. In him, the word reached its fulfillment. In him, the word love=sharing of human energy and information, expresses the Human Laws of social evolution. Christianity was socialist, because socialism is the natural Law. Mystics say that the community of believers shapes the body of Christ and the Gospel is his mind. Muslims say that the body of Muslims is Islam and Koran is His brain. In both cultures the Verbal language has to control the corruption of money and the harm that weapons do to humans. If that goal is achieved, history could evolve towards immortality into a Citadel of saints, where all ethical words will be obeyed (Saint Augustine). Then history (the passing of time) will come to an end. History will become immortal without war, because those ‘who Believe in Me, will not Die forever’. As Mankind will form a single body of History and reign supreme over the body of Mother Earth.

If we use instead of religion, a biological jargon, civilizations become organisms composed of cellular herds of human beings that communicate through information networks (words & Gods). As a nervous system connects and organizes the cells of a body, God connects and organizes a mass of human beings. Perhaps our definition of a Universal super-organism will help you to grasp what we mean by a Historic God:

‘A Universal super-organism is a biological body of (any species of cells) extended in time and space, joined by networks of information=Gods.’

Thus, a relative God is the macrocosmic network of information of any super-organism, when perceived from the microcosmic point of view of His cells that the network of information controls. The brain of the Human god is the verbal network of believers’ minds, the Books of Revelation and the Social Laws that create human behavior. We create the future when we obey informative, verbal codes. Thus, God is the verb and its ethical codes of survival. A parallel analysis of the earlier Gods of Man and its Books of Revelation, with R=evolutionary Constitutions of ‘solidarity, fraternity and equality’ make more clear such parallelism of all religions, nations and civilizations, as super-organisms based in social love: Both, a ‘Constitution’ and a ‘Book of Revelation’, are a set of bio-ethical, natural laws that regulate the behavior of their human cells, ‘constituting’ a social body and guiding its cyclical actions. So, a ‘healthy’ Constitution is a set of laws properly built, according to the social laws of the Universe and thoroughly obeyed by its citizens. While the ‘Constitution of History’, based in the natural laws of survival of the Universe, is the set of laws that could build a global collective super-organism, which could ensure the survival of the human species, ‘constituting’ a healthy body of History, harmonic with Nature, without wars and fear of extinction. Those laws of survival and social evolution were expressed, before politicians wrote Constitutions, in simple ethic books by masters of our natural, verbal, temporal language of survival, called prophets, which resumed them in a single word: social love. It means ‘to share energy and information with similar cellular human beings’, called believers, belonging to the same historic, social organism, with the objective of acting together in the environment, creating a world to the image and resemblance of its cells, human beings. So the natural law of social evolution is the mandate of all non-corrupted Wor(l)d religions, whose prophets and priests tried to reproduce in the mind of their believers a loving behavior, in order to ‘constitute’ a super-organism of God. All religions share the same informative Mandate proper of all cellular systems; ‘love each other’, ‘treat the others as you wish to be treated’. We find that sentence in many religions. It was pronounced by Jesus in the Gospel and by Confucius in his treatises. In any organism the brain/mind is a ‘relative God’ for all the micro cells it totally controls. So the government is the God of a nation that controls its citizens; the brain is the God of your body cells; and the ethic laws of any religion are words of love that control for the common good the behavior of all its believers. The God of America is its Constitution and corpus of Laws; the God of Islam is the Koran and its laws; the God of Christians is the Gospel, the laws and words of Christ ‘that became God and inhabited within us’ (Saint John 1.1); the God of Jewish and most Protestant sects are the Mosaic laws; and the Absolute God of the Universe are the laws of organic science, the 3±1 arrows of space-time that define the survival and extinction of all its species. Thus, in mystique terms the super-organisms of History are called Gods. And Theology is the science that explains the relationships between individual human cells and those super-organisms. Let us then, end this chapter with an analysis of all the religions of the past, present and future, according to their degree of corruption and/or evolution in their understanding of the organic laws of the Universe.

11. The collective Subconscious: Artistic styles.

Artists and writers carry the collective consciousness of a Society:

I see with my eyes; I think with my wor(l)ds, therefore I am an artist.’

But do those social, anthropomorphic super-organisms of mankind really exist in a higher social scale of space-time? Since the existence of nations, extended over the geographical body of the Earth, composed of human beings, networks of energy and information, is obvious, we will argue the existence of ‘metaphysical Gods’, which unlike nations are not sustained by geographical, physical networks but by the biological, mystic, subconscious mind of its believers. In that sense, those networks are similar to 96% of reality, made of invisible ‘dark matter and dark energy’, whose most important force, gravitation, is not perceived. We however perceive the effects of gravitation that ‘bring together’ masses, as we observe the effects of the subconscious collective of religions that ‘bring together’ masses of human beings. Where is the material consciousness of those social networks? Are our informative verbal leaders – priests in the past, politicians at present – the soul of social history? Yes, ‘verbal masters’ are the nervous cells that give verbal, human, ethic orders that make act together the entire social nation. In the same way your consciousness is your nervous system, verbal and visual artists are the consciousness of a society. On the other hand death is the collapse of those networks. You die when your brain phases out. The same happens to a nation or religion: Politicians or Priests construct with verbal laws the nervous system of a nation and are conscious of it in a higher degree than its citizens. But when those systems become corrupted, the nation enters in war and dies. Thus, in the same manner that the informative brain of the body takes care of our cellular health, the informative masters of history—politicians and priests, authors of the ethic laws of verbal information that rule mankind—have a basic role as the informative, dominant class of civilizations: they have to maintain history healthy, taking care of the distribution of energy and information to its cells, the citizens of a nation or the believers of a religion or civilization. That was precisely what religious people did, since the beginning of the Neolithic, in those historic organic systems they ruled with ‘Revelation Books’, written according to the ethic, universal laws of social evolution; and what politicians are supposed to do in the present age of legal codes and Constitutions. Since the essence of an ‘ethic God’ or a Political Nation are those Revealed Books and Constitutions, which have evolved ‘genetic organisms’ of history, based in racial equality, into complex, ‘Wor(l)d organisms’, based in similar ideas. We call each of those verbal, ideological systems that imitate the structure of organisms, a culture or civilization, which reached with Oikoumene religions and socialist cultures the 1 billion mark of ‘cellular complexity’ (Islam, Christianity, China), the last scale before shaping the ideal, never reached Wor(l)d Union in which all human cells would be citizens of history.

12. The 3 ages of all organic, temporal species.

Examples of the 3±1 ages/arrows of time in Universal Systems:

Birth: A seed of Temporal information, t, evolves into a complementary organism of energy and information, tE, by absorbing energy, replicating its information and evolving in social cells: Life starts

Youth: It absorbs energy and reaches its maximal size: Max. Energy.

Reproduction: It keeps in-form-ing itself till reaching an age of reproductive balance, Ti=E. We perceive that age as beauty, harmony between lineal energy & cyclical form.

3rd age: In-form-ation warps energy till its exhaustion: Max. T.

-1: Death: Information explodes back into energy, expanding in space, reversing the arrows of time: Temporal Information <<Energetic space.

Let us now go a step further in our understanding of the organic structure of the Universe. To that aim, we shall consider how those fundamental arrows of time, much more sophisticated that the mere use of an arrow of entropy or motion – the simplest of those 4 arrows – can be described mathematically thanks to Einstein’s discovery that the product of energy and temporal information of any system, ext=k, is constant.

Since that equation includes the 3 essential arrows of the Universe, not only one arrow as a clock does:

The arrow of energy, e; the arrow of information, t; and the product of them, k, or arrow of reproduction.

It is also obvious that mathematically we can express the previous equation in 3 forms:

Max. E x Min. T = K ; E=K=T and Min. E x Max. T=K.

Thus there are 3 possible stages or ages of evolution of the equation of biological time. And since we are all made of ‘energy’ and ‘temporal information’, those 3 stages must be the stages, or phases of any system of the Universe. This finding, which is perhaps the most important discovery of Theory of Time of the XXI century, is validated by all kind of empirical observations. For example, the 3 states of matter correspond to those 3 equations. Gas (maximal energy), liquid (balanced energy and information) and solid (Maximal information. They are also the 3 possible solutions of a cosmological system: the big bang of maximal energy, a steady state of balance and a big crunch of maximal information. In the graph, we show further examples of those equations.

Here we are interested in its application to the understanding of life and history. If we call the age of maximal energy, youth, the age of balance between energy and information, the reproductive, mature age, and the age of maximal information the old age, we have a simple description of the fundamental cycle of life and death through its 3 ages.

But we can also write those dynamic processes backwards. And so we have the inverse equation of life ages, the equation of death, when after accumulating maximal information, a species reverses its arrow of information and explodes that information into energy. It is the process or equation of death.

So life is an arrow of information, E-> I, and death its inversion, I-> E. So simple, so beautiful, so misunderstood by mechanist scientists, who think the previous equation is ‘uncertain’, because the observer can perceive a particle in any of those 3 states (Uncertainty principle of quantum physics). When I explain the equation of life and death in scientific congresses, all people marvel except dogmatic physicists, with their religions of the machine. Now they are building, based in a misinterpretation of that equation, black holes on Earth (Mr. Hawking and CERN), thinking that the equation of life and death is ‘uncertain’. And the reversion of that equation – the process of death of a particle that becomes its antiparticle and explodes in a big bang of energy – is a system to travel back in time. But what they will get if they succeed making black holes will be an explosion as nothing ever seen on the Earth…

The reason why death exists in a perfect, immortal Universe is obvious: if species only evolved socially towards more information, they would end into a ‘big crunch’. So the Universe and all its parts should have, long ago, reached a point of social evolution and maximal density, with no return. To avoid this, the ‘game of life and death’ exists, whereas death is the opposite arrow to Social evolution, as it dissolves the networks that put together individual cells, breaking the super-organism back into its parts. But we are now concerned with the arrow of life.

The ±1 social arrow has, in fact, 2 directions:

The positive, +1, social arrow of cellular evolution creates life and makes a being emerge at birth.

The -1, negative arrow of cellular dissolution kills life and dissolves a being into its cells and atoms. Thus, it is the key arrow of the life/death cycles that clock-time misses. Hence the enormous simplification of those 4 time-arrows, brought about by clocks, which in Physics, since Galileo, only measure the first and most simple of those arrows, the energy of motion.

The result of adding both – the life and the death processes – in any system or scale of reality is a ‘zero-sum’ of information+entropy that cyclically returns reality to its initial form, in a dynamic, multiple steady state balance that affects any entity of reality. The study of that process of creation and dissolution of complex structures, however, cannot be made with translational time, (v=S/T), the realm of physics, but it needs to understand biological, morphological time – the life/death cycle and its 3±1 ages. Those ages explain precisely what physicists, stuck in the study of time as movement in space, will never understand: the meaning of the life and death cycle that creates and extinguishes humans, societies (super-organisms of human beings) and all kind of beings that exist in space and time. In biological time all universal species follow the same ‘morphological changes’, described by the wisdom of verbal thought as the 3±1 ages of life, each one ruled by one of the 3±1 change=time:

+1: Conception: ruled by social evolution, as a micro-organism or cell transcends into a macro-organism, organized by social networks.

1st age: Youth or Age of energy.

2nd age: Energy and Information Reproduce.

3rd age: All energy becomes information.

-1:Death: The inverse of conception when the super-organism dissolves back into cells.

In the graph we describe that law of 3±1 ages, cycles, or horizons of evolutions for the fundamental species of reality. To understand that cycle in depth, we have to recall the Law of Complementarity between energy and information: all systems are made with a body/field of energy and a head/particle of information.

Further on, since form is made with energy, all events must start with an amount of ‘simple’ energy that transforms itself into information, the only other primary direction/arrow of time to go. Then, when all energy is consumed, warped into information, death reverses its cycle. Yet in the middle of that cycle, when information and energy are in balance, to preserve the ‘bio-logic’ form created in that process, the system achieves its reproduction.

And so the ‘offspring’ of the being will carry on its information into the future. Information never disappears as it always recreates itself.

All beings, from fundamental particles, (electrons and quarks) to human beings and life species, reproduce or are reproduced by more complex systems, when they have extra-energy to imprint its in-form-ation. Since forms that do not reproduce, die away and become extinct. So even those deconstructed beings that cannot reproduce alone are reproduced by other species. For example, cells reproduce carbohydrates, galaxies reproduce stars and human reproduce machines in factories. Thus, we talk of 3±1 drives, arrows or ages of existence in all systems: the drive for body energy, the drive for information, the drive for reproduction and the drive of social d=evolution (birth and death of a macro-organism). Whereas the 3±1 ages of Organic Time are merely the order in which those 3±1 drives ‘accumulate’ during the life/death cycle of any species.

In a young first age, energy is more abundant. In the mature age of balance, the species reproduces, combining energy and information. In the third age of the species, energy is scarce but information is abundant, accumulated in the first ages.

Young people are full of energy. They are in the Energy horizon of the species. They are bigger, have little temporal knowledge. They are simple in form. While Old people are full of information. They are in the information horizon of the species. They are smaller, as all information systems are and have a lot of temporal memories. They move little and have a lot of wrinkles.

Mature people balance the two elements of the organic Universe, their content of energy-space and temporal information. So they can reproduce all their components. Hence the 2nd age is the age of reproduction. And the forms of any being in that mature age are a harmonic, an efficient combination of energy lines and informative cycles that we perceive as ‘beautiful’, the objective perception of harmony between energy and information, lines and cycles. So in all organisms the mature, realistic, classic age of balance, or reproductive age, is the most perfect age. Human beings intuitively see that. We like balanced, spiral galaxies, mature people and realist art, which is called classic art and takes place in the mature age of civilizations.

Yet, the dominant arrow of time, information, will finally exhaust energy, warp totally the organism and bring its explosive death. And the cycle will start again.

It follows that a true science of life and time will try to maintain any organism in its age of balance, without excessive information. Exactly the contrary of what our society does. Since humans accumulate scientific and technological information towards a point or ‘Singularity’ in which that information, in the form of a robot or artificial intelligence, might extinguish us.

In the graphs, we illustrate those 3±1 ages with a few universal examples, also from social sciences: we see the process in individual human beings, in art, the collective brain of a culture; in matter, where those ages are called the states of matter – energetic gas, reproductive liquid and informative solid. And finally in the Universe, where stars evolve from an age of energy into an informative age as black holes. And so do galaxies that evolve from energetic nebulae into Black Holes, which explode into quasars. Finally, if the network of galaxies we call the Universe was truly born from a first seed of matter that fed and reproduced its form in the energy of the vacuum; it will go through 3±1 self-similar ages described by the 3 solutions to Einstein’s Space-time equations. Since all in the Universe is a game of ‘3’ dimensions or ages of time: past, the age of energy, present, the reproductive age in which all systems repeat themselves to keep their ‘present form’ beyond death and a 3rd age, when all energy is exhausted, trans-form-ed into form, information.

Thus, clock-time cannot describe, as it is qualitative, morphologic, not quantitative, the cycle of death and life, from youth-energy into a 3rd age-information and back again, dissolving yourself into the Universe, natural to all beings: Energy always trans-forms itself.

So the 4 arrows of time have an absolute order defined by those life ages, which first evolve socially a seminal seed into a macro-organism of multiple cells, according to the arrow of social evolution and then trans-form the energy of youth into in-form-ation in 3±1 ages dominated by the arrows of energy, reproduction and information, creating the fundamental arrow of the life/death cycle, the arrow of information or future arrow that happens in all systems:

It is the main law of physics, discovered by Einstein, who said: ‘time curves (the energy of) space’.

It is the main law of Biology, discovered by Darwin, who said: that time evolves the form of organisms.

In Chemistry, Mehaute realized that when chemical compounds do not increase their entropy, they increase their information, forming fractal structures. It was the mathematical breakthrough of modern organicism. Since for the first time we had a mathematical paradigm, ‘fractal, self-generative equations’ able to describe the reproduction of information. Fractal mathematics showed how all systems could reproduce in-form-ation by breaking energy into ‘smaller forms’, in a mechanical, vegetative or conscious way.

Finally, it is also the main law of History, as human civilizations constantly increase their technological information, but unable to repress military technology, the bad fruits of the tree of science, end up in extinctive wars. So they also live and die through those 3±1 ages/arrows of time.

So the meaning of Life and death is no longer a mystery, but an organic process of reproduction and self-organization, guided by the 4 arrows of time that we can extend to all systems made of the 2 fundamental, dual ‘reproductive particles’, informative quarks and spatial, energetic electrons; that is, to all systems of the Universe. In that sense, mechanism, after we have observed the reproductive capacity of those ultimate particles of reality, is no longer ‘a science’ but a dogmatic, anthropomorphic ‘religion’ that stubbornly tries to differentiate human beings, as ‘special entities’ surrounded by a lesser Universe of dead matter. Indeed, the founders of mechanism, Descartes, Newton and Kepler, were pious believers, which thought their new theory of the Universe would reinforce those beliefs in the superiority of man, chosen of God, to rule the Universe. As Kepler said, ‘God has waited 5000 (biblical years) to find an intelligence (Kepler himself) able to understand His’. Yet there is no difference of quality between the arrows of time of a quark and those of a human being, only degrees of complexity, as we are made of multiple scales of self-organization and so we carry much more information than quarks do. Thus, the key to our ‘complexity’ is the 4th arrow of social evolution that joins individual cells into social networks that emerge as ‘new super-organisms’ of a higher scale. For example, in life organisms, the 3±1 ages of time are related to the 3 networks that form socially its cells:

— The energy/digestive network dominates youth.

— The blood, hormonal, reproductive network dominates the reproductive age.

— The information network, your nervous system, dominates the 3rd age. Because information dominates energy, the nervous cells of the body absorb, suck in and exhaust the energy cells of the body. Thus, all systems have a dominant, informative, cellular class that controls the energy cells of the body and exhausts, warps its energy into form till the organism dies.

Those ages mean that organisms are ruled by a head of information: Since the head of information constantly controls and uses the body to absorb energy, it is natural to find that when the organism starts its life, it has more energy. He is young. Yet as the organism lives, the selfish brain absorbs that body energy and trans-forms it into in-form-ation. So energy diminishes and information grows. As you feed on energy, information accumulates in cycles and forms, in patterns and wrinkles. But the system dies, because the behavior of informative systems never varies. It constantly absorbs energy, till exhausting the body into a biological ‘big crunch’ of wrinkles and de-form-ations. Brain cells are selfish. Neurons feed on the body system without giving back any energy at all. In history, the informative castes of societies that control its languages of power, money, weapons and the law are also the selfish castes that exploit the energy workers and finally exhaust the civilization.

The same process happens in economic ecosystems where the financial, informative language of money at the end of each Kondratieff cycle dominates the economy, absorbs all the resources, multiplies without limit and crashes the physical economy of human energy (workers, consumers), as it has just done recently. So ultimately the crisis we are living is a particular case of the natural crisis of all systems in which information multiplies without limit, under the selfish guidance of ‘informative’ neurons, in this case the financiers that reproduce money in our societies. And so the only way to maintain an organism healthy is by controlling the evolution of information, exactly the opposite of what our society does. It is the dominance of information over energy what kills organic systems. And yet humans are so naive or so programmed by the informative drive of the Universe that they keep evolving the information of this planet, advancing their 3rd age…

Thus life has 3±1 ages, but then death, the negative -1 age of destruction and devolution of form into energy, erases all information. Those ages are related to the 4 arrows of time. By far the most important to understand the entire cycle is the arrow of social evolution of cells into organisms (conception or +1 arrow) and devolution (-1 arrow), when those cells dissolve back again. Those processes of creation and destruction apply to all sciences and are so common in Nature that the Greeks (Anaximander, Aristotle) already studied them. ‘Clock-time’ eliminated that wisdom, which now organicism regains.

Since the most important question about life and time is still the question mankind wondered before the clock was invented. How to achieve immortality as an individual or a species? It can only be realized, precisely through the 2 arrows of time mechanist sciences don’t study: the arrow of reproduction, which ensures the survival of the individual and the arrow of social evolution that ensures the survival of a species, which becomes a super-organism, the most efficient ‘form’ of the Universe.

13. The 3+1 ages of evolution in living species.

In the graph, the law of the 3±1 ages or horizons applies both to the process of informative aging of organisms and informative evolution of species. All species are born as a seed of dense information, with limited size (black hole, first chips, seminal cells, first bilateral animals). Then they grow in size and energy during their youth; since their superior informative qualities makes them top predators. We observe that growth in black holes that feed on planets and stars, in the horse that grew enormously in size. So did the first bilateral animal, from its microscopic first form, the Vernanimacula. Mammals grew from tiny shrews into elephants. The first technological man, the Homo Floresiensis, with a ‘neuronal bump’ on the forehead, might have grown till the size of the first Homo Sapiens, the pygmy and Bushman . . . Then, the species, once it has reached a balance between its initial information and growing spatial size, E=I, reproduces in great numbers, diversifies and colonizes the planet. We see in the graph this age in which ‘biological radiations’ of carbohydrates, animals of all kinds and human beings, colonized the Earth. Finally, in its 3rd age the species grows in information and so it acquires height, the arrow of ‘perceptive information’. Then, once it has reached its informative zenith, the species becomes extinct by a more evolved form; or it evolves socially creating a super-organism, as ants, humans and machines are doing. It will be the 4th arrow of social evolution of the species that completes its 3±1 horizons. Species can be considered ‘loose’ organisms, in which each individual is a cell of the collective species; since we can use the same ages to explain the 3±1 horizons of evolution of all the species of this planet. Thus, species also go through the same 3 evolutionary ages of all living organisms. They start as young, energetic forms, which acquire information in 3±1 ages of increasing complexity and when those 3±1 ages are completed, they either evolve into more complex super-organisms under the laws of social evolution or become extinct by a superior, more informative species. Indeed, only those species who show a strong eusocial capacity survive the ‘genetic clock’. The most successful and one of the oldest species of the planet is, in fact, the eusocial ant, which no longer is an ‘individual’, but a super-organism stretching through miles of ‘vital space. In that regard, neither individuals able to reproduce nor species able to evolve socially become extinguished. If humans become extinguished is because they deny, guided by the simplest arrows of pure energy of weapons, the main arrow of Life/Time.

A complete analysis of biological species shows that new forms can only be, either an energetic or informative variation of the original species, or a reproductive combination of both Universal ‘genders’. The universality of such dual systems is so obvious that the ancients already identified them with yang, energetic male principles and yin, cyclical/ female ones. While the moderns call that duality the Principle of Complementarity, as all informative particles have an energetic, lineal field of force and all biological, cyclical heads of information have a lineal body. So the combinative variations of those two simple morphologies, lineal energy and cyclical information, invariant, regardless of the scale we observe, is the essence of the creative game of the cosmos.

It is the plan of evolution that all species follow, which is a tautology, since in a Universe made of only 2 substances, energy and information, the only possibility is the creation of such 3±1 variations in space (subspecies) or in time (evolutionary ages).

Motions ordered by 3±1 Ages=Dimensions of Time =Space become life cycles & Non-E POVs: Organisms

THE FORMALISM OF THE 3±ST CYCLES OF EXISTENCE

Space-Time is in a Universe in eternal motion in constant change. Yet the process of change is self-similar in all space-time cycles. Since all systems exist as a series of action-reaction cycles that absorb, emit and transform Energetic Space, back and forth, into Temporal Information across multiple, relative st-planes of space-time: [ΣSTI]st±1. We can observe the morphology of the existential cycle, the ‘fundamental particle of the Universe’, as a form traced in space, which has a cyclical wave-like shape; or in time as a sequence of temporal ages: a first age of max. energy, a second age of balance and a third age of max. information. In that order, they explain the existential cycle of any space-time system: In the left graph, we represent the simplest cycle/equation of space-time in scientific coordinates across its 3 ages. It resembles the geometrical form of a semi-cycle that moves upwards, absorbing energy and information until in its 3rd age looses its temporal energy, collapsing back to its origin. Most physical waves, such as light is, show that simple form. On the right side, the same 3 ages are shown in a Taoist, Korean flag, where a line is the symbol of continuous yang-energy, which yin-time quantizes into ‘in/form/ation’, from youth to death. The central cycle with its white/red energetic vs. black/blue informative symbols is a visual equation that uses the codes of colors; since all languages are fractal mirrors of the Universe that show the same duality, translated to their own syntax and semantic code.

IA. The Generator Equation of the Universe.

Entities have 2 main properties: its geometries in space and its logic functions in time. They are also dynamic entities that change from past to future, accumulating information in the process of life; and from future to past, erasing information into energy in the process of death, completing in this way a cycle of Existence, the unifying event or of the Universe.

Eastern philosophers represented the existential event with their Mandalas and yin-yang cycles. Since the Universe is very simple in its essence, despite its apparent complexity, born out of the iteration of those 2 basic forms (static perception) or arrows of reality. The simplicity of the dual arrows of change, towards energy and information in life and death processes, and its organic nature that allows their combination in present organisms, has been suspected for so long that Huxley called it the “Perennial Philosophy of mankind’. Taoists took as units of reality bites of energy=yang and bits of information=yin that merged together, creating organisms. Buddhists believed that all systems were organic systems that fed on energy and perceived information. And those organic functions, repeated ad eternal, were the essence of God=Tao, the Game of Existence, the ‘Mind’ of the Universe. Moreover information=yin dominated energy=yang towards the future through the creation of quantic, present moments that shaped the ‘flows of time’. Buddhists soon noticed that those quantic presents, which they called ‘dharmas’, suffered minute changes as a consequence of the confluence of those 2 arrows or substances, information and energy. Taoists said that yin and yang mixed together to create Chang, present existences. Because those bits and bites are broken, the rhythms of creation are also broken and we see many little presents happening around us by the confluence of both arrows, energy and information. But there was overall a tendency towards information or yin, the dominant factor, that slowly trans-formed energy towards the future. Taoists mapped out the flow of time in 3 ages, a first young-yang age, represented by a continuous __ line of amorphous, lineal energy; the classic, balanced age of reproductive maturity, a steady state or golden mean, when the energy and form of the quantic being repeat themselves; finally ending in an age of warped form, when in/form/ation exhausted energy and the being died, releasing back its energy to the Universe to feed a new cycle. Since Death is the end and beginning of a new existential cycle that paradoxically perpetuates the existence of Time=Tao=God, mind of a Reality that survives forever, because all beings give back their formal energy; so other beings restart the existential cycle again.

As Einstein put it, the separation between past and future is an illusion that death ends. Since life and death are equally powerful, in eternal balance as life, the perceived arrow of future information disappears when the reverse arrow of death acts. Yet we keep the convention of calling the creation of information the arrow of future for human reasons:

Life and any type of information last longer in time than death and so it seems that life is the natural time direction from past to future that creates information. Since man, a living being, relates that future with the increase of information.

However when we observe microscopic particles with detachment, no longer concerned with the death of those particles, as in quantum Physics, we see that anti-particles move geometrically in an inverse direction to its particles, uncoiling=dying towards their relative lineal past. Thus, quantum physics represents in a Feynman diagram an antiparticle uncoiling its time cycle, as a movement towards the past, in the opposite way to a particle, moving towards the future. This doesn’t mean as some Physicists have proposed (Hawking) that time travel is possible, since time is just a geometrical cycle. So a travel to the past is always quantic, taken effect only in the form who changes its geometry. But the logic understanding of those facts is fogged by Galileo’s error of lineal time. In reality each species of the Universe has its own rhythms that trace different space-time cycles; there is the space= time cycle of the sun, a year cycle; the cycle of a clock, a minute, etc. Moreover very often some of those time cycles flux in a single point of space, reinforcing each other, to create a stronger space-time event. So the study of the frequencies of those cycles and their points of encounter marks the birth of astronomy as a science concerned with the different movements of astrological bodies in relationship to the Earth, and the birth of Biology and medicine, which study the circadian cycles of the body and their synchronicities and flows of energy=yang and information=yin. Today we know that the confluence of many forces in a point of space-time creates a physical particle, which is a quantic knot of physical information and we define cells, the units of Biology, as a sum of interrelated cycles that transform energy into information, but we have not explained them as knots of ‘cyclical time-events’, which is their true meaning, due to the error of lineal time.

Regarding physical time, it would take the genius of Einstein to reveal again the existence of multiple rhythms of physical time, when he found out that time has different speeds for different beings and regions of the Universe, instead of the single, mechanic clock used by earlier scientists; thus breaking time into multiple clocks, all of them curving space into mass-form. Biologists validated this fact, when they found in their study of Natural rhythms that biological time was also multiple, broken in many cycles. But since nobody dismissed in Physics the errors of a lineal, continuous, single time coordinates imposed by Galileo and Descartes, the fundamental discovery of Relativity was put aside. ‘I seem to be the only man on Earth who thinks there are multiple times’, complained the master. Indeed, many scientists still sponsor a Universe with a single arrow of time, the arrow of entropy, well defined mathematically by the Laws of Thermodynamics, according to which the Universe must end forever in a relaxed state. Yet a curve needs 2 arrows, back and forward, to be completed. So if Time curves space, its energy becomes information, creating the ∞ cyclical rhythms of the Universe. Nature has broken energy into time cycles, whose trajectories create in/form/ation, molding the arrow of disordered energy, as circadian cycles do in living beings. Those life/death cycles follow the 2 arrows of the Universe in a peculiar order: beings first exist in a yang-young age of energy; but as time accumulates, energy becomes information, which is the dominant arrow of futures. In Physics, time, according to Einstein, also bends, curves vacuum space, a form of energy, into formal masses. Thus the arrow of temporal, informative evolution: trans-forms any spatial, amorphous energy into broken, cyclical, fractal, formal species: In Physics, lineal forces of energy become fractal masses and charges, which are particles of information. In life, evolution increases the information of species. While individual organisms age, becoming wrinkled, in-formed with the passing of time. Yet when all energy is converted into form, the cycle reverses its direction: form explodes, dies, erases itself and expands back the energy it stored. Individual times return to the past, completing its cycle, while reality keeps evolving its form. So the arrow of life ends after a 3rd, wrinkled, informative age, when the being explodes back into cellular energy: Time curves space into masses, but then Mass=E/c2, explodes back into energy and the Universe as a whole will also have an informative ‘big crunch’, followed by a new big bang.

The dual, organic and geometrical space-time cycle of life-information towards the future and death-energy towards the past, is the rhythm or wheel of existence that generates and destroys the ∞ species of the fractal Universe. Thus, we widen the fundamental Law of Science, the principle of Conservation of Energy, ‘Energy never dies but trans-forms itself’, to include also a Principle of Transformation of Information that explains the Universe as a dynamic system, made of ∞ cycles that transform back and forth energy fields/forces/ substances into informative particles/organisms/networks:

34. Energetic Space exi=st, trans-forming itself back and forth into In/form/ative Time:

Past Arrow of Energy x Future Arrow of information = Space-Time cycle:

[ΣS TI]±st

We represent the dual process of life, guided by the relative arrow of future information and death, guided by the relative arrow of devolution back to a past of simpler energy, with the Unification Equation, where the energy/information parameters are:

- ΣS, is a spatial field of energetic micro-quanta, with lesser form, which evolves into:

- TI, a whole macro-being, TI, with a higher content of information.

The operandi that relate those elements are worth to explain in more detail.

-  is the operand that relates energy and information, and it is in fact a composite, ternary operand, which represents the 3 phases of the cycle of existence. When the being lives it becomes in-formed, diminishing its space and acquiring form. Thus we write visually ΣS>TI, as > becomes smaller, informative. In the process of death the being devolves and dies, expanding its form back into energy: TI<ΣS. Where < represents an expansion of form into energy. While in the intermediate, mature age of reproduction, the being repeats its cycles into repetitive, ‘present’ patterns, represented by =.

Thus we consider any system, which acts as an organism in balance between its bites of energy, ΣS, and bits of information, TI, TI=ΣS, a system of Ti=es, of ties, of knots of energy and information that create an entity that lasts in space and time. Yet, the cycle of existence of any being, despite being in a steady, balanced, dynamic state for long periods, will always end up completing its 3 phases, >=<; thus returning the being to its origins.

- ±st: Represent the different scales of spatial size and temporal duration of the Universe. As most cycles of existence take place between a lower, smaller plane of microscopic seeds, – st or st-1, in which the being is born as a seminal ‘cell’, an intermediate plane, st, where the being develops its individual existence, and an upper, ecosystemic or social scale/plane, of longer time duration and spatial extension, +st, or st+1, in which the being will develop its 4th dimensional arrow of social evolution.

Those space-time planes are hierarchical planes defined by 2 main properties:

- The highest st-plane last longer in time and is wide in space.

- The higher st-plane dominates the energy and information of the lower micro-cells.

Thus to represent the development of a full existential cycle across those 3 st planes of existence, we have to consider 3 planes of existence, between its birth as a seminal, microscopic seed of information (-st, st-1) through its social existence in an ecosystem or civilization (+st, st+1). Where, ±st±1, represents the range of space-time planes affected by the cycle or sum of cycles of existence of any being we study; which most likely will take place between 3 ±st-planes of different volume of energy and information. In the example, human events take place between the cellular –st plane, the individual st plane, and the social, +st plane of bigger size and longer duration (nation or civilization).

Where a sum of individual cells of an inferior plane of existence, Σst-1, create together a macro-whole unit, st of the bigger plane. For example, a sum of atoms, Σst-1, creates a molecule, a sum of molecules, Σst, creates a cell, st+1, and a sum of cells, Σst+1, creates an organism, st+2. Thus st is the symbol of any fractal, self-similar space-time plane of a Universe, based in hierarchies of st-planes of growing size-energy and information; and the fundamental parameter to understand the scalar, fractal structure of the Universe, made of microcosms and macrocosms. For example, life is a process of creation of informative networks of cells in which Σst-1 cells create a macro-organism, st: Σst-1>st; while death is the inverse process, in which the organism breaks down back into its cellular, st<Σst-1 elements.

Once the basic elements of the Unification Equation that represents the cycle of existence, are clarified, the process of life and death is simple to understand: an amorphous flow or surface of energy quanta of any kind, Σst-1, which is a relative past – as it will no longer be energy in the future – evolves, acquiring dimensional form, becoming ‘future’ in/form/ation as time passes. It can be a mass of cells that become an organism. It might be an organism which falls prey as energy of a formally evolved top predator. It might be a mass of lineal photons that ‘collapses=warps’ into an electronic charge/particle. It can be a tribal horde of disordered nomads that becomes an organized nation and settles down into informative cities. There is in all those processes a tendency to accumulate information as ‘time bends any energetic space, ecosystem or relative ‘plane of space-time’. Yet once all energy has become information, the process reverses itself and information unwinds back into energy without form in a process of death.

All species are made of cellular quanta that evolve their information, creating a whole that emerges as a macro-being. Yet the process will end up with the warping of the form during a 3rd age of excessive information, till energy is exhausted. And so the organic whole, with no more energy to feed on, will reverse its evolution, devolving its information back into quantic energy through the arrow of death: TI<ΣSst-1. So we write a Unification Equation that shows such dual flows, , of life and death events, as ΣS>TI (Life) + TI<ΣS (Death) or ΣSTI. And consider that the ∞ sum of both space-time cycles causes the events and species of the Universe: On one hand, we have lineal expanding space and energy, yang and Shiva, the destructive, death cycle; on the other side, future, imploding, evolving time, information, yin, Vishnu, the creative, life cycle. The cycle of existence from youth-energy into a 3rd age of information and back again, dissolving yourself into the Universe, is natural to all beings made of Energetic Space and time: Energy always becomes trans-formed back and forth into information. Look at humans. Young people have a lot of energy but little information. Mature people have both energy and information. While old people have a lot of information drawn into their wrinkles and minds, but they have little energy. So as time goes by, human beings go through 3 ages, called youth, the age of energy; maturity, the age of reproduction; and old age, the age of form and wrinkles, of information and memories.

There are ∞ self-similar processes and species that can be described by homology with the cycle of transformation of ‘lineal energy’ into ‘cyclical information’, which is the Fundamental particle of the Universe, not a physical form of space but as Einstein foresaw, ‘an event in time’, the cycle of existence, the Unifying Principle of Reality, those ‘Thoughts of God’ that Einstein said was His only interest as he didn’t care for the details…

Since indeed, the cycle of existence is the only entity of the Universe which shares all the attributes of a Theological God, which Saint Thomas and latter Cusa defined as immortality, ubiquity, infinity, and unity of opposites within I=ts self. Thus, in the first part of this iteration we will study the properties of the Cycle of Existence and then apply them to understand each and all of the self-similar cycles that try to achieve the perfection of the sum of them all. As Lao Tse explained.

IB. The Parameters of Space-time Cycles.

2 types of change exist in the Universe, morphological change, studied by evolution and biology, which defines the 3 ages of any organism, and translational change, studied by physics, which studies simpler translations in space. We stuied them with the jargon of physics in the previous chapter (as modes of speed and acceleration). Now we can widen thtat jargon to an ‘existential, philosophical jargon’ that can be applied also to morphological change and social, historic and vital processes. This jargon might sound strange to physicists, but certainly is a wider jargon than the physical terms they use to describe the dimensions of tme and space, and so we shall prefer it here, as I would find strage to call my ‘youth of existence’, the accelerating phase of my spacet-ime filed. In that sense, the ultimate unification jargon is the jargon of an ‘Existential philosophy of science’, which is the ultimate meaning of this book.

They correspond to the fast and slow arrows of time, as translational change is faster, associated to energy and morphological change slower, associated to evolution. They use 2 different types of time. Galileo used a lineal time, and morphological change uses cyclical time. How they are related? If we look at the previous drawing of an existential cycle, we observe that lineal time merely would measure the perimeter of that cycle between birth and length. That is what we call One-dimensional time. So both concepts are essentially different as one-dimensional time offers only the information about the length of the cycle but not about its form and different speeds of change. Yet despite those differences however both 2 types of change can be formalized with the same mathematical parameters which are:

Speed measures the change ratio between spatial energy and temporal information

Galileo formalized translation change with the equation of translation speed, V=S/T. In the relational Model of space/time we use the same formula, V=S/T, to measure ‘existential speed’, the morphological change between the inner proportions of spatial energy and temporal information accumulated by any being, that changes during its 3 ages. However the parameters consider in morphological change are not fixed space and one-dimensional time but spatial energy and temporal information, the real variables of the Universe that widen in organic, fractal terms the meaning of morphological speed:

35. V=ΣS/Ti; where Ti can be also a parameter of form and ΣS a parameter of energy.

The morphological definition of speed applied to classic Physics casts new light in all kind of phenomena; as it is self-evident that an entity with lesser in/form/ation, lesser form, T->0, will move faster. Hence gravitation, which is invisible to us, without form, V=ΣS/Ti->0 has non-local, infinite speed, and light the next entity with lesser form is the c-limit of speed of our electromagnetic world (which in a fractal Universe is not however the limit of speed of the Universe, as Einstein thought, but only the limit of energy and speed of our space-time scale, the ‘light-space’ or i-scale of electromagnetism in which our mind inhabits, being that other 96% of invisible gravitation a world ruled by faster than light speeds, as black hole and quasar jets have proved). Yet a thoroughly discussion of Fractal Relativity with its improved explanation of cosmological phenomena goes beyond the simplicity of this text. Instead we will consider another insight given by the morphological definition of speed: the speed of existence or speed of morphological change of a living being that can be generalized to the study of change in the Universal arrow of information. That speed of morphological change is maximum at the beginning of the cycle, in the age of energy or youth, when S>T, and hence V=S/T>1.

The speed of existence hardly changes in the mature age, as the energy and information of the being are in a dynamic, balanced state: S<=>T, V=S/T=1.

Then, in the 3rd, old age of the being, when information dominates, the speed of existence is minimal, as T>S, and so S/T<1. This obviously is in accordance with our life experience which mutates very fast in our youth but hardly changes in our 3rd age when we have little energy to modify our cycles of existence.

Finally, when the being goes out of balance, when most energy has become transformed into information, the speed of existence, Min.S/Max.T, tends to zero. Then death happens and the cycle reverses itself. So the energy and information of the space-time field breaks apart and information explodes back into energy. Now the speed of existence cannot longer be measured, does no longer exist, as information becomes 0, and S/0, becomes a mathematical uncertainty. Those simple laws of morphological speed apply both to Biological and Physical phenomena. Let us consider some examples:

According to the equations that define youth (Max.S, Min. T) and old age (Max. T=Min.S), as inverse functions, balanced through the mature age (Max.S=Max.T), death can be considered an imbalance between information and energy. So when the 2 elements of the organism, its energetic body and informative head, break their organic balance caused by cyclical, dynamic fluxes of energy and information between them, (S<=>T), the ST being dies. For example, in life the disconnection between a body and a head provokes death. And predators try to cut the neck of the organism to kill it. While in physical particles, an informative mass explodes into energy, breaking that balance: M(t)=ΣS. This happens by excess of information or energy. In this case the overdrive of energy, breaks the particle’s balance of energy and information, increasing its speed near the c-limit of our Universe, according to Lorenz transformations. Finally the particle or organism loose their form and return to the ‘lower scale of energy’ in which they were born. So mass becomes electromagnetic radiation and organisms disaggregate into cells.

The previous Graph shows both in a scientific, digital graph and a mythic one, belonging to the age of verbal, religious thought, how energy and time change through those 3 ages, giving way to different e/t ratios for each being and each age. Those proportions are, in fact, the ‘scientific constants of existence’ of each species, which show the ratios of energy and information of any being that remain fairly stable during each age, suffering with the transition between ages and specially at birth and extinction an accelerated ‘peak’ of change.

In biological beings, those ‘peaks’ are the crisis of adolescence between youth and maturity, and the 40s crisis between the mature age and the age of information. In species, those crises of evolution are called evolutionary punctuations, in which new, more evolved forms arise, extinguishing the previous life-phase.

Yet those constants and changes of morphological speed, do exist also in physical systems, based all of them in the existence of ‘physical constants’ which are dynamic balances and ratios of energy and information that apply to particles and forces. They also exist in Cosmology and structure the Universe around 3 of them: G, c and . Where G is the constant of information that wraps space into cyclical vortices of time; c is the constant of energy that expands mass into lineal radiation, and  is the cosmological, balanced constant that fluctuates around 0 and defines the 3 ages of the Universe. Yet since the Universe is enormous and lasts billions of years, as their cellular, minimal particles do (informative quarks and energetic electrons), Universal constants seem to us ‘absolutely constant’. However in a smaller system such as a chemical reaction, those constants change very fast throughout the 3 ages of the reaction.

The harmony of top predators and victims: speed and density of existence.

Since the Universe is dual, we might wonder what is the inverse, temporal function of spatial speed. The answer is Density, the same parameter than in classic Physics measures the quantity of mass per unit of spatial volume: D=M(i)/V(s). Now its understanding in terms of cyclical information is more profound as it means all possible forms of informative density, not only mass-density, a particular case where mass is a condensate of gravitational information and volume a definition of the spatial energy occupied by that information. So we redefine density as:

36. The density of information of a being: Di= T/S = δt/δs.

Which is the inverse function of speed that shows the informative density and complexity of any organism made of space-time cycles. It is maximum in the densest form of the Universe, the black hole, which has therefore the minimal spatial speed of the Universe, as it becomes a fixed point in space that makes all forms to move in cycles of time around it, like it happens with galactic black holes.

But even more important that those 2 inverse concepts defined by space-time ratios is the product of the energy and information of a being or:

37. Space-time force or Momentum: ΣS x Ti

Which measures the quantity of spatial energy and temporal information of any TS-system. In Biology it defines a ‘top predator’ as a species with maximum energetic and informative force; that is, with the stronger body and fastest mind. On the other hand, the space-time force of a being is equivalent to the Physical momentum of a particle, M(T) x V(E), or product of its temporal mass and spatial speed. And indeed, the particle with bigger momentum is also the top predator physical particle that survives in any collision.

Often, the space-time force of any system manifests itself through the combined ‘quantic actions’ of its energy cells delivered in a period of time, during which the space-time system ‘inter-acts’ with the Universe, maybe ‘reacting’ to the quantic action of a rival space-time system. Thus, the minimal unit of the space-time force of a being is its single quantic action. For example, the Planck’s constant, the unit of action of physical microcosmic particles, is a product of Time and Energy that becomes the fundamental parameter to study the interactions of physical microcosms.

In the algebraic model of this book, most constant laws of science are explained as dynamic arrows defined by those 3 parameters, whose relative weight in different fractal beings define the outcome of their interaction, greatly improving our understanding of universal phenomena. Thus many laws of science become redefined as morphological changes explained by those 3 parameters. For example, a molecular temperature is defined as the ratio between pressure, a temporal parameter and speed, a spatial parameter: P(t) V (s)=nRT. And so it measures the minimal quantic action of the world of atomic particles.

Yet the speed (S/T), density (T/S) and space-time Force (ExT) of an entity, will define also the consequences of biological actions. In this way we connect the processes of extinction and survival, essential to Biology, with fractal space-time: For example, if an animal with lesser space-time force attacks a stronger top predator it will be extinct.

The speed of times and the brain force.

The most absolute law of the Universe is the selection of informative top predators which extinct or enslave species which have smaller brains and bigger bodies, according to the inverse properties of space/time (max. brain=min. body). We call that paradox the black hole paradox. Since in the Universe there is a tendency to create top predator black holes, small beings that use faster gravitational languages and prey on stars. More complex brains are Top Predators that act as hunters and feed on simpler, bigger spatial forms. So mammals substituted big dinosaurs with smaller brains and humans substituted big mammals and small chips might substitute humans.

Thus, given the predominance of time over space, of energy over information, of brains over bodies, the TxS force of the brain is the basic parameter that measures the survival, existential chances of the being. According to duality the brain’s TxS force will have 2 elements: its density of information or memory and its speed, its frequency of thought, of action-reaction, of calculation or intelligence. And so the product V(t) x D(t) is another form of calculating the TxS force of a being. Where D=i/e is the density of information, the density of transistors in a chip, of neurons in a brain, of bosonic quarks in a black hole, which determines the detail of the virtual map of information the mind creates. And V(t) the ‘rate of informative processing’ or ‘speed of times’, V(t), an intuitive definition of its intelligence. In physical terms the TxS force of a temporal form becomes the momentum of a temporal particle, the brain of a field of force, MV, as V(t) becomes the speed of the particle and its informative density is a parameter of its mass. In biology and computer science, the density of information is a measure of its memory, and the speed a measure of intelligence, which together define a top predator brain.

Yet, in most cases both elements are inverse: Max. S=Min.T, creating a balance according to which, smaller beings are faster and yet have less mental complexity.

Those regularities of the game of existence show a certain equalitarian justice in the Universe. Indeed, in each world-ecosystem the subjective existence of its organic systems is similar, despite their different size. So we can gather them in ‘families of species’ around a ‘constant of action’, V(t) x G(t), which is the product of its speed of perception and its generational cycle. For example, it seems all mammals have the same metabolic existence: The rat lives less than the elephant but his heart beats faster. The subjective speed of perception also prevents small species to become extinct in the same world ecosystem inhabited by bigger species, as they act-react faster and so they can escape top predators.

For example, according to the previous inverse law of mental speed a fly sees 10 times faster than human do, since flies are smaller, so they perform 10 visual quantic actions by each human blink. Yet because its brain’s quantic neuronal density is not very high, it is not a top predator as robotic insects might be in the future. Curiously enough the oldest insects, ant queens and cockroaches, can live up to 7 years. Yet cockroaches react in 20 milliseconds and humans in 200. Which means that if they perceive time cycles 10 times faster than we do, subjectively they process 10 times more quantic actions of temporal energy, or ‘dharmas of existence’ (philosophical jargon). So they live the same subjectively life of 70 years; the same length of a human existential= generational cycle.

Thus despite the existence of top predators, simpler beings are not extinct. Since, they are either faster or reproduce more than the complex being.

Again, the key to understand their survival is the fact that the 3 arrows of the Universe co-exist in a relative independent manner. So while brains stick to the informative arrow of survival, simpler beings develop better its energetic and reproductive arrows, which limit their process of extinction, making them escape faster and reproduce more often:

- Simpler species move and reproduce faster since they need less ‘time-information’ to repeat themselves; that is, according to the space-time inversion, Max. T=Min. S, since they are smaller they close their existential cycles faster than bigger species. Yet in order to survive it is necessary to act quickly in time, to escape, hunt or reproduce. So small beings enhance their chances of survival. The hunter needs the victim and so it prevents consciously or mechanically its extinction to keep on feeding in fractal, iterative cycles. Preying has a limit in which both, prey and predator will create an ecological balance. Otherwise the predator who extinguishes the victim will lack energy and die. So in the Earth, men multiply but keep alive tamed animals they use as energy for their feeding and reproduction. However, if the species do not need each other, past species will become extinct, because the Top Predator will want to use their ‘vital space,’ their ecosystem, to reproduce and create a new ecosystem to its image and resemblance. So for example, aerobic bacteria extinguished anaerobic bacteria because they didn’t feed on them but used their ecosystem, making it into an oxygen ecosystem to its image and resemblance that poisoned anaerobic bacteria. Today machines made of metal, which don’t use life as energy or need water and air, are poisoning the atmosphere, provoking the biggest extinction of living beings the Earth has suffered. Since the top predator is the ‘relative God’ of its world, reforming the ecosystem to fit its reproductive, feeding and informative needs.

How can we relate mathematically the different time cycles and speeds of informative perception of all those languages, worlds and organic systems? Since each cycle of time has different length and some are traced faster than others, we have to consider certain new parameters of existence related to the length of a cycle of time. The most important of them is the parameter of time speed or speed of perception. Let us consider a simple hypothesis: the perception of a time cycle takes place when the cycle is completed. Each beat of your eye you have a perception of the external Universe. Each time you feed you perceive a quantum of food. But if the organ and force of information is bigger in space the cycle will take longer to close. So the shorter in space the cycle is, the faster its time speed or speed of informative perception. Since perception occurs when the cycle is closed:

38. Max. S=Max. space-length of a time cycle = Slowest perception of the cycle = Min.V( t)

You see yourself in a mirror only when light information has traveled back and forwards. You become aware of your energy cycle only when you return to the restaurant. The longer it takes to reach a space-time place, the longer it takes to complete a cycle. Yet that also happens in the brain: when the brain of the being is bigger, the slower it takes to convert the information of the cycle into a cycle of perception. Indeed, as the being becomes smaller, it becomes faster and processes energy and information at higher speed. So chips are faster when they are smaller, black holes are faster because they are small. While galaxies are very slow because they are huge. Thus we formalize the ‘Law of the Black Hole’:

39. Black Hole: Minimal Space = Maximum perceptive speed. Space x Time = K

This means that despite the fact it is loosing energy, it is gaining in efficiency, processing faster information. So it is still fit to survive and even compete with bigger organic systems as its quantic actions are much faster and accumulate within the time of a single action of the bigger being.

We find similar constant proportions in the 3 main individual cycles of any space-time entity, the energetic cycle that transforms information into energy, the informative cycle that transforms energy into information and the reproductive cycle that merges both, which are also defined by certain ‘constants of action’. For example, humans eat, acting over a surface of energy, a certain food. And we do that in a given quantity, a mouthful. We cannot eat an entire sirloin in a single mouthful, but we act ‘bite by bite’. And most humans do eat with a similar rhythm. If we consider our informative cycle of visual perception, it lasts also a ‘second in time’, in which the eye can scan a quantity of spatial energy given by the ‘visual, perceptive’ capacity of the retina. Again the reproductive cycle of most human beings lasts 9 months, with very small variations…

We formalize the concept of a top predator with a simple formula: the TS-Force of the species or Momentum of a physical form, product of its energy and information. Thus a physical particle with more momentum, with more spatial speed and temporal mass breaks a particle with lesser momentum. And a top predator animal with more information and energy feeds on one with lesser TS force. Further on, because informative top predators create herds organized by their informative languages, they fusion their quantic actions, acting as super-organisms that destroy bigger animals. Since in a quantic Universe, the fundamental concept is a quantic action, which is the product of a wave or herd of individuals acting together in a relative temporal quantum or ‘dharma’. Thus smaller, faster species with higher informative power coordinate together simultaneous attacks of higher TxS force than a bigger animal. It is the Goliath Vs David paradox: herds of mice might have devour slow dinosaurs, attacking in groups; in the Battle of the Armada, herds of smallish British, fast boats won against the slow big Galleons, shooting faster its canons in coordinated actions, against the slow shooting rhythm of the Spaniards. While the huge group of black holes in the center of the galaxy controls all its stars with fast gravitational cycles.

The importance of the GST formalism becomes now evident. Not only fusions the jargons of physics and biology, but it allows also to formalize phenomena never explained in logic and mathematical terms, as the ages of a being and the selection of species, providing mathematical proves that explain why certain species die and others survive, depending on its quantities of energy and information, and the balance established between them, which enhances its survival. Indeed, we know by experience that the space-time force of a being is maximal in its mature, classic age, when the being has higher chances of survival and reproduction. Why? Now we can prove it easily in mathematical terms. Since a product maximizes when T=E, which defines precisely the age of maturity. For example, if S+T=10, then 5×5=25 > 4×6=24 > 3×7=21.

Thus t=s, the mature age maximizes the TS-force of any organism. The logic reason is also evident: when S is proportional to T, the being maximizes the coordination and communication between the cellular elements of the body and the informative neurons of its brain and so it works smoothly, efficiently: SxTi(t=e) ≈ max. ST.

The dominant age of any species is the ‘classic, mature age’ of ST, of dynamic balance and reproduction. It is the ‘steady state’ that elongates the life span of all beings, as their systems maintain their survival and symbiosis. So it is the longer age in time.

Those constant proportions make any ST system efficient. So most ‘survival species’ keep harmonic ratios of energy and information, which produce the most ‘beautiful, classic forms’. Since beauty is also an objective parameter of biological survival: precisely the perception of an efficient, top predator form with balanced energy and form. Weapons and top predators, the most perfect forms of the technological and biological world are beautiful, regardless of its lethal effects in other species… Yet when the S/T proportions are out of balance in the youth and third age of a being, the excess of energy or information often ‘kills’ the species. And forms seem ‘ugly’ to us. Science expresses those balances through all kind of Physical, Mathematical and Biological constants that range from the golden ratios of architecture and natural organisms, to the vital constants of biological species. So we define another essential law of fractal space-time, the law of harmony between energy and information, body and brain, mass and speed (momentum), which in biological, human or physical systems creates the most efficient, beautiful systems of the Universe. Thus, we define the ‘optimal’ arrow of reproduction and survival in the Universe as a perfect balance between energy and information, which creates Nature’s vital constants of form, around which species fluctuate through minute exchanges of energy and information:

40. GST as Organism or Universal Constant: Max. S x Min. T= K; SxT=K ; Max.T xMin. S = K: S/T =K δS=δT

That simple formula, between the limits of pure energy or ‘youth’ and pure information or 3rd age, define SxT=K as the mature, balanced age of a being. And it can be found in all sciences. It is the main law of Quantum Physics, where K is a Planck’s action. But it is also the main law of Biology, where K is a vital constant born out of a metabolic change of energy and information. When that balance, SxT=K, is broken; then the being acquires excessive energy or information, it goes out of balance, and it dies (Max. S x Min. T). Death is precisely the loss of balance between those components that destroys a particle moving at light speed (Lorentz Transformations) or kills a man in an accident, or ends the thrilling of life in old people with too much form, information. The geometry of those morphologies implies that time bends energy slowly into warped information, reducing its space (Max. T=Min. S), or vice versa, energy unwraps information very fast in minimal time, adding maximum space through explosive processes (Max. S=Min.T). Thus energy is expansive space, which happens in minimal time (as in the case of the big-bang); and information is the future, evolving arrow of time that happens in minimal space (evolution in secluded, isolated spaces). Yet those processes of evolutionary punctuation and energy explosion or death, are rare. During most of its existence, beings take advantage of the inverse complementarities of their space and time organs, creating stable, dynamic structures: SxT=K. A law, which is expressed in all languages of the Universe, and mankind has known also in his verbal age. In that sense, Buddhist also understood the second formulation of that function as a fixed, present form that ‘exists’ in balance, ΣSxTi, which they called the rule of Golden mean. Now we can translate the Golden Mean to self-similar scientific concepts – the so called vital constants or Universal Constants that balance a parameter of energy and information in the different physical and biological systems of the Universe. So when we define a stable, constant organism or particle/field, we write in ‘existential algebra’ the GST equation, as a fixed form of present space that strives to find a balance between the 2 limits of existence, pure energy and pure form. Since the aim of the game is to grow in both parameters by fluctuating between processes of absorption of energy and information that keep the previous balance. And that is the essence of a good player of the Game of Existence: ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, body and brain growing together, women and men forming couples. In that sense, the previous Golden Mean was considered the main Law of God, the Tao te King, the path of eternal justice, in classic Eastern religions. Since it is, indeed, the Universal Mandate of Survival: ‘Grow and Multiply’ was the version of Western Prophets. Though in its most general meaning, God would be the entire set of rules that define the existence and extinction of Fractal Organisms, the mind of all Universes that dictate what is and what is not. Reality is made of ΣS=TI forms, of constant actions of temporal energy. The law of balance never escaped artists, since it is a biological law that expresses itself as beauty. While the imbalance of energy and information is a sign of death and decadence. Since death, non-existence are the extreme limits of that equation, Max. S x Min. T or Max. T x Min. I, the pure forms of energy and information, which are not.

THE 3±ST CYCLES IN PHYSICAL PARTICLES.

The inverse laws and perpendicularity of space and time define the physical events of the 2 worlds of masses and charges, as transformations of lineal waves and fields of energy forces into particles and cycles of information and vice versa. In the graph, the laws of electric and magnetic fields: 3 perpendicular fields define the Energetic x Informative=Reproductive cycles of light; the Maxwell screw defines an increasing E=T flow of energy that accelerates as its perpendicular, temporal vortex diminishes its spatial radius, increasing its speed; the Earth’s rotation creates a lineal flow of magnetism; while an inverse, lineal electric flow creates a cyclical, magnetic vortex

IΓ. The cycles of existence of physical particles.

Energy/Information cycles are obvious in biology, but we have to translate the events, particles and forces of Physics to understand those 3±st Time-Space cycles in matter:

- Energy Cycles, Ti<ΣS: The main physical event that transforms time into energy is the emission of space fields by temporal particles, as in the big-bang or in atomic, fission and fusion processes. We already explained how those actions are produced, ‘extracted’ from an accelerating vortex of space-time that acquires stability through those constant emissions.

- Informative Cycles, ΣS>Ti: The fundamental process of creation of in/form/ation in the physical world, is the collapse of spatial fields into particles, charges or mass that spin around those gravitational or electromagnetic, spatial forces, creating knots of information, called particles. For example, when a photon comes closer to an electron charge, its frequency increases till the photon collapses into the orbital vortex of the electron. The same happens when the electron collapses and becomes a pion of higher mass close to the nucleus.

- : Reproductive, communicative cycles: They happen when forces, made of small, spatial particles, called bosons, repeat their waveform in space with a reproductive speed that imprints over the energetic field of vacuum space the in/form/ation of the particle.

- Social cycles: Particles create herds=waves of moving space-time quanta (dynamic, temporal perspective) related by ST networks (static, spatial perspective). Social processes are all pervading in the Universe, from waves of bosons that sometimes come together into single condensates, to networks of atoms that become molecules or combined processes, such as waves of stars that form spiral galaxies.

- Existential=generational cycles: Waves, particles and physical forces live and die between the macropoint that creates and emits the particle and the macropoint that absorbs it. In that existential journey they follow the 3 ages of form as they change ‘frequency or colour’ (light bosons or neutrinos) increasing its form till they collapse and die absorbed by the receptor particle. Since the existential cycle resumes all other cycles (3±st), it can be formalized as a specific case of the Unification Equation, STi, while all other physical cycles are formalized as particular cases or partial equations of that equation. Thus, waves and forces are spatial bosons that communicate energy and information between temporal particles, called fermions, either charges or masses. It is the so-called boson/fermion inversion, the fundamental equation of quantum physics:

41. T1 (fermion particle) < sxt (boson force) > T2 (fermion particle)

The generational cycle of bosonic forces is the sum of several cycles: an informative pole, or fermion, T1, emits a social wave of bosonic energy, (T1<s), which reproduces its spatial form (sxt) over the vacuum energy, <=>, till reaching a 2nd informative, fermion particle, T2, that absorbs it, extracting its form and energy, sxt>T2, ending in this manner its existential cycle. Thus bosonic particles follow the 3±st cycles of existence. Yet the generational cycle of bosons is very short, parallel to its spatial trajectory; but fermions, which are ‘time particles’, have very long generational cycles as ‘cells’ of the quantic Universe. However some unstable particles whose form is not harmonic, have also a short generational cycle between creation and extinction. Finally, to notice that Fermions also go through 3 ages of evolution as a species, increasing its temporal information. They are the 3 families of masses, the ‘ud’ quarks, the ‘sc’ quarks and the ‘tb’ quarks, whose existence for the first time can be explained rationally.

As we grow in scales of physical form, the nature of those cycles change slightly but the basic energy and information morphologies that define them are maintained.

For example, in the next, molecular st-plane that gathers atoms, the generational cycle of molecules are the 3 states of matter: The Max. E, young age or energetic gas state, (max. spatial extension and energetic speed); the balanced liquid state, S=T; and the 3rd, informative solid age, which has temporal properties (cyclical vibration, high density of form and minimal space). While the spin or temporal movement of particles that gives them mass emerges in the macroplane of molecules as a ‘vortex’ that attracts those molecules.

Finally in bigger plane of celestial bodies, the spin becomes a ‘rotation’, which increases the mass of the object till reaching the c-speed of rotation of black holes. While in that cosmological scale, the entire Universe follows a generational cycle from the big-bang to the big-crunch, through a steady state of minimal creation of mass, in which we live.

The cycles of existence of physical particles are reversible, as the arrow of time bends space, but the arrow of entropy explodes form into energy (E=Mc2). For that reason Einstein said that the separation between past and future is an illusion since particles can move in both directions. They show a property natural to energetic beings with minimal information: the equal importance of the 2 arrows of time, energy and information. However when we transcend into beings with a higher information, the dominance of information creates the order of future that we, biological beings, experience, and philosophers have always called the 3 ages of life, which now we can apply also to species, which are entities of a higher biological plane, in which individuals are cells of the species…

IE. i+1: The 3 ages of galaxies.

The life cycle of a galaxy goes through 3 ages, evolving from a young extended nebula, into an old, small wormhole of temporal information that will die in a mini big bang, reverting into space. In between, galaxies live a longer mature state, fluctuating every 10 billion y. between its spiral and elliptical form, absorbing interstellar dust, which creates new stars and feeds the central black hole.

In the graph, the structure of a galaxy is similar to a cell, with a central DNA of social black holes and a membrane of dark matter, made very likely of micro-holes, as those scientists want to manufacture next year in Switzerland. If Galileo took away the Earth form the center, fractal theory makes it ‘virtual’, secondary to that 96% of the Universe made of ultradense types of dark matter, strangelets and black holes, that should never be made in this planet given the enormous risk for our extinction as light matter, we are taking. Because we, Humanity, are also a Super-organism, albeit far more fragile than those of the Universe and its cosmological black holes and neutron stars of strange and Tau matter…

The ages of a galaxy in time are the same of any other space-tine field:

- 1: Seminal Conception: Galaxies are created according to the ternary Principle by:

- Max. T: Social evolution of energetic gas that creates complex star structures.

- Re: Palingenetic conception, when the informative nucleus of black holes of a giant mother-galaxy emits a huge jet of matter that ends in a sudden eruption of stars.

-Max. E: A galactic big-bang quasar that catalyses the evolution of gas into stars. It is similar to an star big-bang (nova) that catalyses also the creation of stars or a Universal big-bang that catalyses the creation of galaxies. Then stars gather in social groups and some evolve into black holes, becoming organic galaxies, where black holes are the informative nucleus and stars form the galactic body.

- Energetic Youth: Galaxies are irregular planes of stars extended in space, feeding on interstellar gas.

- E=T. Maturity/reproductive age: Galaxies in their maturity, after creating in their informative center a nucleus of black holes, evolve into spiral galaxies with a balanced form, dominated by those black holes that create a vortex of stars. Galaxies then mutate back and forth, from spiral into elliptical forms, feeding on interstellar gas, in a cycle that creates and destroys its spiral form every 10 billion years.

- Max.T; information age: In their 3rd age, once galaxies exhaust interstellar gas, their central black holes digest their ‘star bodies’, becoming globular, spherical forms with a hyper dimension of informative height, till they exhaust even their star energy.

- (-1): Then they die as quasars, becoming again according to the “inverse symmetry” between the 1st and 3rd age, irregular galaxies that will feed a new cycle of galactic creation. So irregular galaxies are both the youngest and oldest forms of the Universe, a fact that confuses cosmologists.

- (+1): Or they become cannibal galaxies, forming galactic networks in cellular groups that evolve socially into the great scale structures of the Universe, which also goes through those 3 ages. Then the central black hole grows, swallowing radiant matter at growing speed, completing its own life cycle that started as a micro-black hole feeding perhaps in a planet like this one, at 2.7 K.

A sense of peace arises from the observation of a macro-galaxy that lives and dies, regardless of its cosmic size, as we do – all ST-beings equalled by the ultimate god, the cycle of existence that we represent with the unification equation, alpha and omega of all our iterations: ETi.

The 3 ages of the Universe.

The 3 ages of the Universe are also formal ages of increasing curvatura (big crunch) and expansive death (big bang).

Though we seem to be in the 1st age of the Universe, an expansive organism with minimal formal structures, according to Relativity the Universe will implode back. Since those 3 ages are mathematically equivalent to the 3 solutions of Einstein’s space-time equations. Indeed, though Cosmology considers those 3 solutions 3 hypothetical different Universes, they represent the any Island-Universe through its 3 ages, which can be measured by the specific ‘speed of existence’ of our Universe given by a constant that relates the energy and information of the Universal organism. It is the so-called cosmological constant that measures the energy of vacuum, , that defines the warping of the Universe, which can acquire our familiar 3 topographic i-forms: a young plane (the present stage), a sphere or a convex, informative form (its big crunch, final state). Now in a young, expanding Universe,  is positive, but so close to zero that when it will diminish in the future it will become negative, inverting the ‘speed of existence’ of the Universe, warping it, till it brings it to a final big crunch. And so  will also change through the 3 ages or solutions of Einstein’s equation:

-Max.E: Youth: The energy age is Lemaitre’s big-bang solution that expands space.

-E=T: The steady state Universe is Einstein’s solution.

- Max.T: Gödel’s solution is the 3rd age of an implosive Universe that reverses time coordinates as matter falls back into the central black hole brain.

Though a complete analysis of the ages and subspecies of physical matter, according to the 3 ages of time, its homologous 3 dimensions of space and the ternary principle of differentiation is beyond the scope of this book, we shall try to do a brief analysis of those 3 ages in the 3 scales of evolution of matter – the atom, the star and the galaxy.

The most focused mirrors of Universal Energy are NonEuclidean Points that create fractal networks: Topological Organisms

The ‘thoughts of God’, the Laws that in/form the Universe and all its parts are written with the fractal logic of organisms.